Do you think violent protest or peaceful protest is better?

[thenewhebbe]

I am asking whats more effevtive

 

[Mike456]

I am asking whats more effevtive

Violent but depends who protests
I don’t like protests but ig the violent one work the best

 

[Knight]

violent protests work although they at many times ruin the core message they are trying to convey and it becomes abit counterintuitive

 

[thenewhebbe]

violent protests work although they at many times ruin the core message they are trying to convey and it becomes abit counterintuitive

Unless you are the group in power it dosent work

 

[thenewhebbe]

Violent but depends who protests
I don’t like protests but ig the violent one work the best

Sounds like violent dosent work

 

[registerfasterusing]

I am asking whats more effevtive

Violent

 

[thenewhebbe]

Violent

Why

 

[Mike456]

Sends the message quick and drastic

Why

 

[registerfasterusing]

Why

For larger scale causes, it’s more effective

 

[Regular Doomer]

is this even a question?

how does power exerts it self?

how does a gov win? how does police win? how does armies win? how should the population win??

duh...

violence fix things, it is the ultimate diplomatic goal, to assert good with violence

 

[Just Blast]

violent
fire

 

[thenewhebbe]

is this even a question?

how does power exerts it self?

how does a gov win? how does police win? how does armies win? how should the population win??

duh...

violence fix things, it is the ultimate diplomatic goal, to assert good with violence

If they have more power over you tjey will kill you as the saying goes don't take knife to gun a fight

 

[wewuzaryans134]

neither works you need a coup or rebellion to change anything

 

[Regular Doomer]

If they have more power over you tjey will kill you as the saying goes don't take knife to gun a fight

the argument is an analogy you utter idiot, about power, bro you guys are incredibly dumb, crazy how you can't through pearls to the pigs, absolutely braindead coment

a guy with a gun can't hold 100 men with knives, that is the principle of protests, how many policeman? how many army guys to hold an entire population???

Bro, I am still in shock there are people as dumb as you to post such idiotic coment, are you a nigger or a woman by any chance? I am curious

 

[thenewhebbe]

the argument is an analogy you utter idiot, about power, bro you guys are incredibly dumb, crazy how you can't through pearls to the pigs, absolutely braindead coment

a guy with a gun can't hold 100 men with knives, that is the principle of protests, how many policeman? how many army guys to hold an entire population???

Bro, I am still in shock there are people as dumb as you to post such idiotic coment, are you a nigger or a woman by any chance? I am curious

100 men with guns can kill 100 guys witj knfie whats your point

Hold an entire population are you stupid.

 

[Regular Doomer]

100 men with guns can kill 100 guys witj knfie whats your point

Hold an entire population are you stupid.

omg, you really are a nigger, I thought I was talking to a human being.

KYS

 

[thenewhebbe]

omg, you really are a nigger, I thought I was talking to a human being.

KYS

You have no argument.

Plus get raped

 

[thenewhebbe]

For larger scale causes, it’s more effective

Why . Lets say I am im the usa in the 60 and most black people in the civil right movement are violent. Why wouldn't usa just ethnic cleansed the black population

 

[registerfasterusing]

Why . Lets say I am im the usa in the 60 and most black people in the civil right movement are violent. Why wouldn't usa just ethnic cleansed the black population

UN

 

[caleb555]

Violent protests are retarded

 

[thenewhebbe]

UN

Blacks werent popular and ethnic cleansing wasent seen as bad

 

[registerfasterusing]

Blacks werent popular and ethnic cleansing wasent seen as bad

Maybe in the 1860s

 

[thenewhebbe]

Maybe in the 1860s

The holocaust was in the 40s . And countless other ethnic cleansing campainging was happen bit after. It wasent seen as bad

 

[registerfasterusing]

The holocaust was in the 40s . And countless other ethnic cleansing campainging was happen bit after. It wasent seen as bad

The entire world condemned the holocaust

 

[tunisianropemaxxer]

.

 

[looksmaxxed]

protests are pointless irrespective of how violent they are. if it's pro establishment it'll be protected unless the browns are being really stupid, and if it's anti establishment, they'll debank you and put it down by force. they might have some effect at the very municipal level, but so what, change at that level is irrelevant.

the entire point of protests was about right to free assembly, which is about a right to free associate and speak without interference, which is why it should be illegal for government agencies to infiltrate these organizations(for some reason antifa is never infiltrated...hmmm)

 

[thenewhebbe]

The entire world condemned the holocaust

They didnt condem the other ethnic cleansing

 

[thenewhebbe]

Bump

 

[theRetard]

violent if the government is evil
peaceful if the government is not but just did something wrong