
bwrauycnee
Luminary
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2021
- Posts
- 4,893
- Reputation
- 5,000
Based on the standards here, a chadlite is practically 1/1000 or rarer. Think CR7, Chris Evans. Chads are practically non existent. Like Prime Zac Efron. This is definitely rarer than 1/250.Shit reasoning. A fair comparison would have to be (x% percentile height y% face vs y% face x% height).
Otherwise, you would have retarded statements like "the car you drive is more important than your face. who mogs: a guy in a $10mil Lamborghini with a 6/10 face, or a guy with a shitbox and a 5.9/10 face? Clearly the Lambo wins, so car>face"
According to the CDC in the US 6'3.6 is the breaking point for 99th percentile. 6'5 is around 99.6%th, (~+3 SD/standard deviations) so just 4 in 1000 would be taller. 5'9 is slightly under average, we can call it average.
I am also assuming by "6'5 ogre" you are referencing a good frame, which is also statistically pretty rare... so our "face rareness equivalence" would be even higher.. I'll ignore that for ease of calculation.
So, a non-retarded equivalency would be +3sd percentile height (6'5) and 50th face (4PSL) VS 50th height (actually closer to 5'10 but I digress) and +3sd % (99.6) face.
As you can see, the "equivalent" to 6'5 is not a Chadlite, and almost (not quite though) an actor/model tier chad (~6.5 psl)/1 in 250, or around 7.5 or so TRM.
A 6'5 normie can definitely slay in the club, but avg height 99.6th % faces will too, and will stand out anywhere, receive INSANE attention, much more than 6'5 normie. Will be frequently approached by women in every environment.