Do you think women are genetically prone to have no filter for ugly men, hate them, etc.

D

Deleted member 19944

Mistral
Joined
May 29, 2022
Posts
2,200
Reputation
864
What do you think.

I think so. I think women don't want to do it, as much as they are programmed to do so
 
  • +1
Reactions: currylightskin
wtf ur question i dont have enough iq to understand
 
wtf ur question i dont have enough iq to understand
do you think women are predesigned by nature to hate ugly men jsut for beig ugly. even if they are normal or treat them nice.
 
Lol, no. Ugly men have value as artisans, cucks, soldiers, etc.
Actually mens looks isn't that important for women's sexual preferences. It's more the other way around. An ugly man isn't failed in evolurion, but ugly women definitely are failed. Looks is more for women.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Ethniframementalcel, alriodai and Wallenberg
It's genetic. Being nice and having manners is social programming.

Edit: women are nice to high LMS males, mean to low LMS males. an ugly male would need MS to compensate
 
Nigga what kinda question is this, its obviously a yea, BUT historically speaking, No. Women would be nice to the shortest ugly men back then, because they know no matter how small or ugly, they'd still get their ass beat in a fight, which is the main reason for women virtue signaling, but a good amount of that has gone away today due to feminism and women being "equal" to men
 
Nigga what kinda question is this, its obviously a yea, BUT historically speaking, No. Women would be nice to the shortest ugly men back then, because they know no matter how small or ugly, they'd still get their ass beat in a fight, which is the main reason for women virtue signaling, but a good amount of that has gone away today due to feminism and women being "equal" to men
So what should happen now.
 
Nigga what kinda question is this, its obviously a yea, BUT historically speaking, No. Women would be nice to the shortest ugly men back then, because they know no matter how small or ugly, they'd still get their ass beat in a fight, which is the main reason for women virtue signaling, but a good amount of that has gone away today due to feminism and women being "equal" to men
Do you think when the west falls the following generations of gen z-a,b,etc. and beyond will be insanely more based about giving female rights. so if china, or muslim world takes over then the west will be the laughing stock in history.
 
It's genetic. Being nice and having manners is social programming.

Edit: women are nice to high LMS males, mean to low LMS males. an ugly male would need MS to compensate
I think it's looks money status and regal mannerism.

Being autistic or stupid, and not classy/refined in nature matters as well.

But it's against 3 big factors ofc.

In order it's probably looks, money, mannerism, and status.
 
I think it's looks money status and regal mannerism.

Being autistic or stupid, and not classy/refined in nature matters as well.

But it's against 3 big factors ofc.

In order it's probably looks, money, mannerism, and status.
Without looks it's like the claw machine. can't play if you don't have the value.
 

Similar threads

RichmondBread
Replies
5
Views
140
kentick
kentick
SecularIslamist
Replies
15
Views
255
TitusA
TitusA
Z
Replies
20
Views
2K
reptiles
reptiles
Lovecraftscat
Replies
9
Views
190
Meteor21
Meteor21

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top