(DIMORPHIC FEATURES) WHY ARE DIMORPHIC FEATURES LIKE UEE CALLED FAILOSSS GTFIHHH

lebesgue

lebesgue

sexy htn (with BB cream)
Joined
Jul 10, 2023
Posts
767
Reputation
373
Users here can't seem to determine whether x,y,z dimorphic features are failos or not. You have users saying that you need both masculine and feminine features to be attractive and yet those same users call out things like uee (which can be attractive on women), even when they harmonize with the face.

And shit needs to get cleared up. What does the science say? What do yall make of whats going?
 
  • +1
Reactions: EggKing
atleast from my experience, the science is deduced by 60 balding men with yellow porsches
 
  • JFL
Reactions: lebesgue
bhai can you rate me
 
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: soover4me and lebesgue
Uee looks like shit. Slight uee or no uee is obviously ideal
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: lebesgue
Women on average have more uee then men due to their supraorbital rims being less anteriorly projecting. Slight to moderate uee is good and can even be preferred over "hunter eyes", and can make you more approachable.

Being extremely dimorphic (ogre/hypermasc) isn't ideal either. Being maesthetic (masc with some feminine features) is ideal and has the broadest appeal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: soover4me, rand anon and Egyptianmogger
Show me a good eye area that doesn't have either slight uee or no uee
 
  • +1
Reactions: IHeightMogU
Heinrich Schmidt said:
Women on average have more uee then men due to their supraorbital rims being less anteriorly projecting. Slight to moderate uee is good and can even be preferred over "hunter eyes", and can make you more approachable.

Being extremely dimorphic (ogre/hypermasc) isn't ideal either. Being maesthetic (masc with some feminine features) is ideal and has the broadest appeal.
Click to expand...
What evolutionary disadvantage could've being too dimorphic brought? Do you think that we've already evolved far enough to be able to consider nearly androgynous faces ideal?
 
lebesgue said:
What evolutionary disadvantage could've being too dimorphic brought? Do you think that we've already evolved far enough to be able to consider nearly androgynous faces ideal?
Click to expand...
Being extremely dimorphic isn't ideal in this modern day and age, being a hypermasc brute would be more ideal in paleolithic times though.
 
  • +1
Reactions: rand anon and lebesgue
JoshuaAccept said:
Show me a good eye area that doesn't have either slight uee or no uee
Click to expand...
1709257892687
 
lebesgue said:
What evolutionary disadvantage could've being too dimorphic brought? Do you think that we've already evolved far enough to be able to consider nearly androgynous faces ideal?
Click to expand...
yes and no, standards for “health” have changed due to evolution, not anywhere near androgynous. But for example clear skin, shaved face, plump lips etc. have all become signs of health and money due to modern technology
 
  • +1
Reactions: rand anon, lebesgue and Heinrich Schmidt
  • JFL
Reactions: rand anon
looksmaxxer:bluepiller ratio is like 2:1 on this thread rn
 
Heinrich Schmidt said:
Women on average have more uee then men due to their supraorbital rims being less anteriorly projecting. Slight to moderate uee is good and can even be preferred over "hunter eyes", and can make you more approachable.

Being extremely dimorphic (ogre/hypermasc) isn't ideal either. Being maesthetic (masc with some feminine features) is ideal and has the broadest appeal.
Click to expand...
What he said. I'd like to add to this though:
A good rule of thumb is if a soft feature is feminine then it can create appeal for a guy (lips, hair etc...) , however hard features (mostly bones) need to be masculine.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Heinrich Schmidt and lebesgue
ErbCel said:
What he said. I'd like to add to this though:
A good rule of thumb is if a soft feature is feminine then it can create appeal for a guy (lips, hair etc...) , however hard features (mostly bones) need to be masculine.
Click to expand...
Ok. What about high set cheekbones?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Heinrich Schmidt
lebesgue said:
Ok. What about high set cheekbones?
Click to expand...
Good feature to have as they are masc, ideally they should be more forward grown though rather then lateral (as this is a feminine trait).
 
  • +1
Reactions: ErbCel
Yes masculine cheekbones are high set and have low-ish mass. High mass cheekbones can work on Asian phenos tho.
Masculine cheekbones are shaped like a boomerang and feminine cheekbones are shaped like an apple.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: lebesgue
Uee is retarded slight to no UEE is ideal. Things like PFL, PFL - PFH ratio es ratio and ipd matters more seriously.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mvp2v1
FBl said:
Uee is retarded slight to no UEE is ideal. Things like PFL, PFL - PFH ratio es ratio and ipd matters more seriously.
Click to expand...
esr is overrated. alain delon has 0.43 and youd expect that to hurt him way more
 
lebesgue said:
esr is overrated. alain delon has 0.43 and youd expect that to hurt him way more
Click to expand...
Delons eye area is shit it's just his Harmony and colouring carrying him. Delon is way overrated
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Mog3D and lebesgue
FBl said:
Delons eye area is shit it's just his Harmony and colouring carrying him. Delon is way overrated
Click to expand...
Delon is very overrated, but his eye area looks high appeal (although nothing notable)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mog3D and FBl
Upper eyelid exposure is a severe halo and it is not sexually dimorphic for a male or female.

What guides you otherwise?
 
1709270269713


Is not masculine.

1709270297677


Is not masculine.

It's a sign of poor genetics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mog3D
1709270428594


Bad genes + ginger pheno
 
looksmax.org

i got rid of my upper eyelid exposure

and i don't know what exactly caused it? i mean, my eyes still look subhuman because of nct, pajeet tier orbitals and low set cheekbones, but for some reason they are suddenly hooded? I did this: - tried to keep my "brow muscle" in a low set position 24/7 without making an "angry face" -...
looksmax.org looksmax.org

Lmao 2020 thread

1709270492110
 
lebesgue said:
UEE is not a failo. It is not ideal. Is what I think.
Click to expand...
its a failo and failos add up
they have a good eye area in spite of uee
 
I think lower eyelid exposure can halo you, but UEE will always failo you.

1709271234531
1709271189445
1709271284907
Vs
1709271602281
1709271728171
1709271908249
 
  • +1
Reactions: lebesgue
MakinItHappen said:
Upper eyelid exposure is a severe halo and it is not sexually dimorphic for a male or female.

What guides you otherwise?
Click to expand...
Supraorbital bone is less developed in females and they display this trait more while still being considered attractive with it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Xangsane
NSFW Rate this story about a deranged black femcel and a robust prettyboy Chad (features a sex scene)
2 3
Replies
136
Views
11K
Xangsane
Xangsane
chief detectiveman
LifeFuel Lookism Thread Archive - Glossary
Replies
8
Views
2K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
zambia1
Discussion The difference between Facial Harmony, and Facial Averageness. (an extensive thread)
Replies
14
Views
1K
Dimitri159
Dimitri159
coomahboomah
The best looksmatch theory, how to get rejected LESS
Replies
44
Views
3K
coomahboomah
coomahboomah
BucketCrab
Female Psychology I - Introductory Guide
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
polishman
polishman

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top