Redpill Education + Income correlation, with "likes" in online dating interest. A study from 2022.

eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539

summary
"In every nation, a person’s resource-acquisition ability was positively associated with the amount of attention they received from other site members."
"here was a marked sex difference in this effect; resource-acquisition ability improved the attention received by men almost 2.5 times that of women. This sex difference was in every country, admittedly with some variance between nations.


Below, the data per country. (also funyy, how this data, basically shows how much online dating is poular, or not popular in a country)

explanation belwo data/pic:

1. Indicators of Interest. This variable was formed by combining the number of messages, “likes,” and “winks” a member had received from others (Cronbach’s α = 0.72). To predict IOI, we used the member’s country of residence, sex, and their resource-acquisition ability.

2. Resource-acquisition ability was measured by combining (r = .32; M = 7.75, SD = 2.48) the member’s income (1 = Very low; 7 = Very high [based on local currency]) with their level of education (1 = No High School Degree; 7 = Doctorate [e.g., MD, PhD, JD])


Dfgh
 
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
BRUTALS blackpill, BY THE WAY!

Only getting 250% or 300% more macthes than average "earners", for being at really high earner and education levels.
WHILE. being top 1% in looks. You FOR SURE, will get like 1950% more likes than the average looking man.

Makes me notice, How looks matters much more than money + education.

Because. with looks comparrison.
Average man, gets like a match rate of 0.5% in Tinder.
While a top 1% looks guy, gets like a 20% match rate on Tinder.
AKA, an increase of 1950%.
Which makes the 300% increase of high earner/education guy. looks pathetic, imo
 
LooksOverAll

LooksOverAll

LGBTQIA+ Positive
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Posts
13,226
Reputation
26,287
How do you list your income on Tinder?
 
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
I guess LMS is still a thing.

It's just that betabuxxing is pathetic.
I did some comparisson. (see above message).

Aka.
top earner + edcuation = 250%-300% more likes than mr. average income+education.
top 1% in looks = 1950% more likes than mr. avarage looks.

So. it seems to me:
1. earner + education matter WAY less than looks. (in most countries)

And yeah, betabuxxing is a sad existence
 
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
How do you list your income on Tinder?
I dunno. And I dunno even, if they used Tinder data for the study. It will be mentioned in the study, where they got the data from.

But the income data, and education data. they did have.
 
thereallegend

thereallegend

Looks & Money
Joined
Jun 6, 2021
Posts
2,892
Reputation
3,418
BRUTALS blackpill, BY THE WAY!

Only getting 250% or 300% more macthes than average "earners", for being at really high earner and education levels.
WHILE. being top 1% in looks. You FOR SURE, will get like 1950% more likes than the average looking man.

Makes me notice, How looks matters much more than money + education.

Because. with looks comparrison.
Average man, gets like a match rate of 0.5% in Tinder.
While a top 1% looks guy, gets like a 20% match rate on Tinder.
AKA, an increase of 1950%.
Which makes the 300% increase of high earner/education guy. looks pathetic, imo
So looks is 7x as important as money.
 
Lygodactylus

Lygodactylus

Wizard
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Posts
5,266
Reputation
5,749
BRUTALS blackpill, BY THE WAY!

Only getting 250% or 300% more macthes than average "earners", for being at really high earner and education levels.
WHILE. being top 1% in looks. You FOR SURE, will get like 1950% more likes than the average looking man.

Makes me notice, How looks matters much more than money + education.

Because. with looks comparrison.
Average man, gets like a match rate of 0.5% in Tinder.
While a top 1% looks guy, gets like a 20% match rate on Tinder.
AKA, an increase of 1950%.
Which makes the 300% increase of high earner/education guy. looks pathetic, imo
Hey, my name's Chad.Barely finished high school and have no college degree. I have zero ambition. Wanna fuck?

1652570699655
 
Biggdink

Biggdink

80% men are chasing top 20 % women
Joined
May 30, 2020
Posts
17,204
Reputation
37,547
BRUTALS blackpill, BY THE WAY!

Only getting 250% or 300% more macthes than average "earners", for being at really high earner and education levels.
WHILE. being top 1% in looks. You FOR SURE, will get like 1950% more likes than the average looking man.

Makes me notice, How looks matters much more than money + education.

Because. with looks comparrison.
Average man, gets like a match rate of 0.5% in Tinder.
While a top 1% looks guy, gets like a 20% match rate on Tinder.
AKA, an increase of 1950%.
Which makes the 300% increase of high earner/education guy. looks pathetic, imo
Average guys rate is 2.5%
 
Lygodactylus

Lygodactylus

Wizard
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Posts
5,266
Reputation
5,749
LMS was always legit. Money and Status are not “betabuxx” women always want to date up and it does create legitimate attraction.
True though, the problem is that if she chooses you solely for the money then you won't feel the same validation as you'd get from her genuine attraction to you ( based on your looks only)
 
J

Johnnybegood

Iron
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Posts
178
Reputation
155
LMS was always legit. Money and Status are not “betabuxx” women always want to date up and it does create legitimate attraction.
Yeah thats what i observe in real life. Sucessful females tens to date successful males, although in that demographic of successful males they will prob go to the best looking ones,but they will still choose high status guys
 
Lygodactylus

Lygodactylus

Wizard
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Posts
5,266
Reputation
5,749
Yeah thats what i observe in real life. Sucessful females tens to date successful males, although in that demographic of successful males they will prob go to the best looking ones,but they will still choose high status guys
I think it's more about the rich guys attitudes towards life and achieving their goals which is attractive, as opposed to the money itself
 
Predeterminism

Predeterminism

Tell me your genes and I will tell you your life.
Joined
Feb 16, 2022
Posts
3,689
Reputation
5,695
BRUTALS blackpill, BY THE WAY!

Only getting 250% or 300% more macthes than average "earners", for being at really high earner and education levels.
WHILE. being top 1% in looks. You FOR SURE, will get like 1950% more likes than the average looking man.

Makes me notice, How looks matters much more than money + education.

Because. with looks comparrison.
Average man, gets like a match rate of 0.5% in Tinder.
While a top 1% looks guy, gets like a 20% match rate on Tinder.
AKA, an increase of 1950%.
Which makes the 300% increase of high earner/education guy. looks pathetic, imo
still a maxx tho.

we need a cumulitive effect of everything ideally
 
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
Yup according to tinder insights
0.6% (2016)


 
Biggdink

Biggdink

80% men are chasing top 20 % women
Joined
May 30, 2020
Posts
17,204
Reputation
37,547
0.6% (2016)


Have you seen tinder insights ?
 
Chinacurry

Chinacurry

Zephir
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
8,909
Reputation
9,403
BRUTALS blackpill, BY THE WAY!

Only getting 250% or 300% more macthes than average "earners", for being at really high earner and education levels.
WHILE. being top 1% in looks. You FOR SURE, will get like 1950% more likes than the average looking man.

Makes me notice, How looks matters much more than money + education.

Because. with looks comparrison.
Average man, gets like a match rate of 0.5% in Tinder.
While a top 1% looks guy, gets like a 20% match rate on Tinder.
AKA, an increase of 1950%.
Which makes the 300% increase of high earner/education guy. looks pathetic, imo
Yep that's the important thing.

Looks>>>>>>>> money >>>status
 
RottenSperg

RottenSperg

Zephir
Joined
Mar 19, 2022
Posts
2,454
Reputation
1,896
These men are investments big difference from attraction to the person not what he looks like.
 
Chinacurry

Chinacurry

Zephir
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
8,909
Reputation
9,403
Money still good tho for life quality
Maybe better than having no money sure, even then idk.

People here think I have relative good income, I still feel poor as fuck, and still my looks are why I don't get my oneitis, while other guys do
 
Mogpogs

Mogpogs

Nightmare Difficulty
Joined
Mar 10, 2022
Posts
3,723
Reputation
3,826
Maybe better than having no money sure, even then idk.

People here think I have relative good income, I still feel poor as fuck, and still my looks are why I don't get my oneitis, while other guys do
Do poorer guys than you do better?
 
Mogpogs

Mogpogs

Nightmare Difficulty
Joined
Mar 10, 2022
Posts
3,723
Reputation
3,826
Yeah defo bhai, that's why I think the money myth is complete garbage
It works but only for betabuxxing, and that’s no way to live. If I had money I would larp as poor to girls
 
Chinacurry

Chinacurry

Zephir
Joined
Feb 29, 2020
Posts
8,909
Reputation
9,403
It works but only for betabuxxing, and that’s no way to live. If I had money I would larp as poor to girls
I pretty much do larp as poor man.
So funny when I see my peers desperately tryna flex like their Elon musk and shit
 
Danish_Retard

Danish_Retard

yuyevon stan account
Joined
Apr 20, 2020
Posts
10,011
Reputation
23,302
"Specifically, being a woman or having higher resource-acquisition ability led to increased numbers of messages, “winks,” and “likes” from other members (i.e., IOI). "

:feelskek::feelskek::feelshaha:

Just be woman theory

Interesting data tho
 
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
Do poorer guys than you do better?
this below answer man.
Knowing "poor" Chad and Chadlite. Their dating lifes still moggs the normie looking man ALOT. Still, night and day difference
Yep that's the important thing.
Looks>>>>>>>> money >>>status
Do poorer guys than you do better?
I think. When they are equal loking as him, they will do a bit worse. But when they are a good bit better looking than him, they will mogg.
 
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
Have you seen tinder insights ?
I just checked it out.

I see. there is the commulative average data of all users cobined there.
I dunno how accurate it is, for ALL the Tinder users.
Because it's only from people, that use the TinderInsights app.

Now my thinking.
the user base, might be a bit skewed.
1. it's probably longer time users of Tinder that use extra apps like Tinderinsights. Longer time users men of Tinder, I suspect to be guys that do well/decently on Tinder. I bet thoe guys getting nothing from Tinder, go away after 1-2 months. Also guys getting nothing, don't need that app to track that the outcome is zero.
 
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
Yeah defo bhai, that's why I think the money myth is complete garbage
the statts of my OP post shows though!
That going from average to top tier with money+eductaion. Will give you 3x, the results.

So a normie looking guy with 5 mathes per moenth, may go to 15 matches per month.
So it ddoes help some.
it's not complete garbage. But still mostly garbage. because if that nromie looking guy with 5 matches per month, went to become a HTN in looks. His matches would probably be 50 per month instead of 5
 
Biggdink

Biggdink

80% men are chasing top 20 % women
Joined
May 30, 2020
Posts
17,204
Reputation
37,547
I just checked it out.

I see. there is the commulative average data of all users cobined there.
I dunno how accurate it is, for ALL the Tinder users.
Because it's only from people, that use the TinderInsights app.

Now my thinking.
the user base, might be a bit skewed.
1. it's probably longer time users of Tinder that use extra apps like Tinderinsights. Longer time users men of Tinder, I suspect to be guys that do well/decently on Tinder. I bet thoe guys getting nothing from Tinder, go away after 1-2 months. Also guys getting nothing, don't need that app to track that the outcome is zero.
It got popular on Reddit so most guys using insights are redditors and redditors are pretty ugly anyways

Also average match rate was 3% before too many redditors started using it
 
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
It got popular on Reddit so most guys using insights are redditors and redditors are pretty ugly anyways

Also average match rate was 3% before too many redditors started using it
honestly.
I don't beleive 3% match rate, to be the median for men on Tinder.
And I read scientific set up studies, aka controllaing for factors, get way less match rate for median guys that 3% or 2.5%.
 
Biggdink

Biggdink

80% men are chasing top 20 % women
Joined
May 30, 2020
Posts
17,204
Reputation
37,547
honestly.
I don't beleive 3% match rate, to be the median for men on Tinder.
And I read scientific set up studies, aka controllaing for factors, get way less match rate for median guys that 3% or 2.5%.
2-3% is very low , how’s that not believable ?
 
oatmeal

oatmeal

disciple of @Warlow
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Posts
5,573
Reputation
8,488
It got popular on Reddit so most guys using insights are redditors and redditors are pretty ugly anyways

Also average match rate was 3% before too many redditors started using it
yeah that seems to contribute a lot
it's not complete garbage. But still mostly garbage. because if that nromie looking guy with 5 matches per month, went to become a HTN in looks. His matches would probably be 50 per month instead of 5
i mean there's no real way to know, cuz theres like a billion different variables. but sure
 
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
Biggdink

Biggdink

80% men are chasing top 20 % women
Joined
May 30, 2020
Posts
17,204
Reputation
37,547
eduardkoopman

eduardkoopman

Zephir
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Posts
18,003
Reputation
23,539
> study was conducted in London
> British guys are ugly
> not sure what type of guys they used for their study
Do you have any other locations, that back that 2.5% or 3% match rate for median/average man in Tinder?

Because only 1 location for a certain statt, is imo weak.
Studies also, preferably, one has like 3+ studies/places.
 
Turanid_Bull

Turanid_Bull

🎵🎵
Joined
Mar 30, 2020
Posts
890
Reputation
1,164
we knew this before

nothing new
 
Tallooksmaxxer

Tallooksmaxxer

Poor Parentcel
Joined
Oct 27, 2021
Posts
2,218
Reputation
2,397
I Honestly think people should larp hard in their tinder bio. Like sit on the front seat of a chopper one time and take pictures like your are flying and you are the pilot.
 
Tallooksmaxxer

Tallooksmaxxer

Poor Parentcel
Joined
Oct 27, 2021
Posts
2,218
Reputation
2,397
"Specifically, being a woman or having higher resource-acquisition ability led to increased numbers of messages, “winks,” and “likes” from other members (i.e., IOI). "

:feelskek::feelskek::feelshaha:

Just be woman theory
If you cant get girlfriend just go to tinder bro it worked for me ~ Becky
 
Biggdink

Biggdink

80% men are chasing top 20 % women
Joined
May 30, 2020
Posts
17,204
Reputation
37,547
this experiment.
also 0.5% rate.

"I also created an Unattractive Guy profile. He is 34, a little chubby, but not hideous by any means. "


Unattractive and 34 tho

I think non chubby guys in 20s have higher match rate
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top