Dolce gabbana runway ,why 0 Chads faccially?

william2605

william2605

Luminary
Joined
Mar 16, 2023
Posts
8,432
Reputation
6,274

Meanwhile 2016
IMG 1133
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eclipse prinz
That 2016 photo wasn’t even d&g it was balmain. Fashion wants unique ppl now but they used to want unique chads n shi
 
  • +1
Reactions: idontlikemyself6, Resonance, Blondepawg'sDildo and 2 others
no one gives a shit about objective attractiveness in fashion they just want someone unique with good proportions and vibe to the clothes theyre presenting
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blondepawg'sDildo, william2605 and luvletter
no one gives a shit about objective attractiveness in fashion they just want someone unique with good proportions and vibe to the clothes theyre presenting
Why objective attractiveness was popolar in 2016?
 
Why objective attractiveness was popolar in 2016?
They’ve evolved into seeing imperfections as more of a form of art than the traditional idea of perfectionism. And also people payed more attention to how models looked rather than clothes.
 
That 2016 photo wasn’t even d&g it was balmain. Fashion wants unique ppl now but they used to want unique chads n shi
They are to soy to cast deformed people if they want unique.
 
  • +1
Reactions: strait
They are to soy to cast deformed people if they want unique.
I think they don’t want conventionally attractive people like Chico, Sean o and Jordan much but don’t want subhumans and average looking ppl. Still attractive but not like as attractive as before.


Js my theory.
 
Why objective attractiveness was popolar in 2016?
there are a lot of different reasons but its not like there are no attractive models left anymore theres a lot of them
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605 and killuacel
Not attractive as chico ecc
because chico and o'pry are genetic miracles. not common. all you need to be a model is a good dimorphism and angularity.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eclipse prinz, iwishicouldbediff, strait and 1 other person
1 example is fashion trends change, and the look that modelling agencies go/look for also change
I was joking, have you never seen a william2605 post b4?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eclipse prinz
1 example is fashion trends change, and the look that modelling agencies go/look for also change

idk maybe, maybe not it doesnt matter its not like chico is some psl god either hes barely chad theres better looking people than him
Chico was adam lol
 
  • JFL
Reactions: zygosmasher
nah. he gets mogged by chico. 5'10 wide face vs 6'5 true pretty boy
height cope

one of the biggest most unique genetic miracles vs high averageness proportional perfection

its close theyre both chad but given that barrett is more unique than him which i attribute to being better he wins

93167


you cant mog barrett
 
height cope

one of the biggest most unique genetic miracles vs high averageness proportional perfection

its close theyre both chad but given that barrett is more unique than him which i attribute to being better he wins

View attachment 5377570

you cant mog barrett
why do you think unique means better?
1784316800802

shes unique. does she mog top tier stacies?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LoveTheWayYouLie and Klasik616
why do you think unique means better?
View attachment 5377583
shes unique. does she mog top tier stacies?
unique is just one of the many attributes you fucking moron what are you talking about :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

just because youre unique doesnt mean u look good but uniqueness and looking good is better than average good looks
 
because its what seperates you from the crowd

you would react differently seeing jordan barrett walking down the road vs chico, i actually highly doubt you or most people would bat another eye on chico if it was just some random you saw, whereas jordan would instantly stand out with his unique model look

pair all that with close to perfect proportions and objective looks and thats what makes him better

however i think SMV wise averageness is better
 
however i think SMV wise averageness is better
I think SMV is what really matters. Whats the point of looks if it doesnt help you achieve what you really want? women.
 
height cope

one of the biggest most unique genetic miracles vs high averageness proportional perfection

its close theyre both chad but given that barrett is more unique than him which i attribute to being better he wins

View attachment 5377570

you cant mog barrett
What do you mean averageness perfectuon?
 
I think SMV is what really matters. Whats the point of looks if it doesnt help you achieve what you really want? women.
thats what matters to you

ofcourse getting women is nice but if were talking about the best faces that have existed you have to seperate whats there in front of you objectively from what the general consensus is
What do you mean averageness perfectuon?
chico's face is all around perfection but hes extremely high averageness so it lowers him on the looks scale
 
  • +1
Reactions: william2605
ofcourse getting women is nice but if were talking about the best faces that have existed you have to seperate whats there in front of you objectively from what the general consensus is
I see no point in debating looks if the looks don't help you pull women.
 
I see no point in debating looks if the looks don't help you pull women.
ok bro but thats you

we dont think the same way as i stated from the very start

women are not the only thing tied to looks thats probably the most black and white thinking ive ever seen to date jfl
 
ok bro but thats you

we dont think the same way as i stated from the very start

women are not the only thing tied to looks thats probably the most black and white thinking ive ever seen to date jfl
then why do you debate looks?
 
thats what matters to you

ofcourse getting women is nice but if were talking about the best faces that have existed you have to seperate whats there in front of you objectively from what the general consensus is

chico's face is all around perfection but hes extremely high averageness so it lowers him on the looks scale
What fuck you mean all around perfectuon?
Like zygos ,eyes ,ecc?
 
yeah like harmony, features, misc, proportions etc
Could you explain in more detail how he's perfect in all of these categories? And if that's the case, how could he still not be attractive like you said? I don't understand.
 

Similar threads

fantamaxxer
0
Replies
7
Views
56
Daquavius Jr. 3rd
Daquavius Jr. 3rd
Big Boss
  • Poll
0
Replies
8
Views
78
supershocked123
supershocked123
Mob Boss
Replies
6
Views
61
duebaora
D
5.5psl
Replies
0
Views
20
5.5psl
5.5psl
xye
Replies
4
Views
55
xye
xye

Users who are viewing this thread

  • UserE_7.random
  • Darkskin Ethnic
  • vigor
  • zerosmv
  • william2605
Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →