DOggo
erudite
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2019
- Posts
- 965
- Reputation
- 1,178
Mine is 6 inches and I am shitskin so I have transcended all bounds
6 inches is average tbh. Any man who's faced no limiting factors (i.g. nutrition, environment) should have a 6" dick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Mine is 6 inches and I am shitskin so I have transcended all bounds
By Allah, these Indians are jealous. It's a known fact that Pakistanis have less growing up (i.e. food, education, etc), and yet we constantly mog Indians. Indians will always remain our former serfs.
What about girth?Mine is 6 inches and I am shitskin so I have transcended all bounds
it’s 100% genetic jfl6 inches is average tbh. Any man who's faced no limiting factors (i.g. nutrition, environment) should have a 6" dick.
How big is your dick no homoit’s 100% genetic jfl
7.2”How big is your dick no homo
it’s 100% genetic jfl
Fuaaark. And girth?7.2”
not everything is environmental jflNah, it's 70-30.
But these deluded hindu dindu Indians will claim that Pakistan was a part of India even though both countries came to exist in 1947, and before that those deluded ogres were ruled by Islamic rulers. They knew their place back then. Ghazwa-e-Hind makes them quiver in their little hindu dindu shoes.
What about girth?
not everything is environmental jfl
High IQ. Also all the achievements they cling on to were done so by their Islamic rulers jfl. That is why they reek of inferiority.Just remind them that the Indus civilisation was actually in Pakistan. Watch them get butthurt.
My dick up your arse is.
idk bro. Looks thinn though nglBut these deluded hindu dindu Indians will claim that Pakistan was a part of India even though both countries came to exist in 1947, and before that those deluded ogres were ruled by Islamic rulers. They knew their place back then. Ghazwa-e-Hind makes them quiver in their little hindu dindu shoes.
What about girth?
Fuaaark. I'm 6.5" in length but 5.5" in girth.7”
jk 5.25in
You should measure it my dudeidk bro. Looks thinn though ngl
wish i had more girth. may get a bathmate tbh. those look effectiveFuaaark. I'm 6.5" in length but 5.5" in girth.
You should measure it my dude
You're already above average in both length and girth, why not be ok with it? I'm more than content with my size. How much can you gain with a bathmate though? @CupOfCoffee used Cialis and got 0.2" in girth.wish i had more girth. may get a bathmate tbh. those look effective
i have big hands so it looks smaller. i wanna be at like 5.5” girth bc girth>length. and plus it would look better jfl and yeah i wanna try that or viagra just to see what it would be likeYou're already above average in both length and girth, why not be ok with it? I'm more than content with my size. How much can you gain with a bathmate though? @CupOfCoffee used Cialis and got 0.2" in girth.
Well how tall are you then bro? I got small wrists, normal sized hands but long fingers. Jfl.i have big hands so it looks smaller. i wanna be at like 5.5” girth bc girth>length. and plus it would look better jfl and yeah i wanna try that or viagra just to see what it would be like
Slayerada7.5/5.5 BPEL
~6’1. my hands are 7.5in long and that’s average for men actuallyWell how tall are you then bro? I got small wrists, normal sized hands but long fingers. Jfl.
Slayerada
I haven't measured my hand tbh. And I'm 5'10" lol~6’1. my hands are 7.5in long and that’s average for men actually
I am 7 inches bone pressed and greek what should I vote
Not true at all. All measurements about dick sizes are made bonepressed. Remember that mega study involving 15,000 participants? All bonepressed.That measurement isn't the standard I think. Most studies I've looked at tend to measure NBPEL, not BPEL. Furthermore, BPEL measurements can be a bit misleading because someone might be 7 BPEL but 6.5 NBPEL (due to having a very thin "fat pad") whereas someone else might be 7 BPEL but 5.5 NBPEL (due to having a very thick "fat pad"). Moreover, BPEL isn't entirely usable except in certain positions, so that might be another reason to not go off of this measurement. For these reasons NBPEL is the proper standard, and for good reason I believe.
Not true at all. All measurements about dick sizes are made bonepressed. Remember that mega study involving 15,000 participants? All bonepressed.
The mega study I was talking about was a combination of various studies. All the measurements were made by outsiders, like nurses, and all of them used the bone pressed method. Based on these findings, we have concluded that 5.1 inches in length is the average. 15,000 dicks were measured this way. So it's best to measure it bonepressed. Especially when you consider a fatpad. It's done for that very reason btw.I've looked at tons of studies where it was NBPEL jfl. Many studies that report like the average dick length being 5.5 or 5.1 or 5.2 or 5.6 or 5.7 (tons of studies reporting these results) are all NBPEL (some of them specifically say in their methodology that they used the NBPEL method, and for those that don't it's clearly obvious that they're using NBPEL, for if they were using BPEL then it'd turn out that the average NBPEL measurement is like 4.5-5 which is retarded).
The mega study I was talking about was a combination of various studies. All the measurements were made by outsiders, like nurses, and all of them used the bone pressed method. Based on these findings, we have concluded that 5.1 inches in length is the average. 15,000 dicks were measured this way. So it's best to measure it bonepressed. Especially when you consider a fatpad. It's done for that very reason btw.
deluded Arab, why would I believe what an aspie says when there's a mega study that backs me up? Now go cope faggotlmfao dude are you fucking retarded lol? do you really think 5.1 inches is the average BPEL jfl. If that were the case the average NBPEL would be like 4.25-4.5 inches. That's fucking tiny lol. Even 5.1 inches NBPEL is smaller than average.
deluded Arab, why would I believe what an aspie says when there's a mega study that backs me up? Now go cope faggot
Lmfao at this deluded aspie faggot who thinks he knows better than an ACTUAL STUDY. Kill yourself you Semitic faggotLMFAO you're so deluded and far removed from reality. you absolute retarded coping dumb fuck. just go on any porn website and search up "home-made porn." watch a ton of home-made porn videos and look at the dicks jfl. for the average white male the average NBPEL is very close to if not spot-on 6. if you are right about the average BPEL being 5.1 then the average NBPEL is 4.5 which is so fucking retarded lol that means the average "visible" dick length is 4.25-4.5 inches. keep coping with your small dick
Yeah you are right in that regard but I heard that they still press the ruler a little in Nbpel measurment so people still press a little or moderately to cheat. So in internet bone prssed is more reliable because everyone will just press as hard as they canThat measurement isn't the standard I think. Most studies I've looked at tend to measure NBPEL, not BPEL. Furthermore, BPEL measurements can be a bit misleading because someone might be 7 BPEL but 6.5 NBPEL (due to having a very thin "fat pad") whereas someone else might be 7 BPEL but 5.5 NBPEL (due to having a very thick "fat pad"). Moreover, BPEL isn't entirely usable except in certain positions, so that might be another reason to not go off of this measurement. For these reasons NBPEL is the proper standard, and for good reason I believe.
Lmfao at this deluded aspie faggot who thinks he knows better than an ACTUAL STUDY. Kill yourself you Semitic faggot
Yeah you are right in that regard but I heard that they still press the ruler a little in Nbpel measurment so people still press a little or moderately to cheat. So in internet bone prssed is more reliable because everyone will just press as hard as they can
BP is accurate measurement because it's the only measurement that's consistent.keep thinking ur 4.5 incher is average, cope some more bud
Yeah I see your point. People also measure from the side and other retarded shit lmfao. IMO the proper way is to measure from the top without pressing in at all, so the measurement would be from the tip of the penis to the part where the penis connects to the fat pad.
Lmfao at this deluded aspie faggot who thinks he knows better than an ACTUAL STUDY. Kill yourself you Semitic faggot
Hahahahahahahahahaha holy fuckin shit I KNEW you were coping with Bone Pressed lengthBP is accurate measurement because it's the only measurement that's consistent.
I live rent free in your head, you're my little Arab bitch nowAllow me to point out the flaw in this study you fucking retard. I've seen this study before and I've read the actual paper in which it was published when it was first published in 2015. So basically this study takes a bunch of other studies and so-to-speak combines their results. Now this study claims that all of the studies it uses used BPEL measurement. But that's plainly untrue. Here's why, I'll provide proof for your dumbass. Here's the study in question: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bju.13010
Scroll down to the section where all the studies it uses are provided. Let's take one example. The study from India (there's only one study from India it used). Here's a link to the paper on this Indian study: https://www.nature.com/articles/3901569.pdf?origin=ppub
Read their methodology. It states: "Penile length was defined as the linear distance along the dorsal side of the penis extending from the pubo – penile skin junction to the tip of the glans."
Notice, you aspie, that it doesn't state that the measurement was performed from the tip of the glans to the pubic bone. It says it was performed from the tip of the glans to the pubo-penile skin junction (which is where the penis meets the fat pad; which is EXACTLY what NBPEL is).
So this combined study used this Indian study as one of its many studies where this Indian study used the NBPEL method. Let me provide some more evidence:
One other study that this combined study used is this: Wessells et al. Here is the paper to that study: https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65682-9
AGAIN in their methodology it states: "Measurements were made of the length from the pubo-penile skin junction to the meatus."
So this study also used NBPEL measurement.
Therefore this combined study you brought up uses two studies that used NBPEL measurement, not BPEL measurement. I've provided the original papers above for proof.
Get the fuck out of here aspie. Do your fucking research before talking about shit you know nothing about you retard. Go cope with your 4.5 incher now
I live rent free in your head, you're my little Arab bitch now
Keep crying for average 5.1 inch dick lengthlol that's all you have to say? i just disproved everything you said. and if you think i haven't, then show me exactly where it is i have gone wrong (because i'm right lol). according to the Indian study the average NBPEL was 5.1 inches and according to the Wessells study the average NBPEL was also around 5.1 inches. so now you want to tell me that the average BPEL is 5.1 inches LMFAO. gtfoh
Keep crying for average 5.1 inch dick length
Why do you insist on my dick being 4.5 inch lol? Keep copinglol keep coping. it's evident to everyone who read the above comments that i completely disproved your claims. and now that you have absolutely nothing to say, you resort to completely pointless comments lol. next time when you decide to speak about a topic make sure you know your ABCs about it. now go on and cope thinking that your 4.5 incher is "average" jfl
Why do you insist on my dick being 4.5 inch lol? Keep coping
What's your length? And girth? I measured mine BP but it's not 4.5 inches lollol because you're so adamant on the average BPEL being 5.1 inches. clearly this is your coping strategy. you look at some study that says the average is 5.1 inches. you look at one little part of the study that suggests that it gathered up studies that only used the BPEL measurement. you don't look any further. now you live on thinking that 5.1 inches BPEL is the average jfl. if you had done what i did above and looked at the study properly and actually looked at the studies that it gathered up then you'd realize that for several of them it was the NBPEL method that was used not the BPEL method, contra your initial remarks. so regardless of whether you are 5.1 inches BPEL or not, it is clear as sky that the average BPEL is much higher than 5.1 inches BPEL.
What's your length? And girth? I measured mine BP but it's not 4.5 inches lol
Well turns out I dickmog you (but barely) lol.. you're still above average though. In length anyways, and very slightly so in girth. AVG girth is 4.59"I'm 5.3-5.4 inches NBPEL and roughly 6.3 inches BPEL (maybe a bit more depending on how hard I press). My girth is 4.5-4.6 inches at the thickest point and 4.5 inches at mid-shaft. My diameter is 1.6 inches at the thickest point and 1.5 inches at mid-shaft. So, yes, I'm slightly below average overall but at least I admit it and don't cope by misunderstanding studies and convincing myself that I'm average jfl
Well turns out I dickmog you (but barely) lol.. you're still above average though. In length anyways, and very slightly so in girth. AVG girth is 4.59"
I know that study you are referring to. It was actually done right after WW2 and the men that participated in it just had to write down their penis size. There was no third party to confirm the size so you basically had a free reign to write whatever number you wanted to write down. They just accepted it anyways. Ik it's hard to believe but having a 5 inch dick makes you average, most guys will lie about their size but when they're not able to lie and are actually measured bonepressed their dick length comes in much shorter. I also read an article by a sex therapist whose clients were females and she made her clients do an experiment. They claimed their partners has 6+ inch cocks, so what they had to do was wrap two hands around their partners cock. If there was still part of the penis uncovered, their partners were indeed at least 6 inches. Turns out 90% came back saying two hands were sufficient enough to hide their partners cocks. Jfl. So yeah guys lie about their size often, it's best to believe studies where participants are measured bone-pressed over guys on the internet. I have an above average dick both in length and girth but I'll never claim it's huge because it's not huge.I disagree though. There are a few reasons why. Let me elaborate. The average penis size, like the average height, will certainly differ from one race to another race. I remember another study where the average penis size came to 5.9 inches (pretty sure it was NBPEL but can't remember now) for Caucasians. Now for Indians, according to the study mentioned above, the average penis size NBPEL was ~5.1 inches. IIRC, for this study a doctor (male) was present in the room when the measurements were taken. One can imagine that these men were not at full-erection given the circumstances lol (the study does say that those who failed to achieve an erection or had significant problems in achieving one during measurement time were excluded, but for those that were included it's still reasonable to suppose that they weren't at their fullest erection point given the circumstances described above). So, that said, I'd suspect that even for Indians the average penis size would be closer to (if not at) 5.5 NBPEL, not closer to 5 NBPEL (as the study reported). For the average white though given the research I've done it seems to me the average NBPEL is close to (if not at) 6 NBPEL. The average girth, very roughly put, seems to me to be around 4.8 inches for the average white male (given various studies I've looked at).
White and 9 inch bone pressed
Jk xDdickmogged by a teenager lmfao
I believed you. WHITE MALE HALO jflJk xD