D
Deleted member 23391
7" dicklet 5'10" manlet
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2022
- Posts
- 6,399
- Reputation
- 9,482
Ok, I'm not talking about eugenics. But he change any of the things you're talking about. He never reproduced. He changed nothing. He thought he was a beautiful supreme gentleman instead of the incel manlet he was. There was nothing intellectual about his spergout. Just a crazy guy chimping out.Every single man deserves women regardless of how bad his genetics are. You might say "that's bad for the gene pool!!", and I'll tell you if the goal is to rid the world of people with bad genetics, then why are you against men with subpar genetics reproducing but not against women with subpar genetics also reproducing? why is it that short 5'0 womanlets are allowed to practice eugenics and improve their bloodline by mating with men with better genetics but short 5'0 manlets are not allowed to reproduce with 6'0 stacys with good facial qualities in order to improve their bloodline? "Uh we can't just let men reproduce because they are not hypergamous, they will just fuck anything in front of them, while women tend to be more picky!", well you can easily solve this by state-mandated stacys for all subhuman men or imposing a law that prevents men with bad genetics from having any kind of marital sex that isn't eugenic or improves the gene pool in some way. You should support the implementation of such laws rather than supporting giving women more freedom. Either be against both subhuman women and men who reproduce or don't, otherwise you have some sort of double standard and you are biased towards women having more sexual freedoms than men despite being a man yourself. Men (even the ones with bad genetics) deserve more rights than women because they are innately superior to women in many aspects, women do not deserve to have rights, they exist to serve men and make them feel happy and satisfied. Since prehistoric times (maybe even before that), men chose their women and forcefully mated with them, we evolved because men chose their partners and not the other way around, women didn't have any kind of freedom or choice back then when it came to mating, they had no option but to submit to men. Now in our modern age, women have become the choosers because they were granted the right and freedom to be so, it is unnatural and contradicts history. Women having rights and getting to choose their own partners is nothing but a new phenomenon.