I've already answered these incorrect statements, broadly. I realize you guys don't read what I write, so there is no point me restating stuff.
There's not point reading what you write because.it would just be a waste of my time because most of it is retatded
I've already had discussion, with a user who said something similar to you.
looksmax.org
Other users have done exactly what you just did:
looksmax.org
looksmax.org
looksmax.org
There is nothing wrong with context appropriate ad hominems. It is absolutely fair to attack the person if it is warranted. Crying about muh fallacies 24/7 Is the biggest midwit trait, genuine intelligent people understand they are the building blocks of good discourseOther users have done exactly what you just did:
You all proceed to cast ad hominem attacks and make 0 attempt to refute any of my arguments.
You are pathetic. Then you proceed to ghost, when I refute your baseless ad hominem attacks, as described in the above linked exchange.
On your reliance on ad hominem attacks, instead of substantiating your arguments.
Looks theory destroyed: The future of men.
Association between IQ and genetics.Declining genes & the potential end of "modern" society: A short primer on dysgenics and the inevitable Malthusian decline
Weakening selection pressures and Malthusianism: We will enter a period of accelerated Malthusianism: Picture exponential population growth plotted against linear resources. Now picture the exponential population reverted to the mean. Part of this will be because of dysgenics. The industrial...
Declining genes & the potential end of "modern" society: A short primer on dysgenics and the inevitable Malthusian decline
Weakening selection pressures and Malthusianism: We will enter a period of accelerated Malthusianism: Picture exponential population growth plotted against linear resources. Now picture the exponential population reverted to the mean. Part of this will be because of dysgenics. The industrial...
GWAS or genome wide association studies evidence frequencies of genes associated with intelligencem decreasing generationally among native populations:
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1612113114
It not fair if it isn't warranted because you make 0 effort substantiate your opinion which is wrong.
I have an entire thread refuting yours and others' moronic, one liner quips, which you all spout in bad faith.
You can also argue that delayed breeding is inherently dysgenic because it results in higher rates of age-related mutations (autism, for example).
But your studies are all worthless statistics spam, made by people with agendas. Do you realise how easy it is to get any conclusion you want from these types of studies? Its far from objective. All they have to do is use tricky maths and make the method involved and complex and then they know almost no one will have the time or spend the effort to go through and find the problems so they can pass it off as objective knowledge unchallenged. (But when someone does they get fucking rolled)
Yes, it causes noticeable rates of mutational load. Me being one example (my mother was 44 and my father in his 60s when I was conceived).
One marker is not sufficient to prove or disprove the overall contention that genetics are associated with intelligence, especially when the presence of certain genes are being found with less frequency or speculated as activating at different times, in certain populations, with better or worse life outcomes. Small genetic effects at different developmental stages may have large consequences on mental function. I guess this points against both of our conflicting contentions, as it obviously makes specific calculation very difficult, given current technology.
They are not mystery genes. They are particular genes such as the 22 genes accounting for about 5% of the differences in intelligence scores.
While this does not seem like much, as genome sequencing and databases improve further associations will be found.
This is not because there is no correlation but because intelligence is a highly polygenic trait, necessitating much larger sample sizes to reliably identify contributing genes. Most of the GWAS I mentioned have ~70k sizes. Eventually there will be 1+ billion plus sample sized studies to calculate the reliability.
Also, SNP heritability reported in recent GWAS has ranged between >50% to 20%.
Genes, Cells and Brain Areas of Intelligence
What is the neurobiological basis of human intelligence? The brains of some people seem to be more efficient than those of others. Understanding the biological foundations of these differences is of great interest to basic and applied neuroscience. Somehow, the secret must lie in the cells in...www.frontiersin.org
Genes, Cells and Brain Areas of Intelligence
What is the neurobiological basis of human intelligence? The brains of some people seem to be more efficient than those of others. Understanding the biological foundations of these differences is of great interest to basic and applied neuroscience. Somehow, the secret must lie in the cells in...Genes, Cells and Brain Areas of Intelligence
What is the neurobiological basis of human intelligence? The brains of some people seem to be more efficient than those of others. Understanding the biological foundations of these differences is of great interest to basic and applied neuroscience. Somehow, the secret must lie in the cells in...
Finally, and MOST pressingly, the association is very persuasive given the adulthood heritability of IQ as being around 0.8. I genuinely don't understand your contention given this statistic, unless you can explain why the calculation is wrong.
The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age | Twin Research and Human Genetics | Cambridge Core
The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age - Volume 16 Issue 5www.cambridge.org
OP quoted the misleading, made-up "0.80" estimate for "reared apart twins" who weren't actually reared apart. Modern heritability estimates based on twin studies = 0.5 for behavioural traits (and ofc heritability doesnt equal genetic) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25985137/
Population GWAS studies are confounded by non-genetic effects, actual recent (2020, 2022) *unconfounded* with-family GWAS studies have heritability estimates of 4%-17%, of real genetic causality. LOL the 'improvements" on power and samples disproved older, larger estimates.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01062-7
Twin studies are false and cant prove genetic causality: https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...art-iq-study/51AB0D7F19B868D949879046F66C75FE
Thanks for providing me with this study I will look into it, but my concerns written in the immediately above comment, still stand.OP quoted the misleading, made-up "0.80" estimate for "reared apart twins" who weren't actually reared apart. Modern heritability estimates based on twin studies = 0.5 for behavioural traits (and ofc heritability doesnt equal genetic) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25985137/
"when we develop infinite computational power, my secret/mystery phantom genes will finally be proven as causal"
Yea but Twin study estimates cant prove genetic causality, their heritability does not equal genetic
"when we develop infinite computational power, my secret/mystery phantom genes will finally be proven as causal"
You didn't prove anything and you refuse to provide evidence, that's all users will remember.
op got owned, I lowered his genetic estimate from 80% to 4%-17%. For dysgenics to exist, the genetic component of behavioural traits has to be large. and of course, he must prove that large genetic causality within-population before he can suggest that between-populations genetic differences for behaviour exist
Genetics can indirectly effect behaviour, and a small causality for gene snps *has been proven*, i dont deny a "genetic effect". everything is effected by "genetics and environment". The genetic component of EA is caused through gene to environment, genotypic choice in environment (GxE). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721131/
>genetic causality within-populations v between-populations genetic difference
This is a stupid quip, and if you are capable of making some of the above arguments, you are likely to understand that you are now being dishonest.
>genetic causality within-populations v between-populations genetic difference
How is there not genetic causality between-populations genetic differences. How is that not evidenced generally regarding trait selection; type twitch, bone density, grip strength all differ immensely between races or selection of diseases or mental problems like dyslexia having much higher heritability.
>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01062-7
You did not lower the percentage irrefutably.
You are relying on 8 studies over 4 years where second last, shows a considerable outlier relative to the most recent. It shows a trend. But this trend is an expression of homogenous, relatively small sample sizes (~200k at most), likely similar algorithms, data compositions and sources. How can you deny that as all these change or "innovate", with much larger computing power, that the outcome will reasonably stay the same? That's not rhetoric. That's a genuine question.
Also, you complain about my original source having an agenda while refusing to acknowledge there is also an agenda to silence any counter cultural science that challenges increasing "perspective" that IQ is not heritable or that there are differences between races? What modern Departments, in good faith, are going to actively fund these challenging studies? The scientific field is plagued with fake studies and ideology, and underhanded tactics to deplatform "iffy" science. So this argument can be twisted against you and your sources just as you initially did to me regarding my original sources.
Further, for years our leaders said the vaccines stopped transmission. Then at the EU Parliament we find out that Pfizer never specifically tested for stopping transmission.
The point is, we have the "$cience" or Science with political agendas, purported "scientific" claims, "fair" data, "scientific consensus" and as is the case with these SNP studies, limited data, novel technology and computing power (which will increase). If you found 20+ years of such data, with each study exponentially growing in sample sizes confirming your contention, then maybe your contention would be reasonably proven, but it simply isn't.
I think its evident that neither you nor I have training to a PHD standard in statistics, and no one can in good faith either be persuaded by your perspective or mine.
At best, one can only be put on notice (such is the case with me) that SNP heritability may not be as high as initially thought, but that this is only relevant to those specific markers studied, not others that are more "iffy" or morally ambiguous.
Regardless, thank you for that study. It is prima facie interesting. I will read it fully, later.
This is a stupid quip, and if you are capable of making some of the above arguments, you are likely to understand that you are now being dishonest.
The point that puts all those counter-culture scientists on notice, or at least, likely in their mind, motivates (and at time even biases) their "adverse" findings, is the simple undeniable, difference between interracial crime rates in America and Europe, and the political, economic and social state of European countries like Sweden/Finland/Norway versus lets say South Africa (rolling blackouts, 50 years post apartheid - how long can this card be used against government impropriety?) or Zimbabwe (killing the farmers, then 15 yrs later after the land is forcibly acquired, land masses are still not farmed and the population is starving).
Not to mention, increasing rape/violence statistics across Europe correlating to mass immigration intake or the example, that countries like Germany are now complaining that their immigrant population (around 70%) have not wholly assimilated and are not working. Such cultural and social friction evidenced in the aforementioned and in this study https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3602498 is the motivation for challenging science and anti immigration attitudes.
Crime rates: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-21
Interesting commentary on South Africa crisis:
Zimbabwe food crisis: https://www.theguardian.com/global-...imbabwes-children-go-hungry-as-crisis-deepens
Rape statistics in Sweden: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330751/
Such studies are replicated ACROSS Europe.
Immigrant unemployment in Germany - similar in other euro countries. Now such countries seek to implement skilled migrant legislation, as oppose to large intake of non-skilled migrants, who find it harder to assimilate and engage in crime at higher rates https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...long-term-unemployment-benefits-Angela-Merkel
>genetic causality within-populations v between-populations genetic difference
How is there not genetic causality between-populations genetic differences. How is that not evidenced generally regarding trait selection; type twitch, bone density, grip strength all differ immensely between races or selection of diseases or mental problems like dyslexia having much higher heritability.
>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01062-7
You did not lower the percentage irrefutably.
You are relying on 8 studies over 4 years where second last, shows a considerable outlier relative to the most recent. It shows a trend. But this trend is an expression of homogenous, relatively small sample sizes (~200k at most), likely similar algorithms, data compositions and sources. How can you deny that as all these change or "innovate", with much larger computing power, that the outcome will reasonably stay the same? That's not rhetoric. That's a genuine question.
Also, you complain about my original source having an agenda while refusing to acknowledge there is also an agenda to silence any counter cultural science that challenges increasing "perspective" that IQ is not heritable or that there are differences between races? What modern Departments, in good faith, are going to actively fund these challenging studies? The scientific field is plagued with fake studies and ideology, and underhanded tactics to deplatform "iffy" science. So this argument can be twisted against you and your sources just as you initially did to me regarding my original sources.
Further, for years our leaders said the vaccines stopped transmission. Then at the EU Parliament we find out that Pfizer never specifically tested for stopping transmission.
The point is, we have the "$cience" or Science with political agendas, purported "scientific" claims, "fair" data, "scientific consensus" and as is the case with these SNP studies, limited data, novel technology and computing power (which will increase). If you found 20+ years of such data, with each study exponentially growing in sample sizes confirming your contention, then maybe your contention would be reasonably proven, but it simply isn't.
I think its evident that neither you nor I have training to a PHD standard in statistics, and no one can in good faith either be persuaded by your perspective or mine.
At best, one can only be put on notice (such is the case with me) that SNP heritability may not be as high as initially thought, but that this is only relevant to those specific markers studied, not others that are more "iffy" or morally ambiguous.
Regardless, thank you for that study. It is prima facie interesting. I will read it fully, later.
This is a stupid quip, and if you are capable of making some of the above arguments, you are likely to understand that you are now being dishonest.
The point that puts all those counter-culture scientists on notice, or at least, likely in their mind, motivates (and at time even biases) their "adverse" findings, is the simple undeniable, difference between interracial crime rates in America and Europe, and the political, economic and social state of European countries like Sweden/Finland/Norway versus lets say South Africa (rolling blackouts, 50 years post apartheid - how long can this card be used against government impropriety?) or Zimbabwe (killing the farmers, then 15 yrs later after the land is forcibly acquired, land masses are still not farmed and the population is starving).
Not to mention, increasing rape/violence statistics across Europe correlating to mass immigration intake or the example, that countries like Germany are now complaining that their immigrant population (around 70%) have not wholly assimilated and are not working. Such cultural and social friction evidenced in the aforementioned and in this study https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3602498 is the motivation for challenging science and anti immigration attitudes.
Crime rates: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-21
Interesting commentary on South Africa crisis:
Zimbabwe food crisis: https://www.theguardian.com/global-...imbabwes-children-go-hungry-as-crisis-deepens
Rape statistics in Sweden: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330751/
Such studies are replicated ACROSS Europe.
Immigrant unemployment in Germany - similar in other euro countries. Now such countries seek to implement skilled migrant legislation, as oppose to large intake of non-skilled migrants, who find it harder to assimilate and engage in crime at higher rates https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...long-term-unemployment-benefits-Angela-Merkel
Explain Africa. Why are their life outcomes so bad? It's been 50+ years but governments like SA and Zimbabwe still blame white govt, now their infrastructure crumbles? Why do these poor life outcomes end up occurring in countries like America / Europe? How come given all the aid (trillions) over the past 50 years, Africa is still a basket case?
They aren't better power/samples by far. A 70k v 200k samples in the grand scheme of things, relative to what is possible in 10+ years (Hundreds of millions/billions) and different algos (most of those studies, use consensus sets) will be massive.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
No, not wholly. Just that these environmental effects will likely have genomic effects overtime.Are you a genetic determinist? have you ever considered the deleterious effect pollution has on pre-natal and post-natal children up to age 7?
Decreased intelligence in children and exposure to fluoride and arsenic in drinking water - PubMed
Recent evidence suggests that fluoride (F) and arsenic (As) may adversely affect intelligence quotient (IQ) scores. We explore the association between exposure to F and As in drinking water and intelligence in children. Three rural communities in Mexico with contrasting levels of F and As in...
Children's IQ Can Be Affected By Mother's Exposure To Urban Air Pollutants, Study Suggests
Prenatal exposure to environmental pollutants known as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons can adversely affect a child's intelligence quotient or IQ, according to new research.www.sciencedaily.com
Prenatal air pollution and childhood IQ: Preliminary evidence of effect modification by folate - PubMed
Our findings strengthen evidence that air pollution impairs fetal neurodevelopment and suggest a potentially important role of maternal folate in modifying these effects.
Genes are just the expression of past environment.
That's one factor, talking about PMCs and TNCs, applicable to some regions of Africa. Ok. Does that wholly explain the energy shut downs in SA or the mass starvation in Zimbabwe, or continued similar failings and corruption of other States? Or crime rate discrepancies in other countries, even when adjusting for wealth disparities? The answer is no.404 - Page not found
issafrica.org
False, it is applicable to the entirety of africa. Entire generations afflicted by PTSD cannot make a functional societ.
www.cbsnews.com
www.mdpi.com
>genetic causality within-populations v between-populations genetic difference
How is there not genetic causality between-populations genetic differences. How is that not evidenced generally regarding trait selection; type twitch, bone density, grip strength all differ immensely between races or selection of diseases or mental problems like dyslexia having much higher heritability.
>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01062-7
You did not lower the percentage irrefutably.
You are relying on 8 studies over 4 years where second last, shows a considerable outlier relative to the most recent. It shows a trend. But this trend is an expression of homogenous, relatively small sample sizes (~200k at most), likely similar algorithms, data compositions and sources. How can you deny that as all these change or "innovate", with much larger computing power, that the outcome will reasonably stay the same? That's not rhetoric. That's a genuine question.
Also, you complain about my original source having an agenda while refusing to acknowledge there is also an agenda to silence any counter cultural science that challenges increasing "perspective" that IQ is not heritable or that there are differences between races? What modern Departments, in good faith, are going to actively fund these challenging studies? The scientific field is plagued with fake studies and ideology, and underhanded tactics to deplatform "iffy" science. So this argument can be twisted against you and your sources just as you initially did to me regarding my original sources.
Further, for years our leaders said the vaccines stopped transmission. Then at the EU Parliament we find out that Pfizer never specifically tested for stopping transmission.
The point is, we have the "$cience" or Science with political agendas, purported "scientific" claims, "fair" data, "scientific consensus" and as is the case with these SNP studies, limited data, novel technology and computing power (which will increase). If you found 20+ years of such data, with each study exponentially growing in sample sizes confirming your contention, then maybe your contention would be reasonably proven, but it simply isn't.
I think its evident that neither you nor I have training to a PHD standard in statistics, and no one can in good faith either be persuaded by your perspective or mine.
At best, one can only be put on notice (such is the case with me) that SNP heritability may not be as high as initially thought, but that this is only relevant to those specific markers studied, not others that are more "iffy" or morally ambiguous.
Regardless, thank you for that study. It is prima facie interesting. I will read it fully, later.
This is a stupid quip, and if you are capable of making some of the above arguments, you are likely to understand that you are now being dishonest.
The point that puts all those counter-culture scientists on notice, or at least, likely in their mind, motivates (and at time even biases) their "adverse" findings, is the simple undeniable, difference between interracial crime rates in America and Europe, and the political, economic and social state of European countries like Sweden/Finland/Norway versus lets say South Africa (rolling blackouts, 50 years post apartheid - how long can this card be used against government impropriety?) or Zimbabwe (killing the farmers, then 15 yrs later after the land is forcibly acquired, land masses are still not farmed and the population is starving).
Not to mention, increasing rape/violence statistics across Europe correlating to mass immigration intake or the example, that countries like Germany are now complaining that their immigrant population (around 70%) have not wholly assimilated and are not working. Such cultural and social friction evidenced in the aforementioned and in this study https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3602498 is the motivation for challenging science and anti immigration attitudes.
Crime rates: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/topic-pages/tables/table-21
Interesting commentary on South Africa crisis:
Zimbabwe food crisis: https://www.theguardian.com/global-...imbabwes-children-go-hungry-as-crisis-deepens
Rape statistics in Sweden: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8330751/
Such studies are replicated ACROSS Europe.
Immigrant unemployment in Germany - similar in other euro countries. Now such countries seek to implement skilled migrant legislation, as oppose to large intake of non-skilled migrants, who find it harder to assimilate and engage in crime at higher rates https://www.express.co.uk/news/worl...long-term-unemployment-benefits-Angela-Merkel
learn.genetics.utah.edu
Honestly really low IQ. Human populations are not exponentially increasing look at China, Japan, Russia, Native Germans, and most other parts of Europe. The populations in developed places are actual decreasing or growing to stagnation. Second of all selection pressure is increasing in the modern area due to dating apps so most men don’t get laid anymore. The two groups that will continue to reproduce are the same that have done so forever those who can buy pussy basically the rich with high iq and those can earn it the best looking people.Weakening selection pressures and Malthusianism:
We will enter a period of accelerated Malthusianism: Picture exponential population growth plotted against linear resources. Now picture the exponential population reverted to the mean.
Part of this will be because of dysgenics. The industrial revolution created modern technology and modern medicine, it changed social structures and created globalization, which collectively contributed to a weakening of selection pressures. This meant that those who are low iq and are physically unhealthy, lacking capacity for delayed gratification and therein predisposed to a lifestyle premised on living fast and having lots of sex/engaging in hedonism, would have otherwise died under harsh selection pressures. Instead, such dysgenic populations have been afforded a social safety net, in the form of modern political, economic and medical intervention, afforded to by excess production, post-industrial revolution. This dysgenic population has for over 100 year bred at a rate far beyond those who preference resource accumulation and delayed breeding (populations that typically possess a higher iq and health, which are correlated, and who, pre-industrial revolution, were the population who bred the most, as it was their high iq and health that enabled them to cope well with harsh pre-industrial selection pressures, compared to low iq/sick people who died at higher rates).
Scientific evidence of dysgenics:
Notwithstanding cyclical nature of fertility, there is evidence of dysgenics.
There is an evidenced of a lowering of IQ in native populations like northern European countries, even when adjusted for the influence of immigrant populations:
Lynn (1996) Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations
Dutton, Linden, Lynn (2016) The negative Flynn effect: A systematic literature review.
These authors, in their further publications, have also noted a decrease in color discrimination ability and verbal expression.
Reaction times are decreasing:
GWAS or genome wide association studies evidence frequencies of genes associated with intelligencem decreasing generationally among native populations:
What does this mean?
If the iq of western countries continues to decline at current rates, the average western iq will be ~80, meaning society will be incapable of coming up with novel scientific or industrial ideas, meaning society won't progress, less alone even maintain current infrastructure.
I suspect that the elites' agenda 2030 campaign (sacrificing individual liberties to justify increasingly authoritarian measures), aims to lessen the blow from the incoming Malthusian decline, by limiting consumption, travel and social mobility, while ensuring those that are in power now, continue to be in power as society declines as dysgenics and civil unrest increases. Their perspective is that such social restrictions (social credit score, carbon footprint, digital ID) will act as social insulation, against humanities genetic and eventual social, political and economic suicide.
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Department of Economic and Social Affairs
Preamble This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognise that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable...sdgs.un.org
Similarly, the movement towards CRSPR technology, albeit in its infancy, and polygenic risk scoring (selecting against diseases currently and eventually for "questionable" traits like intelligence etc), are further measures to counter dysgenics.
What is CRISPR?
CRISPR is a technology that can be used to edit genes and, as such, will likely change the world.www.newscientist.com
Polygenic Risk Scores
A polygenic risk score is one way by which people can learn what their risk of developing a disease is, based on the total number of genomics variants related to the disease.www.genome.gov
Finally, the elites obsession with transhumanism (From Elon musk's neuralink to increasing scientific interest in nanolipid and graphene technology touted for its wide ranging application such as novel application for medical delivery) may also be an attempt to reverse dysgenics. The US government with the following two documents remarks on the widespread application of nano tech and human use.
Further sources:
Neuralink
Creating a generalized brain interface to restore autonomy to those with unmet medical needs today and unlock human potential tomorrow.neuralink.com
False, it is applicable to the entirety of africa. Entire generations afflicted by PTSD cannot make a functional societ.
Environmental pollution is the cause of this.
Federal health officials agree radioactive waste in St. Louis area may be linked to cancer
Contaminated areas are connected to America's development of its nuclear weapons program decades ago
Human health effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as ambient air pollutants - Report of the Working Group on Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons of the Joint Task Force on the Health Aspects of Air Pollution
Report of the Working Group on Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons of the Joint Task Force on the Health Aspects of Air Pollutionwww.who.int
Cellular Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
We investigated whether cellular phone use was associated with increased risk of tumors using a meta-analysis of case-control studies. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 2018. The primary outcome was the risk of tumors by cellular phone use, which was measured by pooling each...
And there we have it. The same "intergenerational" trauma argument, that always come up.
bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com
The argument is for a Malthusian peak either now or in the short term (20 years).
Do you think intelligence, verbal skills and genetic health are being selected for? They aren't.
You are avoiding talking about South Africa and its government. You are avoiding the comparison between northern african states (Morroco) and the south of Africa.
Perinatal, neonatal, developmental and demographic predictors of intelligence at 4 years of age among low birth weight children: a panel study with a 2-year follow-up - BMC Pediatrics
Intoduction Childhood intelligence is an important predictor of later outcomes in life such as socioeconomic status or health. Hence, a deeper understanding of predictors of child intelligence should suggest points of intervention for children facing adversities. Objectives The purpose of this...
Armed conflicts haven't stopped in Africa. They have stopped completely in most predominantly white countries.
Alright.
Excellent post. Emotions are basically illusions. The only reason we have them is because it was an advantage for ancestors and they were the ones who continued to reproduce. Literally a configuration of neurons firing and chemicals activated and released. It's just completely arbitrary and people actually think their emotions have significance other than their adaptive functions. It really just shows that humans are legit animals that are literally incapable of acting in any other way than in accordance to the arbitrary chemical stimulation that they just happened to have. People become very pathetic to you when you see how primitive they are in this respect.
Unironically yes women standards are sky high so there are two methods to getting laid. Be Insanely good looking or beta-bux which you need intelligence for. Coding is growing super fast in the U.S so most betabuxers will be code monkeys combine this with the high iq needed for those jobs and you get a large population of iq moggers.
What about the 1900's? what major conflicts like widespread genocide has happened on predominantly white developed countries like the U.S. or Italy etc...
False, a good environment is what makes a well-developed country.
Africa is still afflicted by widespread conventional armed conflicts.
If we get to the point of widespread Calhoun's behavioural sink then it will be the end of the human race, rich and poor alike. What makes a thriving society is not deadly environmental selection, but a good environment, this is obvious to everyone who is not deluded or has a particular agenda.
Fertility across the western world and asians are declining, which could imply that the peak has been reached.
Insurgency in Cabo Delgado - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Allied Democratic Forces insurgency - Wikipedia
What about the 1900's? what major conflicts like widespread genocide has happened on predominantly white developed countries like the U.S. or Italy etc...
False, a good environment is what makes a well-developed country.
Africa is still afflicted by widespread conventional armed conflicts.
If we get to the point of widespread Calhoun's behavioural sink then it will be the end of the human race, rich and poor alike. What makes a thriving society is not deadly environmental selection, but a good environment, this is obvious to everyone who is not deluded or has a particular agenda.
False, genocide is an order of magnitude more deleterious for a population than gang violence which doesn't even equate with low-intensity armed conflicts.
ips-dc.org
See:
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/56467/1/MPRA_paper_56467.pdf
Perinatal, neonatal, developmental and demographic predictors of intelligence at 4 years of age among low birth weight children: a panel study with a 2-year follow-up - BMC Pediatrics
Intoduction Childhood intelligence is an important predictor of later outcomes in life such as socioeconomic status or health. Hence, a deeper understanding of predictors of child intelligence should suggest points of intervention for children facing adversities. Objectives The purpose of this...
learn.genetics.utah.edu
The point is European countries have gone through considerable historical wars and in contemporary terms considerable gang violence which has widespread civil and political effects (gang violence arguably industrial and created large cities like London/New York). Yet, European society pushes on. It steps over what happens.
You are so selective with what you respond to. I'm not going to bother retyping what I've said.
How many genocides against white people have happened since the 1900's in the U.S., Canada, Italy, France and predominantly white and well-developed countries?The point is european countries have gone through considerable historical wars and in contemporary terms considerable gang violence which has widespread civil and political effects. Yet, European society pushes on. It steps over what happens.
Stop being dishonest. Here's 5+ pages of conflicts over 1000+ years. How can you discredit this and its social impact?
List of conflicts in Europe - Wikipedia
Keep ignoring the facts.
