BigJimsWornOutTires
Kraken
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
- Posts
- 20,548
- Reputation
- 23,037
Ugh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Even though now their wanting boys and girls toys mixed together? Which confuses all the kids now.trans people are ok i don't mind them
what do you mean? kids can just pick whatever toys they want to play with cant they?Even though now their wanting boys and girls toys mixed together? Which confuses all the kids now.
It's called, Planting the idea. "Get them while they're young." We need to end this. World War 3 is the only solution we're left with. We have no other option. Ugh.what do you mean? kids can just pick whatever toys they want to play with cant they?
planting what idea? if girls want to play with legos or whatever and a boy wants to play with dolls what's the problem?It's called, Planting the idea. "Get them while they're young." We need to end this. World War 3 is the only solution we're left with. We have no other option. Ugh.
I see nothing wrong with the girl playing with legos. But the boy playing with dolls will lead that child to have a difficult time with other children. Thus destroying that child. It would increase bullying and alienation.planting what idea? if girls want to play with legos or whatever and a boy wants to play with dolls what's the problem?
if we normalized boys playing with any toys they wanted then they wouldn't have to worry as much about bullying.I see nothing wrong with the girl playing with legos. But the boy playing with dolls will lead that child to have a difficult time with other children. Thus destroying that child. It would increase bullying and alienation.
why is it bad to let kids decide on gender inherently? we already force gender norms on them what's wrong with letting them decide? the next bill isn't necessarily anything, you're using "slippery slope" which is a fallacy.If the people allow a child to decide on gender, then the next bill those voters will have to agree on is Age Not a Factor.
no? explain how it is.You can't disagree on that if you have agreed to the first. That will be contradicting yourself.
If an 8-year-old boy decides he wants to play with dolls and be a girl. And we allow it. Knowing that child is still developing and hasn't fully matured yet. And then the child is manipulated by a pedophile and wants to be with him/her. Intimately. How can you then decide against that? You already corrupted nature by letting him be the other gender that nature disagreed with from birth. How can you stop then? And if the child decides, "I don't need school or any education anymore." You can not disagree and enforce something the child is not comfortable with. The list goes on and on as to the ramifications of the first law passed. You can't decide you wanna stop when YOU feel it's gone too far.if we normalized boys playing with any toys they wanted then they wouldn't have to worry as much about bullying.
why is it bad to let kids decide on gender inherently? we already force gender norms on them what's wrong with letting them decide? the next bill isn't necessarily anything, you're using "slippery slope" which is a fallacy.
no? explain how it is.
what are you talking about, of course pedophiles fucking children is wrong. you know, i have openly advocated for much older age of consent on this very forum actually. explain how a boy playing with a doll necessarily leads to pedophiles fucking them? if letting girls play with boy toys didn't lead to them necessarily being molested how does this work the other way around?Knowing that child is still developing and hasn't fully matured yet. And then the child is manipulated by a pedophile and wants to be with him/her
i can decide against it because i think that the age of consent should be higher, children don't have the mental faculty to consent. nature isn't being corrupted the boy is just playing with a toy. it doesn't say in nature that boys cant play with dolls so what you're saying doesnt even make sense.How can you then decide against that? You already corrupted nature by letting him be the other gender that nature disagreed with from birth.
this is completely different from playing with toys or gender. playing with certain toys or saying you're a girl if you're a boy isn't at all equal to deciding to not go to school and ruin your future life opportunities. technically you would be forcing the child to do something they aren't comfortable with if they did end up deciding they wanted to be a different gender and you were forcing them to be something they deeply didn't want to be.And if the child decides, "I don't need school or any education anymore." You can not disagree and enforce something the child is not comfortable with.
of course we can. in our society we set up laws to stop things from going to far. we say we live in a free country but you obviously don't have the freedom to rape babies or whatever, because that's too far, so we make sure that can't happen.You can't decide you wanna stop when YOU feel it's gone too far.
laws have been changing all throughout history, jflThey're solid! Well thought of for hundreds of years.
When a child does such it means the obvious. I don't wanna say it. But its nothing to do with transgender racism. I don't wanna say it and you know what? I wont. But its nothing to do with demons, devils, angels, delusions, skitzos, etc. I don't wanna say it and I wont. Ugh.
No. A world war ends it. And you can babble babble babble - as to manipulate manipulate manipulate till you're blue in your face. But when we're at war. Theres no law. And the majority is against pedophiles, faggots, criminals, perverts. PERIOD. No exceptions. No excuses. No more babble babble babble. Game over.what are you talking about, of course pedophiles fucking children is wrong. you know, i have openly advocated for much older age of consent on this very forum actually. explain how a boy playing with a doll necessarily leads to pedophiles fucking them? if letting girls play with boy toys didn't lead to them necessarily being molested how does this work the other way around?
i can decide against it because i think that the age of consent should be higher, children don't have the mental faculty to consent. nature isn't being corrupted the boy is just playing with a toy. it doesn't say in nature that boys cant play with dolls so what you're saying doesnt even make sense.
this is completely different from playing with toys or gender. playing with certain toys or saying you're a girl if you're a boy isn't at all equal to deciding to not go to school and ruin your future life opportunities. technically you would be forcing the child to do something they aren't comfortable with if they did end up deciding they wanted to be a different gender and you were forcing them to be something they deeply didn't want to be.
of course we can. in our society we set up laws to stop things from going to far. we say we live in a free country but you obviously don't have the freedom to rape babies or whatever, because that's too far, so we make sure that can't happen.
laws have been changing all throughout history, jfl
If an 8-year-old boy decides he wants to play with dolls and be a girl. And we allow it. Knowing that child is still developing and hasn't fully matured yet. And then the child is manipulated by a pedophile and wants to be with him/her. Intimately. How can you then decide against that? You already corrupted nature by letting him be the other gender that nature disagreed with from birth. How can you stop then? And if the child decides, "I don't need school or any education anymore." You can not disagree and enforce something the child is not comfortable with. The list goes on and on as to the ramifications of the first law passed. You can't decide you wanna stop when YOU feel it's gone too far. We have laws and rules for good reasons. They're solid! Well thought of for hundreds of years. And back then, the ones deciding wasn't smoking weed and popping pills all day like they are right now.
So in other words, you are not only unable to string together a proper argument, you can't even read what I wrote because you're too mentally lazy or your brain is too smooth and wrinkleless. Faced by an opposing view you shut down, like any conservative brainlet does, and say "babble babble im not reading" and ramble about a war or that i'm manipulating. Well, sir, you've just been destroyed and clobbered in this debate.No. A world war ends it. And you can babble babble babble - as to manipulate manipulate manipulate till you're blue in your face. But when we're at war. Theres no law. And the majority is against it. PERIOD. No exceptions. No excuses. No more babble babble babble. Game over.
PS: not gonna read all that useless babble you just did.
That's the cleverness behind the toys being mixed. 'The people' are fucking naive and dumb as fuck. Most of them care less because they have no children and want no children.I don't have a problem with kids playing with whatever toy they want to play with. If you have a boy and he wants to play with a "girls" toy and you say no because "that's for girls". Aren't YOU planting the idea of gender norms in their head? Now they think they're different or weird for wanting to play with those toys, or that they need to be a girl to play with a doll. I wouldn't want my kids to be trans, I wouldn't accept it, but I acknowledge that I actually know very little of the science behind it. That being said, I would not stop my child from playing with whatever toy they want to play with. I would be more concerned with people advertising trans education/terminology to my young child than what toys they are playing with. My best friend played with dolls as a kid and he's the most masculine chad I know today.
not even that much tbh, but OP is so low iq and his arguments are so bad that i couldn’t help but destroy them.@Original avid supporter of the LGBT. Mirn
Not even close. I read your babble. That's all it was. Useless babble. You made no sense whatsoever. Didn't prove anything. Just useless garbage! How can anyone respond to such? An idiot, perhaps. Or one that smokes weed all day. I don't. So I won't respond to that babble. You lost. Deal with it!not even that much tbh, but OP is so low iq and his arguments are so bad that i couldn’t help but destroy them.
Your like a budget @disillusionedUgh.
whatever helps you cope with using fallacious arguments and conclusions that don’t follow from your premises.Not even close. I read your babble. That's all it was. Useless babble. You made no sense whatsoever. Didn't prove anything. Just useless garbage! How can anyone respond to such? An idiot, perhaps. Or one that smokes weed all day. I don't. So I won't respond to that babble. You lost. Deal with it!
Ugh. You're embarrassing yourself! You lost. Why are you still trying? This is so sad and painful to read.whatever helps you cope with using fallacious arguments and conclusions that don’t follow from your premises.
i thought your arguments were bad but i am at least mentally capable of forming counter arguments to them. you can’t even do that. but of course, you don’t care, and you probably don’t genuinely care about truth or debate.
what do you mean “still trying”? obviously the debate is over, i agree. it ended because you ran away and refused to respond to my argument, claiming it was babble yet unable to elaborate on why i was wrong or what was incorrect about my argument.Ugh. You're embarrassing yourself! You lost. Why are you still trying? This is so sad and painful to read.
On the contrary, that was last night. I had a gorgeous woman in the bedroom waiting for me. "Jim! My pussy's not gonna take care of itself! Get that monstrous cock in here...now!" She yelled so I had to quickly win that debate, which I did, though YOU'RE having a difficult time adjusting to the reality of LOSING the debate. Ugh. Seriously! You're embarrassing yourself. Stop that. Ugh.what do you mean “still trying”? obviously the debate is over, i agree. it ended because you ran away and refused to respond to my argument, claiming it was babble yet unable to elaborate on why i was wrong or what was incorrect about my argument.