DRONES: If a drone can deliver you a product from Amazon, it can deliver a forest gasoline and a spark

BigJimsWornOutTires

BigJimsWornOutTires

Kraken
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Posts
26,416
Reputation
31,913
Before you unleash your retarded arrogance and comment, "Muh that make no sense! Gasoline is a fluid, not product! Duh take your medicine," please, shut the fuck up this one time. Cool?

Staring Ed Helms GIF by The Office




So an Amazon drone or one from Walmart can deliver a package to a precise location. Of course, a drone could deliver gas. A small one drops a cup. A large one can drop a gallon. The flying creep lowers a balloon filled with gas to about twenty feet above the surface and drops it. The balloon hits the ground and splatters. Then another creep flies down to the marked spot and ignites the gas with a spark using a simple mechanism. Both drones return to an undisclosed base, miles away, and no one will ever know.



The fire investigators will never ascertain the accelerant culprit. Gasoline dissolves after it's been burned away. Also, no match, no lighter evidence. And let's not forget dry fuel! With the recent fires in California, they already laid out the conclusion and blamed it on the dry version. And to further complicate any investigation, drones can fly to places not accessible by vehicle or road. Good luck finding that origin!

Whenever strong winds are forecasted, meteorologists will give you a heads-up—a few days to weeks' notice in advance. It wouldn't take the mind of a rocket scientist to organize such a terrorist act. Anyone with access to a weather channel or local forecast and experience operating drones can pull this off. You know, like a wealthy billionaire who wants to purchase a shitload of land at bargain prices. Mansions and their foundations are expensive! But obviated mansions and fresh burnt land ready to flourish rich life again are at hot liquidated prices!

Challenge my theory!

 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: PsychoH, Bars, davidlaidisme67 and 2 others
There is a lot of footage from Ukraine where both sides use drones with small incendiary bombs to put some forest or bushes on fire, though maybe they use bombs with hard shells, but anyway, it doesn't seem like a crazy theory.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bars, Underdog9494, BigJimsWornOutTires and 1 other person
There is a lot of footage from Ukraine where both sides use drones with small incendiary bombs to put some forest or bushes on fire, though maybe they use bombs with hard shells, but anyway, it doesn't seem like a crazy theory.
What I was thinking they really just have to put gas on the drone and blow it up in dense forest, nothing advanced required and only a small explosion needed
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, maximum cope31 and BigJimsWornOutTires
There is a lot of footage from Ukraine where both sides use drones with small incendiary bombs to put some forest or bushes on fire, though maybe they use bombs with hard shells, but anyway, it doesn't seem like a crazy theory.
What I was thinking they really just have to put gas on the drone and blow it up in dense forest, nothing advanced required and only a small explosion needed

But that would leave evidence. It's not that difficult to pull this off without leaving any trace of an accelerant. And as a bonus, using your connections with the press, you could feed them a "dry fuel" narrative so IF an investigator found traces of fuel, well... fits the narrative!
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494
Challenge my theory!


And look at the fucking audacity these motherfuckers have! Not only are they still flying the drones over the fire and probably keeping it burning by dropping gas on it, but they also ram the motherfucker into a super scooper that's trying to put the fire out. This reminds me of 9/11 when they blew the buildings up from the inside, bringing them down. Then they brought the other building down that wasn't affected by the planes. These people have gigantic balls.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494 and maximum cope31
Drone Ignites Prescribed Fire - yet, NO ONE with the press will talk about it. Like when they shadow-banned the topic of 3D-printed guns regarding the identity of the CEO assassin later captured, Luigi. They're BANNED from discussing drones igniting this fire. BANNED!

Dear Celebrities, the motherfuckers tossed you under a bus.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494
And look at the fucking audacity these motherfuckers have! Not only are they still flying the drones over the fire and probably keeping it burning by dropping gas on it, but they also ram the motherfucker into a super scooper that's trying to put the fire out. This reminds me of 9/11 when they blew the buildings up from the inside, bringing them down. Then they brought the other building down that wasn't affected by the planes. These people have gigantic balls.
:lul::lul::lul::lul: The drone 9/11'd that pipe
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494 and BigJimsWornOutTires
:lul::lul::lul::lul: The drone 9/11'd that pipe
These people have BILLIONS of dollars. BILLIONS! Celebrities hated Trump, remember that? Trump remembered. Musk remembered.

Those movie stars should've listened to Robert De Niro:

 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494 and maximum cope31
Not the forest bro, thanks for the idea tho. Use the enemies creation to destroy the enemy
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires and maximum cope31
  • JFL
Reactions: maximum cope31
Not the forest bro, thanks for the idea tho. Use the enemies creation to destroy the enemy
Trump wants to see those celebrities on the streets sucking cock for rent! Every celebrity who opposed Trump and cussed him mocked him, threatened him is on THE NAUGHTY LIST. If Hollywood studios hire them, the producers will join the list. The word went out LOUD and CLEAR!

Watch how deeply the insurance companies fuck them.

 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494
Trump wants to see those celebrities on the streets sucking cock for rent! Every celebrity who opposed Trump and cussed him mocked him, threatened him is on THE NAUGHTY LIST. If Hollywood studios hire them, the producers will join the list. The word went out LOUD and CLEAR!

Watch how deeply the insurance companies fuck them.

Okay? I was talking about burning factories down and living in the woods
 
  • Woah
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Using the data from the investigation of the drones spotted over the New Jersey area, to this day, the government remains clueless about the incidents. They have no idea who was behind the drones. But Trump will let you know later this month the culprits were... drum roll... China!

With that said, how far out there would this theory be that drones dumped gasoline and ignited it in California? If the government couldn't determine the operators of the drones on the East Coast, what makes you think they could even suggest this to the public? Also, consider, that a drone recently rammed itself into a firefighter aircraft and the government is clueless about who operated it. So if they can't figure out the recent one, or the New Jersey events, guess what this means, California? You are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo fucked. My advice is to hunker down. But don't run. Stay right where you're at. Only 7% of your debt has been paid for the crimes you conspired with against our nation. 93% IS STILL DUE!
 
Last edited:
drones not required at all. fires are started by homeless people all over the place all the time, they're easy to put out if reacted to immediately with the proper infrastructure support. in this case, reservoirs were empty, hire hydrants had no water, a full day was allowed to elapse before firefighting planes and were even allowed over the fire. this was an easy fire to put out, and there's probably been dozens of intentional fires that were put out before this. the cumulative effects of very bad planning, poor infrastructure, plus the santa anna winds contributed to this fire growing too quickly to be contained. otherwise it would have just been another normal homeless fire in los angeles
 
  • JFL
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
Before you unleash your retarded arrogance and comment, "Muh that make no sense! Gasoline is a fluid, not product! Duh take your medicine," please, shut the fuck up this one time. Cool?

Staring Ed Helms GIF by The Office




So an Amazon drone or one from Walmart can deliver a package to a precise location. Of course, a drone could deliver gas. A small one drops a cup. A large one can drop a gallon. The flying creep lowers a balloon filled with gas to about twenty feet above the surface and drops it. The balloon hits the ground and splatters. Then another creep flies down to the marked spot and ignites the gas with a spark using a simple mechanism. Both drones return to an undisclosed base, miles away, and no one will ever know.



The fire investigators will never ascertain the accelerant culprit. Gasoline dissolves after it's been burned away. Also, no match, no lighter evidence. And let's not forget dry fuel! With the recent fires in California, they already laid out the conclusion and blamed it on the dry version. And to further complicate any investigation, drones can fly to places not accessible by vehicle or road. Good luck finding that origin!

Whenever strong winds are forecasted, meteorologists will give you a heads-up—a few days to weeks' notice in advance. It wouldn't take the mind of a rocket scientist to organize such a terrorist act. Anyone with access to a weather channel or local forecast and experience operating drones can pull this off. You know, like a wealthy billionaire who wants to purchase a shitload of land at bargain prices. Mansions and their foundations are expensive! But obviated mansions and fresh burnt land ready to flourish rich life again are at hot liquidated prices!

Challenge my theory!


Ngl this is way too accurate to be a theory, this might be true
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
drones not required at all. fires are started by homeless people all over the place all the time, they're easy to put out if reacted to immediately with the proper infrastructure support. in this case, reservoirs were empty, hire hydrants had no water, a full day was allowed to elapse before firefighting planes and were even allowed over the fire. this was an easy fire to put out, and there's probably been dozens of intentional fires that were put out before this. the cumulative effects of very bad planning, poor infrastructure, plus the santa anna winds contributed to this fire growing too quickly to be contained. otherwise it would have just been another normal homeless fire in los angeles
Snl Shaking Head GIF by Saturday Night Live


Drones

Jack Nicholson GIF
DRONES!

DRONES!!
 
There is a lot of footage from Ukraine where both sides use drones with small incendiary bombs to put some forest or bushes on fire, though maybe they use bombs with hard shells, but anyway, it doesn't seem like a crazy theory.
its thermite used to clear out trenches
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigJimsWornOutTires
its thermite used to clear out trenches
We live in a nation where the people don't trust their government and wealthy society. This anger continues to escalate. It will only get worse and prosper. The CEO murder should have been a wake-up call. But arrogant rich fucks are too intoxicated by the money, fame, and imagined power. Of course, they aren't that bright but are lucky lottery winners.

WW3 will distract feelings and animosity.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top