Dosage accuracy

MLGS0LD1ERB0Y

MLGS0LD1ERB0Y

"This is a documentary, not a comedy"
Joined
Oct 26, 2025
Posts
700
Reputation
516
So for the protocol I am following, the start is 2.3ml of mt-2 for two days than gradually increases. Obviously since it’s a tiny dose that means there’s more risk of inaccuracy. Is this much of an issue? Is inaccuracy by a little bit fine?
 
Solution
shmool
So for the protocol I am following, the start is 2.3ml of mt-2 for two days than gradually increases. Obviously since it’s a tiny dose that means there’s more risk of inaccuracy. Is this much of an issue? Is inaccuracy by a little bit fine?
Tiny mt2 doses are always gonna have some measuring inaccuracy thats normal. A smallvariance wont be a big deal, the drug has a wide margin in terms of dose response. What matters way more is total weekly exposure and how your skin reacts, not whether you’re off by 0.05–0.1 ml on a microdose. As long as you staying consistent and not accidentally doubling your dose, a bit of inaccuracy won’t change anything noticeable.:forcedsmile:


IF THIS HELPED, PLEASE MARK AS SOLUTION, IF NOT I'D...
So for the protocol I am following, the start is 2.3ml of mt-2 for two days than gradually increases. Obviously since it’s a tiny dose that means there’s more risk of inaccuracy. Is this much of an issue? Is inaccuracy by a little bit fine?
Tiny mt2 doses are always gonna have some measuring inaccuracy thats normal. A smallvariance wont be a big deal, the drug has a wide margin in terms of dose response. What matters way more is total weekly exposure and how your skin reacts, not whether you’re off by 0.05–0.1 ml on a microdose. As long as you staying consistent and not accidentally doubling your dose, a bit of inaccuracy won’t change anything noticeable.:forcedsmile:


IF THIS HELPED, PLEASE MARK AS SOLUTION, IF NOT I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS:pepefrown:
 
Solution
Tiny mt2 doses are always gonna have some measuring inaccuracy thats normal. A smallvariance wont be a big deal, the drug has a wide margin in terms of dose response. What matters way more is total weekly exposure and how your skin reacts, not whether you’re off by 0.05–0.1 ml on a microdose. As long as you staying consistent and not accidentally doubling your dose, a bit of inaccuracy won’t change anything noticeable.:forcedsmile:


IF THIS HELPED, PLEASE MARK AS SOLUTION, IF NOT I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS:pepefrown:
Did you just add an emoji to a GPT reply
 
Tiny mt2 doses are always gonna have some measuring inaccuracy thats normal. A smallvariance wont be a big deal, the drug has a wide margin in terms of dose response. What matters way more is total weekly exposure and how your skin reacts, not whether you’re off by 0.05–0.1 ml on a microdose. As long as you staying consistent and not accidentally doubling your dose, a bit of inaccuracy won’t change anything noticeable.:forcedsmile:


IF THIS HELPED, PLEASE MARK AS SOLUTION, IF NOT I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY OTHER QUESTIONS:pepefrown:
Cheers boss👌🏿
 

Similar threads

D
  • Question
Replies
14
Views
507
true LTN.12
true LTN.12
K
Replies
33
Views
2K
ihateevb
ihateevb
A
Replies
8
Views
254
Confusedmax
Confusedmax
haxy
Replies
7
Views
234
John-Erik-Hexagon
John-Erik-Hexagon
killuacel
Replies
43
Views
2K
HighIQ ubermensch
HighIQ ubermensch

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top