Does mmtn exist?

[TrvePvle]

I had a dude tell me that its that its lmtn mmtn hmtn and that mmtn isn't mtn, is he right?

 

[nvr3noug6]

mtn means its between hmtn and lmtn

in this case no such a thing as mmtn

mmtn=mtn

 

[Orka]

It used to just be ltn, mtn, htn

Only recently people started categorizing it further

it can mean both of these, depending on who you ask:

mtn [ lmtn, mmtn, hmtn ] category
mtn [ mtn] rating

 

[iqletandrew73]

It used to just be ltn, mtn, htn

Only recently people started categorizing it further

it can mean both of these, depending on who you ask:

mtn [ lmtn, mmtn, hmtn ] category
mtn [ mtn] rating

I feel like it's used to cope if you're LTN and wanna escape the LTN hell, because ngl sometimes hltn and lmtn is only a slight difference, where hhtn and lcl is the same. I think it has a good use if you know you're stuck at mtn, because it matters a lot if you're at the edge of mtn or just inches away from htn (for example, if I were lmtn and some nigga would say I have hmtn potential, then I think it's more accurate than saying you can ascend to htn which is obviously a lie without surgeries) and can be benefical. Also some would rate someone a mtn, others would call it htn, so a point between them (hmtn) is good if they don't over/under rate, and can have an understanding for both opinions. Although I'd only use this low-mid-high seperation inside a tier if we talk about LTN or above, for a sub5 it doesn't matter if he's low sub5 or high, he's still recessed af. I hope I haven't say anything stupid, I'm not trying to be good at ratings, but for me what I've said sounds ballright. Have a nice day

 

[rares54]

It used to just be ltn, mtn, htn

Only recently people started categorizing it further

it can mean both of these, depending on who you ask:

mtn [ lmtn, mmtn, hmtn ] category
mtn [ mtn] rating

I got real confused when i came back to org this year and seen mid mid tier normie

before used to be just like u said

 

[good_king_alex]

I had a dude tell me that its that its lmtn mmtn hmtn and that mmtn isn't mtn, is he right?View attachment 4766613View attachment 4766610View attachment 4766611

i think the differentiation between subgroups is key, as MTN would encompass like 50% or more of the population. so needs to be divided up into lmtn, mmtn, hmtn