do you need to be prettyboymaxx to get approached often?

[Deleted member 25571]

Think I've finally come around to the idea that the ideal look for attracting the 18-24 or so aged hottest girls is to be a prettyboy rather than mascthetic. I used to think that alpha masc'ed chads ruled the smp but tbh I'm not sure I'd agree with that anymore. The main problem with the masc chads is that they reek of ONS material. I think from a male gaze perspective that's exactly what you'd want to be, prime ONS material, however men are the ones that prioritize casual sex over relationships. Women are wired more for relationships than casual sex so they might be more proned to see masc men as trouble and low trust because they look like they're exclusively only good for ONS and have zero relationship values or interests. Prettyboys on the other hand seem to have the best of both worlds, they still have the looks to trigger hypergamous ONS lust but they also look like prime boyfriend material due to being more high trust and relationship oriented beta males who are interested in more than just a pump and dump and more in touch with feminine relationship values.

I think masc men only mog prettyboys in social settings where the masc guy can have a deeper voice, more charisma, and generally higher in-group status due to his build and high-t traits. In that context I can see the mascthetic getting the most ass, but in terms of the initial attraction based purely on nothing but looks I think the prettyboys are the ones that capture the eyes of younger women in their teens and twenties the most. Seems like it changes when they get older but if you're just looking for prime aged girls and you want them to approach or notice you first then you're better off being prettyboy than masc.

 

[Deleted member 24444]

Dnr