Delon and Chico proven harmony mogs bones

Which one is more important?

  • Good harmony

    Votes: 9 69.2%
  • Good bones

    Votes: 4 30.8%

  • Total voters
    13
๕ඞChick3ncu1ry

๕ඞChick3ncu1ry

Life is a beautiful journey, just enjoy the rides.
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Posts
21,423
Reputation
17,761
IMG 3642



They don’t have gigachad jaws or bones, infact it looks like their jaws even narrow like here too as well.


It’s the harmony, how each soft features placed in the bones for appealing and pleasing to the eyes to look at.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 48903, pneumocystosis and Deleted member 57464
@Orc @pneumocystosis @Xangsane @WishIwasChico @the BULL @Iasacrko @Orc
 
  • +1
Reactions: pneumocystosis
Bones are gonna remain forever until your death.

You lose harmony as you age.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ๕ඞChick3ncu1ry
That's just basic knowledge
People in this community tend to forget that you can have good things in something, but what matter is how it comes together, you can have all of the best painting technique, doesnt mean your art will be appealing to look at.
 
  • +1
Reactions: forevermirin
Bones are gonna remain forever until your death.

You lose harmony as you age.
If by "harmony" you mean facial ratios, then no, you don't lose them as you age.

Also OP @Meraki what do you think "harmony" consists of? It consists of the shape and proportions of your fucking bones. This has got to be the dumbest premise to a thread and the dumbest response to a thread combination I have seen since returning. @StrangerDanger @drop @DelonLover1999
 
  • +1
Reactions: RomanianZaddy, DelonLover1999 and ElTruecel
This does not make sense
Bones are gonna remain forever until your death.

You lose harmony as you age.
He’s right and wrong tbh


Bones remain forever but with aging and skin sagging, the bones will not look as strong because the skin sagged.


Check Jeremy meeks for example in 2024, he looks more boneless nowadays too.
 
Harmony mogs but harmony alone without bones is bad because once ur collagen runs out as you get to ur 30s u descend hard
 
  • +1
Reactions: ๕ඞChick3ncu1ry
If by "harmony" you mean facial ratios, then no, you don't lose them as you age.

Also OP @Meraki what do you think "harmony" consists of? It consists of the shape of your fucking bones. This has got to be the dumbest premise to a thread and the dumbest response to a thread combination I have seen since returning. @StrangerDanger @drop @DelonLover1999
No harmony is more than that


It’s the ratio of not only bones but soft features like eyebrows, eyes shape, pfl, eyelashes, nose, lips shape, lips width, ears, forehead, and lastly phenotypes.
 
If by "harmony" you mean facial ratios, then no, you don't lose them as you age.

Also OP @Meraki what do you think "harmony" consists of? It consists of the shape and proportions of your fucking bones. This has got to be the dumbest premise to a thread and the dumbest response to a thread combination I have seen since returning. @StrangerDanger @drop @DelonLover1999
Not the facial ratios but the balance between good and bad features.

The only way you are gonna be looking good at an older age like you did when u were young is if you defy the age pill.

And that is a rare case. Just take the example of guys who peak in high school.
Celebrity example would Leonardo.
 
View attachment 2758080


They don’t have gigachad jaws or bones, infact it looks like their jaws even narrow like here too as well.


It’s the harmony, how each soft features placed in the bones for appealing and pleasing to the eyes to look at.
I mean duh

Does anyone actually deny it at this point?

But bones are better for aging

That too should be undeniable

Case in point look at chico vs sean in 2024
Brutal bonemog
 
Bones are for spergs
 
No harmony is more than that


It’s the ratio of not only bones but soft features like eyebrows, eyes shape, pfl, eyelashes, nose, lips shape, lips width, ears, forehead, and lastly phenotypes.
The marked words either completely or partly are compromised of or affected by bones, everything returns to the base structure.
 
He’s right and wrong tbh


Bones remain forever but with aging and skin sagging, the bones will not look as strong because the skin sagged.


Check Jeremy meeks for example in 2024, he looks more boneless nowadays too.
If we are talking about 60-70 yr Olds. Than not even bones will save you. Though you will look better than most of the oldies out there.
 
Not the facial ratios but the balance between good and bad features.
Can you even elaborate what you are trying to say here. To have all good features mog "balance" between good and bad features.
The only way you are gonna be looking good at an older age like you did when u were young is if you defy the age pill.
Water, irrelevant, also meaningless.
And that is a rare case. Just take the example of guys who peak in high school.
Celebrity example would Leonardo.
Leonardo peaked early because he was carried by youthful health markers on a short boneless cranium.
 
godd

'boness bones woowoowow'

what you think bones are retard


holy shit what a dumbfuck

iq of a fridge
 
no one cares about your threads anymorw
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Clark69
having both is ideal
 
what do you think "harmony" consists of? It consists of the shape and proportions of your fucking bones.
what u said is like saying "nature vs nurture is a dumb discussion because literally everything is nature, even the people who nurture you".

its not the literal meanings of the words but what they mean in context.

in psl terminology, bones = bonemass, aka having a massive jaw, zygos, just a larger skull and shit. you know how all psl morphs have practically the same jaw and zygos.
 
what u said is like saying "nature vs nurture is a dumb discussion because literally everything is nature, even the people who nurture you".

its not the literal meanings of the words but what they mean in context.

in psl terminology, bones = bonemass, aka having a massive jaw, zygos, just a larger skull and shit. you know how all psl morphs have practically the same jaw and zygos.
The PSL terminology is fundamentally flawed and I won't buy into something which is fundamentally flawed.
They should rename it the bonemass/robusticity axis and the proportions axis in that case if they want to discuss respective types relevance.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: forevermirin
Explain Chico harmony
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
Explain Chico harmony
IS THERE LITERALLY ANY MALE MODEL BETTER LOOKING THAN FRANCISCO LACHOWSKI? AND I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT 2007 CHICO WITH AUTISTIC PHOTOS ON HIS FACEBOOK, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT 2008 FRANCISCO WHO WON THE FORD MEN'S SUPERMODEL OF THE WORLD IN SÃO PAULO AND THEN WON A FORD MODELLING CONTRACT AND WORKED FOR DIOR HOMME, VERSACE, DOLCE & GABBANA, DSQUARED, GUCCI, CAVALLI, ARMANI AND OTHERS, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT 2016 POST-PRIME BEARDED CHICO WITH TWO KIDS AND MARRIED WITH JESSIANN GRAVEL BELAND, HELL, I'M TALKING ABOUT 2010 FRANCISCO WITH PERFECT FACIAL HARMONY AND UNIVERSAL APPEAL, 6'5" TALL WITH PERFECT FRAME AND BIDELTOID BREADTH, COMPLETELY HOODED EYES WITH AEGYO SAL AND NEUTRAL CANTHAL TILT WITH NO SCLERAL SHOW AND NO UPPER EYELID EXPOSURE, FLAWLESS SKIN AND PERFECT FACIAL LEANNESS, 1.88 FWHR, 0 ON THE NW SCALE, 7 CM INTERPUPILLARY DISTANCE AND 14.2CM OF ZYGO WIDTH, FORWARD GROWN MAXILLA AND JAWLINE WITH A MASSIVE SKULL.FRANCISCO LACHOWSKI COMES VERY CLOSE TO PERFECTION. THERE ARE VIRTUALLY NO FLAWS IN HIS FACIAL APPEARANCE, THE ONLY FLAWS CAN BE DRAWN WHEN WE GO BELOW THE NECK.. WHICH IS IRRELEVANT WHEN YOU CONSIDER HIS FACIAL AESTHETICS.HE HAS PERFECT MAXILLOFACIAL GROWTH WHICH BECOMES EVIDENT FROM THE ZYGOMATIC ARCHES THAT PROJECT WIDE (ADDS FACIAL WIDTH) AND ARE ROUND IN SHAPE IN THE TIPPING POINTS. THE NOSE IS PERFECT: STRAIGHT NASAL SEPTUM INDICATES THE FACE HASN'T GROWN VERTICALLY MORE THAN IT SHOULD AT ANY POINT IN DEVELOPMENTAL TIME SO IT DOESN'T APPEAR HOOKED, IT IS ALSO DEVOID OF ANY OBSCURE MAL/FORMATIONS, CROOKEDNESS OR DEVIATION (SOME OF WHICH ARE TYPICALLY CAUSED BY ALLERGIES OR FORCE TRAUMA).HE HAS NEAR PERFECT DENTOFACIAL GROWTH. WHILE HE HAS GOTTEN SOME DENTAL AID WITH ORTHODONTICS (EVIDENT FROM THE APPEARANCE OF HIS TOP CENTRAL AND LATERAL INCISORS+CANINES), HIS BITE IS PERFECT. YOU CAN TELL THIS BY LOOKING AT HIS LIP POSTURE, WHICH IS AFFECTED BY THE POSITION OF THE MANDIBLE, AND ANYONE WILL AGREE THAT IT LOOKS NICE AND BALANCED.THE MANDIBLE IS IN AN IDEAL POSITION WHICH MEANS THERE'S NO MALOCCLUSION, AND MALOCCLUSIONS HAVE AN ENORMOUS IMPACT ON THE AESTHETIC APPEARANCE OF THE FACE. THIS IS RARE BECAUSE WITH MODERN [WESTERN] DIET AND THE RAPID INCREASE OF ALLERGIES, IT IS EXTREMELY HARD FOR MOST MALES TO DEVELOP A NICE LOOKING JAW (NOT TO MENTION THAT YOU NEED THE APPROPRIATE TESTOSTERONE LEVELS AND GENETICS TO DEVELOP ONE). LOTS OF MALES THAT WOULD NORMALLY DEVELOP A JAW SIMILAR TO LACHOWSKI'S DON'T, BECAUSE OF MOUTH BREATHING OR IMPROPER MASTICATORY USAGE (THE DIET IS TOO SOFT). IT TAKES A PERFECT GROWING ENVIRONMENT ON TOP OF GOOD GENES AND HORMONE PROFILE TO DEVELOP A BALANCED FACIAL STRUCTURE LIKE LACHOWSKI'S, AND THAT'S LEAVING OUT THE INDIVIDUAL FEATURES LIKE THE EYE AREA, WHICH IN LACHOWSKI'S CASE IS UNIQUE IN ITSELF.NOW COMBINE ALL THIS WITH THE FACT THAT HE IS OVER 6'2''. A GOOD LOOKING FACE WITH PRETTY FEATURES IS HARD TO ACHIEVE WHEN GIVEN A TALL SKELETAL BUILD. MOST GUYS THAT YOU SEE WITH REALLY PRETTY OR HANDSOME FACES ARE 5'9'' TO 5'11'', I.E. AVERAGE HEIGHT. YOU WILL VERY RARELY SEE SOMEONE AS AESTHETIC WITH MASCULINE FEATURES AS FRANCISCO. YOU SEE BEAUTIFUL WOMEN ALL THE TIME AND THERE'S NOTHING ADMIRABLE ABOUT BEING A PRETTY GIRL BECAUSE IT'S SO EASILY ACHIEVABLE AND COMMON. BEAUTIFUL MEN ARE AN EXCEPTION TO THE RULE; SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE ADMIRED, NOT ONLY BECAUSE OF THE BEAUTY ITSELF BUT THE DIFFICULTY IN ACHIEVING SUCH BEAUTY.
 
  • +1
Reactions: redmaxx
IS THERE LITERALLY ANY MALE MODEL BETTER LOOKING THAN FRANCISCO LACHOWSKI? AND I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT 2007 CHICO WITH AUTISTIC PHOTOS ON HIS FACEBOOK, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT 2008 FRANCISCO WHO WON THE FORD MEN'S SUPERMODEL OF THE WORLD IN SÃO PAULO AND THEN WON A FORD MODELLING CONTRACT AND WORKED FOR DIOR HOMME, VERSACE, DOLCE & GABBANA, DSQUARED, GUCCI, CAVALLI, ARMANI AND OTHERS, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT 2016 POST-PRIME BEARDED CHICO WITH TWO KIDS AND MARRIED WITH JESSIANN GRAVEL BELAND, HELL, I'M TALKING ABOUT 2010 FRANCISCO WITH PERFECT FACIAL HARMONY AND UNIVERSAL APPEAL, 6'5" TALL WITH PERFECT FRAME AND BIDELTOID BREADTH, COMPLETELY HOODED EYES WITH AEGYO SAL AND NEUTRAL CANTHAL TILT WITH NO SCLERAL SHOW AND NO UPPER EYELID EXPOSURE, FLAWLESS SKIN AND PERFECT FACIAL LEANNESS, 1.88 FWHR, 0 ON THE NW SCALE, 7 CM INTERPUPILLARY DISTANCE AND 14.2CM OF ZYGO WIDTH, FORWARD GROWN MAXILLA AND JAWLINE WITH A MASSIVE SKULL.FRANCISCO LACHOWSKI COMES VERY CLOSE TO PERFECTION. THERE ARE VIRTUALLY NO FLAWS IN HIS FACIAL APPEARANCE, THE ONLY FLAWS CAN BE DRAWN WHEN WE GO BELOW THE NECK.. WHICH IS IRRELEVANT WHEN YOU CONSIDER HIS FACIAL AESTHETICS.HE HAS PERFECT MAXILLOFACIAL GROWTH WHICH BECOMES EVIDENT FROM THE ZYGOMATIC ARCHES THAT PROJECT WIDE (ADDS FACIAL WIDTH) AND ARE ROUND IN SHAPE IN THE TIPPING POINTS. THE NOSE IS PERFECT: STRAIGHT NASAL SEPTUM INDICATES THE FACE HASN'T GROWN VERTICALLY MORE THAN IT SHOULD AT ANY POINT IN DEVELOPMENTAL TIME SO IT DOESN'T APPEAR HOOKED, IT IS ALSO DEVOID OF ANY OBSCURE MAL/FORMATIONS, CROOKEDNESS OR DEVIATION (SOME OF WHICH ARE TYPICALLY CAUSED BY ALLERGIES OR FORCE TRAUMA).HE HAS NEAR PERFECT DENTOFACIAL GROWTH. WHILE HE HAS GOTTEN SOME DENTAL AID WITH ORTHODONTICS (EVIDENT FROM THE APPEARANCE OF HIS TOP CENTRAL AND LATERAL INCISORS+CANINES), HIS BITE IS PERFECT. YOU CAN TELL THIS BY LOOKING AT HIS LIP POSTURE, WHICH IS AFFECTED BY THE POSITION OF THE MANDIBLE, AND ANYONE WILL AGREE THAT IT LOOKS NICE AND BALANCED.THE MANDIBLE IS IN AN IDEAL POSITION WHICH MEANS THERE'S NO MALOCCLUSION, AND MALOCCLUSIONS HAVE AN ENORMOUS IMPACT ON THE AESTHETIC APPEARANCE OF THE FACE. THIS IS RARE BECAUSE WITH MODERN [WESTERN] DIET AND THE RAPID INCREASE OF ALLERGIES, IT IS EXTREMELY HARD FOR MOST MALES TO DEVELOP A NICE LOOKING JAW (NOT TO MENTION THAT YOU NEED THE APPROPRIATE TESTOSTERONE LEVELS AND GENETICS TO DEVELOP ONE). LOTS OF MALES THAT WOULD NORMALLY DEVELOP A JAW SIMILAR TO LACHOWSKI'S DON'T, BECAUSE OF MOUTH BREATHING OR IMPROPER MASTICATORY USAGE (THE DIET IS TOO SOFT). IT TAKES A PERFECT GROWING ENVIRONMENT ON TOP OF GOOD GENES AND HORMONE PROFILE TO DEVELOP A BALANCED FACIAL STRUCTURE LIKE LACHOWSKI'S, AND THAT'S LEAVING OUT THE INDIVIDUAL FEATURES LIKE THE EYE AREA, WHICH IN LACHOWSKI'S CASE IS UNIQUE IN ITSELF.NOW COMBINE ALL THIS WITH THE FACT THAT HE IS OVER 6'2''. A GOOD LOOKING FACE WITH PRETTY FEATURES IS HARD TO ACHIEVE WHEN GIVEN A TALL SKELETAL BUILD. MOST GUYS THAT YOU SEE WITH REALLY PRETTY OR HANDSOME FACES ARE 5'9'' TO 5'11'', I.E. AVERAGE HEIGHT. YOU WILL VERY RARELY SEE SOMEONE AS AESTHETIC WITH MASCULINE FEATURES AS FRANCISCO. YOU SEE BEAUTIFUL WOMEN ALL THE TIME AND THERE'S NOTHING ADMIRABLE ABOUT BEING A PRETTY GIRL BECAUSE IT'S SO EASILY ACHIEVABLE AND COMMON. BEAUTIFUL MEN ARE AN EXCEPTION TO THE RULE; SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE ADMIRED, NOT ONLY BECAUSE OF THE BEAUTY ITSELF BUT THE DIFFICULTY IN ACHIEVING SUCH BEAUTY.
Ok but why is Chico Harmony
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
Ok but why is Chico Harmony
CHICOS ALWAYS BEEN A GIGAFRAUDING CUCK HE IS DISSAPOINTLY UNIMPRESSIVE CANDIDS, NOWHERE NEAR A PSL GOD. NEVER UNDERSTOOD HOW WOMEN AND AUTISTS ON HERE LIKE HIM, HOWEVER YOU CAN'T DENY HIS IMPRESSIVELY TALENTS AT FRAUDING, YOU SHOULD ADMIRE THE EFFORT HE HAS TAKEN TO FRAUD HIS WAY TO ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MALE MODELS OF ALL TIME WITH ONE OF THE BIGGEST FAN BASES, UNTO SUCH FAME HE WAS DEEMED KING OF WATTPAD. THEY SHOULD MAKE A MOVIE ABOUT CHICOS RAISE TO FAME BY HIS TALENT TO TRICKING SOMETHING SUCH TRIVIAL AS THE HUMAN EYE INTO THINKING HE HAS ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL FACES THEY'VE EVER SEEN. PERSONALLY I AM SPEECHLESS ON HOW HE AS ABLE TO DO IT. LACHOWSKI MUST HAVE A NATURALBORN INSTINCT OR SOME SORT TO SENSE WHENEVER A CAMERA IS TARGETTING HIM AND UTILIZE HIS FRAUDING TECHNIQUES INSTANTANEOUSLY, THAT'S WHY 99% OF HIS PRIME (PEAK OF HIS TALENT) PICS LOOKED GOOD, HOWEVER AT TIMES HE HAS SLIPPED AND EXPOSED HIS TRUE SELF WHERE LOOKS LIKE HIGH TIER NORMIE AT MOST, GOOD CATCH OP. HE IS AN INSPIRATION TO ALL US LOOKSMAXXER SHOWING US THAT YOU CAN FAKE IT UNTIL YOU MAKE IT.
HERE ARE FEW EXAMPLES WHERE HE HAS SLIPPED AND EXPOSED HIS HTN SELF
 
CHICOS ALWAYS BEEN A GIGAFRAUDING CUCK HE IS DISSAPOINTLY UNIMPRESSIVE CANDIDS, NOWHERE NEAR A PSL GOD. NEVER UNDERSTOOD HOW WOMEN AND AUTISTS ON HERE LIKE HIM, HOWEVER YOU CAN'T DENY HIS IMPRESSIVELY TALENTS AT FRAUDING, YOU SHOULD ADMIRE THE EFFORT HE HAS TAKEN TO FRAUD HIS WAY TO ONE OF THE MOST SUCCESSFUL MALE MODELS OF ALL TIME WITH ONE OF THE BIGGEST FAN BASES, UNTO SUCH FAME HE WAS DEEMED KING OF WATTPAD. THEY SHOULD MAKE A MOVIE ABOUT CHICOS RAISE TO FAME BY HIS TALENT TO TRICKING SOMETHING SUCH TRIVIAL AS THE HUMAN EYE INTO THINKING HE HAS ONE OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL FACES THEY'VE EVER SEEN. PERSONALLY I AM SPEECHLESS ON HOW HE AS ABLE TO DO IT. LACHOWSKI MUST HAVE A NATURALBORN INSTINCT OR SOME SORT TO SENSE WHENEVER A CAMERA IS TARGETTING HIM AND UTILIZE HIS FRAUDING TECHNIQUES INSTANTANEOUSLY, THAT'S WHY 99% OF HIS PRIME (PEAK OF HIS TALENT) PICS LOOKED GOOD, HOWEVER AT TIMES HE HAS SLIPPED AND EXPOSED HIS TRUE SELF WHERE LOOKS LIKE HIGH TIER NORMIE AT MOST, GOOD CATCH OP. HE IS AN INSPIRATION TO ALL US LOOKSMAXXER SHOWING US THAT YOU CAN FAKE IT UNTIL YOU MAKE IT.
HERE ARE FEW EXAMPLES WHERE HE HAS SLIPPED AND EXPOSED HIS HTN SELF
Jeremy Allen White
 
Jeremy Allen White
DNRD, enjoy this cute girl instead. What a cozy High School first love GF phenotype she has. :Comfy::Comfy::Comfy::feelsohh::feelsohh::feelsohh::aheago::aheago::aheago:
 
they still got decent bones thogh
 
He’s right and wrong tbh


Bones remain forever but with aging and skin sagging, the bones will not look as strong because the skin sagged.


Check Jeremy meeks for example in 2024, he looks more boneless nowadays too.
Nah he's wrong and wrong

You do lose bonemass as you age, it's not just skin sagging
 

Similar threads

JustBeConfidentBruh
Replies
43
Views
568
JustBeConfidentBruh
JustBeConfidentBruh
skkrrrtcantdo
Replies
34
Views
415
Xangsane
Xangsane
Xangsane
Replies
144
Views
1K
Xangsane
Xangsane
Xangsane
Replies
38
Views
541
Xangsane
Xangsane

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top