Do you think forward growth of the zygos and infras or forward upper maxilla is honestly a femenine trait

yes I would picture the person maybe looking like a crossover between a primate and a human
Jordan Barrett and Nicki Minaj maxilla’s much more reduced even with their crazy growth
 
yes I would picture the person maybe looking like a crossover between a primate and a human
Nicki Minaj morphed with more forward maxilla what they look like
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1705.png
    IMG_1705.png
    2.8 MB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
in fact here is comparison between a male neanderthal skull and a female neanderthal

male:
Neanderthal skull m


female:
INSERT adult female NHM gibraltar 1 neanderthal full widththumb11601160


as you can see the male had much larger zygos, much more forward growth and generally way more robustness than the female

so ultimately zygos and extreme forward growth are male dimorphic as the past shows

men have evolved ,such more smaller skulls since then
 
wdym zygos? If you mean cheekbone prominence, then yes, it is feminine, if you mean hollow cheeks, then it's masculine.
infras are masculine
forward grown upper maxilla isn't feminine or masculine, it's just healthy feature to have.
 
Jordan Barrett and Nicki Minaj maxilla’s much more reduced even with their crazy growth
yes their forward growth is only a fraction of what ancient humans had

here are some more examples from the Smithsonian

Natural History Museum of Slovenia   skulls
 
You they were ugly or they were extremely attractive and made Barrett Nicki Minaj ugly and recessed in comparison
it depends on the type of skull tbh. they probably had their own mix of attractive and unattractive people but unlike today unattractiveness wasn't brought upon by lack of bone. in fact too much bone growth can be ogre. Manny of them probably wouldn't be considered that attractive by today's standards tbh.

and they would be recessed compared to ancient humans
 
Y
it depends on the type of skull tbh. they probably had their own mix of attractive and unattractive people but unlike today unattractiveness wasn't brought upon by lack of bone. in fact too much bone growth can be ogre. Manny of them probably wouldn't be considered that attractive by today's standards tbh.

and they would be recessed compared to ancient humans
ou say they would both be recessed because they had this maxillary projection though right
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1705.png
    IMG_1705.png
    2.8 MB · Views: 0
Y

ou say they would both be recessed because they had this maxillary projection though right
there was actually an ancient skull found with nearly that amount of projection

LYNXNPEF7R1Y3


0000821779 resized afossilandthreedimensionalprintoflucysancestor38millionyearsoldcraniumofau
 
Men on average have higher, smaller and less prominent cheekbones.
 
Men on average have higher, smaller and less prominent cheekbones.
Someone said Ramirez cheekbones too big to be ideal on a Man U would think he is a gay male model lol
 
View attachment 2927081Animated characters have this maxilla yet they don’t look primitive
could be because they are animated but also maybe ancient human and other human species dont look as primitive as we think.

it's still a mystery tbh
 
in fact here is comparison between a male neanderthal skull and a female neanderthal

male:
View attachment 2926976

female:
View attachment 2926978

as you can see the male had much larger zygos, much more forward growth and generally way more robustness than the female

so ultimately zygos and extreme forward growth are male dimorphic as the past shows

men have evolved ,such more smaller skulls since then
Holy fuck the men were brutal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21716
Holy fuck the men were brutal
yes but it was men needed that kind of bone mass for protection since men did most of the fighting and hunting.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
could be because they are animated but also maybe ancient human and other human species dont look as primitive as we think.

it's still a mystery tbh
Yeah the scientistsreconstructing Neanderthals and the rest to be extremely ugly looking and with extremely poor facial development is complete bullshit compared to how they actually looked
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21716
Yeah the scientistsreconstructing Neanderthals and the rest to be extremely ugly looking and with extremely poor facial development is complete bullshit compared to how they actually looked
agreed
 
  • +1
Reactions: Pei

Similar threads

shahid khan
Replies
0
Views
60
shahid khan
shahid khan
Sokarexo
Replies
28
Views
832
kana
kana
zuku
Replies
80
Views
2K
actualunderstander
actualunderstander
shahid khan
Replies
2
Views
200
BlackpilledBodus
BlackpilledBodus
J
Replies
9
Views
350
cooldude1231
cooldude1231

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top