Do you think you got the looks to model?

Do you?

  • Total voters
    86
SurgerySoon said:
You haven't seen my eye area though... nobody is paying this loser to model
Click to expand...
Just re incarnate tbh or be like a model for aspie ads or something
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
If my fwhr was 2.0 and better eye area
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
ArvidGustavsson said:
Is fwhr of 2 and zygos/ipd of 0.45 below average?
Click to expand...

No it’s perfect. I have a FWHR of 1.95/2 as well and it’s literally one of my only redeeming features
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
I could model... in a freakshow.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
idk
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
Yeah, low tier maybe.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
I think I could if I had good eye area
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
After surgery, maybe
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
No, not even after bsso, rhino and eyebrow transplant.

My goal is to become human tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
2peasinapod said:
when i was younger for sure, i made a instagram using my photos from when i was a teen and got scouted immediately by the top agency in the world (img)

i wasnt narxy at all growing up, infact very insecure even though girls always chased me

i just lived organically, i think god really kept his eye on me and everything i did
Click to expand...
larps.me
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043 and Deleted
I already can sing, so modeling will be easy for me.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
dohbeep said:
No it’s perfect. I have a FWHR of 1.95/2 as well and it’s literally one of my only redeeming features
Click to expand...
thats not really special though, its just not a flaw
anything below 2.0 fwhr is subhuman
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
Vidyacoper said:
thats not really special though, its just not a flaw
anything below 2.0 fwhr is subhuman
Click to expand...
Average FWHR is 1.83 for males
And I’m not saying it’s special anyway, but if it wasn’t there and if I had bug eyes I’d have been a genuine trucel
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
dohbeep said:
Average FWHR is 1.83 for males
Click to expand...
ok where did u pull that number from lol, 1.8 is pretty narrow
and the average male is an incel anyways so whats ur point
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
Vidyacoper said:
thats not really special though, its just not a flaw
anything below 2.0 fwhr is subhuman
Click to expand...
04442425 7FDF 40D5 B331 95F0171E1D1E
As Said before, ur the biggest coper
 
Vidyacoper said:
ok where did u pull that number from lol, 1.8 is pretty narrow
and the average male is an incel anyways so whats ur point
Click to expand...

A Study conducted by Stanford university, I ask you what’s your point?
I just said that I’m thankful my FWHR isn’t fucked and that’s it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
ArvidGustavsson said:
View attachment 307829 As Said before, ur the biggest coper
Click to expand...
retard, that's literally taken from top of the eyebrows, once again proving your low iq
dohbeep said:
A Study conducted by Stanford university, I ask you what’s your point?
I just said that I’m thankful my FWHR isn’t fucked and that’s it
Click to expand...
yeah i was just saying 2.0 is minimum for harmonious face
anyway how many people were those results taken from in that stanford study, im interested now
 
1700 people
 
ArvidGustavsson said:
Do you think your gl enough to make a living of modeling is what i’m asking the users of .me
Click to expand...
My eye area, chin and FWHR are model tier, but unfortunately my phenotype, skin color and acne and low bigonial width failo me, so no.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted
So 9 people here thinks they can make a living off modeling? If you truly belive that you should do it rn
john2 said:
My eye area, chin and FWHR are model tier, but unfortunately my phenotype, skin color and acne and low bigonial width failo me, so no.
Click to expand...
All Types of pheno/skin model nowadays
 
Vidyacoper said:
retard, that's literally taken from top of the eyebrows, once again proving your low iq

yeah i was just saying 2.0 is minimum for harmonious face
anyway how many people were those results taken from in that stanford study, im interested now
Click to expand...
Nah bro
1.8-1.9 is literally ideal for male models.
 
i mean i wish, but no never.
Imagine this : In my whole life i can't be admired for my looks no matter what. And my life is me so even if i breed with a stacy the kid that could be a chad won't be me.
You have only one try : Either you'r chad at born either no. And it's so frustrating.
Fuck MM
Beeing GL or decent or shit it's not meaning a lot compared to this.
 
streege said:
i mean i wish, but no never.
Imagine this : In my whole life i can't be admired for my looks no matter what. And my life is me so even if i breed with a stacy the kid that could be a chad won't be me.
You have only one try : Either you'r chad at born either no. And it's so frustrating.
Fuck MM
Beeing GL or decent or shit it's not meaning a lot compared to this.
Click to expand...
923FDB54 B82F 4FD6 A18C C3776169BA38
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 3043
I'm a model of failure.
 
Vidyacoper said:
2.0 + or death
chico's is like 2.05 or something
Click to expand...
Chico isnt 2.05 bro
Lookism users made a lot measurments on him. Me too anyways
He cant be above 2.05 in any way.
Why? Cuz his midface (pupil-lip) is 65.5mm and his bizygomatic is 140mm. So with lowest possible eyebrows (4.5mm around) it would give us 2.0 fwhr but Chico has high set brows (like 10-11mm) which gives us fwhr around 1.83-1.85). Anyways Chico looks the best in distorted pics where his fwhr doesnt cross 1.8.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vidyacoper
needsolution said:
Chico isnt 2.05 bro
Lookism users made a lot measurments on him. Me too anyways
He cant be above 2.05 in any way.
Click to expand...
1584613300629

needsolution said:
Anyways Chico looks the best in distorted pics where his fwhr doesnt cross 1.8.
Click to expand...
yeah i guess tbh
he looks good with any fwhr anyway, its not like fwhr matters much
2.0 is just ideal is all i was trying to say, shouldnt have said you NEED atleast 2.0
 
Maybe after lefort 3
 
Vidyacoper said:
View attachment 314654

yeah i guess tbh
he looks good with any fwhr anyway, its not like fwhr matters much
2.0 is just ideal is all i was trying to say, shouldnt have said you NEED atleast 2.0
Click to expand...
I bet this pic had lens which made Chico face looks way wider. In fact his fwhr cant be any higher than 1.85. Still he looks like god so i dont think it matters.
Also you can still look very good with 1.8 range fwhr (look Gandy, Kortajarena, Chico)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Rhino LeFort
Discussion Average age of a .org user
Replies
48
Views
379
Hammeruntilchad2009
Hammeruntilchad2009
WishIwasChico
if you think looks discrimination is bad then wait...
Replies
25
Views
362
Latinolooksmaxxer
Latinolooksmaxxer
keonxmogs
Discussion Do any HTN+ on here eat what ever tf you guys want ?
Replies
14
Views
224
try2beme
try2beme
noahwillascend
Discussion What do you guys think of me as a user?
Replies
4
Views
48
FaceandBBC
FaceandBBC
The Homelander
A body recomp is the worst thing you can do
Replies
12
Views
154
Samuel Jackson
Samuel Jackson

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 3)
Back
Top