Jason Voorhees
Professor
- Joined
- May 15, 2020
- Posts
- 44,964
- Reputation
- 117,317
Many people on this forum seem to consider Gandy's eye area to be ideal but are they? Gandy's eye area has flaws
Flaws
-Droppy eyelids
-Shallow set eyes
-Non pct eyebrows
-Poor under eye support and negative orbital
vector
-Negative hooding
-Huge pupils( which is a falio)
-Unimpressive orbitals when compared to someone like o'pry, Barrett and Depoot.
Obviously Gandy's eye area is still well above average. He has great eyes but they aren't top tier objectively
And just to be clear there is no such thing as a perfect eye area. Every eye area has flaws. O'pry for example has negative orbital vector and droppy eyelids. Tyson Beckford has epicanthic folds etc but they all have fewer flaws than Gandy.
The people who come closest to a 10/10 eye area are Barrett and Depoot
If Barret had better eyelashes, pfl and canthus they would be a 10 and if Depoot had better canthus, eyelashes and colouring. It would be a 10 aswell. O'pry's is also a 10 when he's edited to have better medial canthus and better eye support
Flaws
-Droppy eyelids
-Shallow set eyes
-Non pct eyebrows
-Poor under eye support and negative orbital
vector
-Negative hooding
-Huge pupils( which is a falio)
-Unimpressive orbitals when compared to someone like o'pry, Barrett and Depoot.
Obviously Gandy's eye area is still well above average. He has great eyes but they aren't top tier objectively
And just to be clear there is no such thing as a perfect eye area. Every eye area has flaws. O'pry for example has negative orbital vector and droppy eyelids. Tyson Beckford has epicanthic folds etc but they all have fewer flaws than Gandy.
The people who come closest to a 10/10 eye area are Barrett and Depoot
If Barret had better eyelashes, pfl and canthus they would be a 10 and if Depoot had better canthus, eyelashes and colouring. It would be a 10 aswell. O'pry's is also a 10 when he's edited to have better medial canthus and better eye support
Last edited: