Do you agree with this SMV ranking based on race (WOMEN)?

[SecularIslamist]

Objectively (key word here). So leave your fetishes aside. I think the global hierarchy goes like this:

1. Whites (Nordic,Germanic, Slav, Anglo etc)
2. Meds (Greeks, Spanish, Italians etc)
3. Latinos (Mexicans, Argentinians, Brazilians)
4. MENAs (Morocco, Turkey to Iran)
5. East Asian (China, Korea Japan)
6. South Asian (Pakistan, India, Bangladesh)
7. SEA (Thailand, Indonesian, Cambodia etc)
8. Black (all nigger countries)

I think online dating is pretty much reflective of it as well.

I'm a MENAsexual retard. If it was my opinions I would go MENA, med, white, Latino etc - but that's just my taste. I think this is pretty objective based on what's out there and how certain races of women get treated. Ofc you can get a gook/south Asian/Arab etc girl that mogs a white girl, but generally they don't. There is ample evidence to suggest average white girl is preferred over top 10% of other races.

There maybe some intra-racial mogging (Koreans mog other gooks, Pakistan mog other curries, Lebanese fog other MENAs) but taken as a whole they are in the same category. This includes some who may bring down the SMV of a certain race e.g. Yemenis (Arabs) or Bolivians (Latinos) because they are seen as the uglier version of the wider race.

Thoughts? @Manchild_v2 @flippasav @PrinceLuenLeoncur

 

[WaterGod]

SEA > South Asian

 

[Jason Voorhees]

White girls are next level

 

[Deleted member 107106]

MENAs over latinos but other than that its good

 

[Deleted member 126320]

East Asian women have insanely high SMV. Same for Quadroon and Castiza Latinas

Thai women also have infinitely more SMV than curry women. Curry women just have higher smv than black women, but a mixed black woman has much more smv.

Southern European women have less SMV than they do, same for Anglo and German women. Only Eastern European women and Nordic match or surpass them.

 

[SecularIslamist]

SEA > South Asian

It's like arguing Czech football league mogs Polish football league.

But they are very similar imo..

White girls are next level

Unfortunately there is a short supply but the Jews made them race traitors at least.

MENAs over latinos but other than that its good

It's an open question. I prefer MENAs ofc. I have to say that Latinos do have sex appeal. That might be because of the liberalism which MENAs don't have.

 

[SecularIslamist]

East Asian women have insanely high SMV. Same for Quadroon and Castiza Latinas

Southern European women have less SMV than they do, same for Anglo and German women. Only Eastern European women and Nordic match or surpass them.

I'm not taking into account these intra-racial differences.

East Asians do not have "insane" SMV. Some men definitely have a massive boner and fetish for them. These individuals probably rate them the highest. But most don't.

They are BWC chasers as well which makes men go after them because they are easy. Not because they are high SMV to men.

 

[Deleted member 126320]

I'm not taking into account these intra-racial differences.

East Asians do not have "insane" SMV. Some men definitely have a massive boner and fetish for them. They probably rate them the highest. But most don't.

They are BWC chasers as well which makes men go after them because they are easy. Not because they are high SMV.

They have higher SMV than MENA women. Culture and perception makes a huge difference. Northern Italian women have way morfe SMV than greek women. Latinas have more SMV than Anglo women as well especially if its not a indio/negro latina

 

[SecularIslamist]

They have higher SMV than MENA women. Culture and perception makes a huge difference.

East Asians don't have higher SMV than MENAs. They just have an insane appeal to cucked anime fags. Most gooks are capped at MTB. Only certain noodlewhores are HTB. Almost impossible for them to be Staceylite unless they get surgery and look less gook - which defeats the point.

They are not higher than whites / meds. This point literally cannot be argued. The first two are untouchable.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

It's like arguing Czech football league mogs Polish football league.

But they are very similar imo..

Unfortunately there is a short supply but the Jews made them race traitors at least.


It's an open question. I prefer MENAs ofc. I have to say that Latinos do have sex appeal. That might be because of the liberalism which MENAs don't have.

Everyone secretly loves white girls but pretend they dont to not seem like sheep/shallow or seem like fetishist. White women are everyone's type.

 

[5foot4currycel]

White passing Latinos yes but non white passing are much lower

 

[Deleted member 133415]

Everyone secretly loves white girls but pretend they dont to not seem like sheep/shallow or seem like fetishist. White women are everyone's type.

Most of them age bad so no, I prefer med / menas

 

[Deleted member 126320]

East Asians don't have higher SMV than MENAs. They just have an insane appeal to cucked anime fags. Most gooks are capped at MTB. Only certain noodlewhores are HTB. Almost impossible for them to be Staceylite unless they get surgery and look less gook - which defeats the point.

They are not higher than whites / meds. This point literally cannot be argued. The first two are untouchable.

your collection of these races is something only a shitskin would make. A woman from Ireland has no where near the SMV as a woman from Russia, just like a Latina from Colombia vs one from Haiti.

Most people prefer their race/phenotype, obviously, so whites will win just based on the fact that most western people are whites and white men would rather date white women.

The average man would rather date a woman from Colombia than a woman from the UK, i'm talking a non-latino and non-european man. women who win beauty contests globally are overwhelmingly not white, they are at mixed, and maybe some are med looking whites

If I am using your shit categories, It's white women broadly, including Greece, Spain, Poland, Russia, etc. makes no sense in separating northern and southern europeans

Then its Latinas broadly speaking, even if subhumans per capita Latin America is very high. The hot ones are all that matter.

Then its East Asian women. Though these two can be switched.

Then MENA, they are literally obsessed with plastic surgery, even worse than gooks.

Then Curry. But its really hard to even determine this, i think western men would rather date a lighter black pheno woman over a curry pheno

 

[SecularIslamist]

Everyone secretly loves white girls but pretend they dont to not seem like sheep/shallow or seem like fetishist. White women are everyone's type.

No, some people genuinely don't. I'm not saying I don't like white women. They are attractive. But I swear to God I've always preferred women with darker features. Light skin obviously but darker features. I've never liked the blonde / blue eyes look. But I will admit that is the general consensus amongst most men.

And no, jfl people do have fetishes.

your collection of these races is something only a shitskin would make. A woman from Ireland has no where near the SMV as a woman from Russia, just like a Latina from Colombia vs one from Haiti.

Most people prefer their race/phenotype, obviously, so whites will win just based on the fact that most western people are whites and white men would rather date white women.

The average man would rather date a woman from Colombia than a woman from the UK, i'm talking a non-latino and non-european man. women who win beauty contests globally are overwhelmingly not white, they are at mixed, and maybe some are med looking whites

If I am using your shit categories, It's white women broadly, including Greece, Spain, Poland, Russia, etc. makes no sense in separating northern and southern europeans

Then its Latinas broadly speaking, even if subhumans per capita Latin America is very high. The hot ones are all that matter.

I knew you was going to make this argument that's why I didn't want to tag you. Yes it's a broad generalization. I probably do prefer Columbians over Brits btw. I don't know if that would be the general consensus though.

Then its East Asian women. Though these two can be switched.

Then MENA, they are literally obsessed with plastic surgery, even worse than gooks.

Then Curry. But its really hard to even determine this, i think western men would rather date a lighter black pheno woman over a curry pheno

Are you commenting based on your dick or everyone's dick. And no jfl a light black women is not more desirable than south Asian. Unless you mean over a Dravidians.

 

[Jaynoyn523]

Objectively (key word here). So leave your fetishes aside. I think the global hierarchy goes like this:

1. Whites (Nordic,Germanic, Slav, Anglo etc)
2. Meds (Greeks, Spanish, Italians etc)
3. Latinos (Mexicans, Argentinians, Brazilians)
4. MENAs (Morocco, Turkey to Iran)
5. East Asian (China, Korea Japan)
6. South Asian (Pakistan, India, Bangladesh)
7. SEA (Thailand, Indonesian, Cambodia etc)
8. Black (all nigger countries)

I think online dating is pretty much reflective of it as well.

I'm a MENAsexual retard. If it was my opinions I would go MENA, med, white, Latino etc - but that's just my taste. I think this is pretty objective based on what's out there and how certain races of women get treated. Ofc you can get a gook/south Asian/Arab etc girl that mogs a white girl, but generally they don't. There is ample evidence to suggest average white girl is preferred over top 10% of other races.

There maybe some intra-racial mogging (Koreans mog other gooks, Pakistan mog other curries, Lebanese fog other MENAs) but taken as a whole they are in the same category. This includes some who may bring down the SMV of a certain race e.g. Yemenis (Arabs) or Bolivians (Latinos) because they are seen as the uglier version of the wider race.

Thoughts? @Manchild_v2 @flippasav @PrinceLuenLeoncur

swap meds with whites, and MENAs with latinos and its perfect

 

[5foot4currycel]

Are you commenting based on your dick or everyone's dick. And no jfl a light black women is not more desirable than south Asian. Unless you mean over a Dravidians.

Light skin black women easily have way more smv than south Asian women jfl

 

[puniteking]

Objectively (key word here). So leave your fetishes aside. I think the global hierarchy goes like this:

1. Whites (Nordic,Germanic, Slav, Anglo etc)
2. Meds (Greeks, Spanish, Italians etc)
3. Latinos (Mexicans, Argentinians, Brazilians)
4. MENAs (Morocco, Turkey to Iran)
5. East Asian (China, Korea Japan)
6. South Asian (Pakistan, India, Bangladesh)
7. SEA (Thailand, Indonesian, Cambodia etc)
8. Black (all nigger countries)

I think online dating is pretty much reflective of it as well.

I'm a MENAsexual retard. If it was my opinions I would go MENA, med, white, Latino etc - but that's just my taste. I think this is pretty objective based on what's out there and how certain races of women get treated. Ofc you can get a gook/south Asian/Arab etc girl that mogs a white girl, but generally they don't. There is ample evidence to suggest average white girl is preferred over top 10% of other races.

There maybe some intra-racial mogging (Koreans mog other gooks, Pakistan mog other curries, Lebanese fog other MENAs) but taken as a whole they are in the same category. This includes some who may bring down the SMV of a certain race e.g. Yemenis (Arabs) or Bolivians (Latinos) because they are seen as the uglier version of the wider race.

Thoughts? @Manchild_v2 @flippasav @PrinceLuenLeoncur

Jfl worst list of all time

Dating apps show Asian foids have the most matches

 

[SecularIslamist]

swap meds with whites, and MENAs with latinos and its perfect

Your opinion? If every man on earth was polled I don't think they would choose a German / Nordic over a med.

But I agree MENAs > meds. I thought it was my fetish rating them higher than Latinos. But people here seem to think they are higher.

Light skin black women easily have way more smv than south Asian women jfl

I don't think so. Even the best looking light skin women is fogged by beat looking south Asian.

Jfl worst list of all time

Dating apps show Asian foids have the most matches

No nigger. I just posted above they have the most "matches" because they actually match back and they love BWC. They drop all standards for whites and likewise whites go after them because they are easy.

 

[5foot4currycel]

I don't think so. Even the best looking light skin women is fogged by beat looking south Asian.

That might be true facially but light skin women have better bodies and have overall higher smv as a result. Also their proximity to whiteness is closer.

 

[Deleted member 126320]

No, some people genuinely don't. I'm not saying I don't like white women. They are attractive. But I swear to God I've always preferred women with darker features. Light skin obviously but darker features. I've never liked the blonde / blue eyes look. But I will admit that is the general consensus amongst most men.

And no, jfl people do have fetishes.

I knew you was going to make this argument that's why I didn't want to tag you. Yes it's a broad generalization. I probably do prefer Columbians over Brits btw. I don't know if that would be the general consensus though.

Are you commenting based on your dick or everyone's dick. And no jfl a light black women is not more desirable than south Asian. Unless you mean over a Dravidians.

Yes, dravidians, idk I've seen more girls who are black get simps and men of all races lusting over black women than curry women, even if a lighter curry has more smv, I cannot give a general determination.

Black women date interracially more than curry women do as well

Most people prefer their own race, and if not that, the lighter equivalent, e.g. a guatamalan preferring a colombian woman and an italian preferring a ukrainian and a dravid curry wanting a yellow skin curry and a philipino wanting a korean.

regardless of your shit cateogories, there's more variance between gooks, curries, latinos and even blacks than there is between european groups

Like compare a sri lankan with those r1b slavic pakistanis, or a korean between a philipino, much bigger differences between than and even a sicilian and a swede

 

[SecularIslamist]

That might be true facially but light skin women have better bodies and have overall higher smv as a result. Also their proximity to whiteness is closer.

Yeah for sure their bodies are better. Light skin black women don't really exist in any significant segment of a population. Mayne in America but their not really a race out their for lightskin black. They are mutts existing in the USA, Brazil, maybe London.

Yes, dravidians, idk I've seen more girls who are black get simps and men of all races lusting over black women than curry women, even if a lighter curry has more smv, I cannot give a general determination.

Black women date interracially more than curry women do as well

Yeah ofc they fog Dravidians I'm not denying that. Black women do not fog curry women. Both are undesirable but curry women (excluding dravidians) are more desirable. Sheboons are undesirable unless you have a fetish. They are the LEAST likely to fuck men outside other races. How often do you see a black woman with another race? Very very rare. Most mixed black people have a black father never mother.

Most people prefer their own race, and if not that, the lighter equivalent, e.g. a guatamalan preferring a colombian woman and an italian preferring a ukrainian and a dravid curry wanting a yellow skin curry and a philipino wanting a korean.

This is an OBJECTIVE scale. When you say most people prefer their own race - their is a cultural , nationalistic and religious reason usually. You strip away all of this and place then in a cosmopolitan location like NYC or London they all run to white women.

regardless of your shit cateogories, there's more variance between gooks, curries, latinos and even blacks than there is between european groups

Like compare a sri lankan with those r1b slavic pakistanis, or a korean between a philipino, much bigger differences between than and even a sicilian and a swede

Slavic Pakistani? Are you on drugs? They are still in the same category what don't you understand? A Sri lanakan and paki is still south Asian. There is more similarity between paki/indian (south Asian) than Italian and paki or Turkish and paki.

 

[Deleted member 150805]

nah

 

[choppedshyt]

Not all Latina women are ranked the same, for example Mexicans aren't as desirable as Colombians. Menas are desirable across all ethnicities so I would rank them higher

 

[SecularIslamist]

Not all Latina women are ranked the same, for example Mexicans aren't as desirable as Colombians. Menas are desirable across all ethnicities so I would rank them higher

Yeah I know this. But you can still find an attractive Iranian / Moroccan that fogs a Lebenese or looks like them.

Likewise you can find a mexican that is Colombian tier.

If I didn't generalise I would have to list out every single nationality!
And people would still complain - my Pashtun village mogs you Baloch retards.

 

[5foot4currycel]

Yeah for sure their bodies are better. Light skin black women don't really exist in any significant segment of a population. Mayne in America but their not really a race out their for lightskin black. They are mutts existing in the USA, Brazil, maybe London.

Yeah ofc they fog Dravidians I'm not denying that. Black women do not fog curry women. Both are undesirable but curry women (excluding dravidians) are more desirable. Sheboons are undesirable unless you have a fetish. They are the LEAST likely to fuck men outside other races. How often do you see a black woman with another race? Very very rare. Most mixed black people have a black father never mother.

I’d argue that American black women (brown and darkskin) have higher smv than south asian women too. It’s not like you see south asian women dating interracially either lol.

Also jfl at excluding Dravidians when they make up a significant percentage of south Asians especially in the US.

 

[SecularIslamist]

I’d argue that American black women (brown and darkskin) have higher smv than south asian women too. It’s not like you see south asian women dating interracially either lol.

South Asian women are low SMV I agree.. I already ranked them 6/8. But they are saved by some GL ones - you can't deny Bollywood has some GL people.

Ironically I posted this thread because some south Asians on this forum act like pakis mogs Latinos / MENAs @JohnDoe @CFW432

Now I am defending The smv of SA women

Also jfl at excluding Dravidians when they make up a significant percentage of south Asians especially in the US.

If Dravidians were a separate category they would be lower than blacks. Even Nixon agrees

 

[Deleted member 126320]

Yeah for sure their bodies are better. Light skin black women don't really exist in any significant segment of a population. Mayne in America but their not really a race out their for lightskin black. They are mutts existing in the USA, Brazil, maybe London.

Yeah ofc they fog Dravidians I'm not denying that. Black women do not fog curry women. Both are undesirable but curry women (excluding dravidians) are more desirable. Sheboons are undesirable unless you have a fetish. They are the LEAST likely to fuck men outside other races. How often do you see a black woman with another race? Very very rare. Most mixed black people have a black father never mother.

The USA has a shit ton of lightskin black women. And black women do date out more than South Asian women, in the USA this is true IDK about UK though. The peak SMV of a black woman fogs the peak smv of a curry woman, even if the average black woman is a 85kg sheboon

This is an OBJECTIVE scale. When you say most people prefer their own race - their is a cultural , nationalistic and religious reason usually. You strip away all of this and place then in a cosmopolitan location like NYC or London they all run to white women.

People prefer their own race because its built into our DNA. The only thing that white women have going for them is the fact that men generally like women with lighter features because it is more dimorphic, and for women its because white men are taller than ethnics.

that's it. there's nothing inherently about white faces or features that make them objectively better looking than ethnics

Just because you are a giga self hater due to being raised in the West, doesn't mean that's a natural state of being or even the average among your kind. This is the reason why mixed people are rated the highest, because they have a sense of familiarity to more groups of people

Slavic Pakistani? Are you on drugs? They are still in the same category what don't you understand? A Sri lanakan and paki is still south Asian. There is more similarity between paki/indian (south Asian) than Italian and paki or Turkish and paki.

No there isn't, they are just the same area and you are lumping them for the same cultural, nationalistic or religious reasons. A pakistani pashtun like those two dudes I posted today have more genes in common with even a Turk and even some souuthern Russians than a Sri lankan. Yes, there's a general curry cluster/genes/phenotype, but its not all of them. just like most latinos are mestizos or triracials but there are still 100% black ones, 100% chinese, 100% asian, etc and huge phenotypical variance just from being mongrelized

A sri lankan and pakistani have drastically different SMVs

 

[SecularIslamist]

The USA has a shit ton of lightskin black women. And black women do date out more than South Asian women, in the USA this is true IDK about UK though. The peak SMV of a black woman fogs the peak smv of a curry woman, even if the average black woman is a 85kg sheboon

Lightskin black women aren't a separate race in and of itself. They got white DNA mixed with them. The only way they can preserve themselves is by breeding with other mixed people.

People prefer their own race because its built into our DNA. The only thing that white women have going for them is the fact that men generally like women with lighter features because it is more dimorphic, and for women its because white men are taller than ethnics.

that's it. there's nothing inherently about white faces or features that make them objectively better looking than ethnics

Just because you are a giga self hater due to being raised in the West, doesn't mean that's a natural state of being or even the average among your kind. This is the reason why mixed people are rated the highest, because they have a sense of familiarity to more groups of people

That's just completely false. People date their own race because of cultural compatibility. If you look around in any secular westernised globohomo society men of all backgrounds chase after white women.

No there isn't, they are just the same area and you are lumping them for the same cultural, nationalistic or religious reasons. A pakistani pashtun like those two dudes I posted today have more genes in common with even a Turk and even some souuthern Russians than a Sri lankan. Yes, there's a general curry cluster/genes/phenotype, but its not all of them. just like most latinos are mestizos or triracials but there are still 100% black ones, 100% chinese, 100% asian, etc and huge phenotypical variance just from being mongrelized

A sri lankan and pakistani have drastically different SMVs

Yes there are differences in smv in every single racial category I posted above. But I am not posting every single nationality and ranking them one by one. If I did then yes of course some nationalities that to belong to a certain race, are higher than others. I already said Pakistan is highest SMV in south Asia the same way Lebanese is likely the highest in MENA. Or Nordics among whites.

 

[5foot4currycel]

Ironically I posted this thread because some south Asians on this forum act like pakis mogs Latinos / MENAs @JohnDoe @CFW432

Now I am defending The smv of SA women

They definitely wouldn’t here in the US but Idk how it would be like in the UK or other European countries.

 

[Deleted member 126320]

Lightskin black women aren't a separate race in and of itself. They got white DNA mixed with them. The only way they can preserve themselves is by breeding with other mixed people.

That's just completely false. People date their own race because of cultural compatibility. If you look around in any secular westernised globohomo society men of all backgrounds chase after white women.

Average black person in the USA is 20% white, they don't need to breed with whites or mulattos to remain like that.

black women are capable of having good bodies, they just need to straighten their hair.

Yes there are differences in smv in every single racial category I posted above. But I am not posting every single nationality and ranking them one by one. If I did then yes of course some nationalities that to belong to a certain race, are higher than others. I already said Pakistan is highest SMV in south Asia the same way Lebanese is likely the highest in MENA. Or Nordics among whites.

It's slavs among whites for women imo and latin/med for men.

Idk, I live around a shit ton of ethnics and most don't care about white women, the only non-whites obsessed with white women are black men, and they are also obsessed with asian women and latinas, just these groups give blacks less pussy than white women do

Most of the curries, chinks and arabs I see with white women purely got with them for green card

 

[SecularIslamist]

Average black person in the USA is 20% white, they don't need to breed with whites or mulattos to remain like that.

Source? That's a retarded stat.
Only 4% of Americans are two or more races. And that's not just mullato - Includes many mixes.

black women are capable of having good bodies, they just need to straighten their hair.

Never denied this. I'm grateful the nigger DNA is in every nafri women because those hips are so fine

It's slavs among whites for women imo and latin/med for men.

Latin/med men don't mog whites men. You need to be JBWpilled.

Idk, I live around a shit ton of ethnics and most don't care about white women, the only non-whites obsessed with white women are black men, and they are also obsessed with asian women and latinas, just these groups give blacks less pussy than white women do

Most of the curries, chinks and arabs I see with white women purely got with them for green card

If you are denying ethnics DONT chase white women you are retarded. Idk maybe it's different in America. Its not just FOBs after green card. They can be so pathetic as to reject an MTB of their own race and go for a white LTB. But in their mind white LTB is higher SMV.

 

[5foot4currycel]

Source? That's a retarded stat.
Only 4% of Americans are two or more races. And that's not just mullato - Includes many mixes.

View attachment 3849294

Even if a black person has 50% white dna they’ll still be counted as part of the 13% black percentage if both their parents are black. You only get counted as mixed if you have one fully white or non black parent.

 

[SecularIslamist]

Even if a black person has 50% white dna they’ll still be counted as part of the 13% black percentage if both their parents are black. You only get counted as mixed if you have one fully white or non black parent.

How do you have 50% white DNA if your parents are both black?

 

[5foot4currycel]

How do you have 50% white DNA if your parents are both black?

Someone like Stephen curry is probably around 50% white or more but he’s considered black in America since both his parents are black lol. Basically they would have mixed with white along time ago but for generations since then they have mostly been with other black people with somewhat similar dna percentages.

 

[Deleted member 154744]

JFL if you think Indians have higher smv than blacks

 

[SecularIslamist]

Someone like Stephen curry is probably around 50% white or more but he’s considered black in America since both his parents are black lol. Basically they would have mixed with white along time ago but for generations since then they have mostly been with other black people with somewhat similar dna percentages.

The blackness hasn't been bleached completely.

JFL if you think Indians have higher smv than blacks

South Asians. We are not talking Indians only. You're forgetting some Indians in the north look decent.

 

[Deleted member 126320]

Source? That's a retarded stat.
Only 4% of Americans are two or more races. And that's not just mullato - Includes many mixes.

View attachment 3849294

Never denied this. I'm grateful the nigger DNA is in every nafri women because those hips are so fine

Latin/med men don't mog whites men. You need to be JBWpilled.

If you are denying ethnics DONT chase white women you are retarded. Idk maybe it's different in America. Its not just FOBs after green card. They can be so pathetic as to reject an MTB of their own race and go for a white LTB. But in their mind white LTB is higher SMV.

I don't see it. It's mostly ethnic women chasing white men here, but even those girls are a vocal minority and usually gook. White women are becoming out of style even for white men who are going for arab and latinas

Black americans are ancestrally part european because slave masters raped their slaves. they dont identify as mixed because of the one drop rule. Black women have low smv because they are fat and ghetto mostly

African Americans typically have a mix of African and European ancestry, with an average of roughly 75-80% African and 20-25% European DNA. This European component is largely a result of historical events, particularly the transatlantic slave trade and the subsequent interactions between enslaved Africans and European colonizers in the Americas.

It's wild that you don't know this, it's like one of the most basic facts about our black population

BTW yes nordics are preferred by shitskins because they get with white people usually for the sole purpose of whitening their children and not even out of sexual desire. but actual white people prefer Mediterranean men

 

[Deleted member 154744]

South Asians. We are not talking Indians only. You're forgetting some Indians in the north look decent.

Oh yes… We are very familiar with your caste system…
At the end of the day you guys are still Indians
I don’t see any difference, and I don’t think anyone except Indians cares about that either

 

[Deleted member 126320]

The blackness hasn't been bleached completely.

View attachment 3849364


South Asians. We are not talking Indians only. You're forgetting some Indians in the north look decent.

These are still classified as black people here, and yes a woman with this phenotype would have smv on par with a white woman, and would dwarf any curry woman in comparison. North Indians look like trash to white people too, I think dravidian males are better looking to werstern people because they look exotic and masculine and not like imbred khaleji ripoffs

these women are all black here



and yes these women would fog any curry

 

[Deleted member 126320]

Also if you adjust for age @SecularIslamist 10% of the population under 25 is mixed. Race mixing was illegal until 1963 here btw.

 

[javen1384]

South asian over Southeast Asian ??

Who are we kidding, filipinas alone carry SEAsians over jeetas
My filipina baddies

Vs Pooja

 

[laworg]

Objectively (key word here). So leave your fetishes aside. I think the global hierarchy goes like this:

1. Whites (Nordic,Germanic, Slav, Anglo etc)
2. Meds (Greeks, Spanish, Italians etc)
3. Latinos (Mexicans, Argentinians, Brazilians)
4. MENAs (Morocco, Turkey to Iran)
5. East Asian (China, Korea Japan)
6. South Asian (Pakistan, India, Bangladesh)
7. SEA (Thailand, Indonesian, Cambodia etc)
8. Black (all nigger countries)

I think online dating is pretty much reflective of it as well.

I'm a MENAsexual retard. If it was my opinions I would go MENA, med, white, Latino etc - but that's just my taste. I think this is pretty objective based on what's out there and how certain races of women get treated. Ofc you can get a gook/south Asian/Arab etc girl that mogs a white girl, but generally they don't. There is ample evidence to suggest average white girl is preferred over top 10% of other races.

There maybe some intra-racial mogging (Koreans mog other gooks, Pakistan mog other curries, Lebanese fog other MENAs) but taken as a whole they are in the same category. This includes some who may bring down the SMV of a certain race e.g. Yemenis (Arabs) or Bolivians (Latinos) because they are seen as the uglier version of the wider race.

Thoughts? @Manchild_v2 @flippasav @PrinceLuenLeoncur

Youd get decapitated in raqqah for this

 

[javen1384]

Chinese are down there with the jeetz
Even their beauty influencers are butt ugly

 

[SecularIslamist]

These are still classified as black people here, and yes a woman with this phenotype would have smv on par with a white woman, and would dwarf any curry woman in comparison. North Indians look like trash to white people too, I think dravidian males are better looking to werstern people because they look exotic and masculine and not like imbred khaleji ripoffs

these women are all black here



and yes these women would fog any curry

They look good but they are rare. Why do light skin mixed blacks need their own category? I don't have a category for mixed any other. I still don't think on average they fog south asians - yes they have some foggers like the one you post. Do you think pakis for light black women then? On average I don't think so. But like you said the population is historically low. I think 10% is an exagerration.

South asian over Southeast Asian ??

Who are we kidding, filipinas alone carry SEAsians over jeetas
My filipina baddies
View attachment 3849413View attachment 3849415

Vs Pooja
View attachment 3849419View attachment 3849420

Oh yes… We are very familiar with your caste system…
At the end of the day you guys are still Indians
I don’t see any difference, and I don’t think anyone except Indians cares about that either

I'm not gonna defend the smv of the good looking south asians when I ranked them pretty low already. I literally posted this thread because I was arguing with some curries who felt that certain south asian women (mostly pakis) fog nafris and latinos by objective standards - which is absolutely ridiculous. If you wanna argue they don't even fog SEAs and blacks then I suggest taking it up with @CFW432 and @JohnDoe

 

[SecularIslamist]

Chinese are down there with the jeetz
Even their beauty influencers are butt ugly
View attachment 3849425

Chinese are the lowest SMV gooks, but Japs and Koreans look much better. Still its possible we can see some chink who looks as good as korean even though majority don't.

 

[javen1384]

They look good but they are rare. Why do light skin mixed blacks need their own category? I don't have a category for mixed any other. I still don't think on average they fog south asians - yes they have some foggers like the one you post. Do you think pakis for light black women then? On average I don't think so. But like you said the population is historically low. I think 10% is an exagerration.



I'm not gonna defend the smv of the good looking south asians when I ranked them pretty low already. I literally posted this thread because I was arguing with some curries who felt that certain south asian women (mostly pakis) fog nafris and latinos by objective standards - which is absolutely ridiculous. If you wanna argue they don't even fog SEAs and blacks then I suggest taking it up with @CFW432 and @JohnDoe

Jeets will always oversell jeetas even though majority of jeets would never date one over a white or chink

 

[javen1384]

Chinese are the lowest SMV gooks, but Japs and Koreans look much better. Still its possible we can see some chink who looks as good as korean even though majority don't.

Chinks are the dalits of east asians

 

[javen1384]

She is half korean half chink, got nerfed hard by her chink side

 

[SecularIslamist]

Chinks are the dalits of east asians

View attachment 3849514
She is half korean half chink, got nerfed hard by her chink side

The difference between a chink and a korean is not that perceptible to casual person. Yeah I can notice chinks are lower SMV, but the differences arent that big. You are just Kpop pilled I think.

This is average Korean.

If you told me they were all Chinese I would believe you.

 

[5foot4currycel]

I'm not gonna defend the smv of the good looking south asians when I ranked them pretty low already. I literally posted this thread because I was arguing with some curries who felt that certain south asian women (mostly pakis) fog nafris and latinos by objective standards - which is absolutely ridiculous. If you wanna argue they don't even fog SEAs and blacks then I suggest taking it up with @CFW432 and @JohnDoe

Who do you think fogs between pakis and gulf Arabs like saudis