Lefty Rankin
Fire
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2023
- Posts
- 27,188
- Reputation
- 33,385
Sure, but where does the structure come from? Why do laws such as physics exist?i could argue the same for the universe's existence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Sure, but where does the structure come from? Why do laws such as physics exist?i could argue the same for the universe's existence
no,why universe have to be created for Gods existing that is not a better argument,okay who then created universeWhole point is universe has to be created but then god has to be created num nur
Nobody created him,he is the First and Last there is nothing before him,and after him,for your easier understanding imagine God as a big energy that can create anything,not as a Personso, who created god
Why does gid exist thenNobody created him,he is the First and Last there is nothing before him,and after him,for your easier understanding imagine God as a big energy that can create anything,not as a Person
Because people created themSure, but where does the structure come from? Why do laws such as physics exist?
Or doscoveredBecause people created them
Im talking about the structure that the laws refer to. Why does it exist?Because people created them
Nah not really. There has to be an uncreated being an eternal being wich would be God. The universe isn't eternal because it has been proven to have a start.Well it comes down to it’s illogical if the world needs a creator than god needs a creator and infiry
No it’s hasn’tNah not really. There has to be an uncreated being an eternal being wich would be God. The universe isn't eternal because it has been proven to have a start.
Because it doesIm talking about the structure that the laws refer to. Why does it exist?
There is some pretty good evidence of the existence of Jesus and him being God, even outside the Bible there are texts from Tactus who was a Roman or a Jew I dont remember. They confirmed the crufixicion of the Lord. Disprove the ressurection and you disprove Christianity. But that is not possible. Look into Jesus his life, teachings and texts who aren't from the Bible.Christ isn’t real
Has been disproven by science thoi could argue the same for the universe's existence

Dude it litteraly has, its maybe the best evidence for God...No it’s hasn’t
cite the studyHas been disproven by science tho
because they do as a consequence of suchSure, but where does the structure come from? Why do laws such as physics exist?
not a single verified sourceThere is some pretty good evidence of the existence of Jesus and him being God, even outside the Bible there are texts from Tactus who was a Roman or a Jew I dont remember. They confirmed the crufixicion of the Lord. Disprove the ressurection and you disprove Christianity. But that is not possible. Look into Jesus his life, teachings and texts who aren't from the Bible.
CiteDude it litteraly has, its maybe the best evidence for God...
Its not about meaning. Most scientists find it perplexing that there's any structure at all in the universe.Because it doesnot everything has a meaning
cite the study
as a consequence of what though?because they do as a consequence of such
What are you talking about? Look up Tacitus and what he wrote about Jesus. Before you say something stupid look it up. Most of the historici say its reliablenot a single verified source
the universe's existenceas a consequence of what though?
tbf all this is just a descriptor of the universe it does not disprove whether or not the universe has always been because the honest scientific answer is that we just dont know
You said what’s the meaning hypoIt’s not about meaning. Most scientists find it perplexing that there's any structure at all in the universe.
Tacitus describes the crucifixion not the resurrectionWhat are you talking about? Look up Tacitus and what he wrote about Jesus. Before you say something stupid look it up. Most of the historici say its reliable
Yeah true I didn't mean the ressurection my badTacitus describes the crucifixion not the resurrection