Do you believe in the double standard?

[AlexAP]

Do you have different standards for promiscuous men and promiscuous women?

I know the logic of people who think promiscuity is different for men than for women: "A good key can open many locks, but a bad lock is opened by many keys." It's difficult for men, so it's an achievement, it's easy for women, so it's not an achievement.

But I don't see it that way tbh. Men who are promiscuous are either born lucky (good looks) and don't have to work much for it, or the women sleep with them for money (rich men), in that case you can admire a man for being rich, but his promiscuity is not an achievement, as there are many gold-diggers. Also, I know non-rich Normies who are promiscuous, they're mostly guys who go partying many times per week and hit on 20-30 drunk girls everytime they're there, most of them being average or below-average. Is this really an achievement? Playing the numbers game with below-average, drunk girls at clubs?

What's your opinion on this?

 

[WontStopNorwooding]

 

[Deleted member 14303]

 

[AlexAP]

View attachment 1300963

Which language? Russian?

 

[WontStopNorwooding]

Which language? Russian?

Ukrainian i think

 

[Yliaster]

View attachment 1300964

does anyone know what the actual fck is this ????

 

[Deleted member 6128]

I’m not attracted to men so why would I give a fuck about a mans promiscuity.

 

[Chadeep]

Quality for me mogs tbh. Rather LTR 10 Stacies than Hooking up with 100 Beckies and live in fear of getting me tooed or STD's

 

[AlexAP]

I’m not attracted to men so why would I give a fuck about a mans promiscuity.

It's not about an individual man, it's about societal standards.

For example, if you have kids. Would you judge your son and your daughter different if they both become promiscuous?

 

[Frank Jack]

No and no man does. There's a reason why men cheer on other men who fuck a lot of women and don't do it for women who fuck a lot of men. Double standards between the sexes exist for a reason.

 

[AlexAP]

Double standards between the sexes exist for a reason.

Not always good reasons though.

Good-looking men and rich men have it as easy as women, I don't see why it's an achievement for them if they're promiscuous.

 

[Deleted member 14303]

does anyone know what the actual fck is this ????

is a pigeon bro

 

[Deleted member 275]

My ex told me to fuck other women while being in a relationship with her because she didnt want to be the only girl i ever had sex with jfl.

Most women want promiscuous men, its an advantage not a disadvantage. Women only have themselves to blame for having such standards for men that encourages them to sleep around.

 

[Yliaster]

My ex told me to fuck other women while being in a relationship with her because she didnt want to be the only girl i ever had sex with jfl.

Lemme guess,she grew up without a father

 

[AlexAP]

Most women want promiscuous men, its an advantage not a disadvantage.

Not true, most women would be repulsed if a guy has a 100+ laycount and would not LTR him. They don't want virgins, but not a slayer either.

 

[Deleted member 6128]

It's not about an individual man, it's about societal standards.

For example, if you have kids. Would you judge your son and your daughter different if they both become promiscuous?

I wouldn’t judge them differently

But men and women live in 2 different worlds

Ofc I would be harsher on my daughter for being promiscuous cause she will face more repercussions if she’s not careful

Example she could get pregnant, be killed, kidnapped and so on

I don’t trust other men simple as

I wouldn’t care if my son was promiscuous if he isn’t rich if he was rich it would be a totally different case

 

[WontStopNorwooding]

Not true, most women would be repulsed if a guy has a 100+ laycount and would not LTR him. They don't want virgins, but not a slayer either.

If they had to pick between a virgin and a slayer, they would def choose the slayer

 

[Deleted member 275]

Lemme guess,she grew up without a father

Nah she had a good kind father that didn't control her and let her do whatever. I met him

 

[AlexAP]

If they had to pick between a virgin and a slayer, they would def choose the slayer

Of course, but they ideally want a normal guy, meaning not a virgin but also not someone with 100+ lays.

If a guy has so many lays the girl probably thinks he's sex-addicted and can't be faithful.

 

[Yliaster]

Nah she had a good kind father that didn't control her and let her do whatever. I met him

How tf do guys like you even find this site

 

[Deleted member 275]

Not true, most women would be repulsed if a guy has a 100+ laycount and would not LTR him. They don't want virgins, but not a slayer either.

Depends on the woman i guess, but i think women look for a man with way more experience than themselves. So if you have a 15 ncount average early20s girl, she wouldnt mind a number like 70. Cuz it makes her aeem better in comparison and feel less guilty orob.

 

[Deleted member 275]

How tf do guys like you even find this site

I am an incel

 

[koalendo]

It's a close one, I judge promiscuous men too but I lean towards the second answer because men are naturally hornier and more suitable for the promiscuous lifestyle, the consequences for that lifestyle are much lesser biologically too.

 

[AlexAP]

Ofc I would be harsher on my daughter for being promiscuous cause she will face more repercussions if she’s not careful

Example she could get pregnant, be killed, kidnapped and so on

I don’t trust other men simple as

So you wouldn't judge her for being promiscuous, you would just tell her to be safe? That's easily possible btw, she can use contraception and the chances of being raped/killed are extremely low, especially if it's at a college campus.

 

[AlexAP]

Depends on the woman i guess, but i think women look for a man with way more experience than themselves. So if you have a 15 ncount average early20s girl, she wouldnt mind a number like 70. Cuz it makes her aeem better in comparison and feel less guilty orob.

They should have experience at all. But I don't think the average girl is comfortable with a man with a very high bodycount.

And sometimes they even accept an unexperienced guy, your first gf didn't mind that you were a virgin and she already had many guys before.

 

[Cigarette]

View attachment 1300963

iconic

 

[AlexAP]

men are naturally hornier and more suitable for the promiscuous lifestyle

Natural urges are not an excuse though.

the consequences for that lifestyle are much lesser biologically too.

Nah not really. Before civilization, it wasn't bad for women to get pregnant, it was normal. Today it's bad for both women and men, men have to pay for 18 years for every kid they have.

 

[Deleted member 275]

They should have experience at all. But I don't think the average girl is comfortable with a man with a very high bodycount.

And sometimes they even accept an unexperienced guy, your first gf didn't mind that you were a virgin and she already had many guys before.

It was a big deal for my first gf though. She said she always slept with very experienced guys with high n-counts and had never had a virgin before. Which is kinda a brutal blackpill considering she was 19yo at the time, JFL honestly. Half her classmates were prob still virgins.

I don't see the point in sleeping around though personally I think LTR mogs. But if I do get chances thrown on my lap, I will take them. Putting in effort yourself seems cope though. Going to parties and hitting on drunk chicks non-stop etc.

I will cheat on my future girlfriends/LTR in such case if an attractive woman makes it easy. My gf would understand it's important for my self-esteem and experience and it wouldn't affect the relationship negatively. Such shit is barely ever going to happen in a man's life anyways.

 

[turkproducer]

Good-looking men and rich men have it as easy as women, I don't see why it's an achievement for them if they're promiscuous.

this statement is so wrong it’s a joke, stacylites have more ONS options than gigachad.

it’s natural for men to want to spread their seed and it’s natural for women to lock down one man.

 

[AlexAP]

this statement is so wrong it’s a joke, stacylites have more ONS options than gigachad.

Ok, Stacylites have more options than Gigachads. But both can easily be promiscuous, that's what I meant. A Stacylite can have 10,000 men in a short time, a Gigachad can have 1,000 women in the same time.

it’s natural for men to want to spread their seed and it’s natural for women to lock down one man.

Women were never designed to be monogamous. There is no such thing as a "traditional family" in nature, and in today's societies women actually become bored faster than men in LTR.

 

[turkproducer]

Ok, Stacylites have more options than Gigachads. But both can easily be promiscuous, that's what I meant. A Stacylite can have 10,000 men in a short time, a Gigachad can have 1,000 women in the same time.

that is a huge discrepancy, see this video for how unfair dating is for stacylite vs gigachad


lol.

Women were never designed to be monogamous. There is no such thing as a "traditional family" in nature, and in today's societies women actually become bored faster than men in LTR.

I didn’t mean they would be monogamous their whole lives, but in the past women would have much fewer partners than now. Probably 1-3 throughout their whole life even in ancient times when there was actually a need to reproduce.

Women becoming easily bored in LTR is thanks to societal changes and not due to biology or their innate beliefs about monogamy

 

[Gonthar]

The problem is that 'promiscuous' women don't bang anyone, they still want Chads, I was always rejected by girls who had a reputation for being sluts....

 

[Deleted member 14262]

If they had to pick between a virgin and a slayer, they would def choose the slayer

It's not that simple. If it's a 5-6/10 they would prefer him to be a slayer. But many would like a 10/10 virgin.

 

[Deleted member 14262]

this statement is so wrong it’s a joke, stacylites have more ONS options than gigachad.

it’s natural for men to want to spread their seed and it’s natural for women to lock down one man.

Not really. Tell me a better mating strategy. A guy who locks down one girl. Has 3-4 kids which he raises to his best of potential regarding their looks and status, and then sets him free into the world. Or a guy who pumps and dumps 5 women.

 

[koalendo]

Natural urges are not an excuse though.

I didn't say it was an excuse that's why I said I judge men too. but you can't judge a rich person who comes from a low crime environment and a poor person who comes from a high crime environment the same when they steal food from the supermarket for example

Nah not really. Before civilization, it wasn't bad for women to get pregnant, it was normal.

Today it's bad for both women and men, men have to pay for 18 years for every kid they have.

I don't think you understand what biological means. also pregnancy is not the only threat that women face when they sleep around.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

There's no "should" here. Male and female promiscuity are inherently viewed differently.

 

[turkproducer]

Not really. Tell me a better mating strategy. A guy who locks down one girl. Has 3-4 kids which he raises to his best of potential regarding their looks and status, and then sets him free into the world. Or a guy who pumps and dumps 5 women.

I didn’t create the male sexual strategy. In history it was always men who mated with multiple women who were able to be successful in fathering many children and passing on their genes.

It has only changed since agriculture has became a thing, so some thousands of years back.

 

[Deleted member 8853]

Dn rd

 

[Deleted member 14262]

I didn’t create the male sexual strategy. In history it was always men who mated with multiple women who were able to be successful in fathering many children and passing on their genes.

It has only changed since agriculture has became a thing, so some thousands of years back.

The smart thing to do would be to adapt to the new environment. Farming was created 11000 years ago so we shouldn't really cope with prehistory.

 

[turkproducer]

The smart thing to do would be to adapt to the new environment. Farming was created 11000 years ago so we shouldn't really cope with prehistory.

Yes of course and humans did adapt… Since agriculture has become a thing the monopoly over passing your genes held by the few has now been extended to the many.

However, this doesn’t mean that our brains have changed much, it is proven that our brains have barely changed for dozens of thousands of years no? That’s why I justified men and women being judged differently, because most of us who are not mentally ill still utilise the same mating strategy, women try to lock down a high quality man, men sleep around with any women to pass on their genes.

 

[Deleted member 14262]

Yes of course and humans did adapt… Since agriculture has become a thing the monopoly over passing your genes held by the few has now been extended to the many.

However, this doesn’t mean that our brains have changed much, it is proven that our brains have barely changed for dozens of thousands of years no? That’s why I justified men and women being judged differently, because most of us who are not mentally ill still utilise the same mating strategy, women try to lock down a high quality man, men sleep around with any women to pass on their genes.

Using genes as an excuse isn't very smart. You need to think with more than just your dick tbh.

 

[Deleted member 1476]

i have no idea tbhlossus and jiffle at my friend @turkproducer writing his prehistoric tomes in this thread

 

[AlexAP]

that is a huge discrepancy, see this video for how unfair dating is for stacylite vs gigachad

Yes, it's easier for Stacylites, but it's still easy for Chad. Both can be promiscuous, even if it's easier for Stacylites.

I didn’t mean they would be monogamous their whole lives, but in the past women would have much fewer partners than now. Probably 1-3 throughout their whole life even in ancient times when there was actually a need to reproduce.

The old studies from the 1950s show that women on average said they had 3 lifetime partners and the men on average had 10. Well, yeah ... something doesn't add up here.

Women becoming easily bored in LTR is thanks to societal changes and not due to biology or their innate beliefs about monogamy

No, in nature the females are as promiscuous as the males. Monogamy was not a thing for humans before the neolithic, it's not a ntaural thing. And female sexuality has been supressed after that. Their natural sexual behavior can be seen when there is no punishment or shaming for it, which we are seeing today.

 

[AlexAP]

The problem is that 'promiscuous' women don't bang anyone, they still want Chads, I was always rejected by girls who had a reputation for being sluts....

Cope. Slutty girls sleep with Normies, I've seen Normies who had a high bodycount because they often times picked up slutty girls at clubs.

 

[AlexAP]

I didn't say it was an excuse that's why I said I judge men too. but you can't judge a rich person who comes from a low crime environment and a poor person who comes from a high crime environment the same when they steal food from the supermarket for example

I do tbh, there's never an excuse for stealing. In Western countries no one is starving.

Pregnancy wasn't a bad thing in nature, it was normal. Only in todays world humans try to avoid pregnancy, because kids should be born in a special environment and not just whenever a woman gets pregnant.

I don't think you understand what biological means. also pregnancy is not the only threat that women face when they sleep around.

There's not really any other, it's not dangerous for women.