"Do men even like women anymore?"

HarrierDuBois

HarrierDuBois

Volition
Joined
Sep 19, 2022
Posts
24,999
Reputation
40,053
What can you even offer me that I can like about you?

Your literature consists mainly of low-effort smut masquerading as a story while containing near zero substance. This is just speaking of contemporary literature as well; historically, even the most influential female writer of all time (Jane Austen) can't compete with Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Shakespeare, etc.

Your philosophers are few and far between; none of them have changed the world, and the most influential of them spoke almost entirely about genders, e.g., Wollstonecraft, Beauvoir, Butler. (Do metaphysics and epistemology even interest women?)

Your cinema consists mainly of hyperbolizing outdated or very specific gender inequalities (that only occur in the best societies that already live better than 95% of the planet does regardless of gender; yeah, very compelling to display inequality through office culture when children starve on the same planet).

The reason you're sexualizing yourself is because your lacking competence in other areas results in your flesh being the only thing you can offer humanity, i.e., something you have not even worked for yourself. (And yes, I despise men who buy into this shit as much as women promoting it; it's a spiral where women are also encouraged to not even develop other areas of their character but focus solely on their flesh.)

I'm not saying that women are useless or can't contribute, but when they seriously wonder on social media why men don't find them appealing other than their bodies, it's because they offer nothing of substance other than their bodies.

I would wish for nothing else regarding women than that they actually sought out and valued profundity in all of life's endeavors. I want to read good metaphysical arguments made by women. I want to see a woman direct a new The Seventh Seal. I want a woman to make The Brother's Karamazov look like old news. Not because I care for the gender but because it benefits humanity as a whole; it's the complacancy and acceptance of mediocrity that gets me.

I want to read and discuss philosophy with my future wife. I don't want a life devoid of substance or to be surrounded by people who lack the desire for profundity.

@Klasik616 @cromagnon @ReadBooksEveryday @DelonLover1999 @Magnum Opus @SidharthTheSlayer @nietzsche
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Debetro, Swarthy Knight, castizo_ascender and 23 others
What can you even offer me that I can like about you?

Your literature consists mainly of low-effort smut masquerading as a story while containing near zero substance. This is just speaking of contemporary literature as well; historically, even the most influential female writer of all time (Jane Austen) can't compete with Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Shakespeare, etc.

Your philosophers are few and far between; none of them have changed the world, and the most influential of them spoke almost entirely about genders, e.g., Wollstonecraft, Beauvoir, Butler. (Do metaphysics and epistemology even interest women?)

Your cinema consists mainly of hyperbolizing outdated or very specific gender inequalities (that only occur in the best societies that already live better than 95% of the planet does regardless of gender; yeah, very compelling to display inequality through office culture when children starve on the same planet).

The reason you're sexualizing yourself is because your lacking competence in other areas results in your flesh being the only thing you can offer humanity, i.e., something you have not even worked for yourself. (And yes, I despise men who buy into this shit as much as women promoting it; it's a spiral where women are also encouraged to not even develop other areas of their character but focus solely on their flesh.)

I'm not saying that women are useless or can't contribute, but when they seriously wonder on social media why men don't find them appealing other than their bodies, it's because they offer nothing of substance other than their bodies.

I would wish for nothing else regarding women than that they actually sought out and valued profundity in all of life's endeavors. I want to read good metaphysical arguments made by women. I want to see a woman direct a new The Seventh Seal. I want a woman to make The Brother's Karamazov look like old news. Not because I care for the gender but because it benefits humanity as a whole; it's the complacancy and acceptance of mediocrity that gets me.

I want to read and discuss philosophy with my future wife. I don't want a life devoid of substance or to be surrounded by people who lack the desire for profundity.

@Klasik616 @cromagnon @ReadBooksEveryday @DelonLover1999 @Magnum Opus @SidharthTheSlayer @nietzsche
Based
This is your most mysoginistic thread
Water, women are superficial

Maybe you can find a good foid in a library but she's gonna have high standards too, atleast she won't find your personality weird.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: raumDEuter, Alt Number 3, truthhurts and 6 others
Based
This is your most mysoginistic thread
It's not even misogynistic; it's literally encouraging women to become Übermensch. But Nietzsche was seen as misanthrope for his views on humanity, so yes, people will misconstrue critique to the benefit of greatness as reprimanding all behaviors of self-pleasure.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 77954, SidharthTheSlayer and Klasik616
It's not even misogynistic it's literally encouraging women to become Übermensch. But Nietzsche was seen as nihilist for his views on humanity so yes people will misconstrue critique towards greatness as reprimanding all behaviour of self pleasure.
Which is something they dislike, they don't even like reading Nietzsche because he's "some sort of a right winger".
 
  • JFL
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
Which is something they dislike, they don't even like reading Nietzsche because he's some sort of a right winger.
1725925609982
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Debetro, raumDEuter and Klasik616
I want to read good metaphysical arguments made by women. I want to see a woman direct a new The Seventh Seal. I want a woman to make The Brother's Karamazov look like old news.
They create the men that go on to pursue such goals. Women are caregivers for the next generation to flourish. Not go on to advance civilization in the same way men do.
 
  • +1
Reactions: raumDEuter, 1966Ford, Sprinkles and 1 other person
philosopher strikes again, we want the wet warm hole between their legs saar, and intimacy/companionship from the opposite gender that we can't get from guy friends.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
2 only reasons men can like a foid:
-Because she's kind, cute, smiley, open and loving (feminine).
-Because she's pretty.
 
  • +1
Reactions: EdgyFashionist and HarrierDuBois
"Muh I'm not like other boys" tier post
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Xangsane, raleqtambrobret, Sprinkles and 2 others
They create the men that go on to pursue such goals. Women are caregivers for the next generation to flourish. Not go on to advance civilization in the same way men do.
Men create children by providing half of the required ingredients, not impossible to expect half of the creative output from women then either. Besides, men and women both hunted and gathered in the past, so yes they're just slacking.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JoshuaG
"I want to read and discuss philosophy with my future wife."
This is not happening, not now, not ever. Women are not designed this way, you want to discuss philosophy? get some guy friends who are into it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tenshi, psychomandible, FutureSlayer and 4 others
"Muh I'm not like other boys" tier post
I'm not encouraging a single molecule of the modern female ideology.

"I want to read and discuss philosophy with my future wife."
This is not happening, not now, not ever. Women are not designed this way, you want to discuss philosophy? get some guy friends who are into it.
99% chance it never happens, even my mother says she likes philosophy and then is not interested in actually reading it...just what?
 
Not disagreeing on principle but do most men produce something of value either?
Vast majority of men don't do anything special. They don't really have any respectable reason for 'not liking women', majority of 'misogynists' are just failed normie pathetic cucks who cry all day. I don't have any respect for them.
 
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: twojei, maarda, Acne Victim and 2 others
Not disagreeing on principle but do most men produce something of value either?
Vast majority of men don't do anything special. They don't really have any respectable reason for 'not liking women', majority of 'misogynists' are just failed normie pathetic cucks who cry all day. I don't have any respect for them.
I definitely agree that the crowd of men is equally useless to the crowd of women, but women don't even have the outliers either, and it is the outliers that every culture and history pertains to.
 
Your philosophers are few and far between; none of them have changed the world, and the most influential of them spoke almost entirely about genders, e.g., Wollstonecraft, Beauvoir, Butler. (Do metaphysics and epistemology even interest women?)
Ayn Rand was extremely influential
 
"I want to read and discuss philosophy with my future wife."
This is not happening, not now, not ever. Women are not designed this way, you want to discuss philosophy? get some guy friends who are into it.
I cannot even imagine myself discussing about morality or politics with my girlfriend.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ascension, JohnDoe and HarrierDuBois
Based
This is your most mysoginistic thread
Water, women are superficial

Maybe you can find a good foid in a library but she's gonna have high standards too, atleast she won't find your personality weird.
They are the most hypergamous ones, no different than degenerate porn addicts

They mentally masturbate to a plain history which consists on wymxn and a 99 percentile gigachad having an affair
 
  • +1
Reactions: FutureSlayer, HarrierDuBois and Klasik616
High iq
 
  • +1
Reactions: omnilegent and HarrierDuBois
Ayn Rand was extremely influential
"Extremely" is an over-exaggeration but yes she was fairly influential. But she mostly just rewired ideas of Nietzsche and a few others.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
Not saying I like Ayn Rand, or anything. I hate right wing libertarianism
Animated GIF

Ayn Rand was so full of herself she didn't read anything else, she never engaged with actual philosophers. Despite that her philosophy as a whole makes sense but it's a fiction.
 
Last edited:
I cannot even imagine myself discussing about morality or politics with my girlfriend.
They are the most hypergamous ones, no different than degenerate porn addicts

They mentally masturbate to a plain history which consists on wymxn and a 99 percentile gigachad having an affair
"I want to read and discuss philosophy with my future wife."
This is not happening, not now, not ever. Women are not designed this way, you want to discuss philosophy? get some guy friends who are into it.
This is the actual biggest psyop in world history:
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: SidharthTheSlayer and Klasik616
Real asf honestly

I never bring up my hobbies such as consuming fine art to girls ever because I cant explain anything from it without being judged by them, I dont even tell most guys because so many americans are fucking troglodytes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Whatever, BetterOffDead, hardRscreamer and 2 others
For some reason I didn't get the tag. Good thread, read every word.
When people say they want women to have less rights, I can't help but to cringe. But when women say they don't have enough rights, I cringe as well. I want every woman to be like Emily Dickinson. If feminism can't achieve that, feminism is a scam.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
Real asf honestly

I never bring up my hobbies such as consuming fine art to girls ever because I cant explain anything from it without being judged by them, I dont even tell most guys because so many americans are fucking troglodytes.
The biggest problem is that I like the things classic, and they (goes for most men in the modern world as well) like things contemporary.

The idiocy lies in the fact that classic things are the accumulated cream of the crop of every generation, so you can't go wrong in search of quality, while contemporary is just a majority of bullshit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FutureSlayer and Klasik616
For some reason I didn't get the tag. Good thread, read every word.
When people say they want women to have less rights, I can't help but to cringe. But when women say they don't have enough rights, I cringe as well. I want every woman to be like Emily Dickinson. If feminism can't achieve that, feminism is a scam.
"Women are oppressed" meanwhile men went to jail/exile/got executed because of how strongly they pursued a specific idea...That's how history is shaped...but okaaaay. Oppression is just motivation and inspiration for more volition, if it's easy no one will do it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 1966Ford and SidharthTheSlayer
Real asf honestly

I never bring up my hobbies such as consuming fine art to girls ever because I cant explain anything from it without being judged by them, I dont even tell most guys because so many americans are fucking troglodytes.
Same some foids think those "high IQ" interests are for losers, you have to talk to the right foid. Same with music taste.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois and ChadL1te
What can you even offer me that I can like about you?

Your literature consists mainly of low-effort smut masquerading as a story while containing near zero substance. This is just speaking of contemporary literature as well; historically, even the most influential female writer of all time (Jane Austen) can't compete with Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Shakespeare, etc.

Your philosophers are few and far between; none of them have changed the world, and the most influential of them spoke almost entirely about genders, e.g., Wollstonecraft, Beauvoir, Butler. (Do metaphysics and epistemology even interest women?)

Your cinema consists mainly of hyperbolizing outdated or very specific gender inequalities (that only occur in the best societies that already live better than 95% of the planet does regardless of gender; yeah, very compelling to display inequality through office culture when children starve on the same planet).

The reason you're sexualizing yourself is because your lacking competence in other areas results in your flesh being the only thing you can offer humanity, i.e., something you have not even worked for yourself. (And yes, I despise men who buy into this shit as much as women promoting it; it's a spiral where women are also encouraged to not even develop other areas of their character but focus solely on their flesh.)

I'm not saying that women are useless or can't contribute, but when they seriously wonder on social media why men don't find them appealing other than their bodies, it's because they offer nothing of substance other than their bodies.

I would wish for nothing else regarding women than that they actually sought out and valued profundity in all of life's endeavors. I want to read good metaphysical arguments made by women. I want to see a woman direct a new The Seventh Seal. I want a woman to make The Brother's Karamazov look like old news. Not because I care for the gender but because it benefits humanity as a whole; it's the complacancy and acceptance of mediocrity that gets me.

I want to read and discuss philosophy with my future wife. I don't want a life devoid of substance or to be surrounded by people who lack the desire for profundity.

@Klasik616 @cromagnon @ReadBooksEveryday @DelonLover1999 @Magnum Opus @SidharthTheSlayer @nietzsche[/USER
[/QUOTE]
for whatever reason women like to masculinize themselves

very rarely though you'll find an actual feminine women with class and that’s where you’ll discover you’re actually very attracted to women

moral of the story is yes you are probably attracted to women just not ones who act like men with the same intentions
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
The biggest problem is that I like the things classic, and they (goes for most men in the modern world as well) like things contemporary.

The idiocy lies in the fact that classic things are the accumulated cream of the crop of every generation, so you can't go wrong in search of quality, while contemporary is just a majority of bullshit.
There's a reason why is bullshit, you have to understand the transition from modern to posmodern thought. It consists of destroying the illustration goals and recreating the classic standards, sometimes mocking the standards to create new ways of art.

They see this bullshit as the main goal, the more rare it is the better. It's politics from the new left. Art is a symbol of how degenerated and diverse the society is.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
There's a reason why is bullshit, you have to understand the transition from modern to posmodern thought. It consists of destroying the illustration goals and recreating the classic standards, sometimes mocking the standards to create new ways of art.

They see this bullshit as the main goal, the more rare it is the better. It's politics from the new left. Art is a symbol of how degenerated and diverse the society is.
The Avantgarde always sought greatness though. These peoples seek shit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Klasik616
High IQ thread, though I gotta say one thing: my favorite thinker is, BY FAR, Butler.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois and moredatesmorerapes
I'm not saying that women are useless or can't contribute
The problem is that women as a collective DON'T contribute. They're a net-overall drain on society and as you pointed out their popular culture is laughable garbage.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
The problem is that women as a collective DON'T contribute. They're a net-overall drain on society and as you pointed out their popular culture is laughable garbage.
I visited a bookstore today to purchase some new books. As I skimmed the classics aisle, I saw girls in groups with a sporadic amount of friendzoned guy friends stand around the YA section and even hear a girl coming in requesting the Sarah J. Maas series. I realized something then: that due to social media making people less willing to read, the fewer sold books threaten book shops with bankruptcy, IF NOT for the interest in reading being reignited by TikTok promoting YA and smut. This creates an endless loop of bookstores making more advertisements for that type of literature, as that is what people getting into reading are getting as their recommendation on social media.
 
  • +1
Reactions: perpetuallytired
i couldnt agree more with your statement, altough i believe that women radiate the feminine energy that men thrive on for the society to go further and beyond
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: watah and HarrierDuBois
i couldnt agree more with your statement, altough i believe that women radiate the feminine energy that men thrive on for the society to go further and beyond
They can, most don't.
 
How many men value "profundity"? Fucking lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: twojei and Deleted member 84469
They can, most don't.
most dont? its probably the fact that you're focused on the really vocal minority, or the up and coming trend of "women dont need men" that you think this way, if you've experienced culture throughout the world you'd know most women(altough in my opinion not loyal) they tend to help their significant others and i guess, motivate the men, in some way, thus contributing in someway lol
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: watah
i couldnt agree more with your statement, altough i believe that women radiate the feminine energy that men thrive on for the society to go further and beyond
2024 nigga…
 
  • +1
Reactions: HarrierDuBois
How many men value "profundity"? Fucking lol.
Not you, obviously. But everyone has different needs, some require mental stimulation as well as physical.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 84469
I visited a bookstore today to purchase some new books. As I skimmed the classics aisle, I saw girls in groups with a sporadic amount of friendzoned guy friends stand around the YA section and even hear a girl coming in requesting the Sarah J. Maas series. I realized something then: that due to social media making people less willing to read, the fewer sold books threaten book shops with bankruptcy, IF NOT for the interest in reading being reignited by TikTok promoting YA and smut. This creates an endless loop of bookstores making more advertisements for that type of literature, as that is what people getting into reading are getting as their recommendation on social media.
Popular culture is literally being reduced to porn, which is funny considering how much feminists rant against it jfl.

But tbh I think physical books would've died either way. I do read but only kindle or webfiction.
 
Popular culture is literally being reduced to porn, which is funny considering how much feminists rant against it jfl.

But tbh I think physical books would've died either way. I do read but only kindle or webfiction.
I much prefer physical copies, helps to bind me to the moment as well as me having a tendency to scribble in the books directly when I get ideas, especially philosophy.
 
What can you even offer me that I can like about you?

Your literature consists mainly of low-effort smut masquerading as a story while containing near zero substance. This is just speaking of contemporary literature as well; historically, even the most influential female writer of all time (Jane Austen) can't compete with Dostoevsky, Tolstoy, Shakespeare, etc.

Your philosophers are few and far between; none of them have changed the world, and the most influential of them spoke almost entirely about genders, e.g., Wollstonecraft, Beauvoir, Butler. (Do metaphysics and epistemology even interest women?)

Your cinema consists mainly of hyperbolizing outdated or very specific gender inequalities (that only occur in the best societies that already live better than 95% of the planet does regardless of gender; yeah, very compelling to display inequality through office culture when children starve on the same planet).

The reason you're sexualizing yourself is because your lacking competence in other areas results in your flesh being the only thing you can offer humanity, i.e., something you have not even worked for yourself. (And yes, I despise men who buy into this shit as much as women promoting it; it's a spiral where women are also encouraged to not even develop other areas of their character but focus solely on their flesh.)

I'm not saying that women are useless or can't contribute, but when they seriously wonder on social media why men don't find them appealing other than their bodies, it's because they offer nothing of substance other than their bodies.

I would wish for nothing else regarding women than that they actually sought out and valued profundity in all of life's endeavors. I want to read good metaphysical arguments made by women. I want to see a woman direct a new The Seventh Seal. I want a woman to make The Brother's Karamazov look like old news. Not because I care for the gender but because it benefits humanity as a whole; it's the complacancy and acceptance of mediocrity that gets me.

I want to read and discuss philosophy with my future wife. I don't want a life devoid of substance or to be surrounded by people who lack the desire for profundity.

@Klasik616 @cromagnon @ReadBooksEveryday @DelonLover1999 @Magnum Opus @SidharthTheSlayer @nietzsche
Learning about woman, their true nature of course is a good test of intelligence and sentience tbh
 
Women offer pussy. Nothing else
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bomber517
Not you, obviously. But everyone has different needs, some require mental stimulation as well as physical.
I literally have a phd in studying the "profound" art you mentioned, and I can tell you gender has nothing to do with this. Most people don't give a shit about high brow literature or whatever.
 
  • +1
Reactions: twojei
you are clueless niggroid homunculus

most dont? its probably the fact that you're focused on the really vocal minority, or the up and coming trend of "women dont need men" that you think this way, if you've experienced culture throughout the world you'd know most women(altough in my opinion not loyal) they tend to help their significant others and i guess, motivate the men, in some way, thus contributing in someway lol
We’re talking about the first world who cares about “all around the world” go back to insta reels please
 

Similar threads

Yliaster
Replies
4
Views
257
distance decay
distance decay
dreamcake1mo
Replies
18
Views
310
Primalsplit
Primalsplit
forevergymcelling
2 3
Replies
141
Views
4K
castizo_ascender
castizo_ascender
dreamcake1mo
Replies
1
Views
61
Shahnameh
Shahnameh
JohnDoe
Replies
19
Views
261
Gengar
Gengar

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top