Eugenics would prevent so much suffering.

[CorinthianLOX]

For example if Elliot Rodger's parents were sterilized or if they never had children then 6 innocent people wouldn't have died and 14 innocent people wouldn't have been injured and be traumatized for life. Most of Elliot's problems were due to aspergers, which is a genetic condition. It means that it can't never be repaired with therapy or medication. This means that Elliot's killing spree was inevitable. Due to his asperger's he was outcasted from his peers and society. He couldn't socialize. But can you blame the world for outcasting autists. No. It is natural to segregate people that don't socialize normally. As a matter of fact the overwelming majority of this forum's userbase wouldn't be Elliot Rodger's friend if he was in their school. If you met er irl you would be utterly disgusted by his presence. Such is human nature. It can't be changed. So instead of trying to change our basic insticts (which would ultimately fail anyway), we should rid those genetic elements from the human race that cause such tragedies as the 2014 Isla Vista killings for example. We need to guide human evolution in the right direction and removing inferior elements from human genetics is the first and the most vital step towards achieving a new an improved and a superior type of humanity.

TLDR: We can prevent school shootings and other tragedies with eugenic principles because we can remove those elements from the human race that cause these tragedies to occur in the first place.

 

[Arthur the Egyptian]

I feel like you have High IQ power and you're trying to unwrap it

I believe in you

 

[CorinthianLOX]

I feel like you have High IQ power and you're trying to unwrap it

I believe in you

ty for believing in me

 

[CorinthianLOX]

bump

 

[bululu_87]

ER wouldnt be his own friend neither

 

[Alias!]

For example if Elliot Rodger's parents were sterilized or if they never had children then 6 innocent people wouldn't have died and 14 innocent people wouldn't have been injured and be traumatized for life. Most of Elliot's problems were due to aspergers, which is a genetic condition. It means that it can't never be repaired with therapy or medication. This means that Elliot's killing spree was inevitable. Due to his asperger's he was outcasted from his peers and society. He couldn't socialize. But can you blame the world for outcasting autists. No. It is natural to segregate people that don't socialize normally. As a matter of fact the overwelming majority of this forum's userbase wouldn't be Elliot Rodger's friend if he was in their school. If you met er irl you would be utterly disgusted by his presence. Such is human nature. It can't be changed. So instead of trying to change our basic insticts (which would ultimately fail anyway), we should rid those genetic elements from the human race that cause such tragedies as the 2014 Isla Vista killings for example. We need to guide human evolution in the right direction and removing inferior elements from human genetics is the first and the most vital step towards achieving a new an improved and a superior type of humanity.

View attachment 3713023

TLDR: We can prevent school shootings and other tragedies with eugenic principles because we can remove those elements from the human race that cause these tragedies to occur in the first place.

Then what workers will make our copes??

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Then what workers will make our copes??

In a perfect world were mankind has been genetically modified to perfection, there would be no need for coping.

 

[3links2]

Eugenics doesn't work with capitalism

 

[Alias!]

In a perfect world were mankind has been genetically modified to perfection, there would be no need for coping. View attachment 3713054

are you eugenic for aesthetics or high trust society?

 

[134applesauce456]

I think selective breeding and only certain people should have kids

 

[BonesmashFinalBoss]

For example if Elliot Rodger's parents were sterilized or if they never had children then 6 innocent people wouldn't have died and 14 innocent people wouldn't have been injured and be traumatized for life. Most of Elliot's problems were due to aspergers, which is a genetic condition. It means that it can't never be repaired with therapy or medication. This means that Elliot's killing spree was inevitable. Due to his asperger's he was outcasted from his peers and society. He couldn't socialize. But can you blame the world for outcasting autists. No. It is natural to segregate people that don't socialize normally. As a matter of fact the overwelming majority of this forum's userbase wouldn't be Elliot Rodger's friend if he was in their school. If you met er irl you would be utterly disgusted by his presence. Such is human nature. It can't be changed. So instead of trying to change our basic insticts (which would ultimately fail anyway), we should rid those genetic elements from the human race that cause such tragedies as the 2014 Isla Vista killings for example. We need to guide human evolution in the right direction and removing inferior elements from human genetics is the first and the most vital step towards achieving a new an improved and a superior type of humanity.

View attachment 3713023

TLDR: We can prevent school shootings and other tragedies with eugenic principles because we can remove those elements from the human race that cause these tragedies to occur in the first place.

I've been saying that since I was 13 but never had the platform to talk about like here on org
water to me

 

[CorinthianLOX]

are you eugenic for aesthetics or high trust society?

both

 

[CorinthianLOX]

I've been saying that since I was 13

truly based

 

[CorinthianLOX]

I think selective breeding and only certain people should have kids

even plato believed in this

 

[ajshabs]

high iq op

 

[CorinthianLOX]

@Snicket @imontheloose

 

[imontheloose]

@Snicket @imontheloose

Eugenics is absolutely optimal. I've made a thread on this. Take a read.

Is eugenics a viable model for the future of humanity?

Seems so. Just as a farmer would select the strongest seed to produce a better harvest, the state should ensure that only the healthiest and most racially valuable to the state should reproduce. Only seems like cruelty to copecelling retards. Nature operates on principles of selection: the...

looksmax.org

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Eugenics is absolutely optimal. I've made a thread on this. Take a read.

Is eugenics a viable model for the future of humanity?

Seems so. Just as a farmer would select the strongest seed to produce a better harvest, the state should ensure that only the healthiest and most racially valuable to the state should reproduce. Only seems like cruelty to copecelling retards. Nature operates on principles of selection: the...

looksmax.org

I read it. I agree with it 100% and mirin' the effort. You truly summarize my thoughts way better than I ever could.

 

[imontheloose]

I read it. I agree with it 100% and mirin' the effort. You truly summarize my thoughts way better than I ever could.

Glad to hear.

 

[neurosis]

Such is human nature. It can't be changed. So instead of trying to change our basic insticts

With eugenics or any form of selection pressure on genomes you could in theory change human nature and our base instincts instead of perpetually culling the 'genetically inferior' because our primitive monkey brains dont like being associated with people who have x or y genetic 'defect'

 

[BonesmashFinalBoss]

truly based

 

[bosnian]

high iq

 

[kana]

let us begin with eugenics by you my brother, killing yourself, let’s get rid of all genetics defects haha

 

[CorinthianLOX]

With eugenics or any form of selection pressure on genomes you could in theory change human nature and our base instincts instead of perpetually culling the 'genetically inferior' because our primitive monkey brains dont like being associated with people who have x or y genetic 'defect'

Yea i phrased it kinda weirdly tbh. I meant that just by the power of will our basic monkey insticts can't be changed. For example, if a liberal who says that she believes in equality declares that she will treat everyone equally no matter their race, gender or mental and physical defects. The moment however when she comes into contact with an autistic person for example, she will subconsiously try to distance himself from the autistic person, because her basic human nature and instincts send her messages that the autistic person is defective and thus not suitable for procreation. Then she will distanse herself from the autist, because the autist offers her no biological and genetic value whatsoever.

 

[neurosis]

Yea i phrased it kinda weirdly tbh. I meant that just by the power of will our basic monkey insticts can't be changed. For example, if a liberal who says that she believes in equality declares that he will treat everyone equally no matter their race, gender or mental and physical defects. The moment however when she comes into contact with an autistic person for example, she will subconsiously try to distance himself from the autistic person, because her basic human nature and instincts send her messages that the autistic person is defective and thus not suitable for procreation. Then she will distanse herself from the autist, because the autist offers her no biological and genetic value whatsoever.

Who says the basic monkey instincts are unalterable and cant be changed? Are they not also dictated by genes just as much as xyz defective trait.

What I'm saying is why not address the root cause of the issue (sexual selection, unconscious biases), instead of the byproduct (xyz demographic who finds themselves at the bottom of the dominance hierarchy)

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Who says the basic monkey instincts are unalterable and cant be changed? Are they not also dictated by genes just as much as xyz defective trait.

What I'm saying is why not address the root cause of the issue (sexual selection, unconscious biases), instead of the byproduct (xyz demographic who finds themselves at the bottom of the dominance hierarchy)

They are changeable with eugenics however they are not alterable with will power. One cannot simply choose to act against his primal instincts.

 

[neurosis]

One cannot simply choose to act against his primal instincts

theres no such thing as choosing to act against primal instincts if you dont have any primal instincts lol

 

[CorinthianLOX]

theres no such thing as choosing to act against primal instincts if you dont have any primal instincts lol

But us humans do tho. For example mate selection is solely based on primal instincts.

 

[neurosis]

But us humans do tho. For example mate selection is solely based on primal instincts.

no shit

we used to be monkeys with a brain volume of 400cc, things can change. if we want, with eugenics, we could alter our primal instincts to be alot less apelike and little more empathetic and understanding to those with disabilities instead of instinctively bullying/avoiding them for invisible status points

For example mate selection is solely based on primal instincts.

not if someone rips out that limbic system of yours and replaces it with a power supply unit

 

[CorinthianLOX]

no shit

we used to be monkeys with a brain volume of 400cc. if we want, with eugenics, we could alter our primal instincts to be alot less apelike and little more empathetic and understanding to those with disabilities instead of instinctively bullying/avoiding them for invisible status points

not if i rip out that limbic system of yours and replace it with a power supply unit

If eugenics was implemented and succeeded without failure then there would be no disabilites so there would be no bullying and avoiding disabled people for status points. If eugenic principles succeed then everyone will be beautiful tall, ND and smart.

 

[neurosis]

so there would be no bullying and avoiding disabled people for status points

instead all youve done is shift the distribution of genes to the right.

If eugenic principles succeed then everyone will be beautiful tall, ND and smart.

unless you plan on making everyone a clone, bullying and ostracization will still persist. it would just be the more beautiful, tall, nt and smart physically/psychologically abusing the slightly less beautiful, tall, NT and smart

you speak as though autists are the only demographic who experience negative reinforcement and everyone else is exempt and lives in NT kumbaya la la land

 

[goober55]

we already have a system of eugenics in place, it just doesn't cater to your fetishism of the perfect race idea

 

[goober55]

these two autists fighting on the .org like its an anime

 

[CorinthianLOX]

you speak as though autists are the only demographic who experience negative reinforcement and everyone else is exempt and lives in NT kumbaya la la land

autists are certainly not the only demographic who experiences negative reinforcement. Ethnics, short people and the deformed experience this also.

My point was that wouldn’t it be good to ascend humanity collectively to a higher genetic plain. Also yes I agree that bullying will exist in some way or another because no matter what, some people are naturally better and stronger than others.

The thing is though that with eugenics more people could have a chance unlike now.

 

[CorinthianLOX]

View attachment 3713181 these two autists fighting on the .org like its an anime

Legit

 

[jbb0514]

For example if Elliot Rodger's parents were sterilized or if they never had children then 6 innocent people wouldn't have died and 14 innocent people wouldn't have been injured and be traumatized for life. Most of Elliot's problems were due to aspergers, which is a genetic condition. It means that it can't never be repaired with therapy or medication. This means that Elliot's killing spree was inevitable. Due to his asperger's he was outcasted from his peers and society. He couldn't socialize. But can you blame the world for outcasting autists. No. It is natural to segregate people that don't socialize normally. As a matter of fact the overwelming majority of this forum's userbase wouldn't be Elliot Rodger's friend if he was in their school. If you met er irl you would be utterly disgusted by his presence. Such is human nature. It can't be changed. So instead of trying to change our basic insticts (which would ultimately fail anyway), we should rid those genetic elements from the human race that cause such tragedies as the 2014 Isla Vista killings for example. We need to guide human evolution in the right direction and removing inferior elements from human genetics is the first and the most vital step towards achieving a new an improved and a superior type of humanity.

View attachment 3713023

TLDR: We can prevent school shootings and other tragedies with eugenic principles because we can remove those elements from the human race that cause these tragedies to occur in the first place.

I have a vision of a future where every human's basic need and necessities like healthy food, sunlight, etc are fulfilled and that everyone has good genetics. With that said, we won't ever even need surgeries, etc anymore because the starting point for everyone is great and we could focus on developing intelligence and further our species' advancement.

If one ever wants a child, you want him/her to live an optimal life so you have a point.

 

[CorinthianLOX]

we already have a system of eugenics in place, it just doesn't cater to your fetishism of the perfect race idea

Yes. This system is called natural selection. Imo We need the state to enforce it so that humanity could improve and ascend to a higher plain of existence.

 

[Michelangelo]

For example if Elliot Rodger's parents were sterilized or if they never had children then 6 innocent people wouldn't have died and 14 innocent people wouldn't have been injured and be traumatized for life. Most of Elliot's problems were due to aspergers, which is a genetic condition. It means that it can't never be repaired with therapy or medication. This means that Elliot's killing spree was inevitable. Due to his asperger's he was outcasted from his peers and society. He couldn't socialize. But can you blame the world for outcasting autists. No. It is natural to segregate people that don't socialize normally. As a matter of fact the overwelming majority of this forum's userbase wouldn't be Elliot Rodger's friend if he was in their school. If you met er irl you would be utterly disgusted by his presence. Such is human nature. It can't be changed. So instead of trying to change our basic insticts (which would ultimately fail anyway), we should rid those genetic elements from the human race that cause such tragedies as the 2014 Isla Vista killings for example. We need to guide human evolution in the right direction and removing inferior elements from human genetics is the first and the most vital step towards achieving a new an improved and a superior type of humanity.

View attachment 3713023

TLDR: We can prevent school shootings and other tragedies with eugenic principles because we can remove those elements from the human race that cause these tragedies to occur in the first place.

I dont know about eugenics, but im convinced some people shouldnt reproduce

 

[Harold O'brien]

Yeah, it's a shame the Nazis kinda fucked this area of science for the foreseeable future

 

[CorinthianLOX]

I have a vision of a future where every human's basic need and necessities like healthy food, sunlight, etc are fulfilled and that everyone has good genetics. With that said, we won't ever even need surgeries, etc anymore because the starting point for everyone is great and we could focus on developing intelligence and further our species' advancement.

If one ever wants a child, you want him/her to live an optimal life so you have a point.

You summarized it better than I ever could.

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Yeah, it's a shame the Nazis kinda fucked this area of science for the foreseeable future

Iceland practiced eugenics in the 2000s. They eradicated down syndrome from their gene pool.

 

[Michelangelo]

we already have a system of eugenics in place, it just doesn't cater to your fetishism of the perfect race idea

I mean, if you are pointing to a certain race im pretty sure they used to sterilize disabled and troubled people exactly for that reason

 

[CorinthianLOX]

it just doesn't cater to your fetishism of the perfect race idea

Also strawman argument because I never talked about a specific race like the white race for example. I talked about the human race which encompasses every single race of humans.

 

[valcovax]

For example if Elliot Rodger's parents were sterilized or if they never had children then 6 innocent people wouldn't have died and 14 innocent people wouldn't have been injured and be traumatized for life. Most of Elliot's problems were due to aspergers, which is a genetic condition. It means that it can't never be repaired with therapy or medication. This means that Elliot's killing spree was inevitable. Due to his asperger's he was outcasted from his peers and society. He couldn't socialize. But can you blame the world for outcasting autists. No. It is natural to segregate people that don't socialize normally. As a matter of fact the overwelming majority of this forum's userbase wouldn't be Elliot Rodger's friend if he was in their school. If you met er irl you would be utterly disgusted by his presence. Such is human nature. It can't be changed. So instead of trying to change our basic insticts (which would ultimately fail anyway), we should rid those genetic elements from the human race that cause such tragedies as the 2014 Isla Vista killings for example. We need to guide human evolution in the right direction and removing inferior elements from human genetics is the first and the most vital step towards achieving a new an improved and a superior type of humanity.

View attachment 3713023

TLDR: We can prevent school shootings and other tragedies with eugenic principles because we can remove those elements from the human race that cause these tragedies to occur in the first place.

I’m sorry but the whole eugenics thing is retarded IMO. what people don’t get is their is a trade off for almost EVERYTHING. your point about the aspergers stuff is a little more interesting, but eugenics for producing only good traits is not a good idea at all. If everyone suddenly had the traits you consider attractive now, then who would actually be considered attractive anymore? the only reason we consider someone tall, is because there is already an average set in place with people who are shorter. I get what you are thinking, but brother I assure you it is a veryyy very flawed concept that should never be attempted or put into place.

 

[Michelangelo]

TLDR: We can prevent school shootings and other tragedies with eugenic principles because we can remove those elements from the human race that cause these tragedies to occur in the first place.

i dont think mass shootings can be attributed to genetics, probably just to violent crime in general, especially murder when someone doesnt have a developed frontal lobe and is impulsive af

 

[CorinthianLOX]

I’m sorry but the whole eugenics thing is retarded IMO. what people don’t get is their is a trade off for almost EVERYTHING. your point about the aspergers stuff is a little more interesting, but eugenics for producing only good traits is not a good idea at all. If everyone suddenly had the traits you consider attractive now, then who would actually be considered attractive anymore? the only reason we consider someone tall, is because there is already an average set in place with people who are shorter. I get what you are thinking, but brother I assure you it is a veryyy very flawed concept that should never be attempted or put into place.

Eugenics can be used for a lot of things. The problem is that we don’t know about gene-editing and human genetics to utilize it.

Like I said previously we could accelerate human progress massively with eugenics. The next generation ought to be taller, better looking, smarter, more ND and fitter than the previous generation. With eugenics and controlled evolution this is conceivable.

 

[CorinthianLOX]

i dont think mass shootings can be attributed to genetics, probably just to violent crime in general, especially murder when someone doesnt have a developed frontal lobe and is impulsive af

What causes an underdeveloped frontal lobe?

 

[Harold O'brien]

I’m sorry but the whole eugenics thing is retarded IMO. what people don’t get is their is a trade off for almost EVERYTHING. your point about the aspergers stuff is a little more interesting, but eugenics for producing only good traits is not a good idea at all. If everyone suddenly had the traits you consider attractive now, then who would actually be considered attractive anymore? the only reason we consider someone tall, is because there is already an average set in place with people who are shorter. I get what you are thinking, but brother I assure you it is a veryyy very flawed concept that should never be attempted or put into place.

Division of labour

Think about what we do with different breeds of dogs, cattle etc. We make groups of people have certain traits intended to help with certain responsibilities and tasks they will be given

 

[Michelangelo]

Eugenics can be used for a lot of things. The problem is that we don’t know about gene-editing and human genetics to utilize it.

Like I said previously we could accelerate human progress massively with eugenics. The next generation ought to be taller, better looking, smarter, more ND and fitter than the previous generation. With eugenics and controlled evolution this is conceivable.

I think the worst part of eugenics is that, as youve said, we dont understand it or how genetics work at a deep level.
It could be a good thing on paper, but society might just utilize it wrong anyway

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Division of labour

Think about what we do with different breeds of dogs, cattle etc. We make groups of people have certain traits intended to help with certain responsibilities and tasks they will be given

Good point