Do you ever notice how feminists never have a counter argument?

[Deprived]

Prime example of this. She addresses that Peterson said men worked more dangerous jobs, kill themselves more often, and are more likely to be homeless. But there is no comeback to it. She just whines about how it's bullshit or "wack" with no logical response. Seriously, there is no comment on this entire thread that even attempts to "debunk" Peterson's claims, they just fucking whine about them. "NOO HE PROVED THAT MEN HAVE IT WORSE IN MANY AREAS OF LIFE "



Funny thing is this comment tries to say that Peterson fans lack critical thinking skills, when the entire thread is just them crying about what Peterson says with no counter argument.



Best part is they even call him an "idiot's idea of a genius". It's like they don't even think before they say something, how can a professor at a T20 university NOT be a genius? Do they realize how competitive academic jobs are?

Now I'm not a Peterson fan (It's not that I don't like him, but I don't watch him often), but when I see his content most of it isn't focused on making negative comments towards women. The vast majority of what he says is just philosophy and self improvement tips aimed at young men. These femininsts get mad at him for saying the slightest negative thing about women (they were angry about YT thumbnails saying he destroyed feminist ideologies), when he probably says more negative things about modern men. The vast majority of his content isn't focused about women at all, he isn't like Shapiro lol.



It's clear who's in the right here. Most modern women seethe at the idea of a man improving themselves. To the point where they result to slander and cry at their misfortunes like a cold heartless degenerate. Muh more feminine women are liberals is a huge cope, most liberal women are impulsive and lack compassion.

 

[Deleted member 15827]

Because they’re brainless pigeons

 

[Wallenberg]

are u really 5ft1

 

[Deprived]

are u really 5ft1

Of course. Why would anyone lie on obscure online forums?

 

[Wallenberg]

Of course. Why would anyone lie on obscure online forums?

good luck

 

[Deleted member 15004]

Prime example of this. She addresses that Peterson said men worked more dangerous jobs, kill themselves more often, and are more likely to be homeless. But there is no comeback to it. She just whines about how it's bullshit or "wack" with no logical response. Seriously, there is no comment on this entire thread that even attempts to "debunk" Peterson's claims, they just fucking whine about them. "NOO HE PROVED THAT MEN HAVE IT WORSE IN MANY AREAS OF LIFE "



Funny thing is this comment tries to say that Peterson fans lack critical thinking skills, when the entire thread is just them crying about what Peterson says with no counter argument.



Best part is they even call him an "idiot's idea of a genius". It's like they don't even think before they say something, how can a professor at a T20 university NOT be a genius? Do they realize how competitive academic jobs are?

Now I'm not a Peterson fan (It's not that I don't like him, but I don't watch him often), but when I see his content most of it isn't focused on making negative comments towards women. The vast majority of what he says is just philosophy and self improvement tips aimed at young men. These femininsts get mad at him for saying the slightest negative thing about women (they were angry about YT thumbnails saying he destroyed feminist ideologies), when he probably says more negative things about modern men. The vast majority of his content isn't focused about women at all, he isn't like Shapiro lol.



It's clear who's in the right here. Most modern women seethe at the idea of a man improving themselves. To the point where they result to slander and cry at their misfortunes like a cold heartless degenerate. Muh more feminine women are liberals is a huge cope, most liberal women are impulsive and lack compassion.

JP has kinda lost the plot these days and has lost it for a while now but I'm thankful I was introduced to him back in tenth grade(2018) by a senior friend of mine(who was black lol funnily enough), when JP was on fire and on top of things. Him going ham on that Kathy Pearson anchor was hilarious and the feminists just couldn't cope and it seems they still can't cope now considering they have NO rebuttals/counterarguments to any of what he said, as you just mentioned

 

[AlexAP]

Meanwhile, Sigma Petersons argument:

Procedural knowledge, generated in the course of heroic behavior, is not organized and integrated within the group and the individual as a consequence of simple accumulation. Procedure “a,” appropriate in situation one, and procedure “b,” appropriate in situation two, may clash in mutual violent opposition in situation three. Under such circumstances intrapsychic or interpersonal conflict necessarily emerges. When such antagonism arises, moral revaluation becomes necessary. As a consequence of such revaluation, behavioral options are brutally rank-ordered, or, less frequently, entire moral systems are devastated, reorganized and replaced. This organization and reorganization occurs as a consequence of “war,” in its concrete, abstract, intrapsychic, and interpersonal variants. In the most basic case, an individual is rendered subject to an intolerable conflict, as a consequence of the perceived (affective) incompatibility of two or more apprehended outcomes of a given behavioral procedure. In the purely intrapsychic sphere, such conflict often emerges when attainment of what is desired presently necessarily interferes with attainment of what is desired (or avoidance of what is feared) in the future. Permanent satisfactory resolution of such conflict (between temptation and “moral purity,” for example) requires the construction of an abstract moral system, powerful enough to allow what an occurrence signifies for the future to govern reaction to what it signifies now. Even that construction, however, is necessarily incomplete when considered only as an “intrapsychic” phenomena. The individual, once capable of coherently integrating competing motivational demands in the private sphere, nonetheless remains destined for conflict with the other, in the course of the inevitable transformations of personal experience. This means that the person who has come to terms with him- or herself—at least in principle—is still subject to the affective dysregulation inevitably produced by interpersonal interaction. It is also the case that such subjugation is actually indicative of insufficient “intrapsychic” organization, as many basic “needs” can only be satisfied through the cooperation of others.

 

[Magical Apple]

Prime example of this. She addresses that Peterson said men worked more dangerous jobs, kill themselves more often, and are more likely to be homeless. But there is no comeback to it. She just whines about how it's bullshit or "wack" with no logical response. Seriously, there is no comment on this entire thread that even attempts to "debunk" Peterson's claims, they just fucking whine about them. "NOO HE PROVED THAT MEN HAVE IT WORSE IN MANY AREAS OF LIFE "



Funny thing is this comment tries to say that Peterson fans lack critical thinking skills, when the entire thread is just them crying about what Peterson says with no counter argument.



Best part is they even call him an "idiot's idea of a genius". It's like they don't even think before they say something, how can a professor at a T20 university NOT be a genius? Do they realize how competitive academic jobs are?

Now I'm not a Peterson fan (It's not that I don't like him, but I don't watch him often), but when I see his content most of it isn't focused on making negative comments towards women. The vast majority of what he says is just philosophy and self improvement tips aimed at young men. These femininsts get mad at him for saying the slightest negative thing about women (they were angry about YT thumbnails saying he destroyed feminist ideologies), when he probably says more negative things about modern men. The vast majority of his content isn't focused about women at all, he isn't like Shapiro lol.



It's clear who's in the right here. Most modern women seethe at the idea of a man improving themselves. To the point where they result to slander and cry at their misfortunes like a cold heartless degenerate. Muh more feminine women are liberals is a huge cope, most liberal women are impulsive and lack compassion.

Jordan petersons ideas are nothing more than common sense. It's pathetic that his is what passes for intellectual these days.