D
Deleted member 22627
Uppereyelidexposuremaxxer
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2022
- Posts
- 4,507
- Reputation
- 6,001
From the paper: The findings indicate that maximal strength benefits are obtained from the use of heavy loads while muscle hypertrophy can be equally achieved across a spectrum of loading ranges.UGHHHH dude you motherfuckers need to take a trip to /fit/ like I had these same arguments 2 fucking years ago to newfags on there. Strength training and hypertrophy are two different things. Compound 5x5 workouts will still cause hypertrophy, but not as much as isolated 3x10 or something like that. This is why you go to a gym and see guys who look like doughballs deadlifting 6 plates, and you see guys who look absolutely stacked doing machine workouts and weird dumbbell shit. Also olympian statues are insanely jacked alot of them had muscles that dont even exist on the human body. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28834797/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25853914/ High load vs Low Load.
These findings indicate that both HL and LL training to failure can elicit significant increases in muscle hypertrophy among well-trained young men; however, HL training is superior for maximizing strength adaptations.
Muscles don't know the difference between 5 reps or 8 or whatever. I'm no Mark Rippertoe 5x5 faggot but I'm reasonably sure one could achieve good muscular development in that rep range as easily as 3x10 if you did reasonable exercises.
Even if there is a significant difference both would eventually reach natty limit so I'm not sure what you are arguing here.
Been working out for a long time so don't need some dyel fgt telling me his bro science.