Do gay people actually exist

iblameakmal

iblameakmal

Bronze
Joined
Feb 24, 2025
Posts
297
Reputation
293
i can’t comprehend how a man can genuinely be attracted to another man.

i mean sometimes when im gooning and a femboy comes up i keep going but in my mind i know that im not actually attracted to them because im straight.

but how can men actually be gay? :lul: is dick that good?? 👀
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Med Amine, ltnfoidraperer, jgrey080 and 6 others
no how would ik
 
  • +1
Reactions: jgrey080, Gandy'sOrbitalVecto, psltristan1 and 1 other person
hmm
 
  • +1
Reactions: jgrey080, psltristan1 and whitecelcoper
@Jenson exists
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: jgrey080, iblameakmal and epic09
Dominating another Man is the highest form of Assertiveness
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Parzivl, jgrey080, iblameakmal and 1 other person
Dominating another Man is the highest form of Assertiveness
yes ive had thoughts about this before… total domination… fuck i crave this feeling… to make another grown man completely submit…

But id never act on it, since i am straight.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: jgrey080 and iamnotaracist
no
there was a quote about this..
"give a goy enough fluoride and pills and they will spit in natures face" o aglo
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameakmal and jgrey080
Most gay people are only like that because of some traumatic event or they got raped by their parents ha, I'm sure there's people who are genuinely gay though I've yet to see
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameakmal and sillybilly
Most gay people are only like that because of some traumatic event or they got raped by their parents ha, I'm sure there's people who are genuinely gay though I've yet to see
homosexuality does not exist
modern homosexuality are all based off of chemicals, unnatural life styles, trauma and propaganda / brainwashing

older homosexuality was purely caste based and isolated to nobles or those who could not interact with women

so someone naturally being attracted to their gender has never existed and never will


cool edit
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameakmal and jgrey080
homosexuality does not exist
modern homosexuality are all based off of chemicals, unnatural life styles, trauma and propaganda / brainwashing

older homosexuality was purely caste based and isolated to nobles or those who could not interact with women

so someone naturally being attracted to their gender has never existed and never will

View attachment 5209292
cool edit
Modern homosexuality is just a shitty attempt at being trans because they lack the necessary qualities to attract women
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameakmal
Modern homosexuality is just a shitty attempt at being trans because they lack the necessary qualities to attract women
what?
trans?
are you a rape victim?
did your uncle rape you?
were you groomed at a young age?
were you introduced to porn at a young age?
 
older homosexuality was purely caste based and isolated to nobles or those who could not interact with women
What is this fucking copium of a statement
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hoopy321
What is this fucking copium of a statement
guys look he said copium and STATEMENT!!!
what a clever cookie!
whooooos a smart 14 year olds
you areee!!!!
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hoopy321
guys look he said copium and STATEMENT!!!
what a clever cookie!
whooooos a smart 14 year olds
you areee!!!!
I mean, it's fucking copium. You have no idea of what the fuck you're talking about.

I can even mention the Sacred Band of Thebes. Plutarch, "Life of Pelopidas," 18.1-19.3. 300-man military unit, founded around 378 BCE, composed entirely of male couples, paired lovers, and beloved.

"Muh, caste-based, isolated to nobles who couldn't get women!"

How the fuck does that account for an ENTIRE state-sponsored military regiment built explicitly around male-male romantic pairing as a battlefield strategy?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hoopy321
I mean, it's fucking copium. You have no idea of what the fuck you're talking about.

I can even mention the Sacred Band of Thebes. Plutarch, "Life of Pelopidas," 18.1-19.3. 300-man military unit, founded around 378 BCE, composed entirely of male couples, paired lovers, and beloved.

"Muh, caste-based, isolated to nobles who couldn't get women!"

How the fuck does that account for an ENTIRE state-sponsored military regiment built explicitly around male-male romantic pairing as a battlefield strategy?
warrior caste
comparing warriors dying to together to faggots who were raped by their uncle xD

nobles and people who couldnt get women
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblameakmal
I mean, it's fucking copium. You have no idea of what the fuck you're talking about.

I can even mention the Sacred Band of Thebes. Plutarch, "Life of Pelopidas," 18.1-19.3. 300-man military unit, founded around 378 BCE, composed entirely of male couples, paired lovers, and beloved.

"Muh, caste-based, isolated to nobles who couldn't get women!"

How the fuck does that account for an ENTIRE state-sponsored military regiment built explicitly around male-male romantic pairing as a battlefield strategy?
Isn't that basically what he's saying tho? They didn't have access to women in the battlefield...
 
warrior caste
It was 300 dudes recruited as the city's elite infantry. Thebes wasn't a caste society. There's no Theban caste system in any source, Plutarch, Diodorus, nobody.

Why the fuck are you inventing a category to retroactively cram the evidence into, jfl?

comparing warriors dying to together to faggots who were raped by their uncle xD
Non-sequitur insult with no source attached.

nobles and people who couldnt get women
So now it's "nobles AND people who couldn't get women," conveniently broad enough to absorb whatever counterexample shows up next. You're fucking useless, lmfao.
 
read and weep
What are you, a fucking mongoloid? Did you only read your boyfriend's replies and actively skipped over mine?
Sacred Band of Thebes. Plutarch, "Life of Pelopidas," 18.1-19.3. 300-man military unit, founded around 378 BCE, composed entirely of male couples, paired lovers, and beloved.

It doesn't make it apply to the Sacred Band. To repeat it, once AGAIN, these were 300 adult male citizens of Thebes serving as the city's professional standing army, men with full civic rights, households, the ABILITY TO MARRY.

Nothing in Plutarch says these guys were romantically pairing up because women were unavailable to them.

Where's the source saying the Sacred Band specifically consisted of men who "couldn't interact with women"? You don't have one, because it doesn't exist, dumbfuck.
 
It was 300 dudes recruited as the city's elite infantry. Thebes wasn't a caste society. There's no Theban caste system in any source, Plutarch, Diodorus, nobody.

Why the fuck are you inventing a category to retroactively cram the evidence into, jfl?


Non-sequitur insult with no source attached.


So now it's "nobles AND people who couldn't get women," conveniently broad enough to absorb whatever counterexample shows up next. You're fucking useless, lmfao.
how many times did you use a thesaurus typing this?
and they did all die together
During the Battle of Chaeronea in 338 BCE, the Sacred Band was surrounded by the Macedonian army led by Philip II and a young Alexander the Great

i have no knowledge of this by the way so yea sure no caste system!
wow class based!!!
warriors selected from the public based off of skill is more so respectable no?

x and y
because x and y factually could not do a

"this fact made me feel bad therefore you are bad and the fact is bad"
 
I mean, it's fucking copium. You have no idea of what the fuck you're talking about.

I can even mention the Sacred Band of Thebes. Plutarch, "Life of Pelopidas," 18.1-19.3. 300-man military unit, founded around 378 BCE, composed entirely of male couples, paired lovers, and beloved.

"Muh, caste-based, isolated to nobles who couldn't get women!"

How the fuck does that account for an ENTIRE state-sponsored military regiment built explicitly around male-male romantic pairing as a battlefield strategy?
omg why did you quote me on castes and then compare a non caste society xDDD

this conversation is over,
the base never made sense and you knew that!!! xDDDDDD

the argument i have been making is that older homosexuality is incomparable to modern homosexuality
older homosexuality was noble
warriors are le noble and very respectable

modern faggots are abused mutts
end of argument
 
and they did all die together
During the Battle of Chaeronea in 338 BCE, the Sacred Band was surrounded by the Macedonian army led by Philip II and a young Alexander the Great

i have no knowledge of this by the way so yea sure no caste system!
wow class based!!!
warriors selected from the public based off of skill is more so respectable no?

x and y
because x and y factually could not do a
You... just word-saladed your way into agreeing with me. How the fuck do you not see this?

"Warriors selected from the public based off of skill" is literally what I said and the opposite of "caste isolated to nobles." That's quite literally a meritocratic military unit.

THAT IS NOT A CASTE SYSTEM, LMFAO :lul:

"this fact made me feel bad therefore you are bad and the fact is bad"
I gave you a primary source (Plutarch, "Life of Pelopidas," 18) that directly contradicts your original claim. You have yet to produce a single source for "caste based, isolated to nobles or those who couldn't get women."

Not one citation, this whole conversation.

Where's your source?

"I have no knowledge of this, but I'm right anyway"?
 
Only if the fuxked is feminine enough to resemble a foid
 
omg why did you quote me on castes and then compare a non caste society xDDD
Uh... dumbass, YOU said the caste claim, not me.

I'm citing your own words back to you.

"older homosexuality was purely caste based and isolated to nobles or those who could not interact with women."

I gave you the Sacred Band of Thebes as a counterexample to that exact claim, a non-caste, merit-selected military unit built around male couples.

You're now acting like pointing out your claim doesn't hold up for a non-caste society is somehow my error, when the entire point is that your "caste-based" framework doesn't describe ancient Greek practice at all.

Still no source for the original claim.
 
Uh... dumbass, YOU said the caste claim, not me.

I'm citing your own words back to you.



I gave you the Sacred Band of Thebes as a counterexample to that exact claim, a non-caste, merit-selected military unit built around male couples.

You're now acting like pointing out your claim doesn't hold up for a non-caste society is somehow my error, when the entire point is that your "caste-based" framework doesn't describe ancient Greek practice at all.

Still no source for the original claim.
do you respect them?
 

Similar threads

overthefalls
Replies
16
Views
97
Whatever
Whatever
paulwesleyyy
Replies
4
Views
32
paulwesleyyy
paulwesleyyy
huecomundoda2
Replies
28
Views
133
LameAssNga
LameAssNga
LowTierBateman
Replies
4
Views
41
LowTierBateman
LowTierBateman
Hihi21
Replies
18
Views
110
Kara
Kara

Users who are viewing this thread

  • sillybilly
  • slaviccartfiend
  • toracinno
  • bruh0352
  • BosniakOnRoids
  • SoundnVision
  • yesimog420
  • Med Amine
  • ricecel713
  • qolmia
  • iblameakmal
  • egyptiansub5
  • ltnfoidraperer
  • LeDufferman
  • chang cypionate
  • cookiekingglazer
  • iamnotaracist
  • nopeguy8
  • Hoopy321
Back
Top