eugenics isn't wrong

[rape]

there is literally no strong, non opinion based argument for why eugenics is wrong. why shouldn't we selectively breed or use genetic modification to enhance desireable & useful traits? isn't it more immoral to doom your child to a life of being ugly or disabled than genetic modification? i don't understand how people can call eugenics immoral when a life of being abused by society for being ugly or disabled is 100x worse than any consequence of eugenics.

 

[Deleted member 6305]

Everyone knows it's right

 

[Vermilioncore]

ugly men are worth less than a speck of old gum on the sidewalk

 

[rape]

ugly men are worth less than a speck of old gum on the sidewalk

which is exactly why eugenics should be common . ugly men are tortured worse than animals so why should we continue to subject people to ugliness if we have the ability to prevent it

 

[Imretarded?]

Because most people are genetically unfit themselves.

They're intellectually and physically stunted from genetic rot. They want to live degenerate lifestyles regardless of the cost of society.

 

[glizzygnasher68]

ugly men are worth less than a speck of old gum on the sidewalk

speck of gum: 10 calories
ugly man: 125,000 calories

feed ugly men to the poor

 

[Imretarded?]

speck of gum: 10 calories
ugly man: 125,000 calories

feed ugly men to the poor

feed the poor to ugly men

 

[Pakicel]

Yeah. And our current model of delusionmaxxing truecels is very ineffective.

 

[thenewhebbe]

The best eugenics system is nature itself

 

[rootototoo]

I'd sacrifice myself if it meant letting society improve

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

it isn't wrong but becoming outdated fast

subhumans will be able fuck any ltb they want and the kids genes will be edited to make them tall, intelligent and good looking as long as they pay the money to

 

[rawr]

there is literally no strong, non opinion based argument for why eugenics is wrong. why shouldn't we selectively breed or use genetic modification to enhance desireable & useful traits? isn't it more immoral to doom your child to a life of being ugly or disabled than genetic modification? i don't understand how people can call eugenics immoral when a life of being abused by society for being ugly or disabled is 100x worse than any consequence of eugenics.

yeah the other day i searched up a question i had to see if anyone answered it before on reddit and it was sort of a pro eugenics question and everyone replied to the person that asked that question calling them pro eugenics and a bigot or fascist some stupid buzz word and it didnt really make any sense to me, they had a point