Do you think personality was important in the hunter gatherer times?

[Uglybrazilian]

For example, in those times a tall wide framed guy would be almost invincible since there was no firearms, swords etc, but a manlet with good social skills could win if he managed to bring other guys to outnumber the tall guy

That could confirm the NT and low inhib pill
What do u think

 

[Deleted member 9380]

pfft no

 

[Rabbi]

It’s more complicated then that tbh
Chimpanzees can change the group favour and form pacts to overthrow a current leader the catch is they would still have to be pretty high up on the physical dominance hierarchy

 

[Rabbi]

I think he most important thing we can gather from ancient times is “Muh I’m introverted don’t like taking to people” is a cope

We are not an ant colony despite our cities being built like one, we feel more isolated than ever

From ancient depictions etc we know our ancestors lived rich social lives and played an extremely crucial role in dynamics
We are a tribal species

 

[Rabbi]

I think he most important thing we can gather from ancient times is “Muh I’m introverted don’t like taking to people” is a cope

We are not an ant colony despite our cities being built like one, we feel more isolated than ever

From ancient depictions etc we know our ancestors lived rich social lives and played an extremely crucial role in dynamics
We are a tribal species

Ofc I still believe genuine introverts exist
Most are introverted because social scenarioas are too daunting and unfavourable if you don’t have a certain value such as looks money etc

 

[Uglybrazilian]

It’s more complicated then that tbh
Chimpanzees can change the group favour and form pacts to overthrow a current leader the catch is they would still have to be pretty high up on the physical dominance hierarchy

Yeah but humans sometimes are able to earn respect without necessarily being phisicaly dominant
Singers, preachers, politicians etc

 

[Rabbi]

Yeah but humans sometimes are able to earn respect without necessarily being phisicaly dominant
Singers, preachers, politicians etc

Almost every politician and notable army general in American history was recorded to be well above average height and stature also there’s a reason why they’re all male hint it’s because we made that way.

 

[Rabbi]

Yeah but humans sometimes are able to earn respect without necessarily being phisicaly dominant
Singers, preachers, politicians etc

The average male height is 5’9 however among CEOs it is over 6’0
Only 4% of the population is 6’2 or over however among fortune CEO’s it is 30%
Same thing with frame/stature and voice it’s ahown that both of the following have been shown to be intimidation factors for other men.

 

[Uglybrazilian]

Almost every politician and notable army general in American history was recorded to be well above average height and stature also there’s a reason why they’re all male hint it’s because we made that way.

I really dont think so
From what I know taller people are more frequent among politicians but they are still the minority and most dominant dictators of the last century were turbomanlets such as Hitler and Stalin
Most of them are also old which is a less dominant trait

 

[Alt Number 3]

Ahahaha

 

[Rabbi]

I really dont think so
From what I know taller people are more frequent among politicians but they are still the minority and most dominante dictators of the last century were turbomanlets such as Hitler and Stalin
Most of them are also old which is a less dominant trait

Old is seen as a wisdom trait ofc a politician will be different from an army general
Also Stalin and Hitler weren’t that short esp for their times

 

[Uglybrazilian]

Old is seen as a wisdom trait ofc a politician will be different from an army general
Also Stalin and Hitler weren’t that short esp for their times

Wisdom is not intimidating on a physical level which is why im saying that humans can be dominant without necessarily being physicaly dominant

also when you look at world war 2 the "politicians are tall" story feels almost like a meme JFL, churchill was 1.67, mussolini 1.69, stalin was 1.63, the tallest of them all was hitler(1.75cm) which is far from dominant on a germanic country. I dont doubt height matters but I really dont think its important as people here say when it comes to dominance and power(in humans).

 

[Alt Number 3]

The personality of ur browridge and saggiatrial crest nigga

 

[Rabbi]

Wisdom is not intimidating on a physical level which is why im saying that humans can be dominant without necessarily being physicaly dominant

also when you look at world war 2 the "politicians are tall" story feels almost like a meme JFL, churchill was 1.67, mussolini 1.69, stalin was 1.63, the tallest of them all was hitler(1.75cm) which is far from dominant on a germanic country. I dont doubt height matters but I really dont think its important as people here say when it comes to dominance and power(in humans).

Fair enough i do get you’re point tho we defo care more about looks today then we did back then but idk about hunter gatherer times when your worth was literally brought about by what you could physically (and mentally) do

 

[Deleted member 9699]

No lmao

hunter-gatherer times no one spoke to other humans, we were roaming around in huge tribes and running into other humans would've been the equivalent of walking into a dark alleyway alone at night. we weren't that civilized. your cock, your height, your muscles and pheromones were all that mattered to attract bitches

 

[Uglybrazilian]

No lmao

hunter-gatherer times no one spoke to other humans, we were roaming around in huge tribes and running into other humans would've been the equivalent of walking into a dark alleyway alone at night. we weren't that civilized. your cock, your height, your muscles and pheromones were all that mattered to attract bitches

Dont know about that, there's research showing that hunter gatherers were pretty civilized and social

 

[Deleted member 9699]

Dont know about that, there's research showing that hunter gatherers were pretty civilized and social

how would research prove anything? youd have to live among them to know

 

[Uglybrazilian]

how would research prove anything? youd have to live among them to know

nigga I kinda agree with you tbh but thats the point of the thread, to imagine how life would be at those times

 

[Tony]

NO LOL IT WUS DOMPILL

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

jealously would play a big role back then. if chud is fucking all the woman grug and nurk will kill him

 

[Uglybrazilian]

jealously would play a big role back then. if chud is fucking all the woman grug and nurk will kill him

exactly what I think, humans are not like lions, the fact that men can get together to kill stronger guys plays a huge role in our evolution

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Yeah but humans sometimes are able to earn respect without necessarily being phisicaly dominant
Singers, preachers, politicians etc

Fax

prestige vs dominance

 

[St. Wristcel]

Since chad has high iq he would dark triad maxx and then split incel manlets skull in after cease fire agreement. Every time line chad wins.

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

exactly what I think, humans are not like lions, the fact that men can get together to kill stronger guys plays a huge role in our evolution

yea. using animals to predict our motives is stupid.

 

[Deleted member 7560]

Hunter-gatherer times seems to be more of natural selection where as the agricultural era and on forth its sexual selection