Destroying the "hunter eyes prey eyes" cope

[Deleted member 21898]

I often hear a lot of niggas say that hooded pct eyes in humans resemble the eyes of predators (wolfs, lions, tigers, etcs) and thus humans with hooded pct tiger eyes are automatically predator hunters and humans with circular or non hooded eyes are preys.

Not only is this retarded because you can't compare primates to other animals since primates are more complex and vastly different from other types of animals, but there are many examples from the animal kingdom that disprove this idea.

All of the animals below are (or "were", if extinct) one of the world's strongest predators despite not having hunter eyes like lions and tigers:


Great white shark and pretty much every shark in existence (also a recessed chincel, over for this subhuman):

Rhino (Not exactly predators I know, but they are one of the strongest animals on earth and they don't have any natural predators in the wild. Predators like lions and tigers avoid this animal because they know they stand no chance against it):

Hippo (subhuman t50 bug eyes and UEE, over for him):

Bears:

Dolphins (Yes they are apex predators and they are capable of killing humans and even sharks):

Colossal Squid:

Fossa (apex predators, some have hunter eyes similar to lions though):

Anaconda:

Helicoprion (extinct):

Megalodon (Biggest shark in existence, extinct):

Tasmanian devil (Apex predator):

Harpy eagle (to be honest some of them have hunter eyes, some of them don't. Regardless they are strong apex predators and they are capable of killing humans):

Short faced bear (extinct):

Gigantic sea scorpion (extinct):

And there are many other examples

 

[Deleted member 23558]

 

[TheTakeoverHasBegun]

Notice how like all of them have brown eyes. Prey eyes + brown eyes = ideal
Incels lied to me

 

[Deleted member 26197]

Mirin that mogger IPD from the dolphin

 

[DelonLover1999]

feline comparisons are all that matters

Look at this quettamogger

 

[Maxxwell]

Thread made because you couldn't cope with your own prey eyes

 

[klip11]

You can't destroy any of our copes

 

[Deleted member 21898]

feline comparisons are all that matters

Look at this quettamogger

View attachment 2343555

Bears are 3x stronger than any known feline

 

[999.escapism]

I often hear a lot of niggas say that hooded pct eyes in humans resemble the eyes of predators (wolfs, lions, tigers, etcs) and thus humans with hooded pct tiger eyes are automatically predator hunters and humans with circular or non hooded eyes are preys.

Not only is this retarded because you can't compare primates to other animals since primates are more complex and vastly different from other types of animals, but there are many examples from the animal kingdom that disprove this idea.

All of the animals below are (or "were", if extinct) one of the world's strongest predators despite not having hunter eyes like lions and tigers:


Great white shark and pretty much every shark in existence (also a recessed chincel, over for this subhuman):


View attachment 2340165View attachment 2340164

Rhino (Not exactly predators I know, but they are one of the strongest animals on earth and they don't have any natural predators in the wild. Predators like lions and tigers avoid this animal because they know they stand no chance against it):

View attachment 2340170View attachment 2340169

Hippo (subhuman t50 bug eyes and UEE, over for him):

View attachment 2340188View attachment 2340189

Bears:

View attachment 2340201View attachment 2340194View attachment 2340200

Dolphins (Yes they are apex predators and they are capable of killing humans and even sharks):

View attachment 2340207View attachment 2340206


Colossal Squid:
View attachment 2340211
View attachment 2340214

Fossa (apex predators, some have hunter eyes similar to lions though):

View attachment 2340315View attachment 2340316

Anaconda:
View attachment 2340230

Helicoprion (extinct):

View attachment 2340246

Megalodon (Biggest shark in existence, extinct):
View attachment 2340248

Tasmanian devil (Apex predator):

View attachment 2340296View attachment 2340297

Harpy eagle (to be honest some of them have hunter eyes, some of them don't. Regardless they are strong apex predators and they are capable of killing humans):


View attachment 2340309
View attachment 2340306

Short faced bear (extinct):

View attachment 2340259View attachment 2340260

Gigantic sea scorpion (extinct):

View attachment 2340263

And there are many other examples

Ehh not cope but just extra lol most of time it’s forced people, if u line up ur eye brows it’ll do alot more than walking around with ur eyes half closed

 

[Samiscool234]

I often hear a lot of niggas say that hooded pct eyes in humans resemble the eyes of predators (wolfs, lions, tigers, etcs) and thus humans with hooded pct tiger eyes are automatically predator hunters and humans with circular or non hooded eyes are preys.

Not only is this retarded because you can't compare primates to other animals since primates are more complex and vastly different from other types of animals, but there are many examples from the animal kingdom that disprove this idea.

All of the animals below are (or "were", if extinct) one of the world's strongest predators despite not having hunter eyes like lions and tigers:


Great white shark and pretty much every shark in existence (also a recessed chincel, over for this subhuman):


View attachment 2340165View attachment 2340164

Rhino (Not exactly predators I know, but they are one of the strongest animals on earth and they don't have any natural predators in the wild. Predators like lions and tigers avoid this animal because they know they stand no chance against it):

View attachment 2340170View attachment 2340169

Hippo (subhuman t50 bug eyes and UEE, over for him):

View attachment 2340188View attachment 2340189

Bears:

View attachment 2340201View attachment 2340194View attachment 2340200

Dolphins (Yes they are apex predators and they are capable of killing humans and even sharks):

View attachment 2340207View attachment 2340206


Colossal Squid:
View attachment 2340211
View attachment 2340214

Fossa (apex predators, some have hunter eyes similar to lions though):

View attachment 2340315View attachment 2340316

Anaconda:
View attachment 2340230

Helicoprion (extinct):

View attachment 2340246

Megalodon (Biggest shark in existence, extinct):
View attachment 2340248

Tasmanian devil (Apex predator):

View attachment 2340296View attachment 2340297

Harpy eagle (to be honest some of them have hunter eyes, some of them don't. Regardless they are strong apex predators and they are capable of killing humans):


View attachment 2340309
View attachment 2340306

Short faced bear (extinct):

View attachment 2340259View attachment 2340260

Gigantic sea scorpion (extinct):

View attachment 2340263

And there are many other examples

A lot of the underwater animals are shitty examples because primative humans would never associate their eyes with predators, as primative humans would never have even seen them bc they would never have had any reason or ability to go into the deep ocean

 

[Deleted member 21898]

Thread made because you couldn't cope with your own prey eyes

I have almond eyes and minimal UEE exposure, also keep coping and comparing primates to felines like an autistic idiot

 

[Deleted member 21898]

A lot of the underwater animals are shitty examples because primative humans would never associate their eyes with predators, as primative humans would never have even seen them bc they would never have any need

The point is that not all predators have muh hunter eyes and it's retarded to compare yourself to any animal anyway

 

[try2beme]

Hunter eyes is a meme
I have positive tilted hooded eyes and i get compliments on anything but my eyes

The ideal shape is almond for both men and women, look at Zayn and Neymars eye area.

 

[Samiscool234]

The point is that not all predators have muh hunter eyes and it's retarded to compare yourself to any animal anyway

It's not retarded to compare more attractive hunter eyes and prey, unattractive eyes to predatory/preyish animals, because doing so is finding an evolutionary basis for their attractiveness. They're not comparing people's eyes to animals for the sake of it

 

[Samiscool234]

Hunter eyes is a meme
I have positive tilted hooded eyes and i get compliments on anything but my eyes

The ideal shape is almond for both men and women, look at Zayn and Neymars eye area.

It all comes down to harmony. Often hunter eyes are better if you have a more masc face, if you have a more prettyboy face or a weak jaw then almond eyes are better more often than not

 

[becomingnearperfect]

Short faced bear (extinct):

unrelated topic but animals are so fucking cool id love to be reincarnated as a bear in my next life

 

[try2beme]

It all comes down to harmony. Often hunter eyes are better if you have a more masc face, if you have a more prettyboy face or a weak jaw then almond eyes are better more often than not

Makes sense. I have a feminine nose/ lips and a masculine jaw.
Regardless I think almond eyes are good for female gaze

 

[Maxxwell]

I have almond eyes and minimal UEE exposure, also keep coping and comparing primates to felines like an autistic idiot

 

[Arditi]

Hamza has the best eyes

 

[wowamat]

Its your father here, new PSL 12 just dropped like a new clash royale card level... Relax Men settle down men

The real 7ft1 masthetic Hippo of the human species, no slit eyes

 

[Deleted member 21898]

It's not retarded to compare more attractive hunter eyes and prey, unattractive eyes to predatory/preyish animals, because doing so is finding an evolutionary basis for their attractiveness. They're not comparing people's eyes to animals for the sake of it

Primates have a completely different evolutionary path than felines and other types of animals. Again, humans have nothing in common with wolfs or lions and it doesn't make any sense to think that humans who have hooded pct eyes are somehow predators and related to wolves or tigers just because these animals also happened to have hooded pct eyes. Not all humans who muh hunter eyes are predators and not all humans who have muh prey eyes are preys either, humans are way too complex and diverse to be the subjects of this retarded black and white analogy that doesn't even have any scientific basis. Only a literal mentally ill autist would look at a lion or a wolf and think to themselves "He is literally me because we have similar eye shapes!!".
Also, you cannot call them hunter eyes since not all hunters have this type of eyes as I explained above, it is cherrypicking at this point, you are picking only certain predators with this type of eyes to accociate with. You should call them feline eyes or cat eyes since these are the only predators who have the so-called hunter eyes.

 

[Samiscool234]

Primates have a completely different evolutionary path than felines and other types of animals. Again, humans have nothing in common with wolfs or lions and it doesn't make any sense to think that humans who have hooded pct eyes are somehow predators and related to wolves or tigers just because these animals also happened to have hooded pct eyes. Not all humans who muh hunter eyes are predators and not all humans who have muh prey eyes are preys either, humans are way too complex and diverse to be the subjects of this retarded black and white analogy that doesn't even have any scientific basis. Only a literal mentally ill autist would look at a lion or a wolf and think to themselves "He is literally me because we have similar eye shapes!!".
Also, you cannot call them hunter eyes since not all hunters have this type of eyes as I explained above, it is cherrypicking at this point, you are picking only certain predators with this type of eyes to accociate with. You should call them feline eyes or cat eyes since these are the only predators who have the so-called hunter eyes.

You don't understand how evolution works bud. I'm not saying humans and hunter-eyed predators are related, I'm saying hunter eyes are a desirable trait among men because of the human-sexual-selection pressures in the primative era. Think about it, cave-women seeing all these animals with hunter eyes would cause them to associate those eyes with strength, aggression, etc., all these traits would be desirable for their male partners as they'd want their male partner to protect them from animal predators. Hence, cave-women would end up mating with hunter-eyed men, passing on the hunter-eyes-attraction gene onto future generations, thus causing this trait to be desirable well into the modern day. Evolution is a very real theory that can explain why a lot of traits are hard-wired to be seen as attractive by men and women.

 

[Deleted member 21898]

You don't understand how evolution works bud. I'm not saying humans and hunter-eyed predators are related, I'm saying hunter eyes are a desirable trait among men because of the human-sexual-selection pressures in the primative era. Think about it, cave-women seeing all these animals with hunter eyes would cause them to associate those eyes with strength, aggression, etc., all these traits would be desirable for their male partners as they'd want their male partner to protect them from animal predators. Hence, cave-women would end up mating with hunter-eyed men, passing on the hunter-eyes-attraction gene onto future generations, thus causing this trait to be desirable well into the modern day. Evolution is a very real theory that can explain why a lot of traits are hard-wired to be seen as attractive by men and women.

I never claimed hunter eyes are not attractive or desirable. Yes, so-called hunter eyes are objectively the most superior type of eyes a man can have as they are the most aesthetically pleasing. I am only arguing against retards who unironically think having hunter eyes makes them a sigma wolf predator. Now about the evolution part, yes I do understand how evolution works, what you are describing is called intersexual selection, it is when one sex (typically the female sex) chooses which members of the opposite sex to reproduce and have sex with. This type of sexual selection is only common in certain environments that allows for women to practice it in the first place. The most common type of sexual selection during the prehistoric era was intrasexual selection, where one sex (typically the male sex) engages in direct competition with each other in order to win the female and impregnate her by force. This involves men either directly fighting each other or dominating each other until one of them emerges victorious and mates with the woman. Cave-women did not choose their own sexual partners (they didn't have the power or agency to do so), it was the other way around. Mating dynamics are relative, they change depending on the environment and culture of the place. The modern dating dynamics where women choose their partners based on facial features and/or height were not the same as a couple of hundred or thousand years ago. The problem arises when you think that modern dating dynamics were the exact same during the prehistoric times. are only common in environments where women have more privileges and freedoms than men. In a natural setting where surviving against other predatory animals and hunting for resources and food was the only goal, intrasexual selection is the only way to reproduce.

Think about it, cave-women seeing all these animals with hunter eyes would cause them to associate those eyes with strength, aggression, etc.

Again this is just PSL nonsense that doesn't have any basis in reality, I dare you to bring me any study in the field of evolutionary psychology that confirms this. It's really only looksmaxxers who believe in this unironically. Also there is 0 correlation between so-called hunter eyes in humans and aggression or strength. And women in the pre-historic era witnessed many types of predators that didn't have hunter eyes such as cave bears, by this logic they would also associate t50 circular eyes in humans with an apex predator like the bear, which is also 3x stronger and powerful than any feline and poses more threat to the safety of humans.

If you wanna play this game of comparing humans to animals, then let me tell you that throughout history intrasexual selection has been more commonly observed than intersexual selection in various animal species (not mention, including primates). There's literally undeniable direct evidence of intrasexual selection happening among many types of animals (If you don't believe me, do your own research). For example in many species of birds, males often engage in aggressive displays to establish dominance and secure access to or take control over females. Male elephant seals engage in battles over territories and harems of female elephant seals. These are undeniable instances of intrasexual selection from nature, where males compete with each other to gain control over females. The belief that intersexual selection (women choosing who to mate with) was more common than intrasexual selection is a PSL cope for narcy chadlites to feel better about their hunter eyes. In humans historical evidence points to intrasexual behaviour. Many ancient cultures have showed male-centric practices such as dueling, jousting, and feats of strength, all of which were often linked to gaining status and intimidating other men to gain control over their women. Women only have the power to choose their partners and have a direct influence on evolution and the gene pool only in certain types of environments where they have the privilege, like modern western societies for example.

 

[horizontallytall]

Thread made because you couldn't cope with your own prey eyes

This . Literally bro took it so personal made a whole lot a encyclopedia of cyclop eyes being superior .

 

[Joe Rogancel]

all OP did is prove dark eyes mog

 

[Esteban1997]

 

[italiangigaChad]

I often hear a lot of niggas say that hooded pct eyes in humans resemble the eyes of predators (wolfs, lions, tigers, etcs) and thus humans with hooded pct tiger eyes are automatically predator hunters and humans with circular or non hooded eyes are preys.

Not only is this retarded because you can't compare primates to other animals since primates are more complex and vastly different from other types of animals, but there are many examples from the animal kingdom that disprove this idea.

All of the animals below are (or "were", if extinct) one of the world's strongest predators despite not having hunter eyes like lions and tigers:


Great white shark and pretty much every shark in existence (also a recessed chincel, over for this subhuman):


View attachment 2340165View attachment 2340164

Rhino (Not exactly predators I know, but they are one of the strongest animals on earth and they don't have any natural predators in the wild. Predators like lions and tigers avoid this animal because they know they stand no chance against it):

View attachment 2340170View attachment 2340169

Hippo (subhuman t50 bug eyes and UEE, over for him):

View attachment 2340188View attachment 2340189

Bears:

View attachment 2340201View attachment 2340194View attachment 2340200

Dolphins (Yes they are apex predators and they are capable of killing humans and even sharks):

View attachment 2340207View attachment 2340206


Colossal Squid:
View attachment 2340211
View attachment 2340214

Fossa (apex predators, some have hunter eyes similar to lions though):

View attachment 2340315View attachment 2340316

Anaconda:
View attachment 2340230

Helicoprion (extinct):

View attachment 2340246

Megalodon (Biggest shark in existence, extinct):
View attachment 2340248

Tasmanian devil (Apex predator):

View attachment 2340296View attachment 2340297

Harpy eagle (to be honest some of them have hunter eyes, some of them don't. Regardless they are strong apex predators and they are capable of killing humans):


View attachment 2340309
View attachment 2340306

Short faced bear (extinct):

View attachment 2340259View attachment 2340260

Gigantic sea scorpion (extinct):

View attachment 2340263

And there are many other examples

the COPE is crazy

 

[Debetro]

What a shit thread

all OP did is prove dark eyes mog