dutasteride is based for nuking my sex drive

[eology]

total coomer death
never coom never watch porn always hate degens

 

[eology]

i only coom here and there in the shower just to eliminate build up of lust

 

[mltnisme124]

total coomer death
never coom never watch porn always hate degens

thanks for the newfound idea ill make sure to use dutasteride from now on

 

[eology]

thanks for the newfound idea ill make sure to use dutasteride from now on

it makes it less dopamine seeking for lust and the reward when releasing is dull and weak

 

[eology]

as a teen my lust would make me feel tracit

 

[sonic55555]

total coomer death
never coom never watch porn always hate degens

if ur on dutasteride u cant get an erect penis anyways, so u wont need to watch porn

 

[eology]

if ur on dutasteride u cant get an erect penis anyways, so u wont need to watch porn

thats like a side for less than 1% users
the thing is that lust is less rewarding because dht is non existent and your balls are sensible to dht

 

[sonic55555]

thats like a side for less than 1% users
the thing is that lust is less rewarding because dht is non existent and your balls are very sensible to dht

im always wary when i hear that corporate selling point, the less than 1% of people experience sexual side effects from nuking 85% of their dht. I just dont buy it, i think people are either in denial about just how badly fin/dut are affecting them or they are too ego to admit it

i also dont see how nuking 90% of ur dht can only cause negative sides in less than 1% of people. Either it does something or it dont. You cant have your cake and eat it too. The equivalent would be to claim that nuking your testosterone by 90% onoly causes sides in less than 1% of people, but OBVIOUSLY that wouldnt be true, it would affect everyone tremendously

You cant chemically castrate yourself and expect it to not have heavy repercussions

 

[eology]

thats like a side for less than 1% users
the thing is that lust is less rewarding because dht is non existent and your balls are sensible to dht

ik theres test, lh/fsh, AR signalling also working on your libido

 

[eology]

im always wary when i hear that corporate selling point, the less than 1% of people experience sexual side effects from nuking 85% of their dht. I just dont buy it, i think people are either in denial about just how badly fin/dut are affecting them or they are too ego to admit it

i also dont see how nuking 90% of ur dht can only cause negative sides in less than 1% of people. Either it does something or it dont. You cant have your cake and eat it too. The equivalent would be to claim that nuking your testosterone by 90% onoly causes sides in less than 1% of people, but OBVIOUSLY that wouldnt be true, it would affect everyone tremendously

You cant chemically castrate yourself and expect it to not have heavy repercussions

few slippery slopes

 

[Saint Casanova]

im always wary when i hear that corporate selling point, the less than 1% of people experience sexual side effects from nuking 85% of their dht. I just dont buy it, i think people are either in denial about just how badly fin/dut are affecting them or they are too ego to admit it

i also dont see how nuking 90% of ur dht can only cause negative sides in less than 1% of people. Either it does something or it dont. You cant have your cake and eat it too. The equivalent would be to claim that nuking your testosterone by 90% onoly causes sides in less than 1% of people, but OBVIOUSLY that wouldnt be true, it would affect everyone tremendously

You cant chemically castrate yourself and expect it to not have heavy repercussions

Maybe it’s because most people are already castrated or near to it with all the other shit in the environment so the 5ar doesnt make much of a difference anymore

 

[eology]

Maybe it’s because most people are already castrated or near to it with all the other shit in the environment so the 5ar doesnt make much of a difference anymore

people assume theyre high t because they go to the gym or something, when could simply mean they have sensible AR on muscles
having low net androgen status

 

[Saint Casanova]

people assume theyre high t because they go to the gym or something, when could simply mean they have sensible AR on muscles
having low net androgen status

Generally it’s best to have sensitive ARs and lower levels of androgens. It’s counter intuitive but too much androgen load is unhealthy

 

[Saint Casanova]

But generally it’s also true that post puberty dht can be lowered by quite a lot and have negligible impact. Although maybe 80, 90% lowering is too low. I think around 30-50% lowering works in terms of slowing down hair loss whilst avoiding sides. That’s why Microdosing also works

people assume theyre high t because they go to the gym or something, when could simply mean they have sensible AR on muscles
having low net androgen status

 

[eology]

Generally it’s best to have sensitive ARs and lower levels of androgens. It’s counter intuitive but too much androgen load is unhealthy

having high t specially if youre not a jbw +htn goodlifing is essential in youth
androgens arent only to be stronger and feel more for the opposite sex, they help a lot with will to power and resistance to roadblocks in life

also some people may only have localized sensitivity on their muscles, all the remaining parts on their body wont answer well to androgen molecules binding

personally, my scalp is very sensible to dht i cannot simply take dut every other day
for people more genetically gifted the downscale of 5ar inhibiting(endogenous dht) and other aggresive androgenics is a possibility
you see bodybuilders taking all the drugs possible with full heads of hair all the time