D
Deleted member 26678
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2023
- Posts
- 475
- Reputation
- 636
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
in the unmorphed photo her is is close to .52 which is dolphinMaking her IPD normal fucks up her ES ratio, so it looks uncanny.
I think Taylor-Joy is an exception to this 0.47 mm ideal ES ratio (as is the case with many East Asians due to epicanthal folds). She may look better if she had no makeup on, but this particular morph still looks off.in the unmorphed photo her is is close to .52 which is dolphin
in the morphed edit her es is .47 which is within the ideal range
Narrow ipd looks shit on both men and womenWomen can get away with wider IPD and men can get away with narrower IPD.
Yes, but men can pull it off, women can't.Narrow ipd looks shit on both men and women
it would exceed the ideal so noWould 0.49 or 0.50 look better? It's the median between 0.52 and 0.47
Again, she might be an exception to the "ideal" ES ratio. For example, I'd look like shit with a 0.47 ES ratio.it would exceed the ideal so no
idk what you are trying to get at. maybe you think it looks better but it can't be ideal on paper because the ratio is fixed.Again, she might be an exception to the "ideal" ES ratio. For example, I'd look like shit with a 0.47 ES ratio.
I was wrong JFL. My ES ratio is 0.478. Apologies for my ignorance.idk what you are trying to get at. maybe you think it looks better but it can't be ideal on paper because the ratio is fixed.
also how do you know you'd look like shit with .47
the mfr is ideal in the morphShe looks equally bad in the morph. You need to lower her PFL and her Palpebral Fissure Height. Her nasal bridge is a little too wide as well.
The problem is that in the morph, her midface ratio might also be unideal which is why she looks masculine in the morph.
No. Noone pulls off a narrow ipd.Women can get away with wider IPD and men can get away with narrower IPD.