G
Guba
Out of here
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2023
- Posts
- 1,268
- Reputation
- 1,617
Race is not political? Ok.this isnt a debate about politics its simply biology. theres nothing it said that was wrong
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Race is not political? Ok.this isnt a debate about politics its simply biology. theres nothing it said that was wrong
Point is, nearly every IQ study shows it's inheritibility. Why do you think the only smart niggers have white parents? (Example: Obama)ad hominem. Also i dont know whats wrong with shekelstein
1. The point of this never said "it can be explained by socio-economic factors" so stop using pointless strawmans you fucking retard. All it said was that the factors that determine IQ are complex and cant be summed up by race, or environment.
this isnt necessarily a debate about race as a system itself. its a debate about intelligence quotients in certain classifications you could consider race being differentRace is not political? Ok.And biology can't be political either? Tell that to the troons who cut off their dicks and think they can magically become women. Speaking of which, Wikipedia also says that men with penises can be women. Totally reliable stuff.
THE RACE OF ONES PARENTS DOESNT MAGICALLY MAKE U SMARTER U FUCKING IDIOTPoint is, nearly every IQ study shows it's inheritibility. Why do you think the only smart niggers have white parents? (Example: Obama)
THE RACE OF ONES PARENTS DOESNT MAGICALLY MAKE U SMARTER U FUCKING IDIOTHOLY SHIT UR IQ MIGHT BE LOWER THAN EVEN THE LOWEST BLACK. It has more to do with having two parents or where you are brought up environmentally
I'm not retarded, you didn't really explain anything either just made dogmatic statements in large bold font and vague unsupported points like the scientific community consensus bla bla blai explained it if you don't want to read but the information in the article is reliable
Im sorry but if your going to try to prove a race has lower iq u should y'know use a accurate IQ test. Not that I didn't already address this like 50 times
What do you mean "accurate IQ test"?Im sorry but if your going to try to prove a race has lower iq u should y'know use a accurate IQ test. Not that I didn't already address this like 50 times
yeah the jews are doing that u fucking idioteven if this were true that would just mean iq is insignificant. bbc is taking over the world. soon everyone will be mixed whether you like it or not. Even if a female doesnt like black dudes, her offspring might and it will keep going on forever until one of them gets blacked
it is supported. it varies between .4-.8. Genetic IQ can differ between different people and even the genes that play into it vary. It is more complex then just "environmental" or "hereditary". If you don't understand this maybe your IQ might be lowI'm not retarded, you didn't really explain anything either just made dogmatic statements in large bold font and vague unsupported points like the scientific community consensus bla bla bla
Wikipedia articles and specifically the one i posted are based on reliable and published sources. This is just ad hominem at this point>Quotes wikipedia
you are not beating low IQ allegations
its actually the school system only teaches us knowledge whereas bak then they lot a lot of emphasis in improving your brain by propriocrption and memory challenges from a young ageSure, but a lot of those gains on these tests is because people are more used to taking standardized tests. People are doing better on the subtests which are more "teachable". On the subtests that test more innate intellectual abilities, the scores are dropping. It's estimated that in Victorian England, the people there were 10-15 IQ points higher than whites today. The fact is that urbanization, low infant mortality, etc has created a dysgenic environment and we are getting less genetically intelligent.
meanwhile actual latest iq studies from 2023Wikipedia articles and specifically the one i posted are based on reliable and published sources. This is just ad hominem at this point
you cant turn the other cheek, one day there wont be enough swede women for ur sonsI don't care about race averages, I'm just happy I personally have a high IQ since that's all that will affect me.
Ultimately I only need to fix my own life. Despite how bad I feel for others.you cant turn the other cheek, one day there wont be enough swede women for ur sons
u can fix ur life quickly bro devote urself to a higher causeUltimately I only need to fix my own life. Despite how bad I feel for others.
there is more genetic diversity among african blacks vs american blacksmeanwhile actual latest iq studies from 2023
View attachment 2404685
even tho sample size is small you can even see African blacks doing better than USA blacks. Guess why![]()
IQ scores by ethnic group in a nationally-representative sample of 10-year old American children
Note: We computed these results based on multiple versions of the ABCD data (v2.01 & v3.01) and with different inclusion/exclusion criteria. I originally posted a version based on the ABCD 2.0…humanvarieties.org
What cause would that be?u can fix ur life quickly bro devote urself to a higher cause
Wikipedia is literally a source of sources. Just try editing a wikipedia article and inserting BS, it won't stay there for long.The "just cite Wikipedia (lol) like a low IQ nigger to prove you're not a low IQ nigger" theory.
He thinks he can add jfl to his sentence and that makes his argument more valid.
Wikipedia literally contains nothing but the propaganda the establishment wants to disseminate to the masses. If I went to Wikipedia and try to say that men with penises cannot be considered women, my edit would indeed not stay there long since it goes against the propaganda the rulers of our societies want to spread. Would you say that simply stating biological facts is "BS"? Because all truthful "BS" is removed if it goes against the official narrative. Imagine actually being such a goy to trust Wikipedia.Wikipedia is literally a source of sources. Just try editing a wikipedia article and inserting BS, it won't stay there for long.
gender debates and biological iq are 2 different things. Race in itself has nothing to do with IQ but rather genes, environment and socio-economic factors. Race is just something people used to group people who tend to have some of the same features but simply being black/white/asian has nothing to do with iq. Even the fact that whites on average have higher iq than blacks can be explained due to natural selection. You simply needed to have higher iq to survive in colder climates and those with lower iq died off.Wikipedia literally contains nothing but the propaganda the establishment wants to disseminate to the masses. If I went to Wikipedia and try to say that men with penises cannot be considered women, my edit would indeed not stay there long since it goes against the propaganda the rulers of our societies want to spread. Would you say that simply stating biological facts is "BS"? Because all truthful "BS" is removed if it goes against the official narrative. Imagine actually being such a goy to trust Wikipedia.
Well obviouslyOnly ashkies.
Self reported race correlates like 99.24 percent with actual ancestry. Genomic analysis where they just stick genomes of different people into a computer and see what comes out correctly predicts race around 98.1 percent of the time, and it’s not even like a prompt where they tell the computer to differentiate, it just sorts different genomes into groups that accurately map onto races we already use. The only weird one is like a northern Pakistan grouping or somethingall im saying is grouping is unnecessary and has nothing to do with actual biology
Um akshually you’re wrong becuase Wikipedia nerds said so
1. wdym by "self reported race" if i say im arabian that doesnt mean im arabian.Self reported race correlates like 99.24 percent with actual ancestry. Genomic analysis where they just stick genomes of different people into a computer and see what comes out correctly predicts race around 98.1 percent of the time, and it’s not even like a prompt where they tell the computer to differentiate, it just sorts different genomes into groups that accurately map onto races we already use. The only weird one is like a northern Pakistan grouping or something
A white person says “I’m white” and magically their ancestry is white!1. wdym by "self reported race" if i say im arabian that doesnt mean im arabian.
2. In your second argument, you essentially used race to prove race exists. Like i said race is a social construct. You cannot say "we used dna to prove that general grouping/classifications of dna exists"
he didnt even know what he was talking about and just copy pasting random images. He does this everytime he loses ina debate "IM DONE TALKING TO YOU BRO!!" is always his final rebuttal. Hes a fucking retard that doesnt know how to actually articulate arguments and rage quits every time. He tried using a Fucking SAT test to prove GENETIC intelligence quotient. He might as well have just used actual IQ testsUm akshually you’re wrong becuase Wikipedia nerds said so![]()
Sat tests correlate between .7 and .85 with iq test resultshe didnt even know what he was talking about and just copy pasting random images. He does this everytime he loses ina debate "IM DONE TALKING TO YOU BRO!!" is always his final rebuttal. Hes a fucking retard that doesnt know how to actually articulate arguments and rage quits every time. He tried using a Fucking SAT test to prove GENETIC intelligence quotient. He might as well have just used actual IQ tests
race is a classification of certain people. Would you say that if a black person were born with a perfect set of mutations that make them look completely white is white? Or would you classify it as ancestryA white person says “I’m white” and magically their ancestry is white!
what is race except different gene frequencies between populations?
Something that would never happen disproves me oh my daysrace is a classification of certain people. Would you say that if a black person were born with a perfect set of mutations that make them look completely white is white? Or would you classify it as ancestry
your right to a certain extent. Sat only shows general cognitive ability which is merely one aspect. Technically every test you take analyzes some aspect of your IQSat tests correlate between .7 and .85 with iq test results
how can you say it never happened or will never happened. Can you analyze every single black person in history, in current day, and in the future and tell me every single one of them dont look white?Something that would never happen disproves me oh my days
but no, they’d still be black, because their genome is black. Albinos aren’t white cause they lack melanin
Nah I’m not talking about this with you if this is the angle. Have a great dayhow can you say it never happened or will never happened. Can you analyze every single black person in history, in current day, and in the future and tell me every single one of them dont look white?
All of them are getting creampied by ethnicsyou cant turn the other cheek, one day there wont be enough swede women for ur sons
Nah I’m not talking about this with you if this is the angle. Have a great day
most people who think they are fully white arent. I wouldnt say there is anyone who is fully anything. we are all mixed already in a senseAll of them are getting creampied by ethnics
jfl this doesnt justify anything gtfo of europemost people who think they are fully white arent. I wouldnt say there is anyone who is fully anything. we are all mixed already in a sense
Anyone has the right to be anywhere they want. I find it funny when racists act as if they have legal rights to their country of origin. Hispanics can be in asia, asians can be in us, americans can be in africa. Your dna doesnt determine which land you are or arent allowed to step injfl this doesnt justify anything gtfo of europe