G
GuyFromSingapore
Hindu~Jewish
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2020
- Posts
- 16,787
- Reputation
- 12,534
I can use a software and give a NordSinid Korean, Nordid like facial silhouette but he will still never look fully Nordid. And still look less Europid than a Mediterranid is to a Nordid.
If race doesn't exist. Then species doesn't exist either. For race is a subcluster within species.
When I look at a supposed "White" South African and also a "Black" South African, the White South African would score more similarity with a White European living in Europe in an autosomal DNA test despite both the White South African and Black South African being from Africa.
Homo Sapiens come from Africa but within a few generations, a few hundreds of thousands of years look less like primates owing to our accelerated evolution, genetic divergence.
Race[phenotypes] is artificial in the sense that I, as human, call both Chimpanzees and Macaques as "monkeys" even though Chimpanzees are more similar to us Homo Sapiens genetically than they are to Macaques. That is because Chimpanzees are archaic phenotypically.
Therefore this proves that intelligence[both of left and right brain] drove human craniofacial evolution and thus consequent divergence from our Primate cousins such as Chimpanzees.
Appearances are an illusion... Earlier generations of humans would have assumed that they have no relation to Macaques and considered them as "animals", a completely distinct category from us humans bearing no proximity or relation whatsoever. But Biologists have compared the skulls of both monkeys and humans and saw that both share a high level of similarity even before genetic testing.
So you cannot say that phenotypes bear no relevance. That would be like saying Einstein wasn't legitimate prior to experiments confirming his theories.
When mulattos are asked if they are mulattos, they always confirm that are infact indeed mulattos. But you may say that, that is infact anecdotal, therefore how does it prove the reality of race?
Because genetic isolation of a certain breed/race and evolution leads to speciation.
You never ask us are Dobermans and German Shepherds artificial constructs even though everyone can tell that they look different. Because you have an agenda.
Race is a subcategory. A Phenotypic and Autosomal genetic clustering.
Would Negroids and Europoids evolve into their own species if they went in their own direction continuing their phenotypic morphology and through constant inbreeding?
Neanderthals were phenotypically distinct from Homo Sapiens but we could interbreed with them.
Race is an illusion from the perspective that both Negrids and Europids are Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals were a sub species of Homo Sapiens more distinct from Europid Homo Sapiens than Negrids to Europid Homo Sapiens while looking more morphologically similar to Europid Homo Sapiens than Negrids are. But we can still that that Neanderthals were different from Homo Sapiens just by looking at them. A "White" human looking entity while not quite exactly being fully human.
It is like as if Europiform tendencies can be of any sub species or even species. But that would be like saying Chocolate flavored Beer vs Chocolate flavored Milk are the same thing. Both are Chocolate flavoured but the base substance is different. Europiform(Chocolate flavour) Beer(substance) vs Europiform(Chocolate) Milk(substance). On the surface both Europiform Homo Sapiens and Europiform Neanderthals are both Europiform but they are of a different subspecies.
I can't "prove" that Chimpanzees exist phenotypically because phenotypes are a matter of aesthetics. A right brained phenomena.
A Chimpanzee looks more similar to a Homo Sapiens than a Canine does to a Homo Sapien and Genetically that's true as well. Which appears to confirm that what we see with our eyes i.e. phenotypes appear to correlate with hard evidence i.e. genetics.
I have never seen a phenotypically Negroid European clustering closer to a Europid European than he is to a Negroid African.
If race doesn't exist. Then species doesn't exist either. For race is a subcluster within species.
When I look at a supposed "White" South African and also a "Black" South African, the White South African would score more similarity with a White European living in Europe in an autosomal DNA test despite both the White South African and Black South African being from Africa.
Homo Sapiens come from Africa but within a few generations, a few hundreds of thousands of years look less like primates owing to our accelerated evolution, genetic divergence.
Race[phenotypes] is artificial in the sense that I, as human, call both Chimpanzees and Macaques as "monkeys" even though Chimpanzees are more similar to us Homo Sapiens genetically than they are to Macaques. That is because Chimpanzees are archaic phenotypically.
Therefore this proves that intelligence[both of left and right brain] drove human craniofacial evolution and thus consequent divergence from our Primate cousins such as Chimpanzees.
Appearances are an illusion... Earlier generations of humans would have assumed that they have no relation to Macaques and considered them as "animals", a completely distinct category from us humans bearing no proximity or relation whatsoever. But Biologists have compared the skulls of both monkeys and humans and saw that both share a high level of similarity even before genetic testing.
So you cannot say that phenotypes bear no relevance. That would be like saying Einstein wasn't legitimate prior to experiments confirming his theories.
When mulattos are asked if they are mulattos, they always confirm that are infact indeed mulattos. But you may say that, that is infact anecdotal, therefore how does it prove the reality of race?
Because genetic isolation of a certain breed/race and evolution leads to speciation.
You never ask us are Dobermans and German Shepherds artificial constructs even though everyone can tell that they look different. Because you have an agenda.
Race is a subcategory. A Phenotypic and Autosomal genetic clustering.
Would Negroids and Europoids evolve into their own species if they went in their own direction continuing their phenotypic morphology and through constant inbreeding?
Neanderthals were phenotypically distinct from Homo Sapiens but we could interbreed with them.
Race is an illusion from the perspective that both Negrids and Europids are Homo Sapiens and Neanderthals were a sub species of Homo Sapiens more distinct from Europid Homo Sapiens than Negrids to Europid Homo Sapiens while looking more morphologically similar to Europid Homo Sapiens than Negrids are. But we can still that that Neanderthals were different from Homo Sapiens just by looking at them. A "White" human looking entity while not quite exactly being fully human.
It is like as if Europiform tendencies can be of any sub species or even species. But that would be like saying Chocolate flavored Beer vs Chocolate flavored Milk are the same thing. Both are Chocolate flavoured but the base substance is different. Europiform(Chocolate flavour) Beer(substance) vs Europiform(Chocolate) Milk(substance). On the surface both Europiform Homo Sapiens and Europiform Neanderthals are both Europiform but they are of a different subspecies.
I can't "prove" that Chimpanzees exist phenotypically because phenotypes are a matter of aesthetics. A right brained phenomena.
A Chimpanzee looks more similar to a Homo Sapiens than a Canine does to a Homo Sapien and Genetically that's true as well. Which appears to confirm that what we see with our eyes i.e. phenotypes appear to correlate with hard evidence i.e. genetics.
I have never seen a phenotypically Negroid European clustering closer to a Europid European than he is to a Negroid African.
Last edited: