D
Deleted member 12128
Fixing my bones
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
- Posts
- 4,986
- Reputation
- 6,950
State your Arguments for or against
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
brazil is Multicultural ?Yes, and just look at Brazil.
Although this is inevitable because of globalization
It is the most mixed-race country in the worldbrazil is Multicultural ?
mix racing isn't Multiculturalism IMO , a good example of Multiculturalism is Canada or americaIt is the most mixed-race country in the world
Canada has few ethnicities, but Usa looks good, even with conflicts like blm.mix racing isn't Multiculturalism IMO , a good example of Multiculturalism is Canada or america
Its doesn't work that way because differences in genetic makeup influence our cognition, making people from different races approach life and problems differently. It is due to these differences that our cultures and way of life are different. We can't be homogenous melting pots when our thinking and being is so different and conflicting.Different culture, different ethnicities, different everything can still look fine and make a society work decently GIVEN there a large homogeneity in faith.
so you believe IQ and the way you think is related to genetics ???Its doesn't work that way because differences in genetic makeup influence our cognition, making people from different races approach life and problems differently. It is due to these differences that our cultures and way of life are different. We can't be homogenous melting pots when our thinking and being is so different and conflicting.
Yes.so you believe IQ and the way you think is related to genetics ???
i don't think we can agree then , since this is fundamentalYes.
i don't think we can agree then , since this is fundamental
there are many environmental factors that are not accounted for.https://incels.is/threads/iq-gene-frequencies-by-race.182230/
this is very disingenuous
wait , define Multiculturalism so i can know what you are talking about , since i heard people define it as "people from different races living together"Sure, put groups of people who have totally different values and ideas on how to run a society, right next to each other in the same society.
What could go wrong?
How so. Multiculturalism in the long term does more harm than good unless it's limited. The beauty of diversity comes from experencing something different, not your everyday life. The differences would slowly start to fade down the path and be harder to sustain in a society of multiculturalismthis is very disingenuous
is pretty
brofood>foidDunno man but the foodis pretty
bro
wait , define Multiculturalism so i can know what you are talking about , since i heard people define it as "people from different races living together"
There can be many cultures living in 9ne nation but to be a melting pot, there should be devides between them. Russia has many cultures in their country but you don't see that they are intermingling. Everyone lives according to their own community lines.State your Arguments for or against
culture and national identities are pretty much overated. But yes a souless individual without any landmark has nothing to rely on and is easier doomable.Brazil is a perfect example of what happens after a long ass time of unlimited multiculturalism (I guess the Southern part is a bit better off). The US will look like that very soon, and western Europe will probably follow too in a decade or two, unless things change drastically. The elites basically want a global Brazil. Once people have nothing to identify with and everybody is a mentally damaged disenfranchised drone, controlling us will become MUCH easier.
the islamic Caliphates had arabs , persians , africans ,and Europeans in it , and i would assume they would mix since people would move in and outNo it's bad
People can't live with so many different groups it's proven through history
I appreciate different cultures but trying to push them to everyone is too much and makes people develop hate towards them sooner or later.
Summarizing: people should stay where they are to avoid conflicts
what if people accept a common religion and identity togetherBrazil is a perfect example of what happens after a long ass time of unlimited multiculturalism (I guess the Southern part is a bit better off). The US will look like that very soon, and western Europe will probably follow too in a decade or two, unless things change drastically. The elites basically want a global Brazil. Once people have nothing to identify with and everybody is a mentally damaged disenfranchised drone, controlling us will become MUCH easier.
Different races can have the same culture sometimes, some people tend more to be assimilated by other cultures, like africans were easily assimilated by european and arab cultures.the islamic Caliphates had arabs , persians , africans ,and Europeans in it , and i would assume they would mix since people would move in and out
Like the US did you mean? At least until the 1960s.what if people accept a common religion and identity together
you mean before the immigration act ? , if so yes and no since there was still racism against black people but it was moving in a good direction with figures like Malcom X and Martin luther kingLike the US did you mean? At least until the 1960s.
The old Persians and Ottomans were similar to what you described I guess, but even those empires fell. Also, the US until the 1960s was similar to that, whites of all different backgrounds - with some blacks and natives here and there - living together without any issues. It's not a coincidence that everything went to shit after multiculturalism. I think what you're describing is a bit of an utopia, the "issue" is that we are incredibly tribalistic in nature and are hardwired to prefer our own kin and support them no matter what.culture and national identities are pretty much overated. But yes a souless individual without any landmark has nothing to rely on and is easier doomable.
What really matters is a set of common belief and faith. With it, you can be black, white, whatever,and live in harmony together, in a whole empire.
i agree but there are alot of things that are in our nature that we rejected , so i don't see a reason why not to try , since its going to happen anyway cuz of globalizationThe old Persians and Ottomans were similar to what you described I guess, but even those empires fell. Also, the US until the 1960s was similar to that, whites of all different backgrounds - with some blacks and natives here and there - living together without any issues. It's not a coincidence that everything went to shit after multiculturalism. I think what you're describing is a bit of an utopia, the "issue" is that we are incredibly tribalistic in nature and are hardwired to prefer our own kin and support them no matter what.
i know about the preference of your own, and that's natural and the requisit to help others later on but what if your "own" are people who share the same faith and you see them as your own brothers, so that it refers to the whole society?The old Persians and Ottomans were similar to what you described I guess, but even those empires fell. Also, the US until the 1960s was similar to that, whites of all different backgrounds - with some blacks and natives here and there - living together without any issues. It's not a coincidence that everything went to shit after multiculturalism. I think what you're describing is a bit of an utopia, the "issue" is that we are incredibly tribalistic in nature and are hardwired to prefer our own kin and support them no matter what.
Yes. The thing is though, most whites didn't even want blacks on the North American continent in the first place lol. It was mostly scummy white traders and jewish slave owners that brought them over.you mean before the immigration act ? , if so yes and no since there was still racism against black people but it was moving in a good direction with figures like Malcom X and Martin luther king
But look at Brazil for example, the vast majority of people (no matter if white, black or native) is Christian and very patriotic as well, so they DO theoretically have an identity. Yet, as you can see, we can't really talk about a functional country outside the rich parts. Multiculturalism and inherent difference in race is 100% a big factor in that, besides obvious no-brainers like corruption, lack of law enforcement, etc.i agree but there are alot of things that are in our nature that we rejected , so i don't see a reason why not to try , since its going to happen anyway cuz of globalization
christianism is just "officially" egalitarist, factually and in doctrine it's not. That's the main issue. Else Arabic empires wouldn't last so long, despite some very bad rulers.But look at Brazil for example, the vast majority of people (no matter if white, black or native) is Christian and very patriotic as well, so they DO theoretically have an identity. Yet, as you can see, we can't really talk about a functional country outside the rich parts. Multiculturalism and inherent difference in race is 100% a big factor in that, besides obvious no-brainers like corruption, lack of law enforcement, etc.