Egyptians mog hard

[innervoid765]

Cradle of civilization

 

[Orc]

and then you find out modern egyptians and ancient egyptians aren't the same people.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

and then you find out modern egyptians and ancient egyptians aren't the same people.

What makes you think so?

 

[Orc]

What makes you think so?

dna evidence.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

dna evidence.

Ancient Egyptians were even darker than modern ones.

 

[Orc]

Ancient Egyptians were even darker than modern ones.

they had more european admixture than they do today, the country was taken over by muslims at some point.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

they had more european admixture than they do today, the country was taken over by muslims at some point.

Bullshit.
They were darker than today and they had nothing to do with Europeans.
This is how they painted themselves:

Those lightskinned ones in this picture were their neighbours, third one is semitic like Arabs are.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

Bullshit.
They were darker than today and they had nothing to do with Europeans.
This is how they painted themselves:

Those lightskinned ones in this picture were their neighbours, third one is semitic like Arabs are.

Egypt at one point was conquered by Greeks and Romans, both overwhelmingly descedant from neolithic farmers from Levant and Anatolia and had nothing to do with modern paleolithic Germano-Slavic Europeans, whom they considered barbarians, different race from Greco-Romans and even animals.

 

[Orc]

Bullshit.
They were darker than today and they had nothing to do with Europeans.
This is how they painted themselves:

Those lightskinned ones in this picture were their neighbours, third one is semitic like Arabs are.

dna evidence suggests otherwise.

also they worked under the sun all day, so naturally they were darker, ancient celts also weren't particularly pale.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

dna evidence suggests otherwise.

also they worked under the sun all day, so naturally they were darker, ancient celts also weren't particularly pale.

It dosen't.
Lybians and Semitic levantines also lived in sunny climate, so your argument is invalid.

 

[Orc]

It dosen't.
Lybians and Semitic levantines also lived in sunny climate, so your argument is invalid.

the research on this is publicly available online.

they shared ancestry with east mediterraneans, more so than modern egyptians, who have more additional african admixture due to a muslim invasion that pretty much took over the entire country.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

the research on this is publicly available online.

they shared ancestry with east mediterraneans, more so than modern egyptians, who have more additional african admixture due to a muslim invasion that pretty much took over the entire country.

Completely opposite, all researches suggest that they are the same population as today.
Muslim invasion was done by semitic Arabs not Africans, it was Egyptians who were Africans.
And all of them had nothing to do with Europeans, east mediteraneans were neolithic sandniggers from Levant and Anatolia.

 

[autistic_tendencies]

Mogger diet too
Beef beer and bread

 

[The Grinch]

Bullshit.
They were darker than today and they had nothing to do with Europeans.
This is how they painted themselves:

Those lightskinned ones in this picture were their neighbours, third one is semitic like Arabs are.

 

[Deleted member 27746]

sandnigger worship thread

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

View attachment 2609587

I only see niggers and sandniggers in these pictures.
Paleolithic europeans would be doing this in picture to sandnigger neolithic swarthy woggy Romans who burned their shitty villages in Germania and brought them as slaves to Southern Europe.

 

[Orc]

Completely opposite, all researches suggest that they are the same population as today.
Muslim invasion was done by semitic Arabs not Africans, it was Egyptians who were Africans.
And all of them had nothing to do with Europeans, east mediteraneans were neolithic sandniggers from Levant and Anatolia.

I can verify that you haven't actually read any of it based on this.


the closest related people to ancient egyptians are modern egyptians, but they've still got more admixture than ancient egyptians did and aren't the same people, they have 8% more african dna on average.

again, this is freely available online.

 

[Debetro]

Bullshit.
They were darker than today and they had nothing to do with Europeans.
This is how they painted themselves:

Those lightskinned ones in this picture were their neighbours, third one is semitic like Arabs are.

There's a lot of blonds represented in ancient egyptian paintings

As you can see they have even darker skin than the example you posted, meaning that the orange color of skin was because of sun tan and not because of genetics since blonds can't be that dark.

I only see niggers and sandniggers in these pictures.
Paleolithic europeans would be doing this in picture to sandnigger neolithic swarthy woggy Romans who burned their shitty villages in Germania and brought them as slaves to Southern Europe.

What you call "sandniggers", were almost if not always depicted with beards and semite features. Negroes were represented with clear negroid features such as you can see in the first post of yours I replied to.

In this picture these 2 have no semitic and negroid features and fair-red skin. Nothing points out that they are not white.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

I can verify that you haven't actually read any of it based on this.


the closest related people to ancient egyptians are modern egyptians, but they've still got more admixture than ancient egyptians did and aren't the same people, they have 8% more african dna on average.

again, this is freely available online.

8% isn't enought to clam that they are not the same people, besides there are several studies and most suggest african component lower than 8% and pretty much genetic continuity between ancient and modern Egyptians.
Also your claim that ancient Egyptians having any euro components is just....lol.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

There's a lot of blonds represented in ancient egyptian paintings

View attachment 2609591View attachment 2609601

As you can see they have even darker skin than the example you posted, meaning that the orange color of skin was because of sun tan and not because of genetics since blonds can't be that dark.

What you call "sandniggers", were almost if not always depicted with beards and semite features. Negroes were represented with clear negroid features such as you can see in the first post of yours I replied to.

In this picture these 2 have no semitic and negroid features and fair-red skin. Nothing points out that they are not white.

They painted their hair obviously.
I showed a picture of them being darker in skin than their berber and semitic sandnigger neighbours who all lived in similar sunny climate.
There is nothing white in that picture you are talking about.
Only niggers and sandniggers.

 

[Orc]

8% isn't enought to clam that they are not the same people.

8% is a lot, enough that you'd see it in appearance.

besides there are several studies and most suggest african component lower than 8% and pretty much genetic continuity between ancient and modern Egyptians.

genetic continuity doesn't mean there wasn't additional admixture + 8% has been the consensus throughout multiple studies + multiple methods of measurement i.e qpAdm and f4-ratio.

and continuity doesn't mean anything when you lost your entire culture to muslims anyway.

Also your claim that ancient Egyptians having any euro components is just....lol

it's not a claim, it's a consistent finding throughout every analysis.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

8% is a lot, enough that you'd see it in appearance.

genetic continuity doesn't mean there wasn't additional admixture + 8% has been the consensus throughout multiple studies + multiple methods of measurement i.e qpAdm and f4-ratio.

and continuity doesn't mean anything when you lost your entire culture to muslims anyway.



it's not a claim, it's a consistent finding throughout every analysis.

No it isn't, and yes genetic continuity does mean they are genetically the same people, that's what we are having discussion about.
Eastern meditreanean is neolithic sandnigger not paleolithic european.
At least they had their culture so the could lose it to muslims...can't say the same thing about certain groups in NW Europe.
They will lose Roman culture to muslims because they don't have any of their own.

 

[innervoid765]

and then you find out modern egyptians and ancient egyptians aren't the same people.

This is such cumskin cope

 

[Orc]

No it isn't, and yes genetic continuity does mean they are genetically the same people, that's what we are having discussion about.
Eastern meditreanean is neolithic sandnigger not paleolithic european.

they're neither culturally, nor genetically the same people, once new dna is introduced to a population they become a separate branch.

americans also aren't europeans anymore, they're mixed people, and the difference between americans and europeans is smaller than it is for ancient and modern egyptians ironically.

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

It's very obvious that ancient Egyptians were whiter.

Even Egyptians 40 years ago were whiter.

North Africans are getting less kids than full blown negroes, thus darkening even North Africas citizen.

Britain also was much lighter skin 50 years ago and 1000 years ago.

 

[innervoid765]

they're neither culturally, nor genetically the same people, once new dna is introduced to a population they become a separate branch.

americans also aren't europeans anymore, they're mixed people, and the difference between americans and europeans is smaller than it is for ancient and modern egyptians ironically.

This is just as comical as when negroids try to claim that they were kangz and start claiming everyone else’s civilizations

 

[P0ssyDestroyer]

Modern and ancient egyptians are 2 different ethnicities. When arabs conquered them they assimilated and raped them. And they sent many arabs there and identified them as Egyptians, then they gave them arabic language and culture, it was common tactics of many nations to destroy many ethnicities and nations, after that they created pseudo new nation that similar to their, they joined it to their to enhance their own Nation

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

they're neither culturally, nor genetically the same people, once new dna is introduced to a population they become a separate branch.

americans also aren't europeans anymore, they're mixed people, and the difference between americans and europeans is smaller than it is for ancient and modern egyptians ironically.

Did you become separate branch with 20% of foreigners (mostly sandniggers) in Netherlands today?
Lol @ this logic.

 

[innervoid765]

Modern and ancient egyptians are 2 different ethnicities. When arabs conquered them they assimilated and raped them. And they sent many arabs there and identified them as Egyptians, then they gave them arabic language and culture, it was common tactics of many nations to destroy many ethnicities and nations, after that they joined new nation to their to enhance their own

Like 80% of modern Egyptians don’t have arab ancestry some do but most don’t and if they do it’s little.

 

[Orc]

It's very obvious that ancient Egyptians were whiter.

Even Egyptians 40 years ago were whiter.

North Africans are getting less kids than full blown negroes, thus darkening even North Africas citizen.

Britain also was much lighter skin 50 years ago and 1000 years ago.

View attachment 2609660

the opposite happened in southern europe, they're lighter today than they were only a few hundred years ago.

south italians used to be able to larp as mexicans to have better job opportunities during the early days of america because they weren't considered white back then (and neither were the irish for that matter)

Did you become separate branch with 20% of foreigners (mostly sandniggers) in Netherlands today?
Lol @ this logic.

yes the people in european cities are a different branch, and also there's two groups with distinct haplotypes in the netherlands because one part of the country had roman admixture and the other didn't.

 

[XtrovertNTnormalfag]

Modern and ancient egyptians are 2 different ethnicities. When arabs conquered them they assimilated and raped them. And they sent many arabs there and identified them as Egyptians, then they gave them arabic language and culture, it was common tactics of many nations to destroy many ethnicities and nations, after that they created pseudo new nation that similar to their, they joined it to their to enhance their own Nation

Sandniggers Arabs conquering sandnigger Byzantine Romans...nothing to do with white people mate.

 

[standardcel]

Modern Egyptians are 40% Arabs. Ancient Egyptians were high iq slayers

 

[ElTruecel]

the research on this is publicly available online.

they shared ancestry with east mediterraneans, more so than modern egyptians, who have more additional african admixture due to a muslim invasion that pretty much took over the entire country.

They shared ancestry with EEF i believe.

 

[Orc]

They shared ancestry with EEF i believe.

the near east and east mediterranean are the same thing, both are just terms for the countries around the levantine sea.

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

the opposite happened in southern europe, they're lighter today than they were only a few hundred years ago.

south italians used to be able to larp as mexicans to have better job opportunities during the early days of america because they weren't considered white back then (and neither were the irish for that matter)

Today the bar to be considered white is lowered more and more.

Even Arabs And Turks are considered white colonizers now because only Negros and Chinks keep breeding, thus skewing the balance of Race.

Real whites will very soon die our, making Arabs and Turks the new white people. At least in the eyes of the remaining Negroes and Chinks.

yes the people in european cities are a different branch, and also there's two groups with distinct haplotypes in the netherlands because one part of the country had roman admixture and the other didn't.

 

[innervoid765]

Modern Egyptians are 40% Arabs. Ancient Egyptians were high iq slayers

No less than that the Islamic empire wasn’t a settler colony Arabs didn’t mass migrate to the places they conquered. Yes some moved there and mixed with the local Egyptians but genetically they’re the same for the most part.

 

[Debetro]

the opposite happened in southern europe, they're lighter today than they were only a few hundred years ago.

south italians used to be able to larp as mexicans to have better job opportunities during the early days of america because they weren't considered white back then (and neither were the irish for that matter)

That's a very small period of time. those 19-20 th century italians were similar or same as nowadays italians.

We have proof that the highest class of south Europe since the medieval ages till the contemporanean era was white thanks to the art and literature produced there. You can check any medieval or reinassance paintings and chances are very high that the people showed had very fair-olive range skin tone, brown hair and colored eyes if it can be appeciated. Literature mentions constantly white blonde females since they were the standard of beauty.

What happened in America is that social Darwinism and Eugenicist Nordicist ideologies appeared at that period of time, so they regulated the inmigration policies not allowing citizenship to the ones less pure and mixed since they were considered inferior, allowing mostly only west-northern europeans. Since globalization was barely a thing, and the average peasant in SE was pretty swarthy, the stereotype of southern europeans being brown and swarthy took over, therefore leading to those policies.

 

[standardcel]

No less than that the Islamic empire wasn’t a settler colony Arabs didn’t mass migrate to the places they conquered. Yes some moved there and mixed with the local Egyptians but genetically they’re the same for the most part.

DNA tests prove that so keep coping

 

[P0ssyDestroyer]

No less than that the Islamic empire wasn’t a settler colony Arabs didn’t mass migrate to the places they conquered. Yes some moved there and mixed with the local Egyptians but genetically they’re the same for the most part.

Do you see this pictures? That's how Iranian people looked like before Arabic Invasion. That's happened to all ethnicities which were conqurered by arabs. They wanted to destroy Persian ethnicity and make them arabs, but they didn't succed. However other nations like Babylonians, Egyptians, Schumers were completely destroyed and turned into Arabs. Assimilation is very Powerful Political weapon. All countries did it to enhance their empires. Arabs did it the most, their Sperm spread everywhere they went. Egyptians are completely different people today, they are so underdeveloped technologically, plus they are religious fanatics. Question how this people changed from being Great to being in the Deepest bottom? Because they are not ancient egyptians. Ancient egyptians were destroyed and New Pseudo Ethnicity appeared

 

[Deleted member 40739]

They were just firstcels. Lol. Doesnt mean much. That terrain meant they would stop being hunter gatherers before other races. They ate all their prey and made them extinct before other races.

Indo-Europeans and Sintashta are the real moggers of ancient world.

 

[P0ssyDestroyer]

They were just firstcels. Lol. Doesnt mean much. That terrain meant they would stop being hunter gatherers before other races. They ate all their prey and made them extinct before other races.

Indo-Europeans and Sintashta are the real moggers of ancient world.

Huns, Genghis Khan's empire too

 

[Deleted member 40739]

View attachment 2609739View attachment 2609740View attachment 2609743View attachment 2609760 Do you see this pictures? That's how Iranian people looked like before Arabic Invasion. That's happened to all ethnicities which were conqurered by arabs. They wanted to destroy Persian ethnicity and make them arabs, but they didn't succed. However other nations like Babylonians, Egyptians, Schumers were completely destroyed and turned into Arabs. Assimilation is very Powerful Political weapon. All countries did it to enhance their empires. Arabs did it the most, their Sperm spread everywhere they went. Egyptians are completely different people today, they are so underdeveloped technologically, plus they are religious fanatics. Question how this people changed from being Great to being in the Deepest bottom? Because they are not ancient egyptians. Ancient egyptians were destroyed and New Pseudo Ethnicity appeared

Those are Afghans and Tajiks bro. Not Iranians.

Different breeds. Iranians were always sandniggers.

Afghans and Tajiks are partially descended from Sintashta culture which is why those 'white' looking phenos in your pictures exists in those countries.

 

[P0ssyDestroyer]

Those are Afghans and Tajiks bro. Not Iranians.

Different breeds. Iranians were always sandniggers. View attachment 2609802



Afghans and Tajiks are partially descended from Sintashta culture which is why those 'white' looking phenos in your pictures exists in those countries.

No you are not right. Afghan, Tajiks and Iranians are all Persians and share 1 Iranian language. Iranians just were conqured more, half of their ethnicity was killed and were replaced by arabs. Hitler believed that Germans are close relatives of Ancient Iranians. Iran means Land of Aryans

 

[P0ssyDestroyer]

Those are Afghans and Tajiks bro. Not Iranians.

Different breeds. Iranians were always sandniggers. View attachment 2609802



Afghans and Tajiks are partially descended from Sintashta culture which is why those 'white' looking phenos in your pictures exists in those countries.

In Iran there are people who look like this too

 

[P0ssyDestroyer]

Those are Afghans and Tajiks bro. Not Iranians.

Different breeds. Iranians were always sandniggers. View attachment 2609802



Afghans and Tajiks are partially descended from Sintashta culture which is why those 'white' looking phenos in your pictures exists in those countries.

These are pure Iranians

 

[Deleted member 40739]

View attachment 2609813View attachment 2609814View attachment 2609816View attachment 2609817View attachment 2609819 These are pure Iranians

Those could be Greek and Macedonian descendants from Alexanders mass marriages in Persia. i read something like that did occur in Persia.

Iranians were always brown. Persia climate is not suited for white/nordic people. Look at Persepolis soldiers depiction. All brown/darkskinned.

 

[Deleted member 40739]

Cradle of civilization

Egypt today is a 100% subhuman Arab shithole. Not the same place as 5000 years ago. Neither its the same ancient race after all those years passing with so many different races invading it.

 

[Deleted member 46404]

View attachment 2609587

The true pic is unpainted btw

So this notion that the darker skinned were dickwashers is merely a lie

 

[innervoid765]

Egypt today is a 100% subhuman Arab shithole.

It is but modern Egyptian are genetically approx 90% the same as the ancient Egyptians look it up and it being a shithole today doesn’t take away from it being the cradle of civilization.

Greece is considered relatively shitholey compared to north Western Europe and yet historically it has a great ancient civilization which laid the foundation for the modern western civilization.

And the Greeks were civilized by the Egyptians and learned everything from them. Like it or not humanity and western civilization is indebted to the Egyptians

 

[Deleted member 46404]

There's a lot of blonds represented in ancient egyptian paintings

View attachment 2609591View attachment 2609601

As you can see they have even darker skin than the example you posted, meaning that the orange color of skin was because of sun tan and not because of genetics since blonds can't be that dark.

What you call "sandniggers", were almost if not always depicted with beards and semite features. Negroes were represented with clear negroid features such as you can see in the first post of yours I replied to.

In this picture these 2 have no semitic and negroid features and fair-red skin. Nothing points out that they are not white.

They painted their hair with henna, and if you try to use the redhead pharaoh as a backup, Ancient Egyptians legit hated Red hair and saw it as disgusting/barbaric, Black/Brown hair oxidized during the mummification process, turning it red/blond.