
whiteegyptian
Egyptian-Israeli
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2025
- Posts
- 3,297
- Reputation
- 4,611
I have a theory, that the jungle environment and living with apes, and hunting and stuff, turned blacks the way they are, violent, low iq, etc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Isnt africa pretty flatI have a theory, that the jungle environment and living with apes, and hunting and stuff, turned blacks the way they are, violent, low iq, etc.
Not at all?Isnt africa pretty flat
high IQ takeI have a theory, that the jungle environment and living with apes, and hunting and stuff, turned blacks the way they are, violent, low iq, etc.
Basically, living in a jungle radically changes human behavior because the environment constantly demands survival based instincts, the wild and dense forests, wild animals, and scarcity of food and water force people to react quickly and decisively to threats, over time, this constant pressure strengthens instinct driven behaviors like aggression, territoriality, and heightened alertness, which are traits to be found in what we call as ''black people'', anthropological studies of forest dwelling tribes show that humans in harsh environments often display more assertive, defensive, and survival focused behavior than those in safe, urban areas, evolutionarily, the jungle selects for traits that improve immediate survival, meaning that instinctual and aggressive responses are reinforced, making people more wilder and more primal, and who lives in the jungle other than the animals? exactly, AFRICANS or ''BlACKS''high IQ take
makes enough sense to me, get this guy in harvardBasically, living in a jungle radically changes human behavior because the environment constantly demands survival based instincts, the wild and dense forests, wild animals, and scarcity of food and water force people to react quickly and decisively to threats, over time, this constant pressure strengthens instinct driven behaviors like aggression, territoriality, and heightened alertness, which are traits to be found in what we call as ''black people'', anthropological studies of forest dwelling tribes show that humans in harsh environments often display more assertive, defensive, and survival focused behavior than those in safe, urban areas, evolutionarily, the jungle selects for traits that improve immediate survival, meaning that instinctual and aggressive responses are reinforced, making people more wilder and more primal, and who lives in the jungle other than the animals? exactly, AFRICANS or ''BlACKS''
No, if your read a history book you’ll see blacks have been peaceful even you Egyptian faggots admit this much.I have a theory, that the jungle environment and living with apes, and hunting and stuff, turned blacks the way they are, violent, low iq, etc.
Do you think we can use animal logic on them and ''domesticate'' them just like we did with wild species? such as cats, dogs?makes enough sense to me, get this guy in harvard![]()
Muh colonization muh slavery, get real you darkie faggot.No, if your read a history book you’ll see blacks have been peaceful even you Egyptian faggots admit this much.
So what changed? The cumskins the violent race called cumskins which colonised your country 3 times under Greeks Romans and Britain actually 4 times including Napoleon invaded and stole everything made blacks poor and thus they are now desperate and do crime
So instead of being a dumbass faggot ask yourself “why the recent change from peaceful to now aggressive what has changed”
we already tried thatDo you think we can use animal logic on them and ''domesticate'' them just like we did with wild species? such as cats, dogs?
funny how before then blacks weren’t “violent” isn’t that funny how before then they weren’t attacking people and commiting crimes hmm I wonder what changedMuh colonization muh slavery, get real you faggot.
Black Africans are always the first to think and talk about the past, never the future or the present.funny how before then blacks weren’t “violent” isn’t that funny how before then they weren’t attacking people and commiting crimes hmm I wonder what changed
But you know who was?
Cumskins
Cumskins are the only race that have literally caused 2 populations to almost go extinct (native Americans and abos)
Cumskins attacked your ancestors ffsthey are a living cancer
If any race has shown its genetic compulsion for aggression and violence it’s none other than the Caucasian cave man
Arabs are also devilish but that’s because your money loving faggots and hedonist where do yo think Jews get it from
I cannot understand how we managed to turn this from a purely academic discussion or topic, to one that involves sex and sexual language, though I agree blacks like to have sex a lot or think about sex because of their primitive sides, and how they evolved.Blacks spent thousands of years in the dog heat shredding fat and speeding up muscle growth through their carnivore diet too which boosted T significantly it makes them High T, Low IQ, NT, want to fight all the time, have sex 12 times a day (tribe ones). This is why they prefer thick women particularly thick white women for example since they are high e. They spend time in the cold which accelerates body fat and degrade muscle mass. No wonder why they also like Latinas so much since they are also thick and come from Siberia which is very cold. So the thick hourglass white foid and ripped nigger with a big dick makes sense.
Violence doesn't mean being wild and chaotic, reducing violence does not make people submissive, it makes them more capable of cooperation, violence is mostly destructive, while being self restraint and social intelligence allow people to build stables societies and resist against ''the system'' way more effectively than aggression alone ever could, take israel-palestine conflict as an example.Men being a bit violent is a good thing actually. If you select against violence through self-domestication, you get a population of dickless loser pussies who won't ever rebel against the system. Chinese are a great example of this. These rice-fed subhumans are creating arguably the biggest anti-human regime in history.
Depends what part, the south is pretty flat I think, but the east is really mountainousNot at all?
We are already domesticated thoughDo you think we can use animal logic on them and ''domesticate'' them just like we did with wild species? such as cats, dogs?