Entschuldigung
这个账号是中国共产党对西方干预的一部分
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2020
- Posts
- 41,363
- Reputation
- 56,326
Why should I?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
yeah countries with more white people and less black people jflits not that they don't want to live in black majority countries they want to live in countries with more money/ opportunities
aka white countriesits not that they don't want to live in black majority countries they want to live in countries with more money/ opportunities
fixed it for youits not that they don't want to live in black majority countries they want to live in countries with more white people/ white people
Rope is a better choice unironicallyyou're a manlet you need to move to asia or somethingtbh
and they still contribute the least economically out of all immigrants despite living in a country thats wealthy/full opportunities.If Africans enslaved every white country on earth, made them impoverished, then wanted to go to Europe I would see it as a little whitewashed but with the current way the world is I think most blacks have a perfectly good reason to be in white countries.
and they still contribute the least economically out of all immigrants despite living in a country thats wealthy/full opportunities.
After they are segregated, denied opportunities, treated like dirt and told that they don't belong their whole lives
The image is cherrypicked.What are you trying to prove? If anything this shows the extent of the damage you guys have done.
how?What are you trying to prove? If anything this shows the extent of the damage you guys have done.
And very well done using pictures of the most well-built structure in ancient Rome against the most remote places in Africa.
how?
you know that the colonization just shows that africa is inferior jfl
Africans today have much more access to technology and knowledge compared to Romans 2000 years ago but are still inferior in building civilizations. Thats what the picture illustrates.
not genocide, there are more and more africans today compared to africans during the colonial era. Hell, Africa is expected to overtake the world in population in a few decades.Inferior at being genocidal warmongers, yes.
??Inferior at being genocidal warmongers, yes.
not genocide, there are more and more africans today compared to africans during the colonial era. Hell, Africa is expected to overtake the world in population in a few decades.
??
just make up strawmans theory
do you know what a straw man is??? just lmao at this iq levelDoes that mean they were not genocided? Sorry I just don't know what else to call the slaughter of tens of millions of people.
How is it a strawman? White people did many genocides in Africa, it actually happened. Blacks have not done the same thing to whites.
Therefore they are inferior (worse) at being genocidal racist maniacs.
You use an incredibly cherrypicked image to illustrate Romans 2000 years ago supposedly being superior at building civilizations?Africans today have much more access to technology and knowledge compared to Romans 2000 years ago but are still inferior in building civilizations. Thats what the picture illustrates.
You guys just blame white people for everything lmao and need to hold their hand all the time.
Are you trying to imply, a group of people couldn’t have been genocided if their current population is more than it was 300-400 years ago? Because that’s what this post of yours strongly suggests.not genocide, there are more and more africans today compared to africans during the colonial era.
do you know what a straw man is??? just lmao at this iq level
i havent even said that it was good that they sold slaves like wtf are u talking about
also:
blacks havent even got the chance of that which literally further proves my point jfl
BUT NIGGA WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?? ARE U THAT RETARDED? YOU JUST COMPLETELY IGNORED MY ORIGINAL POST JUST TO SAYWho said anything about slavery? That's not the only wrong thing that whites did in Africa there were massacres all over the continent, as in colonists killing people, millions of people, for standing up against oppressive rule.
You can't even type properly and my IQ is low?
You use an incredibly cherrypicked image to illustrate Romans 2000 years ago supposedly being superior at building civilizations?
BUT NIGGA WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?? ARE U THAT RETARDED? YOU JUST COMPLETELY IGNORED MY ORIGINAL POST JUST TO SAY
"MUHH OPRESSORS"
"MUHH WHITE MEN BAD"
typical low iq mentality
BUT NIGGA WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?? ARE U THAT RETARDED? YOU JUST COMPLETELY IGNORED MY ORIGINAL POST JUST TO SAY
"MUHH OPRESSORS"
"MUHH WHITE MEN BAD"
typical low iq mentality
At least, African didn't fuck up this world....
what? the colonization literally proves that africans were inferior i really dont know how you can deny this jflThey were oppressors and they were bad.
You said whites were better than blacks cus of colonisation and I said that the only thing they are better at is being genocidal maniacs. I literally replied to your point.
And the only reason I did is cus u came barking at me with muh "blacks aren't equal" bullshit.
so being better opressors made them easily conqeur africaThey were oppressors and they were bad.
You said whites were better than blacks cus of colonisation and I said that the only thing they are better at is being genocidal maniacs. I literally replied to your point.
And the only reason I did is cus u came barking at me with muh "blacks aren't equal" bullshit.
having inferior armies and inventions doesnt mean being inferior tho, if that was the case then China is superior to most europeans countries both historically and nowadaysso being better opressors made them easily conqeur africa
its not like they had no chance to fight back because they had inferior armies, inventions etc
i meant they were inferior at that timehaving inferior armies and inventions doesnt mean being inferior tho, if that was the case then China is superior to most europeans countries both historically and nowadays
also china wasnt that inferior they literally invented gunpowder at the same times as europeanshaving inferior armies and inventions doesnt mean being inferior tho, if that was the case then China is superior to most europeans countries both historically and nowadays
yeah but if that was the case then the chinese and even indians are superior to most europeans both at the past and nowi meant they were inferior at that time
you didnt get my point tbhalso china wasnt that inferior they literally invented gunpowder at the same times as europeans
You do know you’re disregarding the fact that Africa is a continent consisting of 54 countries each with a wide range of cultures, languages and stages of development... Right?The Roman Civilization 2000 years ago is better than African Civilization today. Thats my point.
Not to mention the fact that Africa was robbed of all of their resources from the Europeans when the Europeans met the Africans.And in Rome they had geographical advantage having more resources, such as coal and etc.You use an incredibly cherrypicked image to illustrate Romans 2000 years ago supposedly being superior at building civilizations?
Nothing better than actual historical knowledgeYou do know you’re disregarding the fact that Africa is a continent consisting of 54 countries each with a wide range of cultures, languages and stages of development... Right?
Aside from that, the picture you used as illustration compared a city to a small African village, when you very well could have chosen a picture of an African city like this.
View attachment 733789View attachment 733790
Fun fact, Rome a 1000 years ago looked a lot like the small African village you showed earlier, in the middle ages Rome was covered in mud.
The Forum Romanum was literally buried beneath so much mud that it was used as grazing land for cows and goats.
You do know you’re disregarding the fact that Africa is a continent consisting of 54 countries each with a wide range of cultures, languages and stages of development... Right?
Aside from that, the picture you used as illustration compared a city to a small African village, when you very well could have chosen a picture of an African city like this.
View attachment 733789View attachment 733790
Fun fact, Rome a 1000 years ago looked a lot like the small African village you showed earlier, in the middle ages Rome was covered in mud.
The Forum Romanum was literally buried beneath so much mud that it was used as grazing land for cows and goats.
the first pic is lagos, nigeriaThe first pic is located in hong kong
The 2nd pic is from South Africa whom most of the successes are attributed to the whites who lived/living there.
As far as your statement regarding Rome, noyone can deny that it was a glorious civilization. And of course Rome wouldnt look great after it had fell from prosperity due to its collapse before the middle ages even began
It’s not.The first pic is located in hong kong
Sigh, here’s different cities then.The 2nd pic is from South Africa whom most of the successes are attributed to the whites who lived/living there.
I suppose it was for it’s era but then again the bulk of it‘s people were poor and sweating it out in the city, they lived in shabby, squalid houses that could crumble or burn at any moment with no running water or sanitation in the insula.As far as your statement regarding Rome, noyone can deny that it was a glorious civilization. And of course Rome wouldnt look great after it had fell from prosperity due to its collapse before the middle ages even began