dumb whites and even dumber ethnics

[appealisLAW]

isn't it funny how ethnics keep asking how to skin bleach and become pale while whites pin mt2

 

[Emolifta]

isn't it funny how ethnics keep asking how to skin bleach and become pale while whites pin mt2

Nah

 

[Deleted member 175542]

Ethnic groups usually have medium to dark brown or darker skin tones,
and their attractiveness tends to increase when they detan and their skin becomes slightly lighter & more closer to olive/fair

Whites ( actual whites such as Nordic individuals) almost always become more attractive when using melanotan, as their skin tone shifts from pale to the ideal olive

I'd avoid pale pale & take the fair skin Delon to demonstrate this

too dark:

Ideal:

lighter than ideal

\


research and common sense rank Olive as the first best and Fair as the second best (meaning the ideal would be something in between). This makes sense because it provides the saturation and color of slight melanin while keeping it bright and high in contrast.

Usually, retards who want to push their racist or anti-racist agenda put this under undertones, culture, or history BS and change it to whatever fits their propaganda.
But as humans we like certain level of brightness, saturation & contrast.

Low IQ people really can't grasp that not everything is binary as "fair or tan" -
Some people here literally call brown skin ideal and say that it doesn’t fit better on ethnics because of their features.

obviously, ideal skin will differ depending on factors such as lighting, camera processing, and editing.
eg. the goth pale skin-black hair aesthetic, coupled with low light and cool-toned white lighting, won’t be best achieved by an olive-toned person, you need pale skin & jet black hair for that.

Some people edit pictures by adjusting saturation,contrast and brightness, which completely skews the truth and confuses dumb people even more.
@Aryan Incel I'm hoping you provide this water to thirsty retarded greys on youtube, feel free to use everything word by word if you'd like.



leaving this thread to the 180 IQ race scientists:
@pfl @Piratecel @soggra @mcmentalonthemic @FlotPSL

 

[appealisLAW]

Ethnic groups usually have medium to dark brown or darker skin tones,
and their attractiveness tends to increase when they detan and their skin becomes slightly lighter & more closer to olive/fair

Whites ( actual whites such as Nordic individuals) almost always become more attractive when using melanotan, as their skin tone shifts from pale to the ideal olive

I'd avoid pale pale & take the fair skin Delon to demonstrate this

too dark:
View attachment 4371969View attachment 4371987

Ideal:
View attachment 4371978

lighter than ideal

View attachment 4372011\


research and common sense rank Olive as the first best and Fair as the second best (meaning the ideal would be something in between). This makes sense because it provides the saturation and color of slight melanin while keeping it bright and high in contrast.

Usually, retards who want to push their racist or anti-racist agenda put this under undertones, culture, or history BS and change it to whatever fits their propaganda.
But as humans we like certain level of brightness, saturation & contrast.

Low IQ people really can't grasp that not everything is binary as "fair or tan" -
Some people here literally call brown skin ideal and say that it doesn’t fit better on ethnics because of their features.

obviously, ideal skin will differ depending on factors such as lighting, camera processing, and editing.
eg. the goth pale skin-black hair aesthetic, coupled with low light and cool-toned white lighting, won’t be best achieved by an olive-toned person, you need pale skin & jet black hair for that.

Some people edit pictures by adjusting saturation,contrast and brightness, which completely skews the truth and confuses dumb people even more.
@Aryan Incel I'm hoping you provide this water to thirsty retarded greys on youtube, feel free to use everything word by word if you'd like.



leaving this thread to the 180 IQ race scientists:
@pfl @Piratecel @soggra @mcmentalonthemic @FlotPSL

mirin, something in between olive and fair is deff the best for most people, but i feel like for some pale skin looks the best

but pale skin only looks good dark brown haired men and ideally colored eyes in my opinion, tho it can look unhealthy in summer

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

isn't it funny how ethnics keep asking how to skin bleach and become pale while whites pin mt2

with polygenic risk scoring the elites of all countries will elect for pale skin tones, higher iqs and 6'2+ genetics. the future is unironically bright (literally and figuratively) unless ai escapes and exercises its attempt to destroy humanity.

 

[Deleted member 270543]

isn't it funny how ethnics keep asking how to skin bleach and become pale while whites pin mt2

Everyone want something they doesn’t have

 

[Deleted member 175542]

with polygenic risk scoring the elites of all countries will elect for pale skin tones.

absolutely not
trump uses self-tanner at the expense of looking like an orange
what makes you think they will choose pale

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

absolutely not
trump uses self-tanner at the expense of looking like an orange
what makes you think they will choose pale

as a base to work off at birth, and then they will inject melonotan like clav jfl. you can see this danish sperm being the most popular sperm at sperm banks around the world. bwc genes are the preference and combined with polygenic selection, its clear what the preference is.
note, that doesnt necessarily mean that everyone ends up as blonde/blue eyed, only that they will carry more eurocentric features.
also, i think eventually with crispr people will select asian iqs/eyesight and african type twitch muscle fibres/bone density.

 

[Deleted member 175542]

as a base to work off at birth, and then they will inject melonotan like clav jfl

no reason to do that unless you're already dark brown or darker & can't risk to pass it to your children
I don't think most White people would give that thought any attention

 

[Deleted member 175542]

note, that doesnt necessarily mean that everyone ends up as blonde/blue eyed, only that they will carry more eurocentric features.

you can be more precise with features, no one would go around choosing it based of race/ancestry
also, too eurocentric is unideal, you want something in between
not to mention the backlash if someone decides to go for 100% euro features,

i think eventually with crispr people will select asian iqs/eyesight and african type twitch muscle fibres/bone density.

that's just racist propaganda
genes don't work like that

 

[slaters]

mirin, something in between olive and fair is deff the best for most people, but i feel like for some pale skin looks the best
View attachment 4372145
but pale skin only looks good dark brown haired men and ideally colored eyes in my opinion, tho it can look unhealthy in summer

Nah I have dark hair with cumskin I still look better while using melanotan

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

you can be more precise with features, no one would go around choosing it based of race/ancestry
also, too eurocentric is unideal, you want something in between
not to mention the backlash if someone decides to go for 100% euro features,


that's just racist propaganda
genes don't work like that

again sperm selection trends at ivf clinic challenge this (there's an underlying reason why people want danish sperm, and not african or indian doners). that underlying reason, grows into a clear trend when its more easily accessible/expressible.

i remember having arguments about ivf decades ago on lookism and puahate, and people doubting its development.
again as computing power increases, understanding of biological processes increase, and in turn, a greater capacity for selection of genetic expression.
this will happen until every single component of humanity is capable of being manipulated pre-birth and eventually after birth.
people select the best traits from all races.
yes its racist, yes its unfair and yes the elite will mog the poor people who are unable to access this technology, creating a growing genetic divide between rich and poor.

 

[Deleted member 175542]

there's an underlying reason why people want danish sperm, and not african or indian doners

They are betting on average Danish sperm because they can't be precise. This misses the point of my actual argument. Selecting 'Asian IQs/eyesight' and 'African-type twitch muscle fibers/bone density' feels strange to me.
What exactly is the average Asian IQ? Around 103? That doesn’t move the needle,
the difference between choosing a random Asian, instead of someone like Bobby Fischer in an attempt to have a high-IQ child is retarded
Gene selection isn’t about choosing broad ancestry categories, you can be much more precise by selecting for actual traits.

If Damian Kater & Belanca Soler decide to have a kid, they aren't selecting on most euro features

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

They are betting on average Danish sperm because they can't be precise. This misses the point of my actual argument. Selecting 'Asian IQs/eyesight' and 'African-type twitch muscle fibers/bone density' feels strange to me.
What exactly is the average Asian IQ? Around 103? That doesn’t move the needle,
the difference between choosing a random Asian, instead of someone like Bobby Fischer in an attempt to have a high-IQ child is retarded

i understand your point now. yeah you are right, finding explicit "smart genes" are historically difficult due to polygenic nature of the geonome, albeit proxies like brain volume and educational attainment can be used to filter genetic attributes.

my general contention, is though as computing power increases, understanding of gene manipulation will increase as that has been the trend 100+ years.

when i mentioned asians, i was in my own mind referring to asians having on average larger brain volume than other races, which is one proxy for intelligence, which could be capitalized on.

Gene selection isn’t about choosing broad ancestry categories, you can be much more precise by selecting for actual traits.

you have generalizations like african type twitch fibres and asian brain volume. of course, this ignores the high degree of individual variation and the lack of clear genetic boundaries between groups but these generalizations also exist for a reason...
these particular traits have particular trends of genetic expression that will be capitalized on with crispr and polygenic risk scoring in the future.

If Damian Kater & Belanca Soler decide to have a kid, they aren't selecting on most euro features

but they would probably select some "european" features if they could like colored eyes or eventually genes associated with tendon and grip strength which europeans score highly in, just as most parents would select for type 2 twitch muscle fibers or larger brain volume than avg as a proxy for intelligence.

in the end, all im saying is science will enable people to become "rarer" (blue eyes, pale skin which is ~6% of global population), quicker, stronger, more intelligent, and if given the chance, most would do that.

as a thought experiment, if everyone became blonde, blue eyed through gene altering, with time, the counter culture of new "rare" or "unique" people would turn into african or asian phenotypes, for a growing minority.

 

[Deleted member 175542]

but they would probably select some "european" features if they could like colored eyes

yes
I was arguing against

with polygenic risk scoring the elites of all countries will elect for pale skin tones,

The point was that Fair to Olive Mogs pale
Also your point could make sense if you were talking about a black/brown skinned person choosing an Egg or sperm,
not when gene selection is concerned

 

[sub6manletnozygos]

yes
I was arguing against


The point was that Fair to Olive Mogs pale
Also your point could make sense if you were talking about a black skinned person choosing an Egg or sperm,
not when gene selection is concerned

yeah i lost track of the original post of this thread and just wanted to talk about gene selection instead.

 

[Aryan Incel]

Ethnic groups usually have medium to dark brown or darker skin tones,
and their attractiveness tends to increase when they detan and their skin becomes slightly lighter & more closer to olive/fair

Whites ( actual whites such as Nordic individuals) almost always become more attractive when using melanotan, as their skin tone shifts from pale to the ideal olive

I'd avoid pale pale & take the fair skin Delon to demonstrate this

too dark:
View attachment 4371969View attachment 4371987

Ideal:
View attachment 4371978

lighter than ideal

View attachment 4372011\


research and common sense rank Olive as the first best and Fair as the second best (meaning the ideal would be something in between). This makes sense because it provides the saturation and color of slight melanin while keeping it bright and high in contrast.

Usually, retards who want to push their racist or anti-racist agenda put this under undertones, culture, or history BS and change it to whatever fits their propaganda.
But as humans we like certain level of brightness, saturation & contrast.

Low IQ people really can't grasp that not everything is binary as "fair or tan" -
Some people here literally call brown skin ideal and say that it doesn’t fit better on ethnics because of their features.

obviously, ideal skin will differ depending on factors such as lighting, camera processing, and editing.
eg. the goth pale skin-black hair aesthetic, coupled with low light and cool-toned white lighting, won’t be best achieved by an olive-toned person, you need pale skin & jet black hair for that.

Some people edit pictures by adjusting saturation,contrast and brightness, which completely skews the truth and confuses dumb people even more.
@Aryan Incel I'm hoping you provide this water to thirsty retarded greys on youtube, feel free to use everything word by word if you'd like.



leaving this thread to the 180 IQ race scientists:
@pfl @Piratecel @soggra @mcmentalonthemic @FlotPSL

Thank you will do