Debunking The Raw meat diet

jordanbarett122

jordanbarett122

Iron
Joined
Dec 12, 2024
Posts
149
Reputation
161
I was scrolling org when I came across this video by Goatis titled "The Only Blackpill Vide You Need To See" that is apparently revolutionary in the looksmaxxing space. Apparently bad genetics is not a thing, I somewhat agree with this perspective in some cases and to some extent I believe looks are based on a roll of the dice at least to some extent. However, this is not what I made this thread to argue. His whole thing is basically claiming that looks come down to diet and specifically the consumption of raw animal flesh and milk. Now, I was tempted to buy myself a raw steak and make myself and my entire lineage gigachads for the easy price of eating raw meat. What made it even more tempting is the comments. Every single person seems to be buying the idea that the reason they aren't Chads is because they're parents didn't feed them raw meat but I refused to follow the herd mindset and did some fucking RESEARCH. He started off using the Pottenger Cats Study in which cats that eat raw milk and raw meat had by far stronger bones than cats that ate cooked and condensed. However, we are not fucking cats, the human digestive system is by far more complex and beautifully constructed than that of a cat. Cats are carnivores and humans are Omnivores they can't get all the variety of nutrient sources we have, I hate that I have to give basic biology lessons to grown ass adults but people genuinely think because cats grew bigger bones on a raw diet they should too. This was the best argument made the entire video unfortunately the rest is fucking easy to debunk and I'll try 1 by 1.

1. The richer population of India is not fatter because they dont eat raw meat, they are fatter because all they eat is processed food.

2. The vegetarian mom doesn't have a worse placenta because she doesn't eat raw meat. It's because she doesn't fucking eat meat at all. Never was it mentioned the mother with a healty placenta is a fucking raw meat eater

To be honest these are the only solid arguments that are even worth my time refuting. What I'll say to all the people that are popping up talking about a fucking raw meat diet being law. I ended up doing research and I found out the nutrients lost when eating raw meat can be found fucking everywhere.

alternative food sources:

  1. Vitamin B1 (Thiamine)
    • Loss: Heat-sensitive; up to 50% lost in high heat.
    • Sources: Whole grains, nuts, seeds, pork.
  2. Vitamin B6
    • Loss: 20–40% lost during cooking.
    • Sources: Bananas, avocados, chickpeas, fish.
  3. Vitamin B12
    • Loss: Up to 35% lost in high heat.
    • Sources: Eggs, dairy, fortified foods.
  4. Taurine
    • Loss: Destroyed by high heat.
    • Sources: Shellfish, dark poultry meat, energy drinks.
  5. Iron (Heme)
    • Loss: Slight reduction; absorption may change with cooking.
    • Sources: Spinach, lentils, fortified cereals.
  6. Omega-3 Fatty Acids
    • Loss: Degrades at high temperatures.
    • Sources: Flaxseeds, walnuts, fatty fish.
  7. Enzymes
    • Loss: Fully destroyed by heat.
    • Sources: Raw fruits and vegetables (e.g., papaya, pineapple).
So no you aren't ugly because you didn't eat raw meat growing up your'e just ugly:lul:. If you are dumb enought to be a vegetarian it's over for you. You can enjoy your raw meat please feel free to cope with that but it is not law. Now I fucking love my meat it's basically the only thing I eat nowadays I consume a lot of beef, chicken and fish all types to be honest and thats perfectly great.


Edit: I wrote this thread because lowiqcels actually think eating a raw goat and drinking it's cancer blood will make you Chad. I'll repost this thread in the day to get more lowiqcels thoughts
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ryuken, IngrownDicktipmaxx, dangis and 9 others
raw meat nigga :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: the only reason humans evolved is because they made fire to cook their fucking food yet niggas wanna go back
 
  • +1
Reactions: Megfish21, juggmaxx, noodlelover and 5 others
Most guys would be attractive enough to find someone if we reached our genetic potential through living more natural life which is more than just eating raw meat.
 
  • +1
Reactions: porn and jordanbarett122
YOU ARE FUCKING STUPID. READ THE FUCKING THREAD BEFORE YOU TALK BULLSHIT

I ended up doing research and I found out the nutrients lost when eating raw meat can be found fucking everywhere.

alternative food sources:

  1. Vitamin B1 (Thiamine)
    • Loss: Heat-sensitive; up to 50% lost in high heat.
    • Sources: Whole grains, nuts, seeds, pork.
  2. Vitamin B6
    • Loss: 20–40% lost during cooking.
    • Sources: Bananas, avocados, chickpeas, fish.
  3. Vitamin B12
    • Loss: Up to 35% lost in high heat.
    • Sources: Eggs, dairy, fortified foods.
  4. Taurine
    • Loss: Destroyed by high heat.
    • Sources: Shellfish, dark poultry meat, energy drinks.
  5. Iron (Heme)
    • Loss: Slight reduction; absorption may change with cooking.
    • Sources: Spinach, lentils, fortified cereals.
  6. Omega-3 Fatty Acids
    • Loss: Degrades at high temperatures.
    • Sources: Flaxseeds, walnuts, fatty fish.
  7. Enzymes
    • Loss: Fully destroyed by heat.
    • Sources: Raw fruits and vegetables (e.g., papaya, pineapple).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Megfish21, ryuken, IngrownDicktipmaxx and 5 others
My dads side of the family is part Native American and mainly ate meat their entire life, they all have very strong compact orbitals and bones, my moms side is Italian and ate mainly grains their entire life, and everyone from my moms side including her are subhuman, weird coincidence. But i understand your points

I just realized you were talking about raw meat not meat in general sorry I haven’t slept in a while
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: dangis, ey88, Jova and 6 others
Eating cooked meat is good you lose like micronutrients maybe like 30%. But overcooked meat you lose 60-70%. Raw meat is the best you don't lose any.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dangis, Kazey and porn
Eating cooked meat is good you lose like micronutrients maybe like 30%. But overcooked meat you lose 60-70%. Raw meat is the best you don't lose any.
Yeah but risk to reward is dumb as fuck. I listed all the nutrients and the percentage loss, as well as the replacementss for those nutrients. :ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kazey and Black_Pill_Enjoyer1
Yeah but risk to reward is dumb as fuck. I listed all the nutrients and the percentage loss, as well as the replacementss for those nutrients. :ROFLMAO:
There's no risk dumbass
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Fillowskyy, dangis, noodlelover and 5 others
Gpt thread once again because raw meat deniers haven't got the attention span or knowledge to write an actual thread
 
  • WTF
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: ey88, Jova and N1666
Gpt thread once again because raw meat deniers haven't got the attention span or knowledge to write an actual thread
Bro you're an absolutely retarded, I used AI to source the nutrients that are destroyed, reduced or damaged when cooking and you're talking like I should know all of that bullshit offhead. When you can't argue against the main points you start saying crap. Argue against my main point.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and Black_Pill_Enjoyer1
Bro you're an absolutely retarded, I used AI to source the nutrients that are destroyed, reduced or damaged when cooking and you're talking like I should know all of that bullshit offhead. When you can't argue against the main points you start saying crap. Argue against my main point.
You’re thread is based. I agree with most of your points. It’s just that you have to have the misfortune of arguing with bots on this forum.

In terms of the debate, from my research, Raw meat is objectively better when it’s sourced from “organic” environments, grass fed and with minimal additives. The reason diseases spread through the raw meat is because it’s not sourced from the correct environment, which causes the diseases to foster in the dirty environment (and how well the animal nurtured itself or whatever). There’s literally no such thing as Raw meat being “naturally” more susceptible to carrying diseases, just more likely because they usually are not sourced correctly or contaminated.

This brings me onto cooked meat. Cooked meat is also good. The argument that heat destroys the nutrients is true, but there’s obvious workarounds: consume more cooked meat. Goatis argument about the fact that you could consume as much cooked meat as possible and still be nutrient deficient is obviously complete nonsense, since you can just consume more cooked meat and your nutrient intake would linearly increase until you hit your amount for the day, which wouldn’t even be hard.

Second is to steam all your meat, only around 10% of the nutrients will be lost since none of them are leeched into the water. It’s just so obvious you don’t NEED to eat raw meat to maintain good health and be a mogger (obviously your starting point matters). Which brings me into my next point.

His argument that bad looks are only caused by lack of a healthy raw meat diet in your upbringing is COMPLETE bullshit. Tbh for me it’s pretty easy to see he’s pushing an agenda here when he says this, which I can explain more if you want me to. He knows it’s mostly up to genes but it’s the same when red pill grifters claim that you can only get rich if you “buy their course” if he doesn’t pedal the idea that raw meat is the only thing that matters then his business doesn’t grow essentially, it’s the same concept.

It literally makes 0 sense that it’s all raw meat otherwise what is the point in even having any fucking genes to begin with if everything is just determined by your diet. Completely insane take. Holy shi this reply was long I’m gonna bookmark for when I need to reference to someone else. Let me know your thoughts though g.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: dangis, Kazey, noodlelover and 4 others
Mirin thread
@yuda
 
  • +1
Reactions: yuda and jordanbarett122
Gpt thread once again because raw meat deniers haven't got the attention span or knowledge to write an actual thread
You are my bitch and if I tell you to cook your meat then you WILL do it.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: porn and Jova
You’re thread is based. I agree with most of your points. It’s just that you have to have the misfortune of arguing with bots on this forum.

In terms of the debate, from my research, Raw meat is objectively better when it’s sourced from “organic” environments, grass fed and with minimal additives. The reason diseases spread through the raw meat is because it’s not sourced from the correct environment, which causes the diseases to foster in the dirty environment (and how well the animal nurtured itself or whatever). There’s literally no such thing as Raw meat being “naturally” more susceptible to carrying diseases, just more likely because they usually are not sourced correctly or contaminated.

This brings me onto cooked meat. Cooked meat is also good. The argument that heat destroys the nutrients is true, but there’s obvious workarounds: consume more cooked meat. Goatis argument about the fact that you could consume as much cooked meat as possible and still be nutrient deficient is obviously complete nonsense, since you can just consume more cooked meat and your nutrient intake would linearly increase until you hit your amount for the day, which wouldn’t even be hard.

Second is to steam all your meat, only around 10% of the nutrients will be lost since none of them are leeched into the water. It’s just so obvious you don’t NEED to eat raw meat to maintain good health and be a mogger (obviously your starting point matters). Which brings me into my next point.

His argument that bad looks are only caused by lack of a healthy raw meat diet in your upbringing is COMPLETE bullshit. Tbh for me it’s pretty easy to see he’s pushing an agenda here when he says this, which I can explain more if you want me to. He knows it’s mostly up to genes but it’s the same when red pill grifters claim that you can only get rich if you “buy their course” if he doesn’t pedal the idea that raw meat is the only thing that matters then his business doesn’t grow essentially, it’s the same concept.

It literally makes 0 sense that it’s all raw meat otherwise what is the point in even having any fucking genes to begin with if everything is just determined by your diet. Completely insane take. Holy shi this reply was long I’m gonna bookmark for when I need to reference to someone else. Let me know your thoughts though g.
Makes me wonder why girls have developed faces despite thier shitty diets
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova and Thebuffdon
That Pottenger cat study seems dubious, if cats were unable to reproduce within the 4th generation of a cooked meat and pasteurized milk diet how do we still have domesticated cats
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and jordanbarett122
Why wouldn’t they be more common they are MTB compared to sub5 men?

Wdym
i meant men have better diets than them yet they didn't develop well and mtbs were eating goyslop all day while rotting at home
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova and Thebuffdon
That Pottenger cat study seems dubious, if cats were unable to reproduce within the 4th generation of a cooked meat and pasteurized milk diet how do we still have domesticated cats
I once tried giving a cat well done meat she didn't eat it, but when I gave her medium rare she ate it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and silently_said
i meant men have better diets than them yet they didn't develop well and mtbs were eating goyslop all day while rotting at home
Most mens diet are also shit though
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova
I once tried giving a cat well done meat she didn't eat it, but when I gave her medium rare she ate it
I’m not doubting that cats eat raw meat rather the validity of the study and its conclusions
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and jordanbarett122
What do you think about raw milk, from a farm, and checked for diseases before sold?
 
Just eat meat not neccesaraly raw
 
  • +1
Reactions: jordanbarett122
I’m not doubting that cats eat raw meat rather the validity of the study and its conclusions
i think its about malnourishment and cats can't be fed anything else as they're carnivores
 
He started off using the Pottenger Cats Study in which cats that eat raw milk and raw meat had by far stronger bones than cats that ate cooked and condensed. However, we are not fucking cats
We are still both carnivorous animals that are supposed to eat raw meat. It's completely valid to use them. He also used human equivalent studies.
1. The richer population of India is not fatter because they dont eat raw meat, they are fatter because all they eat is processed food.
He never talked about them being fatter, and certainly didn't say the richer population is worse off lol, how can that even be? They eat meat unlike poor dalits who eat vegetarian and make India the global capital of sickness and ugliness it is.
2. The vegetarian mom doesn't have a worse placenta because she doesn't eat raw meat. It's because she doesn't fucking eat meat at all. Never was it mentioned the mother with a healty placenta is a fucking raw meat eater
The point was the plant based diet that 99.9% of the world is on. It will always have a worse outcome no matter if its relative to a cooked or raw meat diet.
alternative food sources:

  1. Vitamin B1 (Thiamine)
    • Loss: Heat-sensitive; up to 50% lost in high heat.
    • Sources: Whole grains, nuts, seeds
...ignoring that it's encased in indigestible fiber + included with antinutrients so you would be getting literally nothing
Eat it raw along with all the meats you mentioned and will mention. You acknowledge that the nutrients are lost when it's cooked so why not do that and make it optimal?
    • Sources: Bananas, avocados, chickpeas
No plants have B6, wtf are you talking about?
    • fortified foods.
Just gourge on goyslop for the synthetic fake chemicals that are just close enough to real nutrients nutrients theory
  • energy drinks.
Just drink 50 cans of liquid adrenalizing goyslop everyday to age yourself for the taurine theory
  1. Iron (Heme)
    • Loss: Slight reduction; absorption may change with cooking.
    • Sources: Spinach, lentils, fortified cereals.
No plant has heme iron...
  1. Omega-3 Fatty Acids
    • Loss: Degrades at high temperatures.
    • Sources: Flaxseeds, walnuts
Plant oils, completely different version

Retarded thread to make anyway because the entire point of this video is that everyone already eats like you recommended and consume these alternative sources enough, so why do modern humans still develop worse and have shit health?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova
raw meat nigga :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: the only reason humans evolved is because they made fire to cook their fucking food yet niggas wanna go back
can i borrow the time machine you used to find this out?
how the fuck did we "evolve" eating less nutritious food?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and ey88
You’re thread is based. I agree with most of your points. It’s just that you have to have the misfortune of arguing with bots on this forum.

In terms of the debate, from my research, Raw meat is objectively better when it’s sourced from “organic” environments, grass fed and with minimal additives. The reason diseases spread through the raw meat is because it’s not sourced from the correct environment, which causes the diseases to foster in the dirty environment (and how well the animal nurtured itself or whatever). There’s literally no such thing as Raw meat being “naturally” more susceptible to carrying diseases, just more likely because they usually are not sourced correctly or contaminated.

This brings me onto cooked meat. Cooked meat is also good. The argument that heat destroys the nutrients is true, but there’s obvious workarounds: consume more cooked meat. Goatis argument about the fact that you could consume as much cooked meat as possible and still be nutrient deficient is obviously complete nonsense, since you can just consume more cooked meat and your nutrient intake would linearly increase until you hit your amount for the day, which wouldn’t even be hard.

Second is to steam all your meat, only around 10% of the nutrients will be lost since none of them are leeched into the water. It’s just so obvious you don’t NEED to eat raw meat to maintain good health and be a mogger (obviously your starting point matters). Which brings me into my next point.

His argument that bad looks are only caused by lack of a healthy raw meat diet in your upbringing is COMPLETE bullshit. Tbh for me it’s pretty easy to see he’s pushing an agenda here when he says this, which I can explain more if you want me to. He knows it’s mostly up to genes but it’s the same when red pill grifters claim that you can only get rich if you “buy their course” if he doesn’t pedal the idea that raw meat is the only thing that matters then his business doesn’t grow essentially, it’s the same concept.

It literally makes 0 sense that it’s all raw meat otherwise what is the point in even having any fucking genes to begin with if everything is just determined by your diet. Completely insane take. Holy shi this reply was long I’m gonna bookmark for when I need to reference to someone else. Let me know your thoughts though g.
men thanks finally someone with half of a brain. Thanks for the reply it all makes sense. Goatis is not necessarily a fraud but he has an incentive to push his agenda. Great reply(y)
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Thebuffdon
That Pottenger cat study seems dubious, if cats were unable to reproduce within the 4th generation of a cooked meat and pasteurized milk diet how do we still have domesticated cats
Why are we even talking about cats

Cats their organs are made to disgest raw meat food, not cooked meat
So this will be different ofcourse when a cat tried to eat cooked meat

This whole logic is stupid
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova, Miami and jordanbarett122
Thanks for the reply Goatis, Now I will destroy your arguments one by one, obviously with respect.

We are still both carnivorous animals that are supposed to eat raw meat. It's completely valid to use them. He also used human equivalent studies.
Bro please do not compare the digestive system of a cat to that of a human it's making you appear low iq. I get the studies overall idea but the means, methods, conclusions are sketchy. It would have been better if the study used monkeys as they are closer to humans using cats does absolutely fucking nothing.
1. Humans are not carnivores as I explained our digestive systems are far more complex than those of cats. We are not restricted to milk and meat. I can go into detail but come on Goatis do you want me explaining the differences between carnivores and omnivores. If you throw a cat a raw egg it will look at you crazy.

He never talked about them being fatter, and certainly didn't say the richer population is worse off lol, how can that even be? They eat meat unlike poor dalits who eat vegetarian and make India the global capital of sickness and ugliness it is.
2. He said there was a difference in physique. What do the average people mean by this. And if that was not the argument why include the picture of the Dalit mogger who is poor doesn't that hurt your argument
1735945678616

The point was the plant based diet that 99.9% of the world is on. It will always have a worse outcome no matter if its relative to a cooked or raw meat diet.
Yeah no shit! Bro 99.9% of the world is not based on a fucking plant based diet. here is a simple google search
  • Veganism: About 1% of the world's population identifies as vegan, but there are approximately 79 million vegans worldwide.

  • Plant-based diets: Some estimate that around 4 billion people live primarily on a plant-based diet.

  • Plant-based food consumption: In 2022, 60% of households consumed plant-based foods.
...ignoring that it's encased in indigestible fiber + included with antinutrients so you would be getting literally nothing
While it's true that whole grains, nuts, and seeds contain fiber and antinutrients like phytates, these factors don’t render them nutritionally void. Humans can digest and absorb nutrients from these foods. Additionally, animal-based sources of thiamine (e.g., pork, fish, eggs) provide a pretty good alternative =.
Eat it raw along with all the meats you mentioned and will mention. You acknowledge that the nutrients are lost when it's cooked so why not do that and make it optimal?
Because it's disgusting, primitve and could make you sick. The risk to reward ratio for me is retard tier.
No plants have B6, wtf are you talking about?
bro it's literally one of the main sources don''t believe me https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123858535000064#:~:text=Vitamin B6 is derived primarily,implicated as a potent antioxidant.

Just gourge on goyslop for the synthetic fake chemicals that are just close enough to real nutrients nutrients theory
The point is not too make them you're entire diet the point is if you have a balanced diet you'll probably get those nutrients.
Just drink 50 cans of liquid adrenalizing goyslop everyday to age yourself for the taurine theory
That's not what I said once again my point is if you eat a wide variety of stuff obviously with lots of cooked meat you'll get some of these nutrients down either way
No plant has heme iron...
Once again simple google search man
  • Cooking method
    Cooking in an oven can cause a 22–43% loss of heme iron, while cooking in a pan can cause a 1–24% loss.
    Meaning that if you generally eat a lot of cooked meat you'll still get more than sufficient heme iron.
Plant oils, completely different version
So what. its still nutritious

Retarded thread to make anyway because the entire point of this video is that everyone already eats like you recommended and consume these alternative sources enough, so why do modern humans still develop worse and have shit health?

Modern Humans do not have shit health man you're just sayaing bullshit that looks nice on paper.This is the longest humans have lived in a long time. Turns out the places with the most processed food even live the longest:feelswhy::feelswhy: brutal reality. From Caveman days people have been ugly and will continue to be. Not once in that video did I think I really want to be like these tribesemen:lul:/ Those guys are suffering as a person from africa, I can tell you straight up man we eat a fucking lot of meat a lotof us are still ugly asf. Look man people think you came up with some revolutionary idea. Looks are the role of a dice. Anybody that believes raw meat is a gamechanger can fuck themselves up. I genuinely care about your health as well as those of your children, please do not feed them raw meat and if you do start with low sizes because if they get sick they wont recover as fast as you and I, It could be fatal😕. Raw meat will not change anythin man. Once again I will end this reply commenting that I personally eat 2-3x more meat than the average human I love it cooked (y).If you think raw meat will change your life go ahead do it and keep me updated. :feelshah:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova, Thebuffdon and Miami
Bro please do not compare the digestive system of a cat to taht of a human it's making you appear low iq. I get the studies overall idea but the means, methods, conclusions are sketchy. It would have been better if the study used monkeys as they are closer to humans using cats does absolutely fucking nothing.

2. He said there was a difference in physique. What do the average people mean by this. And if that was not the argument why include the picture of the Dalit mogger who is poor doesn't that hurt your argument View attachment 3402953

Yeah no shit! Bro 99.9% of the world is not based on a fucking plant based diet. here is a simple google search
  • Veganism: About 1% of the world's population identifies as vegan, but there are approximately 79 million vegans worldwide.

  • Plant-based diets: Some estimate that around 4 billion people live primarily on a plant-based diet.

  • Plant-based food consumption: In 2022, 60% of households consumed plant-based foods.

While it's true that whole grains, nuts, and seeds contain fiber and antinutrients like phytates, these factors don’t render them nutritionally void. Humans can digest and absorb nutrients from these foods. Additionally, animal-based sources of thiamine (e.g., pork, fish, eggs) provide a pretty good alternative =.

Because it's disgusting, primitve and could make you sick. The risk to reward ratio for me is retard tier.

The point is not too make them you're entire diet the point is if you have a balanced diet you'll probably get those nutrients.

That's not what I said once again my point is if you eat a wide variety of stuff obviously with lots of cooked meat you'll get some of these nutrients down eather way

Once again simple google search man
  • Cooking method
    Cooking in an oven can cause a 22–43% loss of heme iron, while cooking in a pan can cause a 1–24% loss.
    Meaning that if you generally eat a lot of cooked meat you'll still get more than sufficient heme iron.

So what still nutritious

Retarded thread to make anyway because the entire point of this video is that everyone already eats like you recommended and consume these alternative sources enough, so why do modern humans still develop worse and have shit health?

Modern Humans do not have shit health man you're just sayaing bullshit that looks nice on paper.This is the longest humans have lived in a long time. Turns out the places with the most processed food even live the longest:feelswhy::feelswhy: brutal reality. From Caveman days people have been ugly and will continue to be. Not once in that video did I think I really want to be like these tribesemen:lul:/ Those guys are suffering as a person from africa, I can tell you straight up man we eat a fucking lot of meat a lotof us are still ugly asf. Look man people think you came up with some revolutionary idea. Looks are the role of a dice. Anybody that believes raw meat is a gamechanger can fuck themselves up. I genuinely care about your health as well as those of your children, please do not feed them raw meat and if you do start with low sizes because if they get sick they wont recover as fast as you and I, It could be fatal😕. Raw meat will not change anythin man. Once again I will end this reply commenting that I personally eat 2-3x more meat than the average human I love it cooked (y).If you think raw meat will change your life go ahead do it and keep me updated. :feelshah:
Yap yap yap
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova and jordanbarett122
schizo narcsy thinks he is chad on his videos
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova, Miami and Thebuffdon
but balding blonde man on youtube said it, so it must be right… :feelsuhh:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova, Thebuffdon and jordanbarett122
schizo narcsy thinks he is chad on his videos
I agree I binged a couple of his videos. I can't help but saying he is a not very smart. His points are cringe as hell. He thinks looks are the solution to cancer. He underrates other people's looks so much even though those people mog him brutally. The worst part of it is he has this weird fan base that thinks he is God.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova and Thebuffdon
2. He said there was a difference in physique. What do the average people mean by this. And if that was not the argument why include the picture of the Dalit mogger who is poor doesn't that hurt your argument View attachment 3402953
You're taking what i say too literally, try to read it again.
Yeah no shit! Bro 99.9% of the world is not based on a fucking plant based diet. here is a simple google search
  • Veganism: About 1% of the world's population identifies as vegan, but there are approximately 79 million vegans worldwide.

  • Plant-based diets: Some estimate that around 4 billion people live primarily on a plant-based diet.

  • Plant-based food consumption: In 2022, 60% of households consumed plant-based foods.
They are. At least in the west yes they are. Just search up any what i eat in a day on youtube, go interview anyone on the street, meat makes up such a little part of most peoples diets. Those statistics are considering the extreme plant based diets as their plant based diets like veganism and vegetarianism.
While it's true that whole grains, nuts, and seeds contain fiber and antinutrients like phytates, these factors don’t render them nutritionally void. Humans can digest and absorb nutrients from these foods because they just can ok
Because it's disgusting
It's not, you've never eaten proper raw meat from healthy animals
And?
and could make you sick. The risk to reward ratio for me is retard tier.
...on an alternate reality. No one has ever gotten sick from eating raw flesh from a healthy animal ever.
The point is not too make them you're entire diet the point is if you have a balanced diet you'll probably get those nutrients.
Most people on earth follow a "balanced diet" in line with what the experts recommend.
That's not what I said once again my point is if you eat a wide variety of stuff obviously with lots of cooked meat you'll get some of these nutrients down eather way
It is what you're saying. Overeating on cooked meat just to get the nutrients when there's literally 0 reason to cook meat isn't a good idea. Cooked meat is heavy on the gut and more food = more aging.
Modern Humans do not have shit health man you're just sayaing bullshit that looks nice on paper.
So you're just denying reality now? Look around you. Most people have sleeping problems, acne, skin conditions, hair problems, so called middle aged people have tons of pain their body and are on 100 different medications, lots are infertile, the old people of today have the mobility and mental health of potatoes, they basically just exist, meanwhile 100 year olds in Lapland have the mobility and mental sharpenss of little kids
Absolutely NONE, literally 0, of any disease urban humans get nowadays exists in nature.
This is the longest humans have lived in a long time.
Wrong. Living to 70 is literally half of the MINIMUM human lifespan, living to 80 or even 100 is not impressive whatsoever
There are millions of birth and death certificates and documents of people who have lived to over 120, one example is Li Ching Yuen.
I will just say that what contributes to this is mostly comfort, not diet, but all of them did consume mostly meat and occasional raw meat

You're probably just referring to this repeated myth that says muh caveman lived to 30 which is an improvable religious belief
Turns out the places with the most processed food even live the longest:feelswhy::feelswhy: brutal reality.
...on an alternate reality
From Caveman days people have been ugly and will continue to be.
...on an alternate reality, there is not a single ugly skull from "caveman days"
Not once in that video did I think I really want to be like these tribesemen:lul:/ Those guys are suffering as a person from africa,
get your t levels checked son
I can tell you straight up man we eat a fucking lot of meat
...on an alternate reality
I genuinely care about your health as well as those of your children,
You might have good intentions, but you're a brainwashed ignorant retard.
please do not feed them raw meat and if you do start with low sizes because if they get sick they wont recover as fast as you and I, It could be fatal😕.
There are several parents online documenting them feeding their children a normal human diet and nothing but good things happen. Goatis himself included. These children are very healthy very happy and don't have the modern problems that make people think kids are annoying demons
Raw meat will not change anythin man. Once again I will end this reply commenting that I personally eat 2-3x more meat than the average human I love it cooked (y).If you think raw meat will change your life go ahead do it and keep me updated. :feelshah:
It did, i made a thread on this
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova
You're taking what i say too literally, try to read it again.

They are. At least in the west yes they are. Just search up any what i eat in a day on youtube, go interview anyone on the street, meat makes up such a little part of most peoples diets. Those statistics are considering the extreme plant based diets as their plant based diets like veganism and vegetarianism.


It's not, you've never eaten proper raw meat from healthy animals

And?

...on an alternate reality. No one has ever gotten sick from eating raw flesh from a healthy animal ever.

Most people on earth follow a "balanced diet" in line with what the experts recommend.

It is what you're saying. Overeating on cooked meat just to get the nutrients when there's literally 0 reason to cook meat isn't a good idea. Cooked meat is heavy on the gut and more food = more aging.

So you're just denying reality now? Look around you. Most people have sleeping problems, acne, skin conditions, hair problems, so called middle aged people have tons of pain their body and are on 100 different medications, lots are infertile, the old people of today have the mobility and mental health of potatoes, they basically just exist, meanwhile 100 year olds in Lapland have the mobility and mental sharpenss of little kids
Absolutely NONE, literally 0, of any disease urban humans get nowadays exists in nature.

Wrong. Living to 70 is literally half of the MINIMUM human lifespan, living to 80 or even 100 is not impressive whatsoever
There are millions of birth and death certificates and documents of people who have lived to over 120, one example is Li Ching Yuen.
I will just say that what contributes to this is mostly comfort, not diet, but all of them did consume mostly meat and occasional raw meat

You're probably just referring to this repeated myth that says muh caveman lived to 30 which is an improvable religious belief

...on an alternate reality

...on an alternate reality, there is not a single ugly skull from "caveman days"

get your t levels checked son

...on an alternate reality

You might have good intentions, but you're a brainwashed ignorant retard.

There are several parents online documenting them feeding their children a normal human diet and nothing but good things happen. Goatis himself included. These children are very healthy very happy and don't have the modern problems that make people think kids are annoying demons

It did, i made a thread on this
I could refute all of these arguments again but honestly I'll leave that to someone else, I'm exhausted . If you love raw meat that much enjoy it man. I can tell you're the type to argue blindly and spew bullshit. It really comes down to iq at the end of the day man. I made this thread to help people and most see my view points but If people are retarded enough to eat raw meat and CONSIDER IT LAW. Then they were going to do some stupid shit either way. Good Luck brother.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: silently_said
I could refute all of these arguments again but honestly I'll leave that to someone else, I'm exhausted . If you love raw meat that much enjoy it man. I can tell you're the type to argue blindly and spew bullshit. It really comes down to iq at the end of the day man. I made this thread to help people and most see my view points but If people are retarded enough to eat raw meat and CONSIDER IT LAW. Then they were going to do some stupid shit either way. Good Luck brother.
Finally, a concession. Thread debunked, don't listen to this retard
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Fillowskyy, Jova and Thebuffdon
can i borrow the time machine you used to find this out?
how the fuck did we "evolve" eating less nutritious food?
bro, we evolved because our body didn't have to spend as much time breaking down the raw food - cooking the food breaks it down more, sure maybe u lose nutrients, but it is way easier for our body to break down and digest

why do u think you don't see genius as fuck animals who evolved like us and can make computers and civilizations and shit? because they are all disease and parasite ridden and digesting food is such an energy draining process for them

just eat more cooked meat to get missed nutrients, raw is cope and terrible for you :feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: noodlelover
This brings me onto cooked meat. Cooked meat is also good. The argument that heat destroys the nutrients is true, but there’s obvious workarounds: consume more cooked meat. Goatis argument about the fact that you could consume as much cooked meat as possible and still be nutrient deficient is obviously complete nonsense, since you can just consume more cooked meat and your nutrient intake would linearly increase until you hit your amount for the day, which wouldn’t even be hard.
Another point, More nutrients isn't always better. You want enough of every nutrient but too much is determinantal to health.

It's why if you eat too much of a nutrient dense food such as liver, or spinach, you'll get sick.

Second is to steam all your meat, only around 10% of the nutrients will be lost since none of them are leeched into the water.
Or drink the water. Or bake.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Thebuffdon
Summarize pls?

Also wheres that one user who loves raw meat
 
bro, we evolved because our body didn't have to spend as much time breaking down the raw food - cooking the food breaks it down more, sure maybe u lose nutrients, but it is way easier for our body to break down and digest
no it's not? everyone who eats raw meat will tell you how more lighter it is on the stomach. i literally go to sleep right after eating a big meal, you don't even feel it
why do u think you don't see genius as fuck animals who evolved like us and can make computers and civilizations and shit?
the reason could be literally any, nobody knows, maybe it was meant to be like this
because they are all disease and parasite ridden and digesting food is such an energy draining process for them
what animal in nature has diseases?
just eat more cooked meat to get missed nutrients
and feel like shit because it's heavy and age yourself? no thanks
 
  • +1
Reactions: SteveRogers
Another point, More nutrients isn't always better. You want enough of every nutrient but too much is determinantal to health.

It's why if you eat too much of a nutrient dense food such as liver, or spinach, you'll get sick.
You basically want to eat every part of the animal in the amounts they are intended, in my opinion
 
  • +1
Reactions: noodlelover
You basically want to eat every part of the animal in the amounts they are intended, in my opinion
Even the schlong?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: jordanbarett122 and ey88

Similar threads

RapeAllFemales
Replies
16
Views
281
IBlameFentanyl
IBlameFentanyl
IHeartVanillaCoke
Replies
85
Views
1K
odux
odux
asdvek
Replies
32
Views
281
larox.psl
larox.psl
halloweed
Replies
29
Views
489
Magnum Opus
Magnum Opus
nathan
Replies
7
Views
205
nathan
nathan

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top