there is no god
if there is a god then hes not all good
I didnt say hed be all good retard
if your referring to epicurean paradox in specific premise 1 doesn't follow. so it's not a argument against existence of god.
it would be kinda hard to tie in blackpill with theism but its possible, the only thing is it would result in blackpill being subjective rather then objective, at least under my worldview.
this presupposes good in the first place so first you have to reference a criteria of epistemology that can ground ethics.
I can explain if you want.
yes to what?
Yes i believe allah is god
im agnostic, i just feel like its kinda stupid following a specific religion thinking its the right one when there are like 1k+ religions that have existed, if you are religious you should also consider the fact that what you believe in may be wrong
yeah so blackpill in my view would just be subjective preferences that majority of humans hold too rather then objective, because objective defined as mind independent/always true, so transcendental categories like logic, math, and existence of self, would be grounded in the mind of god, would be objective truths. we would see god as the necessary condition for these things existing at all, because these things are assumed as always true, regardless of human opinion, so they would need a transcendent mind to exist in that is also unchanging and always true.
why not in specific?
ever thought abt deism?
Too many reasons I can’t even write them all but one being that if you weren’t told about religion you would be sent to hell for not believing in god
yes
well that's not true for most religions. that's a common belief in protestant christianity and that's pretty much it. in Eastern Orthodox christianity which is what I follow and believe to be the true church etablished by Jesus Christ, god is just and only judges people based on their knowledge, if they have no knowledge of christ they will not be judged.
interesting and i’m glad that is the case, regardless i still don’t believe in god - especially after being blackpilled
i dont know. i really dont. its such a big question i cant answer myself.
God says that the world is evil he knows its a bad place and people are given freedom to do what they want not control us and people naturally defy God since adam and everything ate the apple
I typed a explanation it might eb too complicated but just to summarize in my view the only things I see as objective are logic, math, and other transcendental categories, transcendental categories are basically just concepts that must exist in order for us to come to knowledge, existence or ethics in the first place. and I would say that these categories are ultimately grounded in the mind of god, because only a unchanging mind can ground these because these categories are assumed as unchanging. So blackpill for me is not an evolutionary mechanism that god created or smth, or a transcendent truth, but just a human majority view on looks rather then objective. subjective would just be human preference, so if majority of humans agreed that something is wrong or right, that wouldn't make it objective.
and protestant christnity the modern version of it you see with the guitars and dancing twerking ladies for Jesus is really just watered down heresy that split off from the apostolic faith. so they believe in a lot of bullshit not just that. I believe it drove a lot of people from the true Christianity.
I need to clarify if your catholic then your church doesn't agree evil actually exists, its just a privation of good. god being good, so evil Is just humans acting against the good (which is god). which we would say is necessary because god does not act against his nature which is just.
I reject whatever has insufficient evidence.How are you so sure?
Yes
what standard of knowledge do you use to reject him?
It’s not just christianity i just don’t believe in a god. I respect christianity as a religion and i feel like it can improve a persons life a lot especially some of the commandments eg don’t steal lie etc it has some good morals behind it
Lack of evidence is a good enough standard to reject something.
yeah but im saying what is your standard for knowledge in which you constitute what is evidence and what is not.
I get that what are some other reasons you don't believe in god?
There is absolutely none of any form. All arguments for it have sufficiently convincing counter-arguments. I’d be willing to accept metaphysical arguments if any were convincing.
what arguments have you looked into like modal ontological and stuff?
I just don’t believe in that all powerful being type thing I believe more biology and feel that religion in general is illogical. Like the region you were born totally dictates your religion and faith, yet you will be punished for it?
I’ve saw all the mainstream arguments endless times by now. I remain unconvinced.
if we assume that a all good god exists then you won't be punished on something out of your control, if a god that is not good exists there isn't really a reason to believe in him at all imo. also religion doesn't rlly violate laws of logic it might violate laws of physics such as people walking on water but if you assume the existence of an all powerful god then he would be able to alter physics.I just don’t believe in that all powerful being type thing I believe more biology and feel that religion in general is illogical. Like the region you were born totally dictates your religion and faith, yet you will be punished for it?
Rep me btw saar
Ive been looking for a good refutation for TAG and haven't found any can you direct me to some?
