Does Anya Taylor Joy Look Better Or Worse When Her IPD Gets Fixed?

does anya taylor joy look better or worse when her es and ipd get fixed?

  • better

  • worse

  • the same


Results are only viewable after voting.
D

Deleted member 26678

Joined
Feb 19, 2023
Posts
475
Reputation
636
48DAA490 8E35 4178 99F3 32B3CDD7CF3D
 
she looks uncanny in both but first is slightly more natural looking

her nasal bridge doesnt get smaller when her ipd reduces and gives her that uncanny masculine look
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 25938 and HarrierDuBois
Women can get away with wider IPD and men can get away with narrower IPD.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Ken, Blackgymmax, john2 and 2 others
Making her IPD normal fucks up her ES ratio, so it looks uncanny.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17872
Making her IPD normal fucks up her ES ratio, so it looks uncanny.
in the unmorphed photo her is is close to .52 which is dolphin

in the morphed edit her es is .47 which is within the ideal range
 
in the unmorphed photo her is is close to .52 which is dolphin

in the morphed edit her es is .47 which is within the ideal range
I think Taylor-Joy is an exception to this 0.47 mm ideal ES ratio (as is the case with many East Asians due to epicanthal folds). She may look better if she had no makeup on, but this particular morph still looks off.

Would 0.49 or 0.50 look better? It's the median between 0.52 and 0.47
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackgymmax
it would exceed the ideal so no
Again, she might be an exception to the "ideal" ES ratio. For example, I'd look like shit with a 0.47 ES ratio.
 
Again, she might be an exception to the "ideal" ES ratio. For example, I'd look like shit with a 0.47 ES ratio.
idk what you are trying to get at. maybe you think it looks better but it can't be ideal on paper because the ratio is fixed.

also how do you know you'd look like shit with .47
 
idk what you are trying to get at. maybe you think it looks better but it can't be ideal on paper because the ratio is fixed.

also how do you know you'd look like shit with .47
I was wrong JFL. My ES ratio is 0.478. Apologies for my ignorance.
 
pfl too wide, nasal bridge too wide

still looks better coping if u think otherwise
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 26678
She looks equally bad in the morph. You need to lower her PFL and her Palpebral Fissure Height. Her nasal bridge is a little too wide as well.

The problem is that in the morph, her midface ratio might also be unideal which is why she looks masculine in the morph.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackgymmax
i prefer right
 
She looks equally bad in the morph. You need to lower her PFL and her Palpebral Fissure Height. Her nasal bridge is a little too wide as well.

The problem is that in the morph, her midface ratio might also be unideal which is why she looks masculine in the morph.
the mfr is ideal in the morph

i suspect the uncanniness is coming from the pfl and nasal bridge which others have brought up. this isnt my morph also
 
Looks a lot better IMO. But sometimes standout features are good for actors.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 26678

Similar threads

134applesauce456
2 3
Replies
105
Views
10K
roadtochang123
roadtochang123
turneywest
Replies
235
Views
9K
turneywest
turneywest
got.daim
Replies
70
Views
4K
IraniancelV2
IraniancelV2
got.daim
Replies
17
Views
1K
CD34
CD34

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top