Mosh12
Jai Hind!
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2023
- Posts
- 8,549
- Reputation
- 12,150
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
least obvious ragebaiter JFLno it's not? everyone who eats raw meat will tell you how more lighter it is on the stomach. i literally go to sleep right after eating a big meal, you don't even feel it
the reason could be literally any, nobody knows, maybe it was meant to be like this
what animal in nature has diseases?
and feel like shit because it's heavy and age yourself? no thanks
Caging, you claim you did research but you’ve landed on the ChatGPT tier response of us being omnivores - we are carnivores…some fucking RESEARCH. He started off using the Pottenger Cats Study in which cats that eat raw milk and raw meat had by far stronger bones than cats that ate cooked and condensed. However, we are not fucking cats, the human digestive system is by far more complex and beautifully constructed than that of a cat. Cats are carnivores and humans are Omnivores
I have a question for you, and I know you may be sub par IQ but please try to answer with a bit of sense. Is using AI in 2025 a part of research? Is it more convenient to go through non-relevant studies or ask AI for the articles? The point is using AI does not devalue any of my arguments.Caging, you claim you did research but you’ve landed on the ChatGPT tier response of us being omnivores - we are carnivores…
DNRD anyway got to that and just vocally cringed.
the people who breed cats give them good diets, but you can see degenerated cats in homes where the cats are unable to go outside or are too bad at hunting to succeed in it. These cats have much more disgusting fur and die much sooner. One of my friends had a cat who had disgusting fur from not washing itself, it was too stupid to hunt and died extremely rapidly (2 weeks after discovery) from cancer at age 6.That Pottenger cat study seems dubious, if cats were unable to reproduce within the 4th generation of a cooked meat and pasteurized milk diet how do we still have domesticated cats
You missed my point you donkey.I have a question for you, and I know you may be sub par IQ but please try to answer with a bit of sense. Is using AI in 2025 a part of research? Is it more convenient to go through non-relevant studies or ask AI for the articles? The point is using AI does not devalue any of my arguments.
Holy fucking retard no way you just listed grains and vegetables LMFAOOO you barely get any nutrients from them and none of them are bioavailable and EITHER WAY they are FULL, of anti nutrients YOU ARE A FUCKING RETARDYOU ARE FUCKING STUPID. READ THE FUCKING THREAD BEFORE YOU TALK BULLSHIT
I ended up doing research and I found out the nutrients lost when eating raw meat can be found fucking everywhere.
alternative food sources:
- Vitamin B1 (Thiamine)
- Loss: Heat-sensitive; up to 50% lost in high heat.
- Sources: Whole grains, nuts, seeds, pork.
- Vitamin B6
- Loss: 20–40% lost during cooking.
- Sources: Bananas, avocados, chickpeas, fish.
- Vitamin B12
- Loss: Up to 35% lost in high heat.
- Sources: Eggs, dairy, fortified foods.
- Taurine
- Loss: Destroyed by high heat.
- Sources: Shellfish, dark poultry meat, energy drinks.
- Iron (Heme)
- Loss: Slight reduction; absorption may change with cooking.
- Sources: Spinach, lentils, fortified cereals.
- Omega-3 Fatty Acids
- Loss: Degrades at high temperatures.
- Sources: Flaxseeds, walnuts, fatty fish.
- Enzymes
- Loss: Fully destroyed by heat.
- Sources: Raw fruits and vegetables (e.g., papaya, pineapple).
There is no risk if it's from a good source, I've been eating raw brains, liver, testicles, chicken, beef etc I even drink blood sometimes. Not to mention raw milk or raw colostrum. Never had any disease from it.Don a simple google search right now. Risks of eating raw meat