Does reincarnation exist?

ExMisanthropy

ExMisanthropy

Bronze
Joined
Mar 4, 2025
Posts
300
Reputation
237
For context: I want to kill myself, and I want to know if reincarnation is real, so that I can kill myself and become a chad.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Delonier, fuckinnefor, Sicilian Cyclops and 3 others
You clearly don't know what strawman means as whatever I replied to was exactly what you said.



No, therefore you're wrong.

And I'm correct because of my first comment where I refuted any possibility of the existence of reincarnation.

AND brother, YOU'VE JUST UTTERED THE MOST IGNORANT STATEMENT TO EVER EXIST "THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF REASONING IN THE SUPERNATURAL WITH LOGIC".

This just told me that you've never even read about reincarnation or anything philosophically related because if you did then you'd know that even the necessary being has to comply with logic.


Dude, there is no point in seeing something from a 4th party that simply isn't true. What isn't objectively true, will never be true from any point of view.

And you mentioned nothing hecause you know nothing, you just said random nonsense in the name of "Humans cant understand it" jfl.



Intuition has nothing to do with reincarnation, try again.

No one is born with believing in reincarnation.

An oxford study was done in 20 countries that concluded that children believe in a superior power and an afterlife (Intuition) that isn't reincarnation.



6th sense, even cavemen don't believe in this anymore.


Something that isn't logically possible can never exist.



You have provided 0 proof to your argument and have just blabbered nonsense like "Im not wrong, u arent wrong, we are both right" theres only one truth and you fail to accept it because you don't want to pop your own balloon


There's still objective truth, it doesn't change the fact that most of the religions are merely delusions.


Objective truth is something that is taught in the basics of philosophy, you're unknowledgeable in this topic and you just told me that.

Actually, the infinite universe theory isn't something that can be logically proved.

If the universe is expanding currently as according to science, then it must be finite and if it were eternal as according to the theory, then it should always have been infinite.

Something can't be both finite and infinite.


Keep deluding yourself mate, you live in a cave

Your way is wrong and you need to argue with logicality and science.

Everything that is objectively true can be explained with science and logic.

If everyone adopted the same Pov as you which essentially is that we both are correct then the truth would never be found.
im sorry that you feel so strongly to disprove others. if you truly understood what I was trying convey you'd be able to see that this back and forth is feeding ill intended systems. my lack of vocabulary makes it hard to put such complex theories into words. people like you are merely logic and science driven thus they excel greatly in that sense, thats just how life works. some understand some understand a little less others not at all. look into David Icke and his theories and maybe you'll better rationalize my posts. nonetheless our exchange has brought me great clarity :bigbrain:.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Ogionth
I already say that reincarnation could be scattered randomly. Population amount increasing or decreasing does not disprove reincarnation. Let say a time period where population amount is at the highest, not only reincarnated soul but new soul would exist at that same time period.

You think reincarnation as a consistent regeneration concept, but that would mean that our soul did not have a first body. Which would not make sense since our universe itself started as a big bang.
Randomly being scattered still doesn't provide any evidence to as why reincarnation could even exist.

It still doesn't change the fact that scientifically reincarnation is false and always has been.

There has been not one single instance of reincarnation ever.

Whether the universe started as a big bang or not, is irrelevant to this convo brother.

At this point, you're believing in fairy tales, even worse than that.
 
I
im sorry that you feel so strongly to disprove others. if you truly understood what I was trying convey you'd be able to see that this back and forth is feeding ill intended systems. my lack of vocabulary makes it hard to put such complex theories into words. people like you are merely logic and science driven thus they excel greatly in that sense, thats just how life works. some understand some understand a little less others not at all. look into David Icke and his theories and maybe you'll better rationalize my posts. nonetheless our exchange has brought me great clarity :bigbrain:.
It looks like you don't want to argue anymore so I'll let it go too.

Have fun mate!
 
  • +1
Reactions: LLcel
Randomly being scattered still doesn't provide any evidence to as why reincarnation could even exist.

It still doesn't change the fact that scientifically reincarnation is false and always has been.

There has been not one single instance of reincarnation ever.

Whether the universe started as a big bang or not, is irrelevant to this convo brother.

At this point, you're believing in fairy tales, even worse than that.
I dont believe in reincarnation 100%, which is why I created the post, but science did not ever disprove reincarnation nor prove it. Your point on science disproving reincarnation is because of the "amount of population" changing but it is irrelevant since reincarnation could be random. Their is no scientific testing on whether 2 body contain the same soul or not. Give an actual scientific evidence on why reincarnation is fake, and not "Because of the amount of population"
 
I dont believe in reincarnation 100%, which is why I created the post, but science did not ever disprove reincarnation nor prove it. Your point on science disproving reincarnation is because of the "amount of population" changing but it is irrelevant since reincarnation could be random. Their is no scientific testing on whether 2 body contain the same soul or not. Give an actual scientific evidence on why reincarnation is fake, and not "Because of the amount of population"
First, "Because of amount of population" is not an argument that you should disregard as it refutes 99% of the forms of reincarnation.

The reason why you say the argument is not good for your claim is bcz of "2 body contain same soul"

Well where is your proof that neuroscientifically conciousness can be transferred?

As for what you've asked, I have already proved everything.
there has not been recorded a single instance of reincarnation ever

neuroscientifically, conciousness cannot be transferred

what exactly reincarnation is? is it transfer of soul? how do u define soul? why would the soul lose memories when it reincarnates? and if it doesn't then why hasn't there been any instance recorded empirically, rather than fake anecdotal experiences?

if new souls are being created and every soul is also being recycled then what makes x more worthy of a new soul than y that is reincarnated and if there are no nw souls then why is population increasing

How can you claim that after reincarnation, we lose all memories and if we don't then where's the recorded evidence?
 
For context: I want to kill myself, and I want to know if reincarnation is real, so that I can kill myself and become a chad.
Yes it’s real but that won’t work if you don’t believe I’m handy first
 
Every single thing has to be explained by science and logic. If something cannot be explained by science and logic both then it simply doesn't exist.

Your statements are so ignorant, have you ever even read a book in your life? It feels like I'm talking to a wall lmfao.

Dude's only evidence is "It can't be explained by science" jfl.

Fucking dumbfuck.
Everything? So why are the events that have happened throughout your life even happen in the first place, was it fate? I dont think fate can be described straight up by science. Cope tard.
 
Everything? So why are the events that have happened throughout your life even happen in the first place, was it fate? I dont think fate can be described straight up by science. Cope tard.
"Science and logic"

The events that happened in my life were because of my decisions and the circumstances of my life and due to logic.

🤦

Tell me one thing that is against logic, logic not as in arguing but as a subject.

Let's see you fucking faggot, tell me one thing that contradicts logic yet exists or can be performed.

Tell me one thing that is a logical impossibility but yet has happened or exists.
 
  • +1
Reactions: fuckinnefor
Case in a mental hospital: - “Bon massa aaaa bone massa bone massa bone massa bone massa bone massa bone massa give me bone massa hit me 600 times in zygo hit me please 800 times on the notches a day eat sarmas die chad die chad become sterile make micro fractures in the skull lose 40iq love me.”

Doctor:
Sorry, nothing will work for you on the antidepressants listed, you're not edematous, you just have a micro skull, small stature, not enough bones, and generally you're a swarthy Asian, get the fuck outta here. I can just give you a second chance at a different life, you can be reborn as a Hindu in 20% of cases, or you can be a blond with blue eyes in 1% of cases.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: fxckz and fuckinnefor
For context: I want to kill myself, and I want to know if reincarnation is real, so that I can kill myself and become a chad.
I don’t think so . And if it is , you won’t remember anything from ur past life
 
  • +1
Reactions: fxckz

Similar threads

ruz
Replies
5
Views
75
KB_maxxer
KB_maxxer
G
Replies
7
Views
126
ascendantwill
A
N
Replies
60
Views
712
kazama
kazama
Tallooksmaxxer
Replies
5
Views
95
goyimslayer
goyimslayer
Halcyon0x
Replies
8
Views
91
Halcyon0x
Halcyon0x

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top