Did incels exist like 5 or 10 thousand years ago?

vanillaicecream

vanillaicecream

🦊
Joined
Sep 22, 2021
Posts
9,179
Reputation
15,881
I'm just wondering because I can imagine how much more unbearable it would be without internet and other technological means to cope with... imagine getting no pussy and being bored to death when you're not engaged in physical work
 
I'm just wondering because I can imagine how much more unbearable it would be without internet and other technological means to cope with... imagine getting no pussy and being bored to death when you're not engaged in physical work
Yes. Historically speaking, only 40% of males reproduced.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Roquefort, Deleted member 24781, sub6manletnozygos and 1 other person
Yes. Actually most guys were incels back then. Nowadays situation is much more equal.
 
no, they were killed off shortly after childbirth by disease or thrown off a cliff right away if deformity could be detected

every man running around in prehistoric times was a chad
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 28904, TheAbyssinian and BoneDensity
Yes. Historically speaking, only 40% of males reproduced.
IMG 2981
 
  • +1
Reactions: St.TikTokcel
They probably didn't even discover jerking off. It must've been brutal for those mfs
 
yes, humans produce male offspring at roughly a 50% rate, but according to chromosomal evidence the reproductive rate of men compared to women is 1:4 in africa and 1:3 in europe historically, so out of every man that reproduced, two to three didn't.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and Respalier
no, they were killed off shortly after childbirth by disease or thrown off a cliff right away if deformity could be detected

every man running around in prehistoric times was a chad
Not like all incels are deformed anyway, the question is if there were incels back then for similar reasons that there are incels today
 
no, they were killed off shortly after childbirth by disease or thrown off a cliff right away if deformity could be detected

every man running around in prehistoric times was a chad
That too. In ancient Sparta, new born children were directly given to the elder so that he could check if that child was healthy. Should the child get deemed as inferior, it will be thrown off the cliff.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BoneDensity
peolple didn’t exist 10 thousand yrs ago…
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28904
peolple didn’t exist 10 thousand yrs ago…
Sure, and also an all powerful invisible vengeful being flooded the entire planet because he got mad at humans
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Respalier and incel194012940
Yes but it's not like you'd lay around doing nothing thousands of years ago. During the hunter gatherer period you'd have roaming bands of dangerous males praying on other tribes, raping and raiding. In that kind of environment an incel will quickly get killed off and only elite combat genetics survived generation after generation after generation.

And this is why people looked like this:

1685832896566


Modern humans are the product of peaceful societies where one doesn't have to be a warrior to successfully reproduce thanks to technology surpassing brute force.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Respalier, Roquefort and HarrierDuBois
Yes but it's not like you'd lay around doing nothing thousands of years ago. During the hunter gatherer period you'd have roaming bands of dangerous males praying on other tribes, raping and raiding. In that kind of environment an incel will quickly get killed off and only elite combat genetics survived generation after generation after generation.

And this is why people looked like this:

View attachment 2239327

Modern humans are the product of peaceful societies where one doesn't have to be a warrior to successfully reproduce thanks to technology surpassing brute force.
Also remember the transition from hunter gatherer diets to agricultural diets worsened the bone development in humans. Native americans never did that transition so they had the oldschool robusticity when the europeans arrived.
1685833382291
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: cancercell and BoneDensity
Also remember the transition from hunter gatherer diets to agricultural diets worsened the bone development in humans. Native americans never did that transition so they had the oldschool robusticity when the europeans arrived.
View attachment 2239348
1685833671069


"but muh cholesterol is bad for you, you should eat lots of whole grains and plants" - normie soycuck
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 28904 and HarrierDuBois
Ye but I assume grape was easier for them to get away with
 
1:4 in africa and 1:3 in europe historically
In east asians it's like 1:1.1

Which explains why they're the most neotenous and non-dimorphic race.

The males didn't go through tough selective pressure.
 
In east asians it's like 1:1.1

which explains why they're the most neotenous and non-dimorphic race
it actually is.

arranged marriage fucked them over from a sexual selection perspective.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Respalier and BoneDensity
Also remember the transition from hunter gatherer diets to agricultural diets worsened the bone development in humans. Native americans never did that transition so they had the oldschool robusticity when the europeans arrived.
View attachment 2239348
Top left guy has more bone mass in his skull than everyone in this thread's entire skeletons combined
 
Yes, but instead of rotting they just died. Mist men were incels back then.
 
Nature designed most men to be incel fodder (soldiers who obey chad commanders) so most men died in combat or just raped other tribes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Roquefort
No everyone was FUCKING all the time
 
Men had higher T back then, and imagine no porn. They had no porn.

If you wanted to see a naked female... you had to acquire one.

And add to the mix no laws, no police, you were mostly likely killed by the time you reached your teens and had to leave the tribe to start a family of your own. Must have been a brutal life. Only when farming arrived and grains and crops became available for more people, they could feed more heads, so non-alphas got to have families only starting about 8000 years ago in the fertile crescent. and is perhaps why men evolved to be co-operative or 'civil' with each other. Without men co-operating with each other, things like farming masses of land, inventing things like great architecture, electricity, motor vehicle, making canals and roads, medicines, air travel, firearms, tv, computers, etc would never have happened if it wasn't for beta's being allowed to have a wife and families.

8000 years is nothing in terms of human evolution, that's why people still recognize Alphas from Betas and Betas from Omegas based on looks. In the last 20-25 years we are seeing the reversion back to Alpha's, and the Betas and Omegas are expected to silently die out.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: vanillaicecream
first of all there always was humans who dont reproduce. Thats called evolution. But if you mean dont reproduce because of looks, yes. Only efore 20000 bc it was very rare since almost everyone had proper skull development, and the only ones who dont/get infections were exceptions.
 

Similar threads

OhSeeDeeCel
Replies
2
Views
34
Thodian
Thodian
autistic_tendencies
Replies
2
Views
31
avena
avena
pintowin.official
Replies
6
Views
57
sha
sha
hoidfater
Replies
7
Views
68
Quant23
Q
F
Replies
8
Views
62
Veyro
Veyro

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top