CoolMan78
Silver
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2025
- Posts
- 504
- Reputation
- 529
(pre-pubertal group: 4.08 mm ± 0.3, P = 0.01; post-pubertal group: 3.93 mm ± 0.2, P < 0.01), and lower molars (pre-pubertal group: 3.60 mm ± 0.1, P = 0.001; post-pubertal group: 2.89 mm ± 0.7, P = 0.002). In Maxillary arch, backward movement in the upper incisors (pre-pubertal group: − 1.03 mm ± 0.1; P = 0.02; post-pubertal group: − 1.48 mm ± 0.6, P = 0.03) and upper molars (pre-pubertal group: − 1.12 mm ± 0.5; P = 0.05; post-pubertal group: − 1.49 mm ± 0.6, P = 0.03)
This is the source:
www.nature.com
What do you guys think?
This is the source:
Treatment effects of Herbst appliance in skeletal Class II cases during pre-pubertal and post-pubertal periods: a cone-beam computed tomographic study - Scientific Reports
In the present study, Thirty-six Class patients II (A condition in which the upper jaw is larger than the lower jaw) were randomly selected and assigned to one of two groups based on their maturation stage: the pre-pubertal group (18 patients, mean age 9.15 ± 1.5 years) and post-pubertal group...
www.nature.com
