Eppley ignored me

Resend it please and i just showed diet literally correlates with good facial development


<<In the ancestral health community, a lot of focus is placed on how the nutritional value of the human diet has changed since our days as hunter-gatherers, and how we can adjust our modern diet so it has a composition, macronutrient distribution, and micronutrient profile that more closely resemble that of ancestral human diets. Less attention is given to how the “hardness” of our diet has changed since the preagricultural era, and in which ways this might impact human health, growth, and development.
That’s not to say that nobody has been paying attention to this issue, as there has been some blog posts, presentations at conferences, and articles on this topic. However, in general, it’s safe to say that it’s definitely a subject that deserves more attention. Dr. Mike Mew, a London-based Orthodontist, estimates that modern humans use the masticatory system about 3-5% of what Paleolithic humans did, and that’s before you consider non-nutritional exercise of the jaws (i.e., using teeth as tools to make clothes and weapons) (1). 3-5%! That’s a big decline...
A common belief is that teeth alignment and development of the jaws are purely genetically determined. However, what we have to remember is that our genetic heritage isn’t the end all be all for how we are going to grow and develop. There’s a constant interaction between our genome and the environment, and the forces applied to structures during growth will affect how genes are expressed and the development of the size and shape of each structure.
In the same way that you won’t develop healthy and strong limbs if you’re not adequately stressing them through walking, running, and other physical activities during childhood, your jaws won’t grow correctly if you don’t stress them sufficiently from chewing. Chewing on hard, tough food is important because it activates bone cells in the tooth socket and promotes the growth of big and strong jaws in which there is adequate room for the third molars. There’s no doubt that our time spent running, walking, and otherwise moving our bodies has gone done dramatically since our days as hunter-gatherers. However, this reduction fades in comparison to the decline in masticatory effort and usage.
Soft diets cause dental arch abnormalities
Studies in many different animal species show that animals who are put on a diet of soft, processed food when they are young develop many of the same dental arch abnormalities as contemporary humans, such as malocclusion, narrowed dental arches, and crowded teeth (2, 3). One example is a study of hyraxes (relatives of elephants that chew like humans) fed nutritionally identical hard and soft diets. This study found that hyraxes raised on hard food developed jaws that were significantly longer, thicker, and wider than the ones who chewed softer food (4).
There is strong evidence to suggest that many of the same principles apply to our species as well. Studies – such as those carried out by researchers like Dr. Robert S. Corrucini, who campaigned the idea that malocclusion is a disease of civilization, and Dr. Weston A. Price, who documented the health condition of isolated, traditional populations before and after westernization – show that people who transition from a traditional lifestyle and nutrient-rich, whole foods diet to a western lifestyle and nutrient-poor, processed diet experience a rapid decline in health (5, 6). Moreover, there’s a high incidence of malocclusion, crowded teeth, and tooth decay among the children who are born and raised in the “westernized environment” (5, 6).
A study of younger Australian Aborigines whose families recently started eating processed, modern foods is one of the many examples of cases where these effects are seen. This study found that the younger family members had smaller jaws and serious tooth crowding problems compared to elder members of their families who grew up eating traditional food (5).
As for intervention trials, one small study that investigated theeffect of masticatory muscle training on facial growth in long-face children found that children who chewed on hard resinous gum for two hours each day for one year grew larger jaws and developed straighter teeth (7).
Besides reduced use of the masticatory system, other factors, in particular pacifier sucking, bottle-feeding, incorrect oral posture, and poor maternal and childhood nutritional status may also be important contributors to the high prevalence of malocclusion, crowded teeth, and narrow dental arches in westernized societies.
Shrinking faces
Hunter-gatherers and traditional, isolated people generally have broad dental arches, well-aligned teeth, and ample room for third molars (2, 6, 8). Moreover, examinations of fossils indicate that prior to the Agricultural Revolution, malocclusion and impacted wisdom teeth were virtually unheard of (2, 5, 8). This is in stark contrast to modern societies, where these conditions are extremely common.
In industrialized countries such as the U.S., approximately 50% of all wisdom teeth are removed and about 95% has deviations in their dental alignment (1). Of these 95%, some 30% are recommended orthodontics treatment, a treatment that improves the symptoms present, but may actually worsen the underlying problem (1).
Modern faces are “melting down” in the sense that there has been a major change in the human skeleton since the Paleolithic era. Over the last few thousand years – a blink of an eye from an evolutionary perspective – human faces have become approximately 5 to 10 % smaller after correcting for body size (2).
Some would argue that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and/or that culture is the main factor involved in determining what we perceive as aesthetically pleasing. However, we also have to remember that we have evolved an attraction to certain features as a way to distinguish the healthy and virile from the weak.
Physical attractiveness can serve as a biological signal of good health, and we probably find people with well-developed faces, strong jaws, and broad dental arches attractive because these features are indicators of good genetic qualities and health.
Besides being aesthetically unappealing, the change to a longer, thinner craniofacial structure has had important implications for how we breathe, chew, and function.>>





I have just shown western diets cause facial recession your literally not even willing to look at the other side that it might be epigenetics
Do you know korean foods are really famous? We have our own diet.
+ if western diet causes recession how all the asians are much more recessed?
Tbh idk why I'm even talking about this. Just go out and see how asians look so different from whites...
 
You think? what do korean foids reckon about indian dudes? I mean i dont have an indian accent nor am i typical looking indian, in fact i have an australian accent.
Indians cant get any girl here period, its brutal but I need to be honest

And yes 511 is okay
 
Do you know korean foods are really famous? We have our own diet.
+ if western diet causes recession how all the asians are much more recessed?
Tbh idk why I'm even talking about this. Just go out and see how asians look so different from whites...



So the korean diet consumes traditional food even though most of the stuff you eat is factory grown and not even near natural and it can take many generations to undo reccesion south koreans eat most of their stuff from non natural sources our ancesotors had better diets and this literally has just show the reccession caused by western diets and the western standard is world wide even south koreans tend to soft diets
 
Indians cant get any girl here period, its brutal but I need to be honest

And yes 511 is okay
Thats what im saying is I need to ethnic ambiguous max and looksmaxx before I go somewhere just to slay. Is this skin tone light enough?
IMG 8878
 
So the korean diet consumes traditional food even though most of the stuff you eat is factory grown and not even near natural and it can take many generations to undo reccesion south koreans eat most of their stuff from non natural sources our ancesotors had better diets and this literally has just show the reccession caused by western diets and the western standard is world wide even south koreans tend to soft diets
1. Based on your theory, recession is biological signal that he is not healthy enough.
2. Asians have shallow nasal bridge, brow bridge, and least anteface 'from the birth' Which is even defined in medical study aka neotony. This is established fact in anthropology and medicine.

You cant just claim whole racial difference is caused by diet. You have a tendency to have strong belief without proof. Even if it is completely nonsense.
Thats what im saying is I need to ethnic ambiguous max and looksmaxx before I go somewhere just to slay. Is this skin tone light enough?
View attachment 189348
That's good skin tone. If you wanna ask something use dm.
 
Last edited:
EPPLEY:
VELP6
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 1973, chadpreetinthemaking and toolateforme
1. Based on your theory, recession is biological signal that he is not healthy enough.
2. Asians have shallow nasal bridge, brow bridge, and anteface 'from the birth' Which is even defined in medical study aka neotony. This is established fact in anthropology and medicine.

You cant just claim whole racial difference is caused by diet. You have a tendency to have strong belief without proof. Even if it is completely nonsense.

That's good skin tone. If you wanna ask something use dm.


I just don't think the asian standard is the only 1 also the study you post did not mention race it just said attractive faces your pre supposing it is white your looking at correlations and saying causation.

As for my theory my theory is not saying the person is unhealthy just that that person has not reached their genetic potential which most asians haven't.


And the 3rd bit


<<Facial attractiveness is judged through a combination of multiple cues including morphology (facial shape) and skin properties (facial reflectance). While several studies have examined the way in which people in Western cultures judge facial attractiveness, there have been fewer investigations into non-Western attitudes. This is because stimuli that quantitatively vary the attractiveness of non-Western faces are rare. In the present study, we built a model of the attractiveness of East-Asian faces, judged by East-Asian observers. Therefore, 400 computer-generated East-Asian faces were created and attractiveness rating scores were collected from Japanese observers. Data-driven mathematical calculations were used to identify quantitative links between facial attractiveness and shape and reflectance properties, with no prior hypothesis. Results indicate that faces with larger eyes, smaller noses and brighter skin are judged as more attractive, regardless of the sex of the faces, possibly reflecting a general preference for femininity. Shape is shown to be a strong determinant of attractiveness for both male and female faces, while reflectance properties are less important in judging male facial attractiveness. Our model provides a tool to effectively produce East-Asian face stimuli that quantitatively varies attractiveness and can be used to elucidate visual processes related to attractiveness judgements.>>


The model itself showed the preference for feminine faces within these area's also the study never mentioned the race of the babies
 
I just don't think the asian standard is the only 1 also the study you post did not mention race it just said attractive faces your pre supposing it is white your looking at correlations and saying causation.

As for my theory my theory is not saying the person is unhealthy just that that person has not reached their genetic potential which most asians haven't.


And the 3rd bit


<<Facial attractiveness is judged through a combination of multiple cues including morphology (facial shape) and skin properties (facial reflectance). While several studies have examined the way in which people in Western cultures judge facial attractiveness, there have been fewer investigations into non-Western attitudes. This is because stimuli that quantitatively vary the attractiveness of non-Western faces are rare. In the present study, we built a model of the attractiveness of East-Asian faces, judged by East-Asian observers. Therefore, 400 computer-generated East-Asian faces were created and attractiveness rating scores were collected from Japanese observers. Data-driven mathematical calculations were used to identify quantitative links between facial attractiveness and shape and reflectance properties, with no prior hypothesis. Results indicate that faces with larger eyes, smaller noses and brighter skin are judged as more attractive, regardless of the sex of the faces, possibly reflecting a general preference for femininity. Shape is shown to be a strong determinant of attractiveness for both male and female faces, while reflectance properties are less important in judging male facial attractiveness. Our model provides a tool to effectively produce East-Asian face stimuli that quantitatively varies attractiveness and can be used to elucidate visual processes related to attractiveness judgements.>>


The model itself showed the preference for feminine faces within these area's also the study never mentioned the race of the babies
Like I said, genetical potential itself is much less projected for asians since fundamentally racial skull shape is different.
We are wide as fuck, but not forward projected.
Its genetical, evolutional difference.
Liek you're just denying racial difference in skull/facial structure.
I think you know it doesnt really make sense.
Stop trying to justify your shallow act in the first place. You just didnt think deep before bitching about my self hate, youve gone too far and now claiming total nonsense like asians are actually genetically same with whites..
 
Asians just have recessed maxilla.
Like this is objective fact we can observe from research, in practice, everywhere.
Since I'm blackpilled how do you people want me to contradict myself by claiming 'asians are attractive'?
That's called self serving bias and hiding the moon with my palm
while there is a higher proportion of asians with recessed maxillas they often have more superior bizygomatic breadth than caucasians. Also asian girls' skin is also often better imo however this could just be makeup.
 
while there is a higher proportion of asians with recessed maxillas they often have more superior bizygomatic breadth than caucasians. Also asian girls' skin is also often better imo however this could just be makeup.
Thus I got 15cm bz breadth. It's not freakin meal I have
 
Like I said, genetical potential itself is much less projected for asians since fundamentally racial skull shape is different.
We are wide as fuck, but not forward projected.
Its genetical, evolutional difference.
Liek you're just denying racial difference in skull/facial structure.
I think you know it doesnt really make sense.
Stop trying to justify your shallow act in the first place. You just didnt think deep before bitching about my self hate, youve gone too far and now claiming total nonsense like asians are actually genetically same with whites..



Okay know I'm gonna have to call you out on your bullshit what separates Americans from masai? A hell of a lot in terms of racial bone structure yet the pic I posted hone mogs half the Americans you will ever see why is this this different for asians in before cherry picking look at the links of the masai tribe from Somalians 100 years ago to today.


2nd part look at these classical native ameticans


Images




Long tall faces classically what those in the West call handsome.



Even indenigious ious asians more proof indegenious diets destroyed the Asian face


Er nd 3006 TaiwaneseAborigines



You see long tall bones on her face you can see bone projectiontion s how is diet theory not the most important? When we see racial indengenious people mogging the average white today.


You tell me what caused this facial recession is it genetics was it genetics that turned the Somalians from the chads of old into incels in 100 years no doubt? And this is reproduce able look at indenigious tribes today vs the ones of old compare the the the difference is stark.

I'm not making this shit up look into it they were better looking.



3rd problem is neotanous faces were undesired why did they reproduce?if it was a bad trait it would not have reproduced adding to more credence beauty is subjective.



4th point what you find beautiful changes through out one's life social conditioning is very important
 
Okay know I'm gonna have to call you out on your bullshit what separates Americans from masai? A hell of a lot in terms of racial bone structure yet the pic I posted hone mogs half the Americans you will ever see why is this this different for asians in before cherry picking look at the links of the masai tribe from Somalians 100 years ago to today.


2nd part look at these classical native ameticans


View attachment 189683



Long tall faces classically what those in the West call handsome.



Even indenigious ious asians more proof indegenious diets destroyed the Asian face


View attachment 189686


You see long tall bones on her face you can see bone projectiontion s how is diet theory not the most important? When we see racial indengenious people mogging the average white today.


You tell me what caused this facial recession is it genetics was it genetics that turned the Somalians from the chads of old into incels in 100 years no doubt? And this is reproduce able look at indenigious tribes today vs the ones of old compare the the the difference is stark.

I'm not making this shit up look into it they were better looking.



3rd problem is neotanous faces were undesired why did they reproduce?if it was a bad trait it would not have reproduced adding to more credence beauty is subjective.



4th point what you find beautiful changes through out one's life social conditioning is very important
actually bro Im having really hard time interpreting through your weard ass English
 

Similar threads

Angutoid
Replies
6
Views
101
StraightHeadJames
StraightHeadJames
optimisticzoomer
Replies
3
Views
100
New Poster
New Poster
chadhamed
Replies
8
Views
80
Mr.Proper
Mr.Proper
PsychoDsk
Replies
62
Views
616
RemyOg
R
IncelJihadist
Replies
39
Views
369
RICHCELDOM
RICHCELDOM

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top