Doing NoFap is retarded

I knew a guy, years ago, who would aggressively hump his duvet every time he got upset.
There's no weight to that though :whatfeels: the fuck he's literally humping air :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlayerJonas and imontheloose
There's no weight to that though :whatfeels: the fuck he's literally humping air :lul:
I never asked for specifics. I just knew it happened and was a recurring theme to his daily life.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: SlayerJonas and Sub5kang
*in most cases
*I use probabilities
*NoFap ≠ NoPorn
*"You" = refers to the majority
*Thread is marked "serious"

Because the people don't know why, they regurgitate what is right or wrong

There is no benefit to NoFap : No, you aren't high T because you resist your urges; no, there are no magic nutrients flowing up to your brain

Rejecting some urges is good but not with the example in discussion . You keep thinking about sex thus being less productive (or, my proposal : Fap)

You are an incel rejecting a primitive, effortless pleasure source (penis hard): You don't get sex, you won't experience it in the future because you dislike effort (no real looksmaxxing, wealth accrual, self-improvement) = time won't ease your pain, the opposite happens

with naturetard logic : Natural is superior (logical fallacy) = If they decide to become emotional point at their contradicting stances (NoFap being natural = good)

Primitive ≠ good/bad (debatable), but it remains a part of your life and trying to escape your body doesn't work

Don't make your lifes worse than it is . Our modern society gives you many copes (for no reason, despising effort should be punished), you should use them

Dopamine reward system increases homeostasis and shit (giga faplord aka looksmax.org registration speedrun) :

You after consuming porn every day after hitting age 10-12:

View attachment 4061591

Solution : Stick to weaker sources of sexual stimulus e.g. pictures, imagination, softer grip, etc. so you don't develop unfavorable fetishes .

@chadisbeingmade @imontheloose @Eltrē @Daddy's Home @Debetro
Yes

Every religion in the world, all spiritual beliefs, Nikola Tesla, Carl jung

You are right, and they are wrong

What a banger
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Sub5kang
Yes

Every religion in the world, all spiritual beliefs, Nikola Tesla, Carl jung

You are right, and they are wrong

What a banger
Idk man I just kinda beat my meat and regret it
1000094853
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
Yes

Every religion in the world, all spiritual beliefs, Nikola Tesla, Carl jung

You are right, and they are wrong

What a banger
Nikola Tesla also believed that women who wore earrings were evil and he vehemently stayed away from odd numbered hotel rooms. Not to mention, most religions endorse all sorts of rubbish due to the nature of their surroundings at the time.

What a ridiculous argument.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: IraniancelV2, Gaygymmaxx and SlayerJonas
1. Even atheist philosophers understand that the primary driving factor in an individuals success, in most cases, is to effectively reproduce

In the animal kingdom, the strongest gets to fuck

In the modern society, the richest gets to fuck

And so, by removing your incentive to fuck (masturbating) you remove your incentive to progress.

2. All religions know about this

Being an atheist in 2025 is retarded, the CIA literally has released documents on out of body experiences, and their OWN TRAINING PROGRAM to produce them

You are not the intellectual you think you are, youre a gooner midwit, with lackluster willpower, coping with copes.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: IraniancelV2
fapping boosts test
 
  • +1
Reactions: fwhr glazer
*in most cases
*I use probabilities
*NoFap ≠ NoPorn
*"You" = refers to the majority
*Thread is marked "serious"

Because the people don't know why, they regurgitate what is right or wrong

There is no benefit to NoFap : No, you aren't high T because you resist your urges; no, there are no magic nutrients flowing up to your brain

Rejecting some urges is good but not with the example in discussion . You keep thinking about sex thus being less productive (or, my proposal : Fap)

You are an incel rejecting a primitive, effortless pleasure source (penis hard): You don't get sex, you won't experience it in the future because you dislike effort (no real looksmaxxing, wealth accrual, self-improvement) = time won't ease your pain, the opposite happens

with naturetard logic : Natural is superior (logical fallacy) = If they decide to become emotional point at their contradicting stances (NoFap being natural = good)

Primitive ≠ good/bad (debatable), but it remains a part of your life and trying to escape your body doesn't work

Don't make your lifes worse than it is . Our modern society gives you many copes (for no reason, despising effort should be punished), you should use them

Dopamine reward system increases homeostasis and shit (giga faplord aka looksmax.org registration speedrun) :

You after consuming porn every day after hitting age 10-12:

View attachment 4061591

Solution : Stick to weaker sources of sexual stimulus e.g. pictures, imagination, softer grip, etc. so you don't develop unfavorable fetishes .

@chadisbeingmade @imontheloose @Eltrē @Daddy's Home @Debetro
We have wanked for hundreds of thousands of years so why stop now
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx
Nikola Tesla also believed that women who wore earrings were evil and he vehemently stayed away from odd numbered hotel rooms. Most religions endorse all sorts of rubbish due to the nature of their surroundings at the time.

What a ridiculous argument.
See other argument then

Additionally,

If most religions have some garbage mixed in,

That doesn't change the fact that every single one of them still has a common belief, which should be extremely unlikely

Unless it's an intuitive or fundamental truth.
 
1. Even atheist philosophers understand that the primary driving factor in an individuals success, in most cases, is to effectively reproduce

In the animal kingdom, the strongest gets to fuck

In the modern society, the richest gets to fuck

And so, by removing your incentive to fuck (masturbating) you remove your incentive to progress.

2. All religions know about this

Being an atheist in 2025 is retarded, the CIA literally has released documents on out of body experiences, and their OWN TRAINING PROGRAM to produce them

You are not the intellectual you think you are, youre a gooner midwit, with lackluster willpower, coping with copes.
@imontheloose

And are you atheist btw?
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: IraniancelV2 and Sub5kang
See other argument then

Additionally,

If most religions have some garbage mixed in,

That doesn't change the fact that every single one of them still has a common belief, which should be extremely unlikely

Unless it's an intuitive or fundamental truth.
Pedophillia isn’t commonly banned, and abuse against all sorts of groups is permitted in them all. They’re made in literal barbaric times. Just because some cave dwellers thousands of years ago wrote down that “X is wrong, worship me” doesn’t mean that they are right.

Galileo was placed on indefinite house arrest for debunking geocentrism, a belief promoted by the Bible and Church for countless years.
 
  • +1
Reactions: IraniancelV2 and SlayerJonas
Pedophillia isn’t commonly banned, and abuse against all sorts of groups is permitted in them all. They’re made in literal barbaric times. Just because some cave dwellers thousands of years ago wrote down that “X is wrong, worship me” doesn’t mean that they are right.

Galileo was placed on indefinite house arrest for debunking geocentrism, a belief promoted by the Bible and Church for countless years.
You didn't address the point i made.

Go ahead and read the other reply
 
@imontheloose

And are you atheist btw?
Well, you can’t really be certain, so I’d have to be agnostic implying ignorance to the matter, but I am of the belief that God is unlikely to exist. I am culturally Christian, however.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: IraniancelV2 and SlayerJonas
Well, you can’t really be certain, so I’d have to be agnostic implying ignorance to the matter, but I am of the belief that God is unlikely to exist. I am culturally Christian, however.
Smarter than all religions

Smarter than Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud

And more intellegent than the central intelligence agency, I envy you
 
  • JFL
Reactions: IraniancelV2
how many times do u do it per week?
Once or twice per week, I don't see it as a task to stop fapping so I think this reduced my urge and set it back to whatever is naturally occuring (1-2x week)

Keep this in mind : Something only becomes a problem once you logically/objectively conclude it is one, also about perspective and shit tho
I used to do that till I noticed it would stick similarly to hair on the grate where the water drains from because as it goes into the running water it just sticks to the metal as it's draining out so I wouldn't bother if I were u
Well what works is this, cumming in some kind of tissue
The progress is not caused by capitalism. Capitalism benefits those who are well off and punishes those in tough states, all whilst posing no national integrity bar muh give me 50% to go to Israel. It’s a cynical ideology and is entirely based on individual vanity; nothing else.

The economy should serve the people; the people shouldn’t serve the economy. National pride has died.
Bro your text addresses different shit

The system of money creates the desire for money as it offers many things, in our world money and science are deeply wired and there are obviously discrepancies and contradictions in peoples actions and conflicts occur

Capitalism is rewarding in the sense that you reap what you sow and this world is logical if you understand it, nothing exists out of vanity it's all a consequence of prior stuff that happened (determinism which you believe in also)

But let's rape the retard below first :
Yes

Every religion in the world, all spiritual beliefs, Nikola Tesla, Carl jung

You are right, and they are wrong

What a banger
Appeal to authority doesn't even make sense here at all, not like Tesla and Carl Jung thought about this unimportant shit (relative, for them)

Tesla was busy creating shit
1. Even atheist philosophers understand that the primary driving factor in an individuals success, in most cases, is to effectively reproduce

In the animal kingdom, the strongest gets to fuck

In the modern society, the richest gets to fuck
Failed here again, the individual with the highest SMV gets to fuck or the richest person with prostitutes, who cares about who fucks what this doesn't add anything
And so, by removing your incentive to fuck (masturbating) you remove your incentive to progress.
fapping means playing around with your dick, this isn't "fucking" and not the goal of anyone just a bodily need
2. All religions know about this
I forgot you're Indian
Being an atheist in 2025 is retarded, the CIA literally has released documents on out of body experiences, and their OWN TRAINING PROGRAM to produce them

You are not the intellectual you think you are, youre a gooner midwit, with lackluster willpower, coping with copes.
Wow how offensive, never tag me again fyi I was too kind with your unban now (out of vanity, I'm too kind) that I see how you try to attack me and not my arguments
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Ralix and Gaygymmaxx
Once or twice per week, I don't see it as a task to stop fapping so I think this reduced my urge and set it back to whatever is naturally occuring (1-2x week)

Keep this in mind : Something only becomes a problem once you logically/objectively conclude it is one, also about perspective and shit tho

Well what works is this, cumming in some kind of tissue

Bro your text addresses different shit

The system of money creates the desire for money as it offers many things, in our world money and science are deeply wired and there are obviously discrepancies and contradictions in peoples actions and conflicts occur

Capitalism is rewarding in the sense that you reap what you sow and this world is logical if you understand it, nothing exists out of vanity it's all a consequence of prior stuff that happened (determinism which you believe in also)

But let's rape the retard below first :

Appeal to authority doesn't even make sense here at all, not like Tesla and Carl Jung thought about this unimportant shit (relative, for them)

Tesla was busy creating shit

Failed here again, the individual with the highest SMV gets to fuck or the richest person with prostitutes, who cares about who fucks what this doesn't add anything

fapping means playing around with your dick, this isn't "fucking" and not the goal of anyone just a bodily need

I forgot you're Indian

Wow how offensive, never tag me again fyi I was too kind with your unban now (out of vanity, I'm too kind) that I see how you try to attack me and not my arguments
Also Tesla and Carl jung have both made statements... you can't just say they didn't lol
 
(Didn't address the argument)
Go provide those secret CIA government files that surely reveal the purpose of life and explain how to spend the rest of your life

look at this retarded Indian thinking he's special after being drugged as a child by his older brother and abused by his parents, wouldn't even look at him IRL, most empathic creature calling himself human after being treated with kindness
Also Tesla and Carl jung have both made statements... you can't just say they didn't lol
Go show them, either way not like they prove anything . imontheloose already gave you an absurdly accurate example with Tesla how things can turn out really different in reality .

NoFap won't benefit you in any way and harms you and you get here in my thread saying bullshit like the abused Indian you are and not answering any points I made in the thread .
If most religions have some garbage mixed in,

That doesn't change the fact that every single one of them still has a common belief, which should be extremely unlikely
All religions are human cope . Just like the nofap . It doesn't have any value .

And you still didn't show "your" cia gov files publicly available on their site .
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: chadisbeingmade and Gaygymmaxx
1. Even atheist philosophers understand that the primary driving factor in an individuals success, in most cases, is to effectively reproduce

In the animal kingdom, the strongest gets to fuck

In the modern society, the richest gets to fuck

And so, by removing your incentive to fuck (masturbating) you remove your incentive to progress.

2. All religions know about this

Being an atheist in 2025 is retarded, the CIA literally has released documents on out of body experiences, and their OWN TRAINING PROGRAM to produce them

You are not the intellectual you think you are, youre a gooner midwit, with lackluster willpower, coping with copes.
Outright facepalm. You’re exposing your total incredulity here. Nowhere is there a consensus on what individual success is, that’s why we have philosophy in the first place.

You’re firstly smuggling a norm (success should be driven by sex) out of a description (organisms reproduce). Evolutionary fitness is about gene frequencies, OP can tell you as a biology student. Why do people climb frozen mountains? Why do we write fugues? Why do we take up abstract maths? All of which have motives that are not even remotely related to reproductive payout. Nature isn’t utilitarian. Who told you that?

In animals, it isn’t the strongest; it’s whatever trait meets that niche whether it’s cooperation, stealth, parental investment, mimicry, whatever. You’re just running off complete sloganeering.

You’re committing a begging-the-question fallacy too. People set and achieve long-range goals for reasons that outlast a hormonal blip. Meaning, craft, rivalry, spite, habit, fear of death, to name a few. How do you explain those who developed companies, novels, and so forth that are single? Are they all conveniently monks in disguise?

And no, not all religions. Celibacy exists in Buddhist sects, Catholicism, Hindu sects, Jain ascetics, and even some Sufi Muslims I’ve heard practise celibacy and strict no-sex law.

If these out-of-body documents were so blatant, how come they have no repeatability? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; if the government claims people have felt out of their body, that’s called a memo, not validated ontology. The government just write down what these people claim. How do you not understand this?

There is no such thing as a human scoreboard where progress is maximal copulation tokens. Values are human fictions we wield to get what we want. If what you want is sex, say so. Don’t launder it into metaphysics and decree that everyone else’s telos is a proxy for your libido. There is no should baked into the universe.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: SlayerJonas
Smarter than all religions

Smarter than Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud

And more intellegent than the central intelligence agency, I envy you
I haven’t claimed to be smarter than anyone. Since you like Freud so much here, do you follow his psychosexual theory? Do we have womb envy? Do women have penis envy? Do we think about our parents having sex and get jealous that our father has sexual access to our mother? Do we think his study on Little Hans is fine too?

You’re conveniently picking and choosing people who agree with you. It is so disingenuous, it’s ludicrous. I could show you many folks who are awfully intelligent that believe in all sorts of rubbish.

The brain is so complicated and typical intellect does not correlate linearly with metaphysical reasoning.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: IraniancelV2 and SlayerJonas
Keep in mind that we're the only species who does this dumb shit.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlayerJonas
Go provide those secret CIA government files that surely reveal the purpose of life and explain how to spend the rest of your life
Ok
look at this retarded Indian thinking he's special after being drugged as a child by his older brother and abused by his parents, wouldn't even look at him IRL, most empathic creature calling himself human after being treated with kindness
Nigga what? :ROFLMAO: Who made you this angry

Here's the files
 
I haven’t claimed to be smarter than anyone. Since you like Freud so much here, do you follow his psychosexual theory? Do we have womb envy? Do women have penis envy? Do we think about our parents having sex and get jealous that our father has sexual access to our mother? Do we think his study on Little Hans is fine too?

You’re conveniently picking and choosing people who agree with you. It is so disingenuous, it’s ludicrous. I could show you many folks who are awfully intelligent that believe in all sorts of rubbish.

The brain is so complicated and typical intellect does not correlate linearly with metaphysical reasoning.
You're an atheist when the suprasensory world is literally publicly accessible knowledge


You're right tho I don't actually know shit about Freud :forcedsmile:

The appeal to authority is a weak argument I will concede that
 
I haven’t claimed to be smarter than anyone. Since you like Freud so much here, do you follow his psychosexual theory? Do we have womb envy? Do women have penis envy? Do we think about our parents having sex and get jealous that our father has sexual access to our mother? Do we think his study on Little Hans is fine too?

You’re conveniently picking and choosing people who agree with you. It is so disingenuous, it’s ludicrous. I could show you many folks who are awfully intelligent that believe in all sorts of rubbish.

The brain is so complicated and typical intellect does not correlate linearly with metaphysical reasoning.
Don't interpret much into his arguments . He's below average percentile in everything and wakes up daily to his reality :

- No relationships (unloving family)
- 5'5/5'6 (thinks he's taller)
- Indian, despised by society
- Can't escape the childhood trauma with his brother drugging him
- Neurodivergent / mentally ill
- Below average intelligence, hyperobsessing over his tiny dick like in this thread
Nigga what? :ROFLMAO: Who made you this angry
You provoked this reaction and it's what you deserve . I'm only holding a mirror infront of you .

If God is real he created you to suffer endlessly, even after death
If you can't mention the points stated there accurately don't use it as an argument

Answer the thread, the only thing you say is "all religions are about nofap" to which I respond all religions are fundamentally cope, nofap fits perfectly inside every religion as it's also cope
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: IraniancelV2, chadisbeingmade and imontheloose
You're an atheist when the suprasensory world is literally publicly accessible knowledge


You're right tho I don't actually know shit about Freud :forcedsmile:

The appeal to authority is a weak argument I will concede that
Nice. You’ve shown a memo exists, not that it’s cosmologically true. It says it’s an army officer’s speculative thought-piece of Monroe Institute tapes and metaphysics. Where’s the replicated scientific result or an official CIA endorsement? Hosting ≠ imprimatur.

Now, I’ve dealt with you people before and you all hilariously use this exact same document. They never use the ‘95 document issued by the CIA commissioned by the American Institutes for Research to review literal decades of remote viewing. Their conclusions? “Remote viewing… has not been shown to have value in intelligence operations… continued support for the operational component is not justified.” Program ended. Caput.

Now, if you want to discuss some actual reasoning for why people feel this way, it’s been documented quite thoroughly that you can produce such effects when stimulating the TP junction. These out-of-body experiences people claim to have, just like any hallucinatory delusion, is a multisensory integration glitch. Welcome to physiology, not the suprasensory world, give me a break…

I ask you for a falsifiable claim that doesn’t retreat into anecdotes and telegram recycled PDFs from a schizo’s basement.

The fact is, the one time the agency did a review, it said “zero point. Stop.”

Keep in mind for future, “publicly accessible” ≠ “publicly verified”.
 
  • +1
Reactions: IraniancelV2 and SlayerJonas
Don't interpret much into his arguments . He's below average percentile in everything and wakes up daily to his reality :

- No relationships (unloving family)
- 5'5/5'6 (thinks he's taller)
- Indian, despised by society
- Can't escape the childhood trauma with his brother drugging him
- Neurodivergent / mentally ill
- Below average intelligence, hyperobsessing over his tiny dick like in this thread
He is such a let-down to religious people. I have spoke to very clever religious people and their points are very understandable and coherent. Most of the time it’s done by reasonable retreats and it works incredibly. He is clearly believing what he is out of personal incredulity. “Oh I can’t explain it and therefore God did it.”
 
Don't interpret much into his arguments . He's below average percentile in everything and wakes up daily to his reality :

- No relationships (unloving family)
My family loves me, I dislike my brother
- 5'5/5'6 (thinks he's taller)
I claim nothing but 5"6
- Indian, despised by society
white passing, never bullied
- Can't escape the childhood trauma with his brother drugging him
Ive dealt with much worse shit
- Neurodivergent / mentally ill
nope
- Below average intelligence,
youre insulting me instead of reading the CIA document midwit, not sure why you asked me to link it if you weren't interested
hyperobsessing over his tiny dick like in this thread
Made 1 or 2 posts about my girth

If you'd like the extrapolation of the document

CIA agents, tasked with using remove viewing to identify soviet developments in war and locate hidden bases:

Found a new submarine being developed and deployed

They had no information about this, and nobody in the government was aware

They later confirmed the findings via satellite, in a area which matched the description and specifications of viewers, as did the submarine itself
 
  • JFL
Reactions: IraniancelV2
Nice. You’ve shown a memo exists, not that it’s cosmologically true. It says it’s an army officer’s speculative thought-piece of Monroe Institute tapes and metaphysics. Where’s the replicated scientific result or an official CIA endorsement? Hosting ≠ imprimatur.

Now, I’ve dealt with you people before and you all hilariously use this exact same document. They never use the ‘95 document issued by the CIA commissioned by the American Institutes for Research to review literal decades of remote viewing. Their conclusions? “Remote viewing… has not been shown to have value in intelligence operations… continued support for the operational component is not justified.” Program ended. Caput.

Now, if you want to discuss some actual reasoning for why people feel this way, it’s been documented quite thoroughly that you can produce such effects when stimulating the TP junction. These out-of-body experiences people claim to have, just like any hallucinatory delusion, is a multisensory integration glitch. Welcome to physiology, not the suprasensory world, give me a break…

I ask you for a falsifiable claim that doesn’t retreat into anecdotes and telegram recycled PDFs from a schizo’s basement.

The fact is, the one time the agency did a review, it said “zero point. Stop.”

Keep in mind for future, “publicly accessible” ≠ “publicly verified”.

My family loves me, I dislike my brother

I claim nothing but 5"6

white passing, never bullied

Ive dealt with much worse shit

nope

youre insulting me instead of reading the CIA document midwit, not sure why you asked me to link it if you weren't interested

Made 1 or 2 posts about my girth

If you'd like the extrapolation of the document

CIA agents, tasked with using remove viewing to identify soviet developments in war and locate hidden bases:

Found a new submarine being developed and deployed

They had no information about this, and nobody in the government was aware

They later confirmed the findings via satellite, in a area which matched the description and specifications of viewers, as did the submarine itself
 
Nice. You’ve shown a memo exists, not that it’s cosmologically true. It says it’s an army officer’s speculative thought-piece of Monroe Institute tapes and metaphysics. Where’s the replicated scientific result or an official CIA endorsement? Hosting ≠ imprimatur.

Now, I’ve dealt with you people before and you all hilariously use this exact same document. They never use the ‘95 document issued by the CIA commissioned by the American Institutes for Research to review literal decades of remote viewing. Their conclusions? “Remote viewing… has not been shown to have value in intelligence operations… continued support for the operational component is not justified.” Program ended. Caput.

Now, if you want to discuss some actual reasoning for why people feel this way, it’s been documented quite thoroughly that you can produce such effects when stimulating the TP junction. These out-of-body experiences people claim to have, just like any hallucinatory delusion, is a multisensory integration glitch. Welcome to physiology, not the suprasensory world, give me a break…

I ask you for a falsifiable claim that doesn’t retreat into anecdotes and telegram recycled PDFs from a schizo’s basement.

The fact is, the one time the agency did a review, it said “zero point. Stop.”

Keep in mind for future, “publicly accessible” ≠ “publicly verified”.

 
Nice. You’ve shown a memo exists, not that it’s cosmologically true. It says it’s an army officer’s speculative thought-piece of Monroe Institute tapes and metaphysics. Where’s the replicated scientific result or an official CIA endorsement? Hosting ≠ imprimatur.

Now, I’ve dealt with you people before and you all hilariously use this exact same document. They never use the ‘95 document issued by the CIA commissioned by the American Institutes for Research to review literal decades of remote viewing. Their conclusions? “Remote viewing… has not been shown to have value in intelligence operations… continued support for the operational component is not justified.” Program ended. Caput.

Now, if you want to discuss some actual reasoning for why people feel this way, it’s been documented quite thoroughly that you can produce such effects when stimulating the TP junction. These out-of-body experiences people claim to have, just like any hallucinatory delusion, is a multisensory integration glitch. Welcome to physiology, not the suprasensory world, give me a break…

I ask you for a falsifiable claim that doesn’t retreat into anecdotes and telegram recycled PDFs from a schizo’s basement.

The fact is, the one time the agency did a review, it said “zero point. Stop.”

Keep in mind for future, “publicly accessible” ≠ “publicly verified”.
You've dealt with people like me before and still haven't done your research

Two specific links pertaining to the program and the evidence linked above

And JFL at thinking the CIA will go out of its way to reveal its best spy secrets :ROFLMAO:

We're lucky we got any of these documents, but we do, and you haven't read them.
 

IMG 5145
More schizophrenic dwellings already debunked by independent researchers commissioned by the CIA sourced via ChatGPT, YAY!
You've dealt with people like me before and still haven't done your research

Two specific links pertaining to the program and the evidence linked above

And JFL at thinking the CIA will go out of its way to reveal its best spy secrets :ROFLMAO:

We're lucky we got any of these documents, but we do, and you haven't read them.
I have done my research. Takes a few seconds to find the ‘95 document done by independent researchers commissioned by the CIA.

Wow, all of a sudden your CIA source for your claims are now “muh they would never expose themselves!”

Please do not ever respond to me again. Only supreme genetic quality can address me. No wonder you people are at the bottom of the gene pool and got slaughtered by us.

@chadisbeingmade @wishIwasSalludon
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: IraniancelV2, wishIwasSalludon, SlayerJonas and 1 other person
View attachment 4062050
More schizophrenic dwellings already debunked by independent researchers commissioned by the CIA sourced via ChatGPT, YAY!

I have done my research. Takes a few seconds to find the ‘95 document done by independent researchers commissioned by the CIA.

Wow, all of a sudden your CIA source for your claims are now “muh they would never expose themselves!”

Please do not ever respond to me again. Only supreme genetic quality can address me. No wonder you people are at the bottom of the gene pool and got slaughtered by us.

@chadisbeingmade @wishIwasSalludon
Did you expect me to remember the link by memory?

You didn't even debunk the sources.

what kind of shitty rebuttal is that?
 
Did you expect me to remember the link by memory?

You didn't even debunk the sources.

what kind of shitty rebuttal is that?
Nice. You’ve shown a memo exists, not that it’s cosmologically true. It says it’s an army officer’s speculative thought-piece of Monroe Institute tapes and metaphysics. Where’s the replicated scientific result or an official CIA endorsement? Hosting ≠ imprimatur.

Now, I’ve dealt with you people before and you all hilariously use this exact same document. They never use the ‘95 document issued by the CIA commissioned by the American Institutes for Research to review literal decades of remote viewing. Their conclusions? “Remote viewing… has not been shown to have value in intelligence operations… continued support for the operational component is not justified.” Program ended. Caput.

Now, if you want to discuss some actual reasoning for why people feel this way, it’s been documented quite thoroughly that you can produce such effects when stimulating the TP junction. These out-of-body experiences people claim to have, just like any hallucinatory delusion, is a multisensory integration glitch. Welcome to physiology, not the suprasensory world, give me a break…

I ask you for a falsifiable claim that doesn’t retreat into anecdotes and telegram recycled PDFs from a schizo’s basement.

The fact is, the one time the agency did a review, it said “zero point. Stop.”

Keep in mind for future, “publicly accessible” ≠ “publicly verified”.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlayerJonas
*in most cases
*I use probabilities
*NoFap ≠ NoPorn
*"You" = refers to the majority
*Thread is marked "serious"

Because the people don't know why, they regurgitate what is right or wrong

There is no benefit to NoFap : No, you aren't high T because you resist your urges; no, there are no magic nutrients flowing up to your brain

Rejecting some urges is good but not with the example in discussion . You keep thinking about sex thus being less productive (or, my proposal : Fap)

You are an incel rejecting a primitive, effortless pleasure source (penis hard): You don't get sex, you won't experience it in the future because you dislike effort (no real looksmaxxing, wealth accrual, self-improvement) = time won't ease your pain, the opposite happens

with naturetard logic : Natural is superior (logical fallacy) = If they decide to become emotional point at their contradicting stances (NoFap being natural = good)

Primitive ≠ good/bad (debatable), but it remains a part of your life and trying to escape your body doesn't work

Don't make your lifes worse than it is . Our modern society gives you many copes (for no reason, despising effort should be punished), you should use them

Dopamine reward system increases homeostasis and shit (giga faplord aka looksmax.org registration speedrun) :

You after consuming porn every day after hitting age 10-12:

View attachment 4061591

Solution : Stick to weaker sources of sexual stimulus e.g. pictures, imagination, softer grip, etc. so you don't develop unfavorable fetishes .

@chadisbeingmade @imontheloose @Eltrē @Daddy's Home @Debetro
Just don't overdo it theory, but it's lowkey hard to leave the porn shit behind when you are a stone cold truecel like me tbh.

@Gengar @Greypiller @Zagro @Sadist
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zagro
@imontheloose
Screenshot 20250828 163329 Chrome


Here's your ever valued 1995 memo

Summarized:
1. The remote viewers have displayed a statistically significant hit rate
(They are aquiring data which they shouldn't be able to aquire)

The researchers simply state they aren't sure if there are confounding variables

And then go on to state it isn't reliable enough for spying or intelligence gathering in a practical manner
(Because these agents aren't fucking Buddhist monks)

They don't say it doesn't work, they don't say they're sure it's bogus.

We take this document, which supports my point

then the other documents, which you ignored

And it's obvious you're a retard.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: IraniancelV2 and ethnic subhuman
I claim nothing but 5"6
My girlfriends are around that height but it's ok, everyone is beautiful in their own way even if they lack everything .
youre insulting me instead of reading the CIA document midwit,
It's you that got emotional after receiving nothing but kindness, I forgot Indians aren't capable of thinking in other perspectives
Made 1 or 2 posts about my girth

If you'd like the extrapolation of the document

CIA agents, tasked with using remove viewing to identify soviet developments in war and locate hidden bases:

Found a new submarine being developed and deployed

They had no information about this, and nobody in the government was aware

They later confirmed the findings via satellite, in a area which matched the description and specifications of viewers, as did the submarine itself
So you say even if that info would change the entire world and human understanding of it, no one cared nor did experts bring up this public piece of info, it's you skimming through a doc that reveals this world-altering info to us in an incel forum ? @imontheloose @chadisbeingmade
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: IraniancelV2, ethnic subhuman, chadisbeingmade and 1 other person
@imontheloose your own "debunking" document literally says the results are too statistically significant to be attributed to what you call "delusions"

The only possible way it's not real, is if there were issues in the laboratory
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ethnic subhuman
It's you that got emotional
You're literally hurling personal insults that stretch back through my entire post history and you're trying to feign emotional stability while calling me emotional :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: ethnic subhuman
The documents I linked cannot be explained by confounding variables

So why are you so afraid to read it?
 
  • +1
Reactions: ethnic subhuman
@imontheloose
View attachment 4062076

Here's your ever valued 1995 memo

Summarized:
1. The remote viewers have displayed a statistically significant hit rate
(They are aquiring data which they shouldn't be able to aquire)

The researchers simply state they aren't sure if there are confounding variables

And then go on to state it isn't reliable enough for spying or intelligence gathering in a practical manner
(Because these agents aren't fucking Buddhist monks)

They don't say it doesn't work, they don't say they're sure it's bogus.

We take this document, which supports my point

then the other documents, which you ignored

And it's obvious you're a retard.
Nice. Copied from AI.

I imagine in curryland they haven’t taught you that deviations from chance doesn’t imply proper correlation. Yes, the confounding variables (something you don’t have a Scooby about) are the fact they used the same viewers, same judge, and same target photos. The image says itself the experiment didn’t identify the source of the origin of this deviation. Now, the independent researchers rightfully concluded this is insufficient and shows nowhere near close enough proof. Maybe show the part which states no actionable intelligence was produced nor was it reliable enough to use.

Your inferior genetics swaps “unexplained statistical blip in small, methodologically narrow lab tasks” with “they’re acquiring information they shouldn’t be able to”. This is textbook schizophrenia, I’m not kidding.

Tiny effects can clear p-values so easily. Ask your AI to tell you about it since you obviously haven’t ever worked in STEM and thus are clueless on how to operate a study/analysis, let alone conclude it and find statistical credibility.

“p-value cleared in a study” ≠ “psychic knowledge”.

Stop responding to me. You’re running out of gas.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: IraniancelV2, Gaygymmaxx and SlayerJonas
*in most cases
*I use probabilities
*NoFap ≠ NoPorn
*"You" = refers to the majority
*Thread is marked "serious"

Because the people don't know why, they regurgitate what is right or wrong

There is no benefit to NoFap : No, you aren't high T because you resist your urges; no, there are no magic nutrients flowing up to your brain

Rejecting some urges is good but not with the example in discussion . You keep thinking about sex thus being less productive (or, my proposal : Fap)

You are an incel rejecting a primitive, effortless pleasure source (penis hard): You don't get sex, you won't experience it in the future because you dislike effort (no real looksmaxxing, wealth accrual, self-improvement) = time won't ease your pain, the opposite happens

with naturetard logic : Natural is superior (logical fallacy) = If they decide to become emotional point at their contradicting stances (NoFap being natural = good)

Primitive ≠ good/bad (debatable), but it remains a part of your life and trying to escape your body doesn't work

Don't make your lifes worse than it is . Our modern society gives you many copes (for no reason, despising effort should be punished), you should use them

Dopamine reward system increases homeostasis and shit (giga faplord aka looksmax.org registration speedrun) :

You after consuming porn every day after hitting age 10-12:

View attachment 4061591

Solution : Stick to weaker sources of sexual stimulus e.g. pictures, imagination, softer grip, etc. so you don't develop unfavorable fetishes .

@chadisbeingmade @imontheloose @Eltrē @Daddy's Home @Debetro
water GIF
 
Nice. Copied from AI.

I imagine in curryland they haven’t taught you that deviations from chance doesn’t imply proper correlation. Yes, the confounding variables (something you don’t have a Scooby about) are the fact they used the same viewers, same judge, and same target photos. The image says itself the experiment didn’t identify the source of the origin of this deviation. Now, the independent researchers rightfully concluded this is insufficient and shows nowhere near close enough proof. Maybe show the part which states no actionable intelligence was produced nor was it reliable enough to use.

Your inferior genetics swaps “unexplained statistical blip in small, methodologically narrow lab tasks” with “they’re acquiring information they shouldn’t be able to”. This is textbook schizophrenia, I’m not kidding.

Tiny effects can clear p-values so easily. Ask your AI to tell you about it since you obviously haven’t ever worked in STEM and thus are clueless on how to operate a study/analysis, let alone conclude it and find statistical credibility.

“p-value cleared in a study” ≠ “psychic knowledge”.

Stop responding to me. You’re running out of gas.
You think I wrote that with AI? :ROFLMAO:

Also still haven't acknowledged the sources I sent you.

"Secret Ninja Art"
Images 16

"Claim victory without a counter argument"
 
tbh after looking at people with actual porn addictions i think nofap is valid just cope for the regular person. like what religion can be fore legitmate sociopaths :feelshah:
 
You think I wrote that with AI? :ROFLMAO:

Also still haven't acknowledged the sources I sent you.

"Secret Ninja Art"
View attachment 4062122
"Claim victory without a counter argument"
SOFREP link was a pop-history article that admits hard evidence is lacking. Your CIA link is just a random session summary that can be addressed by my very first paragraph. The only document that actually means anything in the eyes of science, something my ancestors gave to yours as we starved you, stated no usable intelligence so continued support was unjustified. Borderline word-for-word quote as well.

Provide me with a double-blind target series that replicates the in-house team. Until then, you’re wrong; this is literally how science works.
 
  • +1
Reactions: IraniancelV2 and SlayerJonas
Being an atheist in 2025 is retarded, the CIA literally has released documents on out of body experiences, and their OWN TRAINING PROGRAM to produce them.
@Volksstaffel looks like one guy took my clash royale clan chat troll a tad bit too serious :lul::lul::lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Volksstaffel
SOFREP link was a pop-history article that admits hard evidence is lacking. Your CIA link is just a random session summary that can be addressed by my very first paragraph. The only document that actually means anything in the eyes of science, something my ancestors gave to yours as we starved you, stated no usable intelligence so continued support was unjustified. Borderline word-for-word quote as well.

Provide me with a double-blind target series that replicates the in-house team. Until then, you’re wrong; this is literally how science works.
Screenshot 20250822 212447 Discord
 
Smarter than all religions

Smarter than Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud

And more intellegent than the central intelligence agency, I envy you
Appeal to authority final boss
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx and imontheloose
*in most cases
*I use probabilities
*NoFap ≠ NoPorn
*"You" = refers to the majority
*Thread is marked "serious"

Because the people don't know why, they regurgitate what is right or wrong

There is no benefit to NoFap : No, you aren't high T because you resist your urges; no, there are no magic nutrients flowing up to your brain

Rejecting some urges is good but not with the example in discussion . You keep thinking about sex thus being less productive (or, my proposal : Fap)

You are an incel rejecting a primitive, effortless pleasure source (penis hard): You don't get sex, you won't experience it in the future because you dislike effort (no real looksmaxxing, wealth accrual, self-improvement) = time won't ease your pain, the opposite happens

with naturetard logic : Natural is superior (logical fallacy) = If they decide to become emotional point at their contradicting stances (NoFap being natural = good)

Primitive ≠ good/bad (debatable), but it remains a part of your life and trying to escape your body doesn't work

Don't make your lifes worse than it is . Our modern society gives you many copes (for no reason, despising effort should be punished), you should use them

Dopamine reward system increases homeostasis and shit (giga faplord aka looksmax.org registration speedrun) :

You after consuming porn every day after hitting age 10-12:

View attachment 4061591

Solution : Stick to weaker sources of sexual stimulus e.g. pictures, imagination, softer grip, etc. so you don't develop unfavorable fetishes .

@chadisbeingmade @imontheloose @Eltrē @Daddy's Home @Debetro
Lifefuel for got.daim
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gaygymmaxx and SlayerJonas
Since I've been on SSRI I stopped feeling horny and can't get my shit up.
 

Similar threads

kurd
Replies
65
Views
1K
Jeremy Meeks
Jeremy Meeks
The Observant One
Replies
10
Views
763
itzbegun
itzbegun
Gaygymmaxx
Replies
150
Views
2K
madaeria
madaeria

Users who are viewing this thread

  • jflkiefmaxxing
  • Pollorex
Back
Top