Did you know that paternity test are banned in France ?

[Deleted member 10987]

What a fucking cucked country
And 20 % France is Nafri, 15 % is Black, 5 % are others non-french

 

[Deleted member 7651]

 

[Deleted member 6723]

yes bro

 

[Deleted member 10987]

View attachment 942231
View attachment 942232

Being jealous is completely normal
Only cucks arent jealous

 

[Gonthar]

Based France!

 

[StressShady]

What a fucking cucked country
And 20 % France is Nafri, 15 % is Black, 5 % are others non-french

Now you know why it's called the must cucked country in the world, 2nd only from Sweden

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Now you know why it's called the must cucked country in the world, 2nd only from Sweden

I know i live there
Im not even french but i feel bad for this country

 

[StressShady]

View attachment 942231
View attachment 942232

Also: Taking a sample of your childs DNA for paternity test - immoral
Raising a roastie's half black bastard child who is cleary not even yours - very moral

 

[StressShady]

I know i live there
Im not even french but i feel bad for this country

Exit france asap move to based poland

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Exit france asap move to based poland

No

 

[Deleted member 1400]

France has been always the roots of degenracy since Roman times. Gauls were homo.

 

[Deleted member 10987]

France has been always the roots of degenracy since Roman times. Gauls were homo.

No

 

[Deleted member 7820]

That explains a lot.

 

[Baldingman1998]

View attachment 942231
View attachment 942232

WHAT A DISGUSTING SPINELESS INSECT. MIGHT AS WELL SUCK YOUR WIFE BOYFRIENDS DICK AND GET FUCKED WITH HER YOU PATHETIC CUCK. HOW IS THAT REAL ??!??!?? WHAT CHILD GENETIC INFO PUTS HIM IN DANGER!?!?! WHAT IS THAT CUCK EVEN TALKING ABOUT!!!???

 

[lutte]

WHAT A DISGUSTING SPINELESS INSECT. MIGHT AS WELL SUCK YOUR WIFE BOYFRIENDS DICK AND GET FUCKED WITH HER YOU PATHETIC CUCK. HOW IS THAT REAL ??!??!?? WHAT CHILD GENETIC INFO PUTS HIM IN DANGER!?!?! WHAT IS THAT CUCK EVEN TALKING ABOUT!!!???

Problème?

 

[Baldingman1998]

Problème?

No

 

[lutte]

No

Très bien

 

[Deleted member 5698]

France has been always the roots of degenracy since Roman times. Gauls were homo.

 

[Deleted member 3043]

No

better be like that, never forget now you'r a baldcuck agnostic arab. you have to accept and swallow every drop of modernity.( raw )

 

[Baldingman1998]

Très bien

 

[Baldingman1998]

better be like that, never forget now you'r a baldcuck agnostic arab. you have to accept and swallow every drop of modernity.( raw )

Morality has nothing to do with religion jfl at your iq

 

[Deleted member 3043]

Morality has nothing to do with religion jfl at your iq

Read more brother unironically.
Subjective morality has no rational reasoning behind it on average vs another subjective morality.

 

[Baldingman1998]

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Morality has nothing to do with religion jfl at your iq

Lmao you retard

 

[Deleted member 3902]

Well but they don’t have to pay child support either

 

[Baldingman1998]

Lmao you retard

Read more brother unironically.
Subjective morality has no rational reasoning behind it on average vs another subjective morality.

Then explain this

MUH BASED MUSLIM GIRLS

Face it. Women will be whores no matter what. This low inhib mother literally wearing something white girls would be ashamed to show in PUBLIC https://xhamster.com/videos/hijabi-slut-booty-10888152 Imagen marrying a "virgin" and her going out in public like that. Jfl

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 10987]

Then explain this

MUH BASED MUSLIM GIRLS

Face it. Women will be whores no matter what. This low inhib mother literally wearing something white girls would be ashamed to show in PUBLIC https://xhamster.com/videos/hijabi-slut-booty-10888152 Imagen marrying a "virgin" and her going out in public like that. Jfl

looksmax.org

>cherrypickin

 

[Deleted member 3043]

Then explain this

MUH BASED MUSLIM GIRLS

Face it. Women will be whores no matter what. This low inhib mother literally wearing something white girls would be ashamed to show in PUBLIC https://xhamster.com/videos/hijabi-slut-booty-10888152 Imagen marrying a "virgin" and her going out in public like that. Jfl

looksmax.org

how is it related to moralistic philosophy and logic i'm refering to in theory?
And i'm not gonna watch a porn video tbh,what's the point?

 

[Baldingman1998]

how is it related to moralistic philosophy and logic i'm refering to in theory?
And i'm not gonna watch a porn video tbh,what's the point?

It's not porn. It's a nice loving mother walking with her son in a mall

 

[Baldingman1998]

how is it related to moralistic philosophy and logic i'm refering to in theory?
And i'm not gonna watch a porn video tbh,what's the point?

I don't get my morals fr religion I get them from my upbringing (my parents teaching me what is right or wrong. Which makes me "good" according to my own moral standards because I am good for the sake of being good and not because of fear of space Daddy

 

[Deleted member 3043]

It's not porn. It's a nice loving mother walking with her son in a mall

but what it has to do with my point?
I'm saying subjective morality is what you have, and what have every people that don't rely on God - and even there you need to be sure your position is the most rational which i believe i do.

To put it simply if you'r atheist vs another atheist, what you consider moral and what he considers moral can be different. Yet you will have pretty much no way to make your position "better" or more "truthful", beside using some consequentialism.
Because in the name of what beeing for or against modernity and such things should be better than the opposite?
It's subjective, it rely on the individual.
Nobody is right. nobody is wrong.

While if you believe in objective morality, you can't be opposed by subjective morality : Because if you believe such thing is bad it's not merely because of your subjectivity but also because it's God that said so. And God>humans. Since he is all knowing and knows what's the best for you.

And eventually, i don't believe we can reach a set of full rules enough to create a society just by subjective morality : not lying, not offing people, ok. but that's actually very little things.
you'll have people for g ppl and others against, who will be right? ppl for modernity others against, who will be right? etc.

 

[Deleted member 3043]

I don't get my morals fr religion I get them from my upbringing (my parents teaching me what is right or wrong. Which makes me "good" according to my own moral standards because I am good for the sake of being good and not because of fear of space Daddy

this is not a question of "fear" you monk but rather of metaphysical impossibility to have a coherent set of morality and rules because it's fucking subjective when you'r an atheist.

And there is no "sake of beeing good", nobody acts without there beeing a reason to it. If you do it, it's for pleasing yourself or others, or for ostentation, or for whatever reason.

 

[Baldingman1998]

but what it has to do with my point?
I'm saying subjective morality is what you have, and what have every people that don't rely on God - and even there you need to be sure your position is the most rational which i believe i do.

To put it simply if you'r atheist vs another atheist, what you consider moral and what he considers moral can be different. Yet you will have pretty much no way to make your position "better" or more "truthful", beside using some consequentialism.
Because in the name of what beeing for or against modernity and such things should be better than the opposite?
It's subjective, it rely on the individual.
Nobody is right. nobody is wrong.

While if you believe in objective morality, you can't be opposed by subjective morality : Because if you believe such thing is bad it's not merely because of your subjectivity but also because it's God that said so. And God>humans. Since he is all knowing and knows what's the best for you.

And eventually, i don't believe we can reach a set of full rules enough to create a society just by subjective morality : not lying, not offing people, ok. but that's actually very little things.
you'll have people for g ppl and others against, who will be right? ppl for modernity others against, who will be right? etc.

this is not a question of "fear" you monk but rather of metaphysical impossibility to have a coherent set of morality and rules because it's fucking subjective when you'r an atheist.

And there is no "sake of beeing good", nobody acts without there beeing a reason to it. If you do it, it's for pleasing yourself or others, or for ostentation, or for whatever reason.

Yes good points. But with common sense most humans can come up with similar morals. Like don't kill etc. Even animals have that logic

 

[studiocel]

A paternity tests in France is just seeing if the baby come out dark skinned or not

 

[Deleted member 3043]

Yes good points. But with common sense most humans can come up with similar morals. Like don't kill etc. Even animals have that logic

this is what i adressed. you can agree on little obvious things, but with these can you create a whole society and juridical system?
No. It's not enough to be against killing others, to be against lying etc.
That's what i meant with a coherent set of ruling, ie enough to create a WHOLE society.
Think of it to yourself : how many things related to morality do you differ from others guys that share your point of view, even in your own family. you'll see it's impossible to make everyone accepting everything.

 

[Baldingman1998]

this is what i adressed. you can agree on little obvious things, but with these can you create a whole society and juridical system?
No. It's not enough to be against killing others, to be against lying etc.
That's what i meant with a coherent set of ruling, ie enough to create a WHOLE society.
Think of it to yourself : how many things related to morality do you differ from others guys that share your point of view, even in your own family. you'll see it's impossible to make everyone accepting everything.

Morality can exist without religion. It has in the past. Secular countries take the foundations of religions but it's not directly based of religion. Or for example look at past civilizations they had rules etc without religion as well to make functioning societies. For example in my country I live in a village far from the cities and everyone knows each other etc. So the community is like a big family. Nothing to do with religion

 

[Deleted member 2729]

Imagine living in the west

 

[Deleted member 3043]

Morality can exist without religion. It has in the past. Secular countries take the foundations of religions but it's not directly based of religion. Or for example look at past civilizations they had rules etc without religion as well to make functioning societies. For example in my country I live in a village far from the cities and everyone knows each other etc. So the community is like a big family. Nothing to do with religion

Well i can only take about one position, that i know the best but :
- consequentialism wise, every single rule of that the Beloved gave us from Him, is the best to preserve people health and mental health and sanity in the long run. Marriage, piety for it, no alchohol, no addiction, etc. It's all about beeing wholesome enough, away from any and every bad thing in this world, to be able to actualize your human nature and be a male, not an animal, to look for the truth.
Can any or this secular stuff say the same? I don't think so.

- Even for these secular countries, they are somehow paradoxical : They claim to be man made, yet can't get rid of indirect religious position. For example, "love" as in an immaterialistic approach is purely from religion, because atheism don't believe in immateriality - they don't have any rational claim tho but they'r believer as i told you - and yet atheist are those who believe the most in "love". etc. It's low sentient tbh from such individuals.

- At the end of the day, even if the rules weren't the best at least in the short term, if it was said to be from God, with a good way to punish people - hard rules are not meant to be applied but to prevent people to act bad by the fear of it, the faith you were in, stastically was like that during history. What if somebody disagree with what your village says? What an individual created has less power than what is supposed to be from God, if it's really the case. People would have harder time to be able to argue against. And it's why even now, despite degen maxxing, the faith is strong in most of the population of those countries. At the end of the day, it's about having a well functionning society and this implies to have rules that are applied and respected by people, that's why there are sanctions. While most guys who didn't understood anything only see the sanctions and act like reddits soyboys "woahahah it's bbaaad" while they get cucked, divorce rped, etc because of their set of rules and subjective morality.

 

[Baldingman1998]

Well i can only take about one position, that i know the best but :
- consequentialism wise, every single rule of that the Beloved gave us from Him, is the best to preserve people health and mental health and sanity in the long run. Marriage, piety for it, no alchohol, no addiction, etc. It's all about beeing wholesome enough, away from any and every bad thing in this world, to be able to actualize your human nature and be a male, not an animal, to look for the truth.
Can any or this secular stuff say the same? I don't think so.

- Even for these secular countries, they are somehow paradoxical : They claim to be man made, yet can't get rid of indirect religious position. For example, "love" as in an immaterialistic approach is purely from religion, because atheism don't believe in immateriality - they don't have any rational claim tho but they'r believer as i told you - and yet atheist are those who believe the most in "love". etc. It's low sentient tbh from such individuals.

- At the end of the day, even if the rules weren't the best at least in the short term, if it was said to be from God, with a good way to punish people - hard rules are not meant to be applied but to prevent people to act bad by the fear of it, the faith you were in, stastically was like that during history. What if somebody disagree with what your village says? What an individual created has less power than what is supposed to be from God, if it's really the case. People would have harder time to be able to argue against. And it's why even now, despite degen maxxing, the faith is strong in most of the population of those countries. At the end of the day, it's about having a well functionning society and this implies to have rules that are applied and respected by people, that's why there are sanctions. While most guys who didn't understood anything only see the sanctions and act like reddits soyboys "woahahah it's bbaaad" while they get cucked, divorce rped, etc because of their set of rules and subjective morality.

 

[Deleted member 3043]

View attachment 960817

read, unironically, you make me write, son.