Do you think they see any difference ?

[LTNUser]

Do you guys think women see any difference between a 8/10 and a 9/10 guy ?
Do ratings even matter after you get past CL rating ?
Both 8/10 and the 9/10 men will attract hundreds of chicks and the quality of chicks may differ but I don't think women can tell who's more attractive between an 8/10 man and a 9/10 man .
And if you think money can make up for your lack of good looks then you're totally wrong.
The same way money doesn't work for rich billionaires,it also won't work for you if you're 7 or 8/10 and competing with a man higher in rating than you.
You could be a 7/10 and have billions of money but women would still prefer to date the 8/10 guy with less money.
So,stop listening to anyone who says money matters.
Money can't save you if you are competing with a guy with status halo+good looks.

@registerfasterusing @Bryce @inversions @Insomnia @richoxne

 

[registerfasterusing]

Do you guys think women see any difference between a 8/10 and a 9/10 guy ?
Do ratings even matter after you get past CL rating ?
Both 8/10 and the 9/10 men will attract hundreds of chicks and the quality of chicks may differ but I don't think women can tell who's more attractive between an 8/10 man and a 9/10 man .
And if you think money can make up for your lack of good looks then you're totally wrong.
The same way money doesn't work for rich billionaires,it also won't work for you if you're 7 or 8/10 and competing with a man higher in rating than you.
You could be a 7/10 and have billions of money but women would still prefer to date the 8/10 guy with less money.
So,stop listening to anyone who says money matters.
Money can't save you if you are competing with a guy with status halo+good looks.

@registerfasterusing @Bryce @inversions @Insomnia @richoxne

It rly doesnt matter

 

[richoxne]

 

[inversions]

You could be a 7/10 and have billions of money but women would still prefer to date the 8/10 guy with less money.

nah

 

[Incelforeever]

Nigga just fuck

 

[Insomnia]

Maybe there is a small difference, I doubt it would be a big one though

 

[Bryce]

No. They're too dumb to know the difference.

 

[mrdouchebag]

After some point, even attractiveness has diminished returns. That said, the threshold is quite high though.

 

[SomaliSub5]

past chadlite, there is subjectivity

phenotype probably matters more at chadlite+

 

[PharmaPhaggot]

Sure but both ratings are so rare that its gonna cause the same reaction so it only matters when they are compared to eachother

 

[Hoopy321]

Do you guys think women see any difference between a 8/10 and a 9/10 guy ?
Do ratings even matter after you get past CL rating ?
Both 8/10 and the 9/10 men will attract hundreds of chicks and the quality of chicks may differ but I don't think women can tell who's more attractive between an 8/10 man and a 9/10 man .
And if you think money can make up for your lack of good looks then you're totally wrong.
The same way money doesn't work for rich billionaires,it also won't work for you if you're 7 or 8/10 and competing with a man higher in rating than you.
You could be a 7/10 and have billions of money but women would still prefer to date the 8/10 guy with less money.
So,stop listening to anyone who says money matters.
Money can't save you if you are competing with a guy with status halo+good looks.

@registerfasterusing @Bryce @inversions @Insomnia @richoxne

Doesn’t really matter

 

[revant]

i mean its diminishing returns after a certain point, especially in regards to long-term sexual attraction.

i remember coming across a study (https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/personality/2017-fugere.pdf) where like several women and mothers were given personality (essentially brief traits) and attractiveness profiles and using that were needed to determine if a man was a suitable partner or not. The attractiveness scale was split into three parts: unattractive, moderately attractive, attractive. As part of the methodology, they did a pretest with a different set of women used a scale from 1-7 to rate men's faces (oddly similar to PSL scale lul ) and then afterwards, they split the faces into unattractive, moderately attractive, highly attractive based on average ratings (2.98 unattractive, 4.25 moderately attractive, 4.68 attractive).

Essentially, conclusion of the study found that moderately attractive men and attractive men were always chosen by both mothers and daughters regardless of what desirable traits they have, with unattractive men never being chosen (oh whats fucking new jfl), but what was interesting was that on average, men that have desirable traits but were only moderately attractive were chosen more by women compared to men that were attractive but had undesirable traits.

looking back rn its lowkey a jester ass study jfl which probably has many faults, but like i guess once your past a certain rating like HHTN to low Cl (or prob CL range in general), looks are a lot more a diminshing factor. Women are also in general way too retarded to know the damn difference, at that point it becomes a phenotype preferance i guess.