Anonymous Member
Indian, Manlet, Mentalcel
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2023
- Posts
- 160
- Reputation
- 77
How so?You may disagree but you are still delusional.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How so?You may disagree but you are still delusional.
Pre-2019, successful models are not that common.How so?
No because I don't have the sexual tendencies to look at thousands of examples of nearly nude men and this forum is even more delusional when it comes to rating men. Also, there's less diversity at the male apex.have you thinked about making this kind of polls but with male models?
Place your vote.I agree, stupid voting system @Reckless Turtle
Back then, you still didn’t need to be incredibly attractive to be a successful model.Pre-2019, successful models are not that common.
How successful are you talking about?Back then, you still didn’t need to be incredibly attractive to be a successful model.
Google-able status. Models aren’t only chosen for their features; a major part of it is their uniqueness or polarization. Obviously, you still need to have some ideal features to be successful, but for this reason, numerous models fall below a 7.5 in raw attractiveness.How successful are you talking about?
I haven't included any of those models.Google-able status. Models aren’t only chosen for their features; a major part of it is their uniqueness or polarization. Obviously, you still need to have some ideal features to be successful, but for this reason, numerous models fall below a 7.5 in raw attractiveness.
You have, Gisele Bündchen is a 7.25, at best.I haven't included any of those models.
Nope. Again, you're delusional.You have, Gisele Bündchen is a 7.25, at best.
Facially one of the worst looking VS models
No, you are. I never said Gisele is weird; she just simply would not be the most attractive out of 82+ prime-age females. Face is more important than body.Nope. Again, you're delusional.
This is what a successful, weird-looking model looks like (by the way, she still had to have an exceptional body):
View attachment 2360097
Do you even go outside?I never said Gisele is weird; she just simply would not be the most attractive out of 82+ prime-age females.
Yes . It could be my location, though.Do you even go outside?
You could live right outside a modeling agency in Tallinn and your remark would still be delusional because you literally implied that >1/82 females would be aesthetically attractive enough to have a $400m modeling career.Yes . It could be my location, though.
I live in an affluent part of Cali. I also have a preference for 15-22 aged girls.You could live right outside a modeling agency in Tallinn and your remark would still be delusional because you literally implied that >1/82 females would be aesthetically attractive enough to have a $400m modeling career.
Bruh, I’ve already explained to you that attractiveness doesn’t have a 1:1 correlation with modeling success.
would be aesthetically attractive enough to have a $400m modeling career.
Most top female models get scouted by their early teens so I'm not sure how this is relevant.Most guys would prefer a younger
The opinion of one Indian, Manlet, Mentalcel does not reflect the entirety of an extremely competitive, global, multi-billion-dollar industry. Most of those sorority girls are in sororities for a reason, which is because they weren't attractive enough to get scouted and have a well-paying modeling career. And that's before considering the few, ancillary factors involved in modeling.Literally, look at white sorority girls; I’d prefer a good portion of them over Gisele.
No, I guarantee you the majority of guys prefer the more feminine, neotenous sorority girl.Most top female models get scouted by their early teens so I'm not sure how this is relevant.
The opinion of one Indian, Manlet, Mentalcel does not reflect the entirety of an extremely competitive, global, multi-billion-dollar industry. Most of those sorority girls are in sororities for a reason, which is because they weren't attractive enough to get scouted and have a well-paying modeling career. And that's before considering the few, ancillary factors involved in modeling.
Most men are shorter than the average female model, so that point is irrelevant.No, I guarantee you the majority of guys prefer the more feminine, neotenous sorority girl.
Most women are interested in modeling and would take the opportunity if possible.You don’t know that; you’re assuming. Also, how do you know they even tried to model?
What is?First off, that’s untrue.
It doesn't matter what most men prefer. She was in a relationship with one of the most famous actors and was married to/reproduced with one of the best athletes and has dated a bunch of millionaires and billionaires. The market decided her value, and women have little interest in the majority of men and their "preferences." This is why tons of women are fans of her and wish they could look like her.Second off, even if they had identical bodies, I guarantee guys would still prefer the more feminine, neotenous face. Gisele is too masculine.