Don't care about your IQ

[Deleted member 125661]

Means ur iq it's around 150-250

 

[piec]

 

[Deleted member 110111]

nice

 

[blimp]

I care about your iq so now your iq is 20

 

[Deleted member 116989]

iq is bs

 

[fr0st]

iq is bs

How?

 

[Deleted member 116989]

How?

iq just measure you logical skills, but there's a lot more to count if you actually wanna measure someone intelligence, the spectrum is very large.

 

[Deleted member 100722]

Means ur iq it's around 150-250

I have a colleague at work who is like this, it's fascinating

 

[fr0st]

iq just measure you logical skills, but there's a lot more to count if you actually wanna measure someone intelligence, the spectrum is very large.

Problem-solving ability is universally important in all forms of intellectual skills. A man who is unable to perform high-level problem-solving and cannot think logically will be stupid in most scenarios. Name one instance where a man of 80 iq will be smarter than a man of 150 iq.

 

[Deleted member 116989]

Problem-solving ability is universally important in all forms of intellectual skills. A man who is unable to perform high-level problem-solving and cannot think logically will be stupid in most scenarios. Name one instance where a man of 80 iq will be smarter than a man of 150 iq.

high level problem solving doesn't always revolve around logic. Irl someone who has lower iq but more experience in a specific field will probably perform better in every way than someone with higher iq and no experience. And what I meant before is not that iq is actually useless but more like we need to find a better way to measure intelligence because iq is too restrictive.

 

[fr0st]

high level problem solving doesn't always revolve around logic. Irl someone who has lower iq but more experience in a specific field will probably perform better in every way than someone with higher iq and no experience. And what I meant before is not that iq is actually useless but more like we need to find a better way to measure intelligence because iq is too restrictive.

Although I agree that a person with more experience will most likely outshine an intelligent person in a certain field, this only really applies to the first time. IQ corresponds to one's ability to soak up and apply new knowledge, so if this hypothetical smart person decides to spend any amount of time learning this skill, he will outshine this man in a matter of weeks. I see what you're saying, though. I agree.

 

[Deleted member 116989]

Although I agree that a person with more experience will most likely outshine an intelligent person in a certain field, this only really applies to the first time. IQ corresponds to one's ability to soak up and apply new knowledge, so if this hypothetical smart person decides to spend any amount of time learning this skill, he will outshine this man in a matter of weeks. I see what you're saying, though. I agree.

i agree with you too, ofc if the high iq person gain experience he will be better than the low iq one with already experience after some time. As i tried to say before, my response was more focused just on the fact that (imo) iq is a too restrictive way to measure intelligence (even tho is the best method we have for now), and it makes no sense to talk so much about precise iq scores when it's not something that will actually tell your whole capabilities.